The need for accountability and transparency in intercollegiate athletic medicine

Challenges Faced by Collegiate Athletic Trainers, Part I: Organizational Conflict and Clinical Decision Making

CONTEXT

Organizational conflict, particularly between coaches and medical professionals, has been reported in collegiate athletics. Different values create room for conflict between coaches and athletic trainers (ATs); however, ATs' experiences when making medical decisions are not fully understood.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the presence of organizational conflict regarding medical decision making and determine if differences exist across athletic affiliations.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Collegiate athletics (National Collegiate Athletic Association [NCAA], National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics [NAIA], National Junior College Athletic Association [NJCAA]).

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

A total of 434 ATs responded (age = 27.7 ± 3.2 years, years certified = 5.2 ± 2.7), representing the NCAA Division I (DI; n = 199), Division II (DII; n = 67), Division III (DIII; n = 108); NAIA (n = 37); and NJCAA (n = 23) settings.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The survey instrument contained quantitative measures and open-ended questions, with affiliation as our primary independent variable. Responses to Likert-scale questions (1 = strongly agree, 5 = strongly disagree) regarding organizational pressures within athletics served as the dependent variables. Kruskal-Wallis analysis-of-variance and Mann-Whitney U post hoc tests assessed differences in organizational conflict across affiliations. Open-ended questions were analyzed inductively.

RESULTS

We obtained a 14.47% (434 of 3000) response rate. National Collegiate Athletic Association DI ATs disagreed less than NCAA DII and DIII and NJCAA ATs that they would worry about job security if turnover in the head coaching position occurred (P < .05). Regarding the influence of coaches on job performance, differences were found between NCAA DI and DIII and between DI and NJCAA ATs (P < .01). Visibility of the injury and situational factors influenced the level of perceived pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Athletic trainers perceived pressure from coaches regarding medical decision making. Division I ATs placed greater emphasis on the role that coaches played in their job performance and job security. Athletic departments should consider transitioning to patient-centered models of care to better align values and reduce the external pressures placed on ATs.

Sports neurology as a multidisciplinary field

A multidisciplinary approach within sports neurology fills a critical role in the management of athletes with neurologic injury. This model promotes streamlined access to sports medicine providers who can offer high-quality multispecialty care in a collaborative manner, to provide optimal outcomes for athletes. This chapter highlights the rise of the multidisciplinary care approach in nonathletic healthcare settings and introduces the concept of the interdisciplinary sports medicine care model. Next, we review the roles of medical providers who are integral in effective management of sport-related concussion, followed by a discussion of the athletic healthcare teams that treat other sport-related neurologic injuries and athletes with pre-existing neurologic conditions. Finally, we note important educational, legal, and independent medical care issues in athletic healthcare settings, and summarize the applicability of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary care models to the subspecialty of sports neurology.