1
|
Eco-Efficient Quantification of Glucosinolates in Camelina Seed, Oil, and Defatted Meal: Optimization, Development, and Validation of a UPLC-DAD Method. Antioxidants (Basel) 2022; 11:antiox11122441. [PMID: 36552649 PMCID: PMC9774283 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11122441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Camelina sativa (camelina) seed, oil, and defatted meal are widely used for food, animal feed, and other purposes. The accurate quantification of camelina glucosinolates is critical as their functionalities are highly dose-dependent. The classic quantification of glucosinolates in camelina products involves tedious desulfation steps, toxic reagents, and a lengthy instrument time because glucosinolates are easy to degrade and subject to interference in the liquid chromatography. Thus, we developed and validated an eco-efficient UPLC-DAD method for determining glucoarabin (GS9), glucocamelinin (GS10), and homoglucocamelinin (GS11) in camelina seed, oil, and defatted meal. Glucosinolates were extracted using 80% cold methanol to denature myrosinase, and were separated by an HSS T3 column without desulfation. Glucotropaeolin was used as an internal standard to track analyte degradation and loss during sample preparation. The method has shown high precision (relative standard deviations ranging from 4.12% to 6.54%) and accuracy (>94.4% spike recovery) for GS9-11, and all validation parameters passed the industry-consensus AOAC Appendix F criteria. To our best knowledge, this is the first eco-efficient and low-cost analytical method that is validated against strict AOAC criteria for the quantification of intact camelina glucosinolates. The method is suitable to be adopted as a new industrial testing standard to assist in the quality control of camelina products.
Collapse
|
2
|
Christodoulou C, Mavrommatis A, Mitsiopoulou C, Symeon G, Dotas V, Sotirakoglou K, Kotsampasi B, Tsiplakou E. Assessing the Optimum Level of Supplementation with Camelina Seeds in Ewes' Diets to Improve Milk Quality. Foods 2021; 10:foods10092076. [PMID: 34574185 PMCID: PMC8465129 DOI: 10.3390/foods10092076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Camelina sativa seeds are rich in bioactive compounds such as polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and antioxidants, thus, their supplementation in ewes’ diets, may be an effective way to develop high nutritional dairy products. Therefore, the present study investigates the effect of the dietary inclusion of Camelina sativa seeds in ewes’ oxidative status and milk quality. Forty-eight dairy Chios ewes were divided into four homogenous groups and were fed individually. The concentrate of the control group (CON) had no inclusion of Camelina seeds, while the treatment groups (CSS6, CSS11, CSS16) were supplemented with 6%, 11%, and 16%, respectively. Including Camelina seeds in 6% and 11%, had no impact on milk performance, while in the CSS16, milk fat was significantly decreased compared to the CON. Supplementing Camelina seeds improved milk quality from a human health perspective by modifying the content of saturated fatty acid, the proportions of α-linolenic (C18:3 n-3), and C18:2 cis-9, trans-11 (CLA), and the ω6/ω3 ratio. Furthermore, the activity of catalase (CAT) was significantly increased in the CSS11 and CSS16, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity also significantly upsurged in the CSS16. Still, the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) were significantly increased in the CSS11 compared to the CON and CSS6, and in the CSS16 compared to the CSS6. In CSS16, protein carbonyls were significantly increased. Finally, in the CSS-fed ewes, milk oxidative stability was fortified, as suggested by the modifications in the activities of SOD, CAT, and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), in the antioxidant capacity, and the oxidative stress biomarkers. Consequently, the incorporation of 6% Camelina seeds in the concentrates of ewes improves milk’s fatty acid profile and oxidative status. However, more research is required regarding the possible negative effects of the constant consumption of Camelina seeds by ewes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Christodoulou
- Laboratory of Nutritional Physiology and Feeding, Department of Animal Science, School of Animal Biosciences, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece; (C.C.); (A.M.); (C.M.)
| | - Alexandros Mavrommatis
- Laboratory of Nutritional Physiology and Feeding, Department of Animal Science, School of Animal Biosciences, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece; (C.C.); (A.M.); (C.M.)
| | - Christina Mitsiopoulou
- Laboratory of Nutritional Physiology and Feeding, Department of Animal Science, School of Animal Biosciences, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece; (C.C.); (A.M.); (C.M.)
| | - George Symeon
- Research Institute of Animal Science, Hellenic Agricultural Organization—Demeter, 58100 Giannitsa, Greece; (G.S.); (B.K.)
| | - Vasilis Dotas
- Department of Animal Production, School of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Kyriaki Sotirakoglou
- Laboratory of Mathematics and Statistics, Department of Natural Resources and Agricultural Engineering, School of Environment and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece;
| | - Basiliki Kotsampasi
- Research Institute of Animal Science, Hellenic Agricultural Organization—Demeter, 58100 Giannitsa, Greece; (G.S.); (B.K.)
| | - Eleni Tsiplakou
- Laboratory of Nutritional Physiology and Feeding, Department of Animal Science, School of Animal Biosciences, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece; (C.C.); (A.M.); (C.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-21-0529-4435; Fax: +30-21-0529-4413
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lolli S, Grilli G, Ferrari L, Battelli G, Pozzo S, Galasso I, Russo R, Brasca M, Reggiani R, Ferrante V. Effect of Different Percentage of Camelina sativa Cake in Laying Hens Diet: Performance, Welfare, and Eggshell Quality. Animals (Basel) 2020; 10:E1396. [PMID: 32796606 PMCID: PMC7459675 DOI: 10.3390/ani10081396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Although camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] is a good source of protein, antioxidants, and polyunsaturated fatty acids, its antinutritional compounds limit its use in animal feeding. The aim of this study was to verify the effect of feeding laying hens with up to 20% of camelina cake from a breeding line containing a low level of glucosinolates on performance, welfare, and eggshell quality. Two hundred and forty Hy-Line® hens from 18 to 51 weeks of age were divided into three treatments: control (C), camelina cake 10% (CAM10), and camelina cake 20% (CAM20). Egg number was recorded daily, while egg weight, feed consumption, and mortality were recorded weekly. At 24 and 43 weeks of hen age, shell resistance to fracture was measured. Our results demonstrate no detrimental effects for CAM10 and CAM20 diets on feed intake, growth performance, and welfare. No difference in egg production was detected among the diets. The significant (p < 0.05) interaction of diet and age factors suggest that the addition of camelina cake, up to 20%, likely protects the eggshell of older hens. Our findings confirm that camelina cake might be an alternative and sustainable protein source for hens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna Lolli
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via G. Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy; (S.L.); (L.F.)
| | - Guido Grilli
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, via dell’Università 6, 26900 Lodi, Italy;
| | - Lorenzo Ferrari
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via G. Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy; (S.L.); (L.F.)
| | - Giovanna Battelli
- National Research Council, Institute of Sciences of Food Production, via G. Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy; (G.B.); (S.P.); (M.B.)
| | - Sara Pozzo
- National Research Council, Institute of Sciences of Food Production, via G. Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy; (G.B.); (S.P.); (M.B.)
| | - Incoronata Galasso
- National Research Council, Institute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, via Bassini 15, 20133 Milano, Italy; (I.G.); (R.R.); (R.R.)
| | - Roberto Russo
- National Research Council, Institute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, via Bassini 15, 20133 Milano, Italy; (I.G.); (R.R.); (R.R.)
| | - Milena Brasca
- National Research Council, Institute of Sciences of Food Production, via G. Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy; (G.B.); (S.P.); (M.B.)
| | - Remo Reggiani
- National Research Council, Institute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, via Bassini 15, 20133 Milano, Italy; (I.G.); (R.R.); (R.R.)
| | - Valentina Ferrante
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via G. Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy; (S.L.); (L.F.)
| |
Collapse
|