Concurrent Validity of a Stationary Cycling Test and the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test in Adults With Concussion

Comparison of the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test With a Physiologically Informed Cycle Test: Calgary Concussion Cycle Test

BACKGROUND

Sport-related concussions are a complex injury requiring multifaceted assessment, including physical exertion. Currently, concussion testing relies primarily on a treadmill-based protocol for assessing exertion-related symptoms in persons after concussion. This study compared a modified cycle protocol (Calgary Concussion Cycle Test [CCCT]) with the clinically adopted standard, the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT), across multiple physiological parameters.

HYPOTHESIS

Treadmill and cycle matched workload protocols would produce similar results for cerebral blood velocity, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PETCO2), but heart rate (HR) and oxygen consumption (VO2) would be higher on the treadmill than the cycle modality.

STUDY DESIGN

Crossover study design.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

METHODS

A total of 17 healthy adults (8 men, 9 women; age, 26 ± 3 years; body mass index, 23.8 ± 2.7 kg/m2) completed the BCTT and CCCT protocols, 7 days apart in a randomized order. During both exertional protocols, the physiological parameters measured were middle cerebral artery mean blood velocity (MCAv), MAP, PETCO2, VO2, and HR. Analysis of variance with effect size computations, coefficient of variation, and Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement were used to compare exercise tests.

RESULTS

The BCTT and CCCT produced comparable results for both male and female participants with no significant differences for average MCAv, MAP, and PETCO2 (all P > 0.05; all generalized eta squared [η2G] < 0.02 [negligible]; P value range, 0.29-0.99) between stages. When accounting for exercise stage and modality, VO2 (P < 0.01) and HR (P < 0.01) were higher on the treadmill compared with the cycle. Aside from the final few stages, all physiology measures displayed good-to-excellent agreeability/variability.

CONCLUSION

The CCCT was physiologically similar to the BCTT in terms of MCAv, PETCO2, and MAP; however, HR and VO2 differed between modalities.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Providing a cycle-based modality to exertional testing after injury mayincrease accessibility to determine symptom thresholds in the future.

Cerebral blood velocity during concurrent supine cycling, lower body negative pressure, and head-up tilt challenges: implications for concussion rehabilitation

Introduction. The effect of concurrent head-up tilt and lower body negative pressure (LBNP) have been examined on middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv) at rest; however, it is unknown the superimposed effect these factors have on blunting the elevation in cerebral blood velocity associated with moderate-intensity exercise.Methods. 23 healthy adults (11 females / 12 males, 20-33 years) completed three visits. The first consisted of a maximal ramp supine cycling test to identify the wattage associated with individualized maximal MCAv. Subsequent visits included randomized no LBNP (control) or LBNP at -40 Torr (experimental) with successively increasing head-up tilt stages of 0, 15, 30, and 45 degrees during the pre-described individualized wattage. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound was utilized to quantify MCAv. Two-factorial repeated measures analysis of variance with effect sizes were used to determine differences between days and tilt stages.Results. Between-day baseline values for MCAv, heart rate, and blood pressure displayed low variability with <5% variation. With no LBNP, MCAv was above baseline on average for all participants; however, 15 degrees and 30 degrees tilt with concurrent -40 Torr LBNP was sufficient to return MCAv to 100% of baseline values in females and males, respectively. Body-weight did not impact the association between tilt and pressure (R2range: 0.01-0.12).Conclusion. Combined LBNP and tilt were sufficient to reduce the increase in MCAv associated with moderate-intensity exercise. This exercise modality shows utility to enable individuals with a concussion to obtain the positive physiological adaptions associated with exercise while minimizing symptom exacerbation due to the notion of the Monro-Kellie doctrine.

Does oscillation size matter? Impact of added resistance on the cerebral pressure-flow Relationship in females and males

Sinusoidal squat-stand maneuvers (SSM) without resistance have been shown to produce ~30-50 mmHg swings in mean arterial pressure which are largely buffered in the brain via dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA). This study aimed to further elucidate how this regulatory mechanism is affected during SSM with added resistance (~20% bodyweight). Twenty-five participants (sex/gender: 13 females/12 males) completed two bouts of 5-min SSM for both bodyweight and resistance conditions (10% bodyweight in each arm) at frequencies of 0.05 Hz (20-s squat/stand cycles) and 0.10 Hz (10-s squat/stand cycles). Middle and posterior cerebral artery (MCA/PCA) cerebral blood velocities were indexed with transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Beat-to-beat blood pressure (BP) was quantified via finger photoplesmography. Transfer function analysis was employed to quantify dCA in both cerebral arteries across the cardiac cycle (diastole, mean, and systole). Two-by-two Analysis of Variance with generalized eta squared effect sizes were utilized to determine differences between resistance vs. bodyweight squats and between sexes/genders. Absolute mean and diastolic BP were elevated during the resistance squats (p < 0.001); however, only the BP point-estimate power spectrum densities were augmented at 0.10 Hz (p < 0.048). No differences were noted for phase and gain metrics between bodyweight and resistance SSM (p > 0.067); however, females displayed attenuated systolic regulation (p < 0.003). Despite augmented systemic BP during resistance SSM, the brain was effective at buffering the additional stress to mitigate overperfusion/pressure. Females displayed less dCA regulation within the systolic aspect of the cardiac cycle, which may be associated with physiological underpinnings related to various clinical conditions/presentations.