1
|
Carli M, Weiss F, Grenno G, Ponzini S, Kolachalam S, Vaglini F, Viaggi C, Pardini C, Tidona S, Longoni B, Maggio R, Scarselli M. Pharmacological Strategies for Bipolar Disorders in Acute Phases and Chronic Management with a Special Focus on Lithium, Valproic Acid, and Atypical Antipsychotics. Curr Neuropharmacol 2023; 21:935-950. [PMID: 36825703 PMCID: PMC10227916 DOI: 10.2174/1570159x21666230224102318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Bipolar disorders (BDs) are a heterogeneous group of severe affective disorders generally described by the alternation of (hypo)manic, depressive, and mixed phases, with euthymic intervals of variable duration. BDs are burdened with high psychiatric and physical comorbidity, increased suicide risk and reduced life expectancy. In addition, BDs can progress into complicated forms (e.g., mixed states, rapid/irregular cycling), which are more difficult to treat and often require personalized pharmacological combinations. Mood stabilizers, particularly Lithium and Valproic acid (VPA), still represent the cornerstones of both acute and chronic pharmacotherapies of BDs. Lithium is the gold standard in BD-I and BDII with typical features, while VPA seems more effective for atypical forms (e.g., mixed-prevalence and rapid-cycling). However, despite appropriate mood stabilization, many patients show residual symptoms, and more than a half recur within 1-2 years, highlighting the need of additional strategies. Among these, the association of atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) with mood stabilizers is recurrent in the treatment of acute phases, but it is also being growingly explored in the maintenance pharmacotherapy. These combinations are clinically more aggressive and often needed in the acute phases, whereas simplifying pharmacotherapies to mood stabilizers only is preferable in the long-term, whenever possible. When mood stabilizers are not enough for maintenance treatment, Quetiapine and, less consistently, Aripiprazole have been proposed as the most advisable adjunctive strategies, for their safety and tolerability profiles. However, in view of the increased risk of serious adverse effects, a careful patient-centered balance between costs and benefits is mandatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Carli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco Weiss
- Psychiatry Unit 2, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giovanna Grenno
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Sergio Ponzini
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Shivakumar Kolachalam
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesca Vaglini
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Cristina Viaggi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Carla Pardini
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Simone Tidona
- Psychiatry Unit 2, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Biancamaria Longoni
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Maggio
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Marco Scarselli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Weiss F, Tidona S, Carli M, Perugi G, Scarselli M. Triple Diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder with Coexisting Bipolar and Alcohol Use Disorders: Clinical Aspects and Pharmacological Treatments. Curr Neuropharmacol 2023; 21:1467-1476. [PMID: 36306451 PMCID: PMC10472804 DOI: 10.2174/1570159x20666220830154002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Bipolar Disorder (BD) and Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) are common medical conditions often coexisting and exerting mutual influence on disease course and pharmacological treatment response. Each disorder, when considered separately, relies on different therapeutic approaches, making it crucial to detect the plausible association between them. Treating solely the emerging condition (e.g., alcoholism) and disregarding the patient's whole psychopathological ground often leads to treatment failure and relapse. Clinical experience and scientific evidence rather show that tailoring treatments for these three conditions considering their co-occurrence as a sole complex disorder yields more fulfilling and durable clinical outcomes. In light of the above considerations, the purpose of the present review is to critically discuss the pharmacological strategies in the personalized treatment of complex conditions defined by ADHD-bipolarityalcoholism coexistence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Weiss
- Psychiatry Unit 2, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Simone Tidona
- Psychiatry Unit 2, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marco Carli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa 56126, Italy
| | - Giulio Perugi
- Psychiatry Unit 2, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marco Scarselli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa 56126, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Munkholm K. The need for establishing optimal treatment strategies for patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder remains. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2022; 146:287-289. [PMID: 36117289 DOI: 10.1111/acps.13495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus Munkholm
- Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roosen L, Sienaert P. Evidence-based treatment strategies for rapid cycling bipolar disorder, a systematic review. J Affect Disord 2022; 311:69-77. [PMID: 35545157 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Rapid cycling is a phase of bipolar disorder with increased episode frequencies. It is a severe and disabling condition that often poses a major challenge to the clinician. The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the evidence-based treatment options for rapid cycling. METHODS A systematic search on Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases from inception until December 2021 was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. An additional search on clinicaltrials.gov was done. References of retrieved papers and key reviews were hand-searched. Randomized controlled trials including at least 10 patients with bipolar disorder, rapid cycling, reporting an objective outcome measure were selected. RESULTS Our search, initially revealing 1330 articles, resulted in 16 papers about treatment of an acute mood episode, relapse prevention or both. Lithium, anticonvulsants, second generation antipsychotics, antidepressants and thyroid hormone were assessed as treatment options in the presented data. Evidence supporting the use of aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, valproate and lamotrigine for treatment of rapid cycling bipolar disorder was found. LIMITATIONS Small sample sizes, different index episodes and variety of outcome measures. CONCLUSION Evidence regarding treatment of rapid cycling remains scarce. Evidence supports the use of aripiprazole, olanzapine, and valproate for acute manic or mixed episodes, quetiapine for acute depressive episodes and aripiprazole and lamotrigine for relapse prevention. Given the paucity of available evidence, and the burden that accompanies rapid cycling, future research is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Roosen
- KU Leuven, University Psychiatric Center KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven/Leuvensesteenweg 517, 3070 Kortenberg, Belgium.
| | - P Sienaert
- KU Leuven, University Psychiatric Center KU Leuven, Academic Center for ECT and Neuromodulation (AcCENT), Leuvensesteenweg 517, 3070 Kortenberg, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grunze H, Soyka M. The pharmacotherapeutic management of comorbid bipolar disorder and alcohol use disorder. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23:1181-1193. [PMID: 35640575 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2083500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Comorbidity of bipolar disorder (BD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) is very frequent resulting in detrimental outcomes, including increased mortality. Diagnosis of AUD in BD and vice versa is often delayed as symptoms of one disorder mimic and obscure the other one. Evidence for pharmacotherapies for people with comorbid BD and AUD remains limited, and further proof-of-concept studies are urgently needed. AREAS COVERED This paper explores the currently available pharmacotherapies for AUD, BD and their usefulness for comorbid BD and AUD. It also covers to some degree the epidemiology, diagnosis, and potential common neurobiological traits of comorbid BD and AUD. EXPERT OPINION The authors conclude that more controlled studies are needed before evidence-based guidance can be drawn up for clinician's use. Since there are no relevant pharmacological interactions, approved medications for AUD can also be used safely in BD. For mood stabilization, lithium should be considered first in adherent persons with BD and comorbid AUD. Alternatives include valproate, lamotrigine, and some atypical antipsychotics, with partial D2/D3 receptor agonism possibly being beneficial in AUD, too.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heinz Grunze
- Psychiatrie Schwäbisch Hall, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany.,Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Michael Soyka
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians- University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bourla A, Ferreri F, Baudry T, Panizzi V, Adrien V, Mouchabac S. Rapid cycling bipolar disorder: Literature review on pharmacological treatment illustrated by a case report on ketamine. Brain Behav 2022; 12:e2483. [PMID: 35041295 PMCID: PMC8865164 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rapid cycling bipolar disorder (RCBD) is defined as four or more affective episodes (depression, mania or hypomania) within 1 year. RCBD has a high point of prevalence (from 10% to 20% among clinical bipolar samples) and is associated with greater severity, longer illness duration, worse global functioning and higher suicidal risk, but there is no consensus on treatment option. The use of several pharmacological agents has been reported (levothyroxine, antipsychotics, antidepressants and mood stabilizers). OBJECTIVE The main objective of this review was to propose a critical review of the literature and to rank the pharmacological agent using a level of evidence (LEO) adapted from the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, and to illustrate it with a case report on off-label intravenous ketamine. METHOD We conducted a review using the MeSH terms and keywords (bipolar [Title/Abstract]) AND (rapid [Title/Abstract]) AND (cycling [Title/Abstract]) AND (treatment [Title/Abstract]). Alexis Bourla and Stéphane Mouchabac screened 638 documents identified through literature search in Medline (PubMed) or by bibliographic references and 164 abstracts were then analyzed. Nonpharmacological treatments were excluded. RESULT Seventy articles were included in the review and divided into six categories: mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, hormonal treatments, ketamine and other pharmacological treatments. DISCUSSION Our review highlights the heterogeneity of the pharmacological treatment of RCBD and no clear consensus can emerge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Bourla
- Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Department of Psychiatry, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, ICRIN Psychiatry (Infrastructure of Clinical Research In Neurosciences - Psychiatry), Brain Institute (ICM), INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France.,INICEA, Jeanne d'Arc Hospital, Korian, Saint-Mandé, France
| | - Florian Ferreri
- Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Department of Psychiatry, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, ICRIN Psychiatry (Infrastructure of Clinical Research In Neurosciences - Psychiatry), Brain Institute (ICM), INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Baudry
- Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Department of Psychiatry, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Vincent Panizzi
- Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Department of Psychiatry, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Vladimir Adrien
- Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Department of Psychiatry, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, ICRIN Psychiatry (Infrastructure of Clinical Research In Neurosciences - Psychiatry), Brain Institute (ICM), INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Mouchabac
- Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Department of Psychiatry, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, ICRIN Psychiatry (Infrastructure of Clinical Research In Neurosciences - Psychiatry), Brain Institute (ICM), INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Carli M, Risaliti E, Francomano M, Kolachalam S, Longoni B, Bocci G, Maggio R, Scarselli M. A 5-Year Study of Lithium and Valproic Acid Drug Monitoring in Patients with Bipolar Disorders in an Italian Clinical Center. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022; 15:ph15010105. [PMID: 35056162 PMCID: PMC8780673 DOI: 10.3390/ph15010105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is an effective tool used to improve the pharmacological treatment in clinical practice, especially to detect subtherapeutic drug plasma concentration (Cp) in order to consider a change of dosage during treatment and reach its putative therapeutic range. In this study, we report the Cp values of lithium and valproic acid (VPA), alone and in combination, mostly in bipolar patients admitted to an Italian clinical center of the University of Pisa during the years 2016–2020, which include 12,294 samples of VPA, 7449 of lithium and 1118 of both in combination. Lithium and VPA are the most utilized drugs in treating bipolar disorders, and their TDM is strongly recommended by recent guidelines. In relation to lithium Cp monitoring, several studies have underlined that 0.5–0.8 mmol/L is the optimal range for chronic treatment, and below 0.4 mmol/L, it is unlikely to produce a clinical response. For VPA, the therapeutic range is 50–100 μg/mL and a linear correlation between Cp and clinical efficacy has been proposed, where below 50 μg/mL, the clinical efficacy of VPA has not been proven thus far. Toxic levels of both drugs were rarely found in our study, while a high percentage of patients, about one-third, had sub-therapeutic Cp during their treatments. In addition, in several cases of patients receiving multiple blood sampling, the initial subtherapeutic Cp changed only partially without reaching its therapeutic window. In relation to age, we found a higher percentage of lithium and VPA Cp values in range in the adolescents than in the adults and elderly groups. No differences were reported when analyzing the distribution of Cp values in males and females. In conclusion, this present study suggests that TDM is widely used by many specialists, but there is still a window of improvement for optimizing pharmacological treatments in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Carli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (E.R.); (M.F.); (S.K.); (B.L.)
| | - Eleonora Risaliti
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (E.R.); (M.F.); (S.K.); (B.L.)
| | - Mena Francomano
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (E.R.); (M.F.); (S.K.); (B.L.)
| | - Shivakumar Kolachalam
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (E.R.); (M.F.); (S.K.); (B.L.)
| | - Biancamaria Longoni
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (E.R.); (M.F.); (S.K.); (B.L.)
| | - Guido Bocci
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Roberto Maggio
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Marco Scarselli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (E.R.); (M.F.); (S.K.); (B.L.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chandrasekar R, Sivagami B, Eswarisai M, Nandini P, Pallavi Y, Sai Dikshitha P, Shirisha V, Yamini Y. Analytical method validation for related substances in sodium valproate oral solution by gas chromatography. FUTURE JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES 2021. [DOI: 10.1186/s43094-021-00344-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Sodium Valproate is the sodium salt of valproic acid (VPA). Valproic acid is mainly used for the treatment of epilepsy. The specific aim of the study is to develop and validate an optimized method for the determination of six related substances such as N,N-dimethyl valpronamide, valeric acid, 2-methyl valeric acid, 2-ethyl valeric acid, 2-isopropyl valeric acid and 2-n-butyl valeric acid in Sodium Valproate Oral Solution by Gas Chromatography. Chromatographic separations of these six related substances were achieved on DB-FFAP fused silica capillary column (30 m × 0.53 mm) bonded with a 0.5-µm layer of macrogol 20,000 2-nitroterephthalate materials used as stationary phase. The six related impurities were extracted using heptane and monitored by Gas Chromatography coupled with flame ionization detector. The performance of the developed method was assessed by evaluating system suitability, method precision, specificity, linearity and range, ruggedness, accuracy, robustness.
Results
The correlation coefficient was within the acceptance criteria in the range of 0.9998. The evaluated concentrations for Sodium Valproate were in the ranges of 5.05–25.27 ppm. The average recovery values were in the range of 92.4–100.4%. Solution Stability experiments were performed to evaluate the degradation behavior of SVS.
Conclusion
A novel, precise and sensitive GC method was developed, validated and optimized for the determination of six related substances in sodium Valproate oral solution. The results obtained from the validation experiments demonstrated that the method is accurate, precise, linear, specific, sensitive and robust. Hence, the proposed method can be an alternative method, for the determination of related substances in sodium valproate oral solution drug substance.
Collapse
|
9
|
Preuss UW, Schaefer M, Born C, Grunze H. Bipolar Disorder and Comorbid Use of Illicit Substances. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2021; 57:medicina57111256. [PMID: 34833474 PMCID: PMC8623998 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57111256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Substance use disorders (SUD) are highly prevalent in bipolar disorder (BD) and significantly affect clinical outcomes. Incidence and management of illicit drug use differ from alcohol use disorders, nicotine use of behavioral addictions. It is not yet clear why people with bipolar disorder are at higher risk of addictive disorders, but recent data suggest common neurobiological and genetic underpinnings and epigenetic alterations. In the absence of specific diagnostic instruments, the clinical interview is conducive for the diagnosis. Treating SUD in bipolar disorder requires a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach. Most treatment trials focus on single drugs, such as cannabis alone or in combination with alcohol, cocaine, or amphetamines. Synopsis of data provides limited evidence that lithium and valproate are effective for the treatment of mood symptoms in cannabis users and may reduce substance use. Furthermore, the neuroprotective agent citicoline may reduce cocaine consumption in BD subjects. However, many of the available studies had an open-label design and were of modest to small sample size. The very few available psychotherapeutic trials indicate no significant differences in outcomes between BD with or without SUD. Although SUD is one of the most important comorbidities in BD with a significant influence on clinical outcome, there is still a lack both of basic research and clinical trials, allowing for evidence-based and specific best practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich W. Preuss
- Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatische Medizin, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Posilipostrasse 4, 71640 Ludwigsburg, Germany
- Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Martin-Luther-Universität, Halle-Wittenberg, Julius-Kühn-Str. 7, 06112 Halle/Saale, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Martin Schaefer
- Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Suchtmedizin, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistr. 92, 45136 Essen, Germany;
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie (CCM), Charité Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Born
- Psychiatrie Schwäbisch Hall, 74523 Schwäbisch Hall, Germany; (C.B.); (H.G.)
- Campus Nuremberg-Nord, Paracelsus Medical University, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Heinz Grunze
- Psychiatrie Schwäbisch Hall, 74523 Schwäbisch Hall, Germany; (C.B.); (H.G.)
- Campus Nuremberg-Nord, Paracelsus Medical University, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Amerio A, Russo D, Miletto N, Aguglia A, Costanza A, Benatti B, Odone A, Barroilhet SA, Brakoulias V, Dell’Osso B, Serafini G, Amore M, Ghaemi SN. Polypharmacy as maintenance treatment in bipolar illness: A systematic review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2021; 144:259-276. [PMID: 33960396 PMCID: PMC8453557 DOI: 10.1111/acps.13312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Polypharmacy is common in maintenance treatment of bipolar illness, but proof of greater efficacy compared to monotherapy is assumed rather than well known. We systematically reviewed the evidence from the literature to provide recommendations for clinical management and future research. METHOD A systematic review was conducted on the use of polypharmacy in bipolar prophylaxis. Relevant papers published in English through 31 December 2019 were identified searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library. RESULTS Twelve studies matched inclusion criteria, including 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The best drug combination in prevention is represented by lithium + valproic acid which showed a significant effect on time to mood relapses (HR = 0.57) compared to valproic acid monotherapy, especially for manic episodes (HR = 0.51). The effect was significant in terms of time to new drug treatment (HR = 0.51) and time to hospitalization (HR = 0.57). A significant reduction in the frequency of mood relapses was also reported for lithium + valproic acid vs. lithium monotherapy (RR=0.12); however, the trial had a small sample size. Lamotrigine + valproic acid reported significant efficacy in prevention of depressive episodes compared to lamotrigine alone. CONCLUSIONS The literature to support a generally greater efficacy with polypharmacy in bipolar illness is scant and heterogeneous. Within that limited evidence base, the best drug combination in bipolar prevention is represented by lithium + valproic acid for manic, but not depressive episodes. Clinical practice should focus more on adequate monotherapy before considering polypharmacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Amerio
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI)Section of PsychiatryUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly,IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoGenoaItaly,Department of PsychiatryTufts UniversityBostonMAUSA
| | - Daniel Russo
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI)Section of PsychiatryUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly,IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoGenoaItaly,Department of Mental HealthA.S.L. CN1CuneoItaly
| | - Norberto Miletto
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI)Section of PsychiatryUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly,IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoGenoaItaly
| | - Andrea Aguglia
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI)Section of PsychiatryUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly,IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoGenoaItaly
| | - Alessandra Costanza
- Department of PsychiatryFaculty of MedicineUniversity of Geneva (UNIGE)GenevaSwitzerland,Department of PsychiatryASO Santi Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo HospitalAlessandriaItaly
| | - Beatrice Benatti
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Luigi SaccoLuigi Sacco HospitalUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Anna Odone
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic MedicineUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly
| | - Sergio A. Barroilhet
- Department of PsychiatryTufts UniversityBostonMAUSA,Center for Quantitative HealthMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA,Department of PsychiatryHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA,Department of PsychiatryClinical Hospital University of ChileSantiagoChile
| | - Vlasios Brakoulias
- Western Sydney Local Health District Mental Health Service and School of MedicineWestern Sydney UniversityBlacktown HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Bernardo Dell’Osso
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Luigi SaccoLuigi Sacco HospitalUniversity of MilanMilanItaly,“Aldo Ravelli” Center for Nanotechnology and NeurostimulationUniversity of MilanMilanItaly,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesStanford UniversityStanfordCAUSA
| | - Gianluca Serafini
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI)Section of PsychiatryUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly,IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoGenoaItaly
| | - Mario Amore
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI)Section of PsychiatryUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly,IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoGenoaItaly
| | - S. Nassir Ghaemi
- Department of PsychiatryTufts UniversityBostonMAUSA,Department of PsychiatryHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Grunze H, Schaefer M, Scherk H, Born C, Preuss UW. Comorbid Bipolar and Alcohol Use Disorder-A Therapeutic Challenge. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:660432. [PMID: 33833701 PMCID: PMC8021702 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.660432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Comorbidity rates in Bipolar disorder rank highest among major mental disorders, especially comorbid substance use. Besides cannabis, alcohol is the most frequent substance of abuse as it is societally accepted and can be purchased and consumed legally. Estimates for lifetime comorbidity of bipolar disorder and alcohol use disorder are substantial and in the range of 40-70%, both for Bipolar I and II disorder, and with male preponderance. Alcohol use disorder and bipolarity significantly influence each other's severity and prognosis with a more complicated course of both disorders. Modern treatment concepts acknowledge the interplay between these disorders using an integrated therapy approach where both disorders are tackled in the same setting by a multi-professional team. Motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral and socio- therapies incorporating the family and social environment are cornerstones in psychotherapy whereas the accompanying pharmacological treatment aims to reduce craving and to optimize mood stability. Adding valproate to lithium may reduce alcohol consumption whereas studies with antipsychotics or naltrexone and acamprosate did not affect mood fluctuations or drinking patterns. In summary, there is a continuous need for more research in order to develop evidence-based approaches for integrated treatment of this frequent comorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heinz Grunze
- Psychiatrie Schwäbisch Hall, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany
- Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Heinz Grunze
| | - Martin Schaefer
- Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, und Suchtmedizin, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Born
- Psychiatrie Schwäbisch Hall, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany
- Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Ulrich W. Preuss
- Vitos Klinik Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Herborn, Germany
- Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie, und Psychosomatik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gao K, Arnold JG, Prihoda TJ, Quinones M, Singh V, Schinagle M, Conroy C, D'Arcangelo N, Bai Y, Calabrese JR, Bowden CL. Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Treatment (SMART) for Bipolar Disorder at Any Phase of Illness and at least Mild Symptom Severity. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY BULLETIN 2020; 50:8-25. [PMID: 32508363 PMCID: PMC7255841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To sequentially study the effectiveness of lithium and divalproex monotherapy and adjunctive therapy with quetiapine or lamotrigine in the acute and continuation treatment of bipolar I or II disorder at any phase of illness and at least mild symptom severity. METHODS From June 2011 to December 2016, patients with bipolar I or II disorder (using DSM-IV diagnostic criteria) and CGI-S (Clinical Global Impression-Severity) ⩾ 3 were randomized to receive lithium or divalproex monotherapy for 2 weeks. Patients who had CGI-S-depression ⩾ 3 for 2 weeks at any time after 2-week monotherapy were randomly assigned to receive quetiapine or lamotrigine, or remaining on monotherapy for a total of 26 weeks. RESULTS The rates of early termination due to lack of efficacy and side effects and changes in BISS (Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Scale) and CGI-S total score were not significantly different between lithium and divalproex. The completion rate was significantly higher with adjunctive therapy than with monotherapy. BISS and CGI-S total scores, and their sub-scores were significantly reduced with adjunctive therapy compared to monotherapy. Adjunctive therapy significantly increased survival times compared to monotherapy (hazard ratio = 6.8), and the monotherapy group had a significantly increased risk for not reaching sustained recovery from depression (hazard ratio = 12.7). Patients who did not need the 2nd randomization and remained on monotherapy had a significantly reduced hazard for discontinuation (hazard ratio = 3.8). CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of lithium and divalproex as monotherapy was modest. Adjunctive lamotrigine and quetiapine to either one was well-tolerated and equally effective in reducing bipolar symptomatology, but adjunctive therapy should be initiated as early as possible when depression symptoms are present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keming Gao
- Gao, MD, PhD, Schinagle, MD, Calabrese, MD, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. Arnold, PhD, Bowden, MD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Prihoda, PhD, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Quinones, MD, IKARE Mood, Trauma, and Recovery Clinic, San Antonio, Texas. Singh, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, El Paso, Texas. Conroy, MPH, D'Arcangelo, MSW, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. Cleveland, Ohio. Bai, MD, MS, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guandong Province, China
| | - Jodi G Arnold
- Gao, MD, PhD, Schinagle, MD, Calabrese, MD, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. Arnold, PhD, Bowden, MD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Prihoda, PhD, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Quinones, MD, IKARE Mood, Trauma, and Recovery Clinic, San Antonio, Texas. Singh, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, El Paso, Texas. Conroy, MPH, D'Arcangelo, MSW, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. Cleveland, Ohio. Bai, MD, MS, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guandong Province, China
| | - Thomas J Prihoda
- Gao, MD, PhD, Schinagle, MD, Calabrese, MD, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. Arnold, PhD, Bowden, MD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Prihoda, PhD, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Quinones, MD, IKARE Mood, Trauma, and Recovery Clinic, San Antonio, Texas. Singh, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, El Paso, Texas. Conroy, MPH, D'Arcangelo, MSW, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. Cleveland, Ohio. Bai, MD, MS, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guandong Province, China
| | - Marlon Quinones
- Gao, MD, PhD, Schinagle, MD, Calabrese, MD, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. Arnold, PhD, Bowden, MD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Prihoda, PhD, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Quinones, MD, IKARE Mood, Trauma, and Recovery Clinic, San Antonio, Texas. Singh, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, El Paso, Texas. Conroy, MPH, D'Arcangelo, MSW, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. Cleveland, Ohio. Bai, MD, MS, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guandong Province, China
| | - Vivek Singh
- Gao, MD, PhD, Schinagle, MD, Calabrese, MD, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. Arnold, PhD, Bowden, MD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Prihoda, PhD, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Quinones, MD, IKARE Mood, Trauma, and Recovery Clinic, San Antonio, Texas. Singh, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, El Paso, Texas. Conroy, MPH, D'Arcangelo, MSW, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. Cleveland, Ohio. Bai, MD, MS, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guandong Province, China
| | - Martha Schinagle
- Gao, MD, PhD, Schinagle, MD, Calabrese, MD, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. Arnold, PhD, Bowden, MD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Prihoda, PhD, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Quinones, MD, IKARE Mood, Trauma, and Recovery Clinic, San Antonio, Texas. Singh, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, El Paso, Texas. Conroy, MPH, D'Arcangelo, MSW, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. Cleveland, Ohio. Bai, MD, MS, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guandong Province, China
| | - Carla Conroy
- Gao, MD, PhD, Schinagle, MD, Calabrese, MD, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. Arnold, PhD, Bowden, MD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Prihoda, PhD, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Quinones, MD, IKARE Mood, Trauma, and Recovery Clinic, San Antonio, Texas. Singh, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, El Paso, Texas. Conroy, MPH, D'Arcangelo, MSW, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. Cleveland, Ohio. Bai, MD, MS, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guandong Province, China
| | - Nicole D'Arcangelo
- Gao, MD, PhD, Schinagle, MD, Calabrese, MD, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. Arnold, PhD, Bowden, MD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Prihoda, PhD, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Quinones, MD, IKARE Mood, Trauma, and Recovery Clinic, San Antonio, Texas. Singh, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, El Paso, Texas. Conroy, MPH, D'Arcangelo, MSW, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. Cleveland, Ohio. Bai, MD, MS, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guandong Province, China
| | - Yuanhan Bai
- Gao, MD, PhD, Schinagle, MD, Calabrese, MD, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. Arnold, PhD, Bowden, MD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Prihoda, PhD, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Quinones, MD, IKARE Mood, Trauma, and Recovery Clinic, San Antonio, Texas. Singh, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, El Paso, Texas. Conroy, MPH, D'Arcangelo, MSW, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. Cleveland, Ohio. Bai, MD, MS, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guandong Province, China
| | - Joseph R Calabrese
- Gao, MD, PhD, Schinagle, MD, Calabrese, MD, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. Arnold, PhD, Bowden, MD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Prihoda, PhD, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Quinones, MD, IKARE Mood, Trauma, and Recovery Clinic, San Antonio, Texas. Singh, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, El Paso, Texas. Conroy, MPH, D'Arcangelo, MSW, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. Cleveland, Ohio. Bai, MD, MS, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guandong Province, China
| | - Charles L Bowden
- Gao, MD, PhD, Schinagle, MD, Calabrese, MD, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. Arnold, PhD, Bowden, MD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Prihoda, PhD, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Quinones, MD, IKARE Mood, Trauma, and Recovery Clinic, San Antonio, Texas. Singh, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, El Paso, Texas. Conroy, MPH, D'Arcangelo, MSW, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. Cleveland, Ohio. Bai, MD, MS, Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, and Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, Guandong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Coles AS, Sasiadek J, George TP. Pharmacotherapies for co-occurring substance use and bipolar disorders: A systematic review. Bipolar Disord 2019; 21:595-610. [PMID: 31077521 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Substance use disorders (SUDs), including those for alcohol, stimulants, tobacco, opioids and cannabis, in patients with bipolar disorder are a major clinical and public health problem, and are present in the majority of these patients. Nonetheless, the development of effective pharmacological treatments for co-occurring SUDs in bipolar illness have not been well-developed and may be an important practical reason for the reduced effectiveness of these medications in community practice. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of the literature (PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar), and identified N = 29 clinical studies, which evaluated both mental health and SUD outcomes in patients with co-occurring bipolar disorders and SUDs. RESULTS Our findings suggest the potential of valproate sodium and lamotrigine as preferred pharmacological agents for the treatment of co-occurring psychiatric and substance use outcomes in these patients. However, many of the reviewed studies are of open-label designs and of modest sample sizes. CONCLUSIONS Thus, given the gaps in our knowledge, recommendations for treatment of this common and important co-morbidity are preliminary. Accordingly, the conduct of larger, randomized controlled trials for this co-morbidity is clearly needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandria S Coles
- Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Julia Sasiadek
- Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tony P George
- Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Brain and Therapeutics, Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Medical Sciences (IMS), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Reddy YJ, Jhanwar V, Nagpal R, Reddy MS, Shah N, Ghorpade S, Kulkarni S. Prescribing practices of Indian psychiatrists in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2019; 53:458-469. [PMID: 30727750 DOI: 10.1177/0004867419826718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The treatment of bipolar disorder is challenging because of its clinical complexity and availability of multiple treatment options, none of which are ideal mood stabilizers. This survey studies prescription practices of psychiatrists in India and their adherence to guidelines. METHOD In total, 500 psychiatrists randomly selected from the Indian Psychiatric Society membership directory were administered a face-to-face 22-item questionnaire pertaining to the management of bipolar disorder. RESULTS For acute mania, most practitioners preferred a combination of a mood stabilizer and an atypical antipsychotic to monotherapy. For acute depression, there was a preference for a combination of an antidepressant and a mood stabilizer over other alternatives. Electroconvulsive therapy was preferred in the treatment of severe episodes and to hasten the process of recovery. Approximately, 50% of psychiatrists prescribe maintenance treatment after the first bipolar episode, but maintenance therapy was rarely offered lifelong. While the majority (85%) of psychiatrists acknowledged referring to various clinical guidelines, their ultimate choice of treatment was also significantly determined by personal experience and reference to textbooks. LIMITATIONS The study did not study actual prescriptions. Hence, the responses to queries in the survey are indirect measures from which we have tried to understand the actual practices, and of course, these are susceptible to self-report and social-desirability biases. This was a cross-sectional study; therefore, temporal changes in responses could not be considered. CONCLUSION Overall, Indian psychiatrists seemed to broadly adhere to recommendations of clinical practice guidelines, but with some notable exceptions. The preference for antidepressants in treating depression is contrary to general restraint recommended by most guidelines. Therefore, the efficacy of antidepressants in treating bipolar depression in the context of Indian psychiatrists' practice needs to be studied systematically. Not initiating maintenance treatment early in the course of illness may have serious implications on the long-term outcome of bipolar disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yc Janardhan Reddy
- 1 Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, India
| | - Venugopal Jhanwar
- 2 Psychiatry Department, Deva Institute of Healthcare & Research Pvt. Ltd., Varanasi, India
| | | | - M S Reddy
- 4 Asha Bipolar Clinic, Asha Hospital, Hyderabad, India
| | - Nilesh Shah
- 5 Department of Psychiatry, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College & General Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Sanman Ghorpade
- 6 Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, India
| | - Sujay Kulkarni
- 6 Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Musetti L, Tundo A, Benedetti A, Massimetti G, Cambiali E, Pergentini I, Del Grande C, Dell'Osso L. Lithium, valproate, and carbamazepine prescribing patterns for long-term treatment of bipolar I and II disorders: A prospective study. Hum Psychopharmacol 2018; 33:e2676. [PMID: 30311959 DOI: 10.1002/hup.2676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2018] [Revised: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to describe the prescription patterns of the mood stabilizers most commonly used for the treatment of bipolar I and II disorders (lithium, valproate, and carbamazepine) and to analyze the treatment outcomes. METHODS Two hundred and thirty-four outpatients with bipolar disorders receiving prophylactic treatment with lithium, valproate, carbamazepine, or their combination were followed up for at least 18 months in two Italian psychiatric centers specialized in mood disorders. RESULTS The combination of lithium and valproate or carbamazepine was the most common prophylactic treatment (54.3%), followed by valproate or carbamazepine (24%) and lithium monotherapy (22%). Polytherapy was prescribed mainly to patients with bipolar I disorder, a high number of previous episodes and lifetime psychotic symptoms, whereas valproate or carbamazepine monotherapy was prescribed to patients with anxiety comorbidity. The annual frequency of recurrences decreased significantly after entering the study in the overall sample, and the reduction was significantly higher in patients on lithium plus valproate or carbamazepine compared with the valproate or carbamazepine group, but not with the lithium monotherapy group. The number of mixed recurrences during the follow-up was significantly higher in patients on lithium plus valproate or carbamazepine. CONCLUSIONS Our findings may help clinicians to personalize long-term treatment to prevent relapses of bipolar disorder according to clinical presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Musetti
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Alessandra Benedetti
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gabriele Massimetti
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Erika Cambiali
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Irene Pergentini
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Claudia Del Grande
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Liliana Dell'Osso
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Reddy SR, Reddy KH, Kumar MN, Reddy PM, Reddy JVR, Sharma HK. A Validated GC-MS Method for the Determination of Genotoxic Impurities in Divalproex Sodium Drug Substance. J Chromatogr Sci 2018; 57:101-107. [DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/bmy089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S Raghavender Reddy
- Aurobindo Pharma Limited Research Centre-II, Survey No: 71&72, Indrakaran Village, Kandi Mandal, Sangareddy, Telangana, India
| | - K Hussain Reddy
- Department of Chemistry, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - M Narendra Kumar
- Aurobindo Pharma Limited Research Centre-II, Survey No: 71&72, Indrakaran Village, Kandi Mandal, Sangareddy, Telangana, India
| | - P Madhava Reddy
- Aurobindo Pharma Limited Research Centre-II, Survey No: 71&72, Indrakaran Village, Kandi Mandal, Sangareddy, Telangana, India
| | - J Venkata Ramana Reddy
- Aurobindo Pharma Limited Research Centre-II, Survey No: 71&72, Indrakaran Village, Kandi Mandal, Sangareddy, Telangana, India
| | - Hemant Kumar Sharma
- Aurobindo Pharma Limited Research Centre-II, Survey No: 71&72, Indrakaran Village, Kandi Mandal, Sangareddy, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Psychiatric comorbidity in alcohol use disorders: results from the German S3 guidelines. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2018; 268:219-229. [PMID: 28439723 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-017-0801-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2016] [Accepted: 04/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Alcohol use disorders (AUD) have a high comorbidity with mental disorders. Vice versa, alcohol consumption plays an important role in affective disorders, anxiety disorders, ADHD, schizophrenic psychosis, and other mental disorders. In developing the current interdisciplinary, evidence-based treatment guideline on screening, diagnostics, and treatment of AUD, available research on comorbid mental diseases in AUD has been compiled to generate recommendations for treatment. The guideline was prepared under the responsibility of the German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics (DGPPN) and the German Association for Addiction Research and Therapy (DG-Sucht). To meet the methodological criteria for the highest quality guidelines ("S3-criteria") as defined by the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), the following criteria were employed: (1) a systematic search, selection, and appraisal of the international literature; (2) a structured process to reach consensus; and (3) inclusion of all relevant representatives of future guideline users. After assessing and grading the available literature, the expert groups generated several recommendations for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of comorbid mental disorders. These recommendations were subdivided into psycho-, pharmaco-, and combination therapies. These are the first guidelines ever to make specific treatment recommendations for comorbid mental diseases in AUD. The recommendations extend to different treatment approaches including diagnostics and settings to present available effective and state-of-the-art treatment approaches to clinicians. Hitherto, many clinical constellations have not been addressed in research. Therefore, recommendations for future research are specified.
Collapse
|
18
|
Yatham LN, Kennedy SH, Parikh SV, Schaffer A, Bond DJ, Frey BN, Sharma V, Goldstein BI, Rej S, Beaulieu S, Alda M, MacQueen G, Milev RV, Ravindran A, O'Donovan C, McIntosh D, Lam RW, Vazquez G, Kapczinski F, McIntyre RS, Kozicky J, Kanba S, Lafer B, Suppes T, Calabrese JR, Vieta E, Malhi G, Post RM, Berk M. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) 2018 guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2018; 20:97-170. [PMID: 29536616 PMCID: PMC5947163 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 901] [Impact Index Per Article: 150.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2017] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) previously published treatment guidelines for bipolar disorder in 2005, along with international commentaries and subsequent updates in 2007, 2009, and 2013. The last two updates were published in collaboration with the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD). These 2018 CANMAT and ISBD Bipolar Treatment Guidelines represent the significant advances in the field since the last full edition was published in 2005, including updates to diagnosis and management as well as new research into pharmacological and psychological treatments. These advances have been translated into clear and easy to use recommendations for first, second, and third- line treatments, with consideration given to levels of evidence for efficacy, clinical support based on experience, and consensus ratings of safety, tolerability, and treatment-emergent switch risk. New to these guidelines, hierarchical rankings were created for first and second- line treatments recommended for acute mania, acute depression, and maintenance treatment in bipolar I disorder. Created by considering the impact of each treatment across all phases of illness, this hierarchy will further assist clinicians in making evidence-based treatment decisions. Lithium, quetiapine, divalproex, asenapine, aripiprazole, paliperidone, risperidone, and cariprazine alone or in combination are recommended as first-line treatments for acute mania. First-line options for bipolar I depression include quetiapine, lurasidone plus lithium or divalproex, lithium, lamotrigine, lurasidone, or adjunctive lamotrigine. While medications that have been shown to be effective for the acute phase should generally be continued for the maintenance phase in bipolar I disorder, there are some exceptions (such as with antidepressants); and available data suggest that lithium, quetiapine, divalproex, lamotrigine, asenapine, and aripiprazole monotherapy or combination treatments should be considered first-line for those initiating or switching treatment during the maintenance phase. In addition to addressing issues in bipolar I disorder, these guidelines also provide an overview of, and recommendations for, clinical management of bipolar II disorder, as well as advice on specific populations, such as women at various stages of the reproductive cycle, children and adolescents, and older adults. There are also discussions on the impact of specific psychiatric and medical comorbidities such as substance use, anxiety, and metabolic disorders. Finally, an overview of issues related to safety and monitoring is provided. The CANMAT and ISBD groups hope that these guidelines become a valuable tool for practitioners across the globe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lakshmi N Yatham
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | | | - Sagar V Parikh
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMIUSA
| | - Ayal Schaffer
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoONCanada
| | - David J Bond
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMNUSA
| | - Benicio N Frey
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural NeurosciencesMcMaster UniversityHamiltonONCanada
| | - Verinder Sharma
- Departments of Psychiatry and Obstetrics & GynaecologyWestern UniversityLondonONCanada
| | | | - Soham Rej
- Department of PsychiatryMcGill UniversityMontrealQCCanada
| | - Serge Beaulieu
- Department of PsychiatryMcGill UniversityMontrealQCCanada
| | - Martin Alda
- Department of PsychiatryDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNSCanada
| | - Glenda MacQueen
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Roumen V Milev
- Departments of Psychiatry and PsychologyQueen's UniversityKingstonONCanada
| | - Arun Ravindran
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoONCanada
| | | | - Diane McIntosh
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Raymond W Lam
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Gustavo Vazquez
- Departments of Psychiatry and PsychologyQueen's UniversityKingstonONCanada
| | - Flavio Kapczinski
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural NeurosciencesMcMaster UniversityHamiltonONCanada
| | | | - Jan Kozicky
- School of Population and Public HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | | | - Beny Lafer
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Sao PauloSao PauloBrazil
| | - Trisha Suppes
- Bipolar and Depression Research ProgramVA Palo AltoDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences Stanford UniversityStanfordCAUSA
| | - Joseph R Calabrese
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity Hospitals Case Medical CenterCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandOHUSA
| | - Eduard Vieta
- Bipolar UnitInstitute of NeuroscienceHospital ClinicUniversity of BarcelonaIDIBAPS, CIBERSAMBarcelonaCataloniaSpain
| | - Gin Malhi
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Robert M Post
- Department of PsychiatryGeorge Washington UniversityWashingtonDCUSA
| | - Michael Berk
- Deakin UniveristyIMPACT Strategic Research CentreSchool of Medicine, Barwon HealthGeelongVic.Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
de Queiroz AIG, Chaves Filho AJM, Araújo TDS, Lima CNC, Machado MDJS, Carvalho AF, Vasconcelos SMM, de Lucena DF, Quevedo J, Macedo D. Antimanic activity of minocycline in a GBR12909-induced model of mania in mice: Possible role of antioxidant and neurotrophic mechanisms. J Affect Disord 2018; 225:40-51. [PMID: 28783519 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Revised: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 07/31/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mania/hypomania is the cardinal feature of bipolar disorder. Recently, single administration of the dopamine transporter (DAT) inhibitor, GBR12909, was related to mania-like alterations. In the present study we aimed at testing behavioral and brain oxidant/neurotrophic alterations induced by the repeated administration of GBR12909 and its prevention/reversal by the mood stabilizing drugs, lithium (Li) and valproate (VAL) as well as by the neuroprotective drug, minocycline (Mino). METHODS Adult Swiss mice were submitted to 14 days protocols namely prevention and reversal. In the reversal protocol mice were given GBR12909 or saline and between days 8 and 14 received Li, VAL, Mino (25 or 50mg/kg) or saline. In the prevention treatment, mice were pretreated with Li, VAL, Mino or saline prior to GBR12909. RESULTS GBR12909 repeated administration induced hyperlocomotion and increased risk taking behavior that were prevented and reversed by the mood stabilizers and both doses of Mino. Li, VAL or Mino were more effective in the reversal of striatal GSH alterations induced by GBR12909. Regarding lipid peroxidation Mino was more effective in the prevention and reversal of lipid peroxidation in the hippocampus whereas Li and VAL prevented this alteration in the striatum and PFC. Li, VAL and Mino25 reversed the decrease in BDNF levels induced by GBR12909. CONCLUSION GBR12909 repeated administration resembles manic phenotype. Similarly to classical mood-stabilizing agents, Mino prevented and reversed GBR12909 manic-like behavior in mice. Thus, our data provide preclinical support to the design of trials investigating Mino's possible antimanic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Isabelle G de Queiroz
- Neuropharmacology Laboratory, Drug Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
| | - Adriano José Maia Chaves Filho
- Neuropharmacology Laboratory, Drug Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
| | - Tatiane da Silva Araújo
- Neuropharmacology Laboratory, Drug Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
| | - Camila Nayane Carvalho Lima
- Neuropharmacology Laboratory, Drug Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
| | - Michel de Jesus Souza Machado
- Neuropharmacology Laboratory, Drug Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
| | - André F Carvalho
- Translational Psychiatry Research Group and the Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
| | - Silvania Maria Mendes Vasconcelos
- Neuropharmacology Laboratory, Drug Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
| | - David Freitas de Lucena
- Neuropharmacology Laboratory, Drug Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
| | - João Quevedo
- Translational Psychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA; Center of Excellence on Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA; Neuroscience Graduate Program, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, TX, USA; Laboratory of Neurosciences, Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Health Sciences Unit, University of Southern Santa Catarina (UNESC), Criciúma, SC, Brazil
| | - Danielle Macedo
- Neuropharmacology Laboratory, Drug Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Reddy SR, Reddy KH, Reddy PM, Reddy GA, Kumar MN, Sharma HK. Reliable GC Method for Related Substances in Divalproex Sodium Drug. J Chromatogr Sci 2017; 55:891-898. [PMID: 29048489 DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/bmx057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
A specific GC method has been developed, optimized and validated for the determination of seven related substances namely N,N-dimethyl valpronamide, valeric acid, 2-methyl valeric acid, 2-ethyl valeric acid, 2-isopropyl valeric acid, 2-n-butyl valeric acid and 2-propyl-2-pentenoic acid in divalproex sodium (DPS) drug substance. Chromatographic separations of these seven impurities were achieved on DB-FFAP column (30 m × 0.53 mm, 1.0 μm), which consists nitroterephthalic acid modified polyethylene glycol material as stationary phase. DPS is a coordination complex of the sodium valproate and valproic acid (VPA). Nonanoic acid is used as internal standard. All the seven related substances, VPA and nonanoic acid were extracted into dichloromethane and monitored by GC with flame ionization detector. The performance of the developed method was assessed by evaluating specificity, linearity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy and robustness. Forced degradation experiments were conducted to evaluate the degradation behavior of DPS. The established limits of detection (LODs) and limits of quantification (LOQs) values for the related substances were in the ranges of 4-5 and 12-15 μg mL-1, respectively. Further, for VPA, LOD and LOQ values were 4 and 12 μg mL-1, respectively. The correction factors of these related substances with respect to VPA and lie between 0.92 and 1.44. The average recoveries were in the range of 92.4-108.4%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Raghavender Reddy
- Aurobindo Pharma Limited Research Centre-II, Survey No: 71&72, Indrakaran Village, Sangareddy Mandal, Medak 502 329, Telangana, India
| | - K Hussain Reddy
- Department of Chemistry, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Anantapur 515 003, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - P Madhava Reddy
- Aurobindo Pharma Limited Research Centre-II, Survey No: 71&72, Indrakaran Village, Sangareddy Mandal, Medak 502 329, Telangana, India
| | - G Amarnatha Reddy
- Aurobindo Pharma Limited Research Centre-II, Survey No: 71&72, Indrakaran Village, Sangareddy Mandal, Medak 502 329, Telangana, India
| | - M Narendra Kumar
- Aurobindo Pharma Limited Research Centre-II, Survey No: 71&72, Indrakaran Village, Sangareddy Mandal, Medak 502 329, Telangana, India
| | - Hemant Kumar Sharma
- Aurobindo Pharma Limited Research Centre-II, Survey No: 71&72, Indrakaran Village, Sangareddy Mandal, Medak 502 329, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Stokes PRA, Kalk NJ, Young AH. Bipolar disorder and addictions: the elephant in the room. Br J Psychiatry 2017; 211:132-134. [PMID: 28864753 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.193912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2016] [Revised: 04/04/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Addictions are highly prevalent in bipolar disorder and greatly affect clinical outcomes. In this editorial, we review the evidence that addictions are a key challenge in bipolar disorder, examine putative neurobiological mechanisms, and reflect on the limited clinical trial evidence base with suggestions for treatment strategies and further developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul R A Stokes
- Paul R. A. Stokes, PhD, Nicola J. Kalk, PhD, Allan H. Young, FRCPsych, Centre far Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nicola J Kalk
- Paul R. A. Stokes, PhD, Nicola J. Kalk, PhD, Allan H. Young, FRCPsych, Centre far Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Allan H Young
- Paul R. A. Stokes, PhD, Nicola J. Kalk, PhD, Allan H. Young, FRCPsych, Centre far Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gao K, Ganocy SJ, Conroy C, Brownrigg B, Serrano MB, Calabrese JR. A placebo controlled study of quetiapine-XR in bipolar depression accompanied by generalized anxiety with and without a recent history of alcohol and cannabis use. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2017; 234:2233-2244. [PMID: 28536866 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-017-4642-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare treatment response in bipolar I or II depression and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) with and without recent alcohol and/or cannabis use disorder (ALC/CAN) to quetiapine-XR (extended release) or placebo. METHODS A randomized, double-blind, 8-week study of quetiapine-XR versus placebo in patients with bipolar I or II depression and GAD with or without a recent ALC/CAN was used to compare changes in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR-16), Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorder-Severity (CGI-BP-S), and Timeline Follow Back within and between groups. RESULTS In the quetiapine-XR group, patients with a recent ALC/CAN (n = 22) had significant decreases in QIDS-SR-16 (-9.6 ± 1.6 vs. -3.7 ± 1.7) and CGI-BP-S (-1.6 ± 0.4 vs. -0.8 ± 0.03) than those without a recent ALC/CAN (n = 24). In the placebo group, both patients with a recent ALC/CAN (n = 23) and those without (n = 21) had similar reductions in these measures. The reduction of QIDS-SR-16 scores in patients with a recent ALC/CAN was also significantly different from that of their counterparts in the placebo group. Patients who received quetiapine-XR had larger decreases in the number of drinking days/week (p = 0.17) and number of cannabis joints/week (p = 0.09) compared to those who received placebo. CONCLUSION Quetiapine-XR was superior to placebo in reducing QIDS-SR-16 total score in patients with a recent ALC/CAN. Patients taking quetiapine-XR used less alcohol and cannabis than patients on placebo, suggesting that quetiapine-XR may be of use in patients with bipolar disorder accompanied by GAD and other comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keming Gao
- Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10524 Euclid Avenue, 12th Floor, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| | - Stephen J Ganocy
- Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10524 Euclid Avenue, 12th Floor, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Carla Conroy
- Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10524 Euclid Avenue, 12th Floor, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Brittany Brownrigg
- Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10524 Euclid Avenue, 12th Floor, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Mary Beth Serrano
- Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10524 Euclid Avenue, 12th Floor, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Joseph R Calabrese
- Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10524 Euclid Avenue, 12th Floor, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in a Lifetime Perspective: Is Lithium Still the Best Choice? Clin Drug Investig 2017; 37:713-727. [DOI: 10.1007/s40261-017-0531-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
24
|
Fountoulakis KN, Yatham L, Grunze H, Vieta E, Young A, Blier P, Kasper S, Moeller HJ. The International College of Neuro-Psychopharmacology (CINP) Treatment Guidelines for Bipolar Disorder in Adults (CINP-BD-2017), Part 2: Review, Grading of the Evidence, and a Precise Algorithm. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2017; 20:121-179. [PMID: 27816941 PMCID: PMC5409012 DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyw100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2016] [Revised: 10/29/2016] [Accepted: 11/03/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The current paper includes a systematic search of the literature, a detailed presentation of the results, and a grading of treatment options in terms of efficacy and tolerability/safety. Material and Methods The PRISMA method was used in the literature search with the combination of the words 'bipolar,' 'manic,' 'mania,' 'manic depression,' and 'manic depressive' with 'randomized,' and 'algorithms' with 'mania,' 'manic,' 'bipolar,' 'manic-depressive,' or 'manic depression.' Relevant web pages and review articles were also reviewed. Results The current report is based on the analysis of 57 guideline papers and 531 published papers related to RCTs, reviews, posthoc, or meta-analysis papers to March 25, 2016. The specific treatment options for acute mania, mixed episodes, acute bipolar depression, maintenance phase, psychotic and mixed features, anxiety, and rapid cycling were evaluated with regards to efficacy. Existing treatment guidelines were also reviewed. Finally, Tables reflecting efficacy and recommendation levels were created that led to the development of a precise algorithm that still has to prove its feasibility in everyday clinical practice. Conclusions A systematic literature search was conducted on the pharmacological treatment of bipolar disorder to identify all relevant random controlled trials pertaining to all aspects of bipolar disorder and graded the data according to a predetermined method to develop a precise treatment algorithm for management of various phases of bipolar disorder. It is important to note that the some of the recommendations in the treatment algorithm were based on the secondary outcome data from posthoc analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos N Fountoulakis
- 3rd Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Mood Disorders Centre of Excellence, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Canada; Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Centre for Affective Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Institute of Mental Health Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, MUV, AKH, Vienna, Austria; Psychiatric Department Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Lakshmi Yatham
- 3rd Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Mood Disorders Centre of Excellence, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Canada; Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Centre for Affective Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Institute of Mental Health Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, MUV, AKH, Vienna, Austria; Psychiatric Department Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Heinz Grunze
- 3rd Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Mood Disorders Centre of Excellence, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Canada; Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Centre for Affective Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Institute of Mental Health Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, MUV, AKH, Vienna, Austria; Psychiatric Department Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Eduard Vieta
- 3rd Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Mood Disorders Centre of Excellence, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Canada; Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Centre for Affective Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Institute of Mental Health Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, MUV, AKH, Vienna, Austria; Psychiatric Department Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Allan Young
- 3rd Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Mood Disorders Centre of Excellence, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Canada; Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Centre for Affective Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Institute of Mental Health Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, MUV, AKH, Vienna, Austria; Psychiatric Department Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Pierre Blier
- 3rd Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Mood Disorders Centre of Excellence, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Canada; Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Centre for Affective Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Institute of Mental Health Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, MUV, AKH, Vienna, Austria; Psychiatric Department Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Siegfried Kasper
- 3rd Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Mood Disorders Centre of Excellence, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Canada; Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Centre for Affective Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Institute of Mental Health Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, MUV, AKH, Vienna, Austria; Psychiatric Department Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Hans Jurgen Moeller
- 3rd Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Mood Disorders Centre of Excellence, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Canada; Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Centre for Affective Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Institute of Mental Health Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, MUV, AKH, Vienna, Austria; Psychiatric Department Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Goodwin GM, Haddad PM, Ferrier IN, Aronson JK, Barnes T, Cipriani A, Coghill DR, Fazel S, Geddes JR, Grunze H, Holmes EA, Howes O, Hudson S, Hunt N, Jones I, Macmillan IC, McAllister-Williams H, Miklowitz DR, Morriss R, Munafò M, Paton C, Saharkian BJ, Saunders K, Sinclair J, Taylor D, Vieta E, Young AH. Evidence-based guidelines for treating bipolar disorder: Revised third edition recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol 2016; 30:495-553. [PMID: 26979387 PMCID: PMC4922419 DOI: 10.1177/0269881116636545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 457] [Impact Index Per Article: 57.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines specify the scope and targets of treatment for bipolar disorder. The third version is based explicitly on the available evidence and presented, like previous Clinical Practice Guidelines, as recommendations to aid clinical decision making for practitioners: it may also serve as a source of information for patients and carers, and assist audit. The recommendations are presented together with a more detailed review of the corresponding evidence. A consensus meeting, involving experts in bipolar disorder and its treatment, reviewed key areas and considered the strength of evidence and clinical implications. The guidelines were drawn up after extensive feedback from these participants. The best evidence from randomized controlled trials and, where available, observational studies employing quasi-experimental designs was used to evaluate treatment options. The strength of recommendations has been described using the GRADE approach. The guidelines cover the diagnosis of bipolar disorder, clinical management, and strategies for the use of medicines in short-term treatment of episodes, relapse prevention and stopping treatment. The use of medication is integrated with a coherent approach to psychoeducation and behaviour change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G M Goodwin
- University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - P M Haddad
- Greater Manchester West Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Eccles, Manchester, UK
| | - I N Ferrier
- Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, UK and Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - J K Aronson
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| | - Trh Barnes
- The Centre for Mental Health, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, UK
| | - A Cipriani
- University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - D R Coghill
- MACHS 2, Ninewells' Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK; now Departments of Paediatrics and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - S Fazel
- University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - J R Geddes
- University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - H Grunze
- Univ. Klinik f. Psychiatrie u. Psychotherapie, Christian Doppler Klinik, Universitätsklinik der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität (PMU), Salzburg, Christian Doppler Klinik Salzburg, Austria
| | - E A Holmes
- MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
| | - O Howes
- Institute of Psychiatry (Box 67), London, UK
| | | | - N Hunt
- Fulbourn Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - I Jones
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Cardiff, UK
| | - I C Macmillan
- Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - H McAllister-Williams
- Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, UK and Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - D R Miklowitz
- UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - R Morriss
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Nottingham, UK
| | - M Munafò
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - C Paton
- Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, Dartford, UK
| | - B J Saharkian
- Department of Psychiatry (Box 189), University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kea Saunders
- University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Jma Sinclair
- University Department of Psychiatry, Southampton, UK
| | - D Taylor
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Pharmacy Department, Maudsley Hospital, London, UK
| | - E Vieta
- Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A H Young
- Centre for Affective Disorders, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Secades-Álvarez A, Fernández-Rodríguez C. Review of the efficacy of treatments for bipolar disorder and substance abuse. REVISTA DE PSIQUIATRIA Y SALUD MENTAL 2016; 10:113-124. [PMID: 26778814 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2015.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2015] [Revised: 10/02/2015] [Accepted: 10/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to provide a descriptive overview of different psychological and pharmacological interventions used in the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder and substance abuse, in order to determine their efficacy. A review of the current literature was performed using the databases Medline and PsycINFO (2005-2015). A total of 30 experimental studies were grouped according to the type of therapeutic modality described (pharmacological 19; psychological 11). Quetiapine and valproate have demonstrated superiority on psychiatric symptoms and a reduction in alcohol consumption, respectively. Group psychological therapies with education, relapse prevention and family inclusion have also been shown to reduce the symptomatology and prevent alcohol consumption and dropouts. Although there seems to be some recommended interventions, the multicomponent base, the lack of information related to participants during treatment, experimental control or the number of dropouts of these studies suggest that it would be irresponsible to assume that there are well established treatments.
Collapse
|
27
|
Carrà G, Bartoli F, Crocamo C, Brady KT, Clerici M. Attempted suicide in people with co-occurring bipolar and substance use disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2015; 167:125-35. [PMID: 24955564 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2014] [Revised: 05/29/2014] [Accepted: 05/30/2014] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both individuals with bipolar (BD) and those with alcohol (AUD) and other substance (SUD) use disorders are likely to attempt suicide. Comorbidity of BD and AUD/SUD may increase the likelihood of suicide attempts. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the association of comorbid AUD/SUD and suicide attempts in subjects with BD in the literature to date. METHODS Electronic databases through January 2013 were searched. Studies reporting rates of suicide attempts in people with co-occurring BD and AUD/SUD were retrieved. Comorbid AUD and SUD and suicide attempts rates as well as demographic, clinical, and methodological variables were extracted from each publication or obtained directly from its authors. RESULTS Twenty-nine of 222 studies assessed for eligibility met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 31,294 individuals with BD, of whom 6308 (20.1%) had documented suicide attempts. There were consistent findings across the studies included. As compared to controls, subjects with BD and comorbid AUD/SUD were more likely to attempt suicide. The cross-sectional association estimates showed random-effects pooled crude ORs of 1.96 (95% CI=1.56-2.47; p<0.01), 1.72 (95% CI=1.52-1.95; p<0.01), and 1.77 (95% CI=1.49-2.10; p<0.01), for combined AUD/SUD, AUD, and SUD. There was no publication bias and sensitivity analyses based on the highest quality studies confirmed core results. LIMITATIONS The effects of the number and the type of suicide attempts could not be investigated due to insufficient information. CONCLUSIONS Comorbid AUD and SUD in individuals with BD are significantly associated with suicide attempts. Individuals with this comorbidity should be targeted for intensive suicide prevention efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Carrà
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Francesco Bartoli
- Department of Surgery and Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Milano Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, Monza (MB), Italy.
| | - Cristina Crocamo
- Department of Surgery and Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Milano Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, Monza (MB), Italy
| | - Kathleen T Brady
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina,Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Massimo Clerici
- Department of Surgery and Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Milano Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, Monza (MB), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Minozzi S, Cinquini M, Amato L, Davoli M, Farrell MF, Pani PP, Vecchi S. Anticonvulsants for cocaine dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD006754. [PMID: 25882271 PMCID: PMC8812341 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006754.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cocaine dependence is a major public health problem that is characterised by recidivism and a host of medical and psychosocial complications. Although effective pharmacotherapy is available for alcohol and heroin dependence, none is currently available for cocaine dependence, despite two decades of clinical trials primarily involving antidepressant, anticonvulsivant and dopaminergic medications. Extensive consideration has been given to optimal pharmacological approaches to the treatment of individuals with cocaine dependence, and both dopamine antagonists and agonists have been considered. Anticonvulsants have been candidates for use in the treatment of addiction based on the hypothesis that seizure kindling-like mechanisms contribute to addiction. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticonvulsants for individuals with cocaine dependence. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group Trials Register (June 2014), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2014, Issue 6), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2014), EMBASE (1988 to June 2014), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (1982 to June 2014), Web of Science (1991 to June 2014) and the reference lists of eligible articles. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials that focus on the use of anticonvulsant medications to treat individuals with cocaine dependence. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used the standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN RESULTS We included a total of 20 studies with 2068 participants. We studied the anticonvulsant drugs carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, phenytoin, tiagabine, topiramate and vigabatrin. All studies compared anticonvulsants versus placebo. Only one study had one arm by which the anticonvulsant was compared with the antidepressant desipramine. Upon comparison of anticonvulsant versus placebo, we found no significant differences for any of the efficacy and safety measures. Dropouts: risk ratio (RR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.05, 17 studies, 20 arms, 1695 participants, moderate quality of evidence. Use of cocaine: RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.02, nine studies, 11 arms, 867 participants, moderate quality of evidence; side effects: RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.90, eight studies, 775 participants; craving: standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.25, 95% CI -0.59 to 0.09, seven studies, eight arms, 428 participants, low quality of evidence. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although caution is needed when results from a limited number of small clinical trials are assessed, no current evidence supports the clinical use of anticonvulsant medications in the treatment of patients with cocaine dependence. Although the findings of new trials will improve the quality of study results, especially in relation to specific medications, anticonvulsants as a category cannot be considered first-, second- or third-line treatment for cocaine dependence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Minozzi
- Lazio Regional Health ServiceDepartment of EpidemiologyVia di Santa Costanza, 53RomeItaly00198
| | - Michela Cinquini
- Mario NegriCentro Cochrane Italianovia Giuseppe La Masa 19MILANOItaly20156
| | - Laura Amato
- Lazio Regional Health ServiceDepartment of EpidemiologyVia di Santa Costanza, 53RomeItaly00198
| | - Marina Davoli
- Lazio Regional Health ServiceDepartment of EpidemiologyVia di Santa Costanza, 53RomeItaly00198
| | - Michael F Farrell
- University of New South WalesNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre36 King StreetRandwickSydneyNSWAustraliaNSW 2025
| | - Pier Paolo Pani
- Health District 8 (ASL 8) CagliariSocial‐Health DivisionVia Logudoro 17CagliariSardiniaItaly09127
| | - Simona Vecchi
- Lazio Regional Health ServiceDepartment of EpidemiologyVia di Santa Costanza, 53RomeItaly00198
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hammond CJ, Niciu MJ, Drew S, Arias AJ. Anticonvulsants for the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome and alcohol use disorders. CNS Drugs 2015; 29:293-311. [PMID: 25895020 PMCID: PMC5759952 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-015-0240-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Alcoholic patients suffer from harmful allostatic neuroplastic changes in the brain causing an acute withdrawal syndrome upon cessation of drinking followed by a protracted abstinence syndrome and an increased risk of relapse to heavy drinking. Benzodiazepines have long been the treatment of choice for detoxifying patients and managing alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). Non-benzodiazepine anticonvulsants (NBACs) are increasingly being used both for alcohol withdrawal management and for ongoing outpatient treatment of alcohol dependence, with the goal of either abstinence or harm reduction. This expert narrative review summarizes the scientific basis and clinical evidence supporting the use of NBACs in treating AWS and for reducing harmful drinking patterns. There is less evidence in support of NBAC therapy for AWS, with few placebo-controlled trials. Carbamazepine and gabapentin appear to be the most promising adjunctive treatments for AWS, and they may be useful as monotherapy in select cases, especially in outpatient settings and for the treatment of mild-to-moderate low-risk patients with the AWS. The body of evidence supporting the use of the NBACs for reducing harmful drinking in the outpatient setting is stronger. Topiramate appears to have a robust effect on reducing harmful drinking in alcoholics. Gabapentin is a potentially efficacious treatment for reducing the risk of relapse to harmful drinking patterns in outpatient management of alcoholism. Gabapentin's ease of use, rapid titration, good tolerability, and efficacy in both the withdrawal and chronic phases of treatment make it particularly appealing. In summary, several NBACs appear to be beneficial in treating AWS and alcohol use disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J. Hammond
- Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 207900, 230 South Frontage Road, New Haven, CT 06520, USA, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mark J. Niciu
- Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Shannon Drew
- Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System-West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Albert J. Arias
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System-West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Galvez JF, Bauer IE, Sanches M, Wu HE, Hamilton JE, Mwangi B, Kapczinski FP, Zunta-Soares G, Soares JC. Shared clinical associations between obesity and impulsivity in rapid cycling bipolar disorder: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 2014; 168:306-13. [PMID: 25086289 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2014] [Accepted: 05/23/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity seems to show a two-way relationship with bipolar disorder (BD), representing not only a possible vulnerability factor but also a consequence of chronic mood dysregulation associated with an overall poor prognosis. Increased impulsivity has been described across all stages and phases of BD as being also associated with a worse prognosis. Although obesity and impulsivity are common features among rapid cycling bipolar disorder (RC-BD) patients, there is a lack of understanding about the clinical implications of these conditions combined in BD. METHODS To explore and integrate available evidence on shared clinical associations between obesity and impulsivity in RC-BD a systematic search of the literature in the electronic database of the National Library of Medicine (PubMed) has been conducted. RESULTS One hundred and fourteen articles were included in our systematic review. Among RC-BD patients, substance abuse disorders (SUDs), anxiety disorders (ADs), predominantly depressive polarity, chronic exposure to antidepressants, psychotic symptoms, suicidality, and comorbid medical conditions are strongly associated with both obesity and impulsivity. LIMITATIONS Heterogeneity of published data, inconsistent measurements of both obesity and impulsivity in RC-BD and an absence of control for RC-BD in epidemiological surveys. Consequently, their combined impact on the severity of RC-BD is yet to be recognized and remains to be poorly understood. CONCLUSION In RC-BD patients the co-occurrence of obesity and impulsivity is associated with an unfavorable course of illness, specific shared clinical correlates, negative psychosocial impact, and overall worse prognosis. There is a need to examine obesity and impulsivity as modulating factors and markers of severity in RC-BD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan F Galvez
- UT Center of Excellence on Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana School of Medicine, Bogotá, Colombia.
| | - Isabelle E Bauer
- UT Center of Excellence on Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Marsal Sanches
- UT Center of Excellence on Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Hanjing E Wu
- UT Center of Excellence on Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Jane E Hamilton
- UT Center of Excellence on Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Benson Mwangi
- UT Center of Excellence on Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Flavio P Kapczinski
- UT Center of Excellence on Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA; Molecular Psychiatry Laboratory, UT Center of Excellence on Mood Disorders, Houston, TX, USA; Harris County Psychiatric Center (HCPC), University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Giovana Zunta-Soares
- UT Center of Excellence on Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Jair C Soares
- UT Center of Excellence on Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA; Harris County Psychiatric Center (HCPC), University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Díaz-Caneja CM, Moreno C, Llorente C, Espliego A, Arango C, Moreno D. Practitioner review: Long-term pharmacological treatment of pediatric bipolar disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2014; 55:959-80. [PMID: 24905547 DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/27/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although long-term treatment is a core aspect of the management of children and adolescents with bipolar disorder (BD), most clinical recommendations are based on results from short-term studies or adult data. In order to guide clinical practice, we review the efficacy and safety profile of mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, and other pharmacological strategies for the long-term treatment of BD in pediatric patients. METHODS A MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and PsycInfo search (inception through November 2013) was performed to identify prospective studies longer than 12 weeks assessing the use of pharmacological strategies for the long-term treatment of BD in pediatric patients (0-18 years of age). RESULTS Four randomized controlled trials (RCT) [three placebo-controlled (assessing aripiprazole (2) and flax oil), and one head-to-head comparison of lithium vs. divalproex], and thirteen noncontrolled studies (six open-label studies assessing lithium or anticonvulsants, five assessing second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and four assessing combination strategies) were included in the review. Aripiprazole has shown efficacy for relapse prevention in children with pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD) 4-9 years of age in one placebo-controlled RCT. Positive results have been reported in noncontrolled studies with quetiapine and lithium for relapse prevention, as well as with lithium, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and the combination of risperidone and divalproex or lithium for long-term symptom reduction in PBD. The most frequently reported adverse events in children and adolescents treated with lithium and anticonvulsants are gastrointestinal and neurological, whereas use of SGAs is mainly related to weight gain and sedation. CONCLUSION According to the limited empirical evidence, aripiprazole can be useful for relapse prevention in children with PBD. Given the lack of consistent efficacy data, clinical decision making should be based on individual clinical aspects and safety concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Covadonga M Díaz-Caneja
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, CIBERSAM, IiSGM, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abulseoud OA, Camsari UM, Ruby CL, Mohamed K, Abdel Gawad NM, Kasasbeh A, Yüksel MY, Choi DS. Lateral hypothalamic kindling induces manic-like behavior in rats: a novel animal model. Int J Bipolar Disord 2014; 2:7. [PMID: 26092394 PMCID: PMC4452639 DOI: 10.1186/s40345-014-0007-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2014] [Accepted: 04/30/2014] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The lateral hypothalamus integrates critical physiological functions such as the sleep-wake cycle, energy expenditure, and sexual behaviors. These functions are severely dysregulated during mania. In this study, we successfully induced manic-like behavioral phenotypes in adult, male Wistar rats through bilateral lateral hypothalamic area kindling (LHK). To test the validity of the model, we studied the effect of standard antimanic medications lithium (47.5 mg/kg) or valproic acid (200 mg/kg) twice/day for 15 days in attenuating manic-like behaviors in the LHK rat. Compared with pre-kindling behaviors, LHK rats displayed significantly increased sexual self-stimulation (P = 0.034), excessive rearing (P = 0.0005), feeding (P = 0.013), and grooming (P = 0.007) during the kindling interval. LHK rats also drank more alcohol during the mania-induction days compared with baseline ethanol consumption levels (P = 0.01). Moreover, LHK rat exhibited increased total locomotor activity (P = 0.02) with reduced rest interval (P < 0.001) during the mania induction and post-mania days compared with baseline activity levels and rest intervals. Chronic administration of lithium or valproic acid significantly attenuated manic-like behaviors in the LHK rat model. Given the behavioral phenotype and the response to standard antimanic medications, the LHK rats may provide a model for studying manic psychopathology in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osama A Abulseoud
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sylvia LG, Reilly-Harrington NA, Leon AC, Kansky CI, Calabrese JR, Bowden CL, Ketter TA, Friedman ES, Iosifescu DV, Thase ME, Ostacher MJ, Keyes M, Rabideau D, Nierenberg AA. Medication adherence in a comparative effectiveness trial for bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2014; 129:359-65. [PMID: 24117232 PMCID: PMC3975824 DOI: 10.1111/acps.12202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Psychopharmacology remains the foundation of treatment for bipolar disorder, but medication adherence in this population is low (range 20-64%). We examined medication adherence in a multisite, comparative effectiveness study of lithium. METHOD The Lithium Moderate Dose Use Study (LiTMUS) was a 6-month, six-site, randomized effectiveness trial of adjunctive moderate dose lithium therapy compared with optimized treatment in adult out-patients with bipolar I or II disorder (N=283). Medication adherence was measured at each study visit with the Tablet Routine Questionnaire. RESULTS We found that 4.50% of participants reported missing at least 30% of their medications in the past week at baseline and non-adherence remained low throughout the trial (<7%). Poor medication adherence was associated with more manic symptoms and side-effects as well as lower lithium serum levels at mid- and post-treatment, but not with poor quality of life, overall severity of illness, or depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION Participants in LiTMUS were highly adherent with taking their medications. The lack of association with possible predictors of adherence, such as depression and quality of life, could be explained by the limited variance or other factors as well as by not using an objective measure of adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa G. Sylvia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA,Corresponding author: Louisa G. Sylvia, PhD, 50 Staniford St, Suite 580, Boston, MA, , Phone: 617-643-4804, Fax: 617-643-6768
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Dustin Rabideau
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cipriani A, Reid K, Young AH, Macritchie K, Geddes J. Valproic acid, valproate and divalproex in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013:CD003196. [PMID: 24132760 PMCID: PMC6599863 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003196.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bipolar disorder is a recurrent illness that is amongst the top 30 causes of disability worldwide and is associated with significant healthcare costs. In the past, emphasis was placed solely on the treatment of acute episodes of bipolar disorder; recently, the importance of episode prevention and of minimisation of iatrogenicity has been recognised. For many years, lithium was the only mood stabiliser in common use, and it remains an agent of first choice in the preventative treatment of bipolar disorder. However, an estimated 20% to 40% of patients may not respond adequately to lithium. Valproate is an anticonvulsant drug that has been shown to be effective in acute mania and is frequently used in maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder. When the acceptability of long-term treatment is considered, together with efficacy, the adverse event profile of a medication is also important. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001 and last updated in 2009. OBJECTIVES 1. To determine the efficacy of valproate continuation and maintenance treatment:a) in preventing or attenuating manic, depressive and mixed episodes of bipolar disorder;b) in preventing or attenuating episodes of bipolar disorder in patients with rapid cycling disorder; and; c) in improving patients' general health and social functioning, as measured by global clinical impression, employment and marital stability.2. To review the acceptability to patients of long-term valproate treatment, as measured by numbers of dropouts and reasons for dropping out, by compliance and by reference to patients' expressed views regarding treatment.3. To investigate the adverse effects of valproate treatment (including general prevalence of side effects) and overall mortality rates. SEARCH METHODS Search of the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group Register (CCDANCTR) (to January 2013), which includes relevant randomised controlled trials from the following bibliographic databases: The Cochrane Library (all years), EMBASE, (1974 to date), MEDLINE (1950 to date) and PsycINFO (1967 to date). No language restrictions were applied. Reference lists of relevant papers and previous systematic reviews were handsearched. Pharmaceutical companies marketing valproate and experts in this field were contacted for supplemental data. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials allocating participants with bipolar disorder to long-term treatment with valproate or any other mood stabiliser, or antipsychotic drugs, or placebo. Maintenance treatment was defined as treatment instituted specifically or mainly to prevent further episodes of illness. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Three review authors independently extracted data. A double-entry procedure was employed by two review authors. Information extracted included study characteristics, participant characteristics, intervention details and outcome measures in terms of efficacy, acceptability and tolerability. For dichotomous data, risk ratios were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For statistically significant results, we calculated the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) and the number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH). For continuous data, mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) were calculated along with 95% CIs. MDs were used when the same scale was used to measure an outcome; SMDs were employed when different scales were used to measure the same outcome. The primary analysis used a fixed-effect model. Binary outcomes were calculated on a strict intention-to-treat (ITT) basis; dropouts were included in this analysis. When data were missing and the method of "last observation carried forward" (LOCF) had been used to do an ITT analysis, then the LOCF data were used. MAIN RESULTS Six randomised controlled trials (overall 876 participants) lasting 6 to 24 months were included. Two studies (overall 312 participants) compared valproate with placebo, four studies (overall 618 participants) valproate with lithium, one study (overall 23 participants) valproate with olanzapine and one study (overall 220 participants) valproate with the combination of valproate plus lithium. In terms of study quality, most studies reported the methods used to generate random sequence; however, only one study reported enough details on allocation concealment. Four of six included studies described their design as "double blind", but only two trials reported full details about blinding. Valproate was more effective than placebo in preventing study withdrawal due to any mood episode (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.93; NNTB 8), but no difference in efficacy was found between valproate and lithium (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.20). Valproate was associated with fewer participants dropping out of treatment for any cause when compared with placebo or lithium (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.95 and RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.98, respectively). However, combination therapy with lithium plus valproate was more likely to prevent relapse than was monotherapy with valproate (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.96). Significant differences in adverse event frequencies were found, and lithium was associated with more frequent diarrhoea, polyuria, increased thirst and enuresis, whereas valproate was associated with increased sedation and infection. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Limited evidence supports the efficacy of valproate in the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder. Clinicians and patients should consider acceptability and tolerability profile when choosing between lithium and valproate-their combination or other agents-as long-term treatment for bipolar disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Cipriani
- University of OxfordDepartment of PsychiatryWarneford HospitalOxfordUKOX3 7JX
| | - Keith Reid
- Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation TrustBamburgh ClinicJubilee RoadNewcastleUKNE3 3XT
| | - Allan H Young
- Imperial College LondonDivision of Brain Sciences, Centre for Mental HealthLondonUKW6 8RP
| | - Karine Macritchie
- University of EdinburghDivision of PsychiatryRoyal Edinburgh HospitalEdinburghUKEH10 5HF
| | - John Geddes
- University of Oxford/Warneford HospitalDepartment of PsychiatryOxfordUKOX3 7JX
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Although the most distinctive clinical feature of bipolar disorder is the pathologically elevated mood, it does not usually constitute the prevalent mood state of bipolar illness. The majority of patients with bipolar disorder spend much more time in depressive episodes, including subsyndromal depressive symptoms, and bipolar depression accounts for the largest part of the morbidity and mortality of the illness. The pharmacological treatment of bipolar depression mostly consists of combinations of at least two drugs, including mood stabilizers (lithium and anticonvulsants), atypical antipsychotics, and antidepressants. Antidepressants are the most frequently prescribed drugs, but recommendations from evidence-based guidelines are not conclusive and do not overtly support their use. Among antidepressants, best evidence exists for fluoxetine, but in combination with olanzapine. Although some guidelines recommend the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or bupropion in combination with antimanic agents as first-choice treatment, others do not, based on the available evidence. Among anticonvulsants, the use of lamotrigine is overall recommended as a first-line choice, but acute monotherapy studies have failed. Valproate is generally mentioned as a second-line treatment. Lithium monotherapy is also suggested by most guidelines as a first-line treatment, but its efficacy in acute use is not totally clear. Amongst atypical antipsychotics, quetiapine, in monotherapy or as adjunctive treatment, is recommended by most guidelines as a first-line choice. Olanzapine monotherapy is also suggested by some guidelines and is approved in Japan. Armodafinil, pramipexole, ketamine, and lurasidone are recent proposals. Long-term treatment in bipolar disorder is strongly recommended, but guidelines do not recommend the use of antidepressants as a maintenance treatment. Lithium, lamotrigine, valproate, olanzapine, quetiapine, and aripiprazole are the recommended first-line maintenance options.
Collapse
|
36
|
Should an assessment of Axis I comorbidity be included in the initial diagnostic assessment of mood disorders? Role of QIDS-16-SR total score in predicting number of Axis I comorbidity. J Affect Disord 2013; 148:256-64. [PMID: 23273550 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2012] [Accepted: 12/03/2012] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Axis I comorbidity in mood disorders was common in epidemiological studies. This study was designed to investigate the prevalence, pattern, and number of Axis I comorbidities and the role of the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology - 16 items-Self-Report (QIDS-16-SR) in predicting the number of comorbidities in major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder (BPD). METHODS Baseline data from the first 300 routine clinical outpatients diagnosed with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Systematic-Treatment-Enhancement - Program for BPD version 5.0.0 were used. Baseline severity was measured with QIDS-16-SR and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S). RESULTS Of 113 patients with MDD and 166 with BPD, the prevalence of any current anxiety disorder (AD), substance use disorder (SUD), and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was 76% versus 74%, 14% versus 29%, and 8% versus 21%, respectively. The most common patterns of current comorbidity were MDD+AD (58.4%) for MDD, and BPD+AD (39.8%) and BPD+AD+SUD (11.4%) for BPD. More than 80% patients with MDD or BPD had ≥ 1 current comorbid disorder. About 20% patients with BPD and 10% with MDD had ≥ 4 other disorders. The number of comorbidities was positively associated with baseline severity and suicidal ideation in both MDD and BPD. A QIDS-16-SR of 10 had a positive predictive value of ≥ 90% in predicting ≥ 1 comorbidity in MDD and BPD. LIMITATIONS The sample was modest and from a tertiary medical center. CONCLUSION A thorough diagnostic assessment for Axis I comorbidity should be included in all patients with mood disorders, especially when a QIDS-16-SR of ≥ 10 points.
Collapse
|
37
|
Grunze H, Vieta E, Goodwin GM, Bowden C, Licht RW, Möller HJ, Kasper S. The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for the biological treatment of bipolar disorders: update 2012 on the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder. World J Biol Psychiatry 2013; 14:154-219. [PMID: 23480132 DOI: 10.3109/15622975.2013.770551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 263] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES These guidelines are based on a first edition that was published in 2004, and have been edited and updated with the available scientific evidence up to October 2012. Their purpose is to supply a systematic overview of all scientific evidence pertaining to the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder in adults. METHODS Material used for these guidelines are based on a systematic literature search using various data bases. Their scientific rigor was categorised into six levels of evidence (A-F) and different grades of recommendation to ensure practicability were assigned. RESULTS Maintenance trial designs are complex and changed fundamentally over time; thus, it is not possible to give an overall recommendation for long-term treatment. Different scenarios have to be examined separately: Prevention of mania, depression, or an episode of any polarity, both in acute responders and in patients treated de novo. Treatment might differ in Bipolar II patients or Rapid cyclers, as well as in special subpopulations. We identified several medications preventive against new manic episodes, whereas the current state of research into the prevention of new depressive episodes is less satisfactory. Lithium continues to be the substance with the broadest base of evidence across treatment scenarios. CONCLUSIONS Although major advances have been made since the first edition of this guideline in 2004, there are still areas of uncertainty, especially the prevention of depressive episodes and optimal long-term treatment of Bipolar II patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heinz Grunze
- Newcastle University, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Fountoulakis KN, Kontis D, Gonda X, Yatham LN. A systematic review of the evidence on the treatment of rapid cycling bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2013; 15:115-37. [PMID: 23437958 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Rapid cycling is associated with longer illness duration and greater illness severity in bipolar disorder. The aim of the present study was to review the existing published randomized trials investigating the effect of treatment on patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder. METHODS A MEDLINE search was conducted using combinations of the following key words: bipolar and rapid or rapid-cycling or rapid cycling and randomized. The search was conducted through July 16, 2011, and no conference proceedings were included. RESULTS The search returned 206 papers and ultimately 25 papers were selected for review. Only six randomized, controlled trials specifically designed to study a rapid cycling population were found. Most data were derived from post hoc analyses of trials that had included rapid cyclers. The literature suggested that: (i) rapid cycling patients perform worse in the follow-up period; (ii) lithium and anticonvulsants have comparable efficacies; (iii) there is inconclusive evidence on the comparative acute or prophylactic efficacy of the combination of anticonvulsants versus anticonvulsant monotherapy; (iv) aripiprazole, olanzapine, and quetiapine are effective against acute bipolar episodes; (v) olanzapine and quetiapine appear to be equally effective to anticonvulsants during acute treatment; (vi) aripiprazole and olanzapine appear promising for the maintenance of response of rapid cyclers; and (vii) there might be an association between antidepressant use and the presence of rapid cycling. CONCLUSION The literature examining the pharmacological treatment of rapid cycling is still sparse and therefore there is no clear consensus with respect to its optimal pharmacological management. Clinical trials specifically studying rapid cycling are needed in order to unravel the appropriate management of rapid cycling bipolar disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos N Fountoulakis
- Third Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yatham LN, Kennedy SH, Parikh SV, Schaffer A, Beaulieu S, Alda M, O'Donovan C, Macqueen G, McIntyre RS, Sharma V, Ravindran A, Young LT, Milev R, Bond DJ, Frey BN, Goldstein BI, Lafer B, Birmaher B, Ha K, Nolen WA, Berk M. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) collaborative update of CANMAT guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder: update 2013. Bipolar Disord 2013; 15:1-44. [PMID: 23237061 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 540] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments published guidelines for the management of bipolar disorder in 2005, with updates in 2007 and 2009. This third update, in conjunction with the International Society for Bipolar Disorders, reviews new evidence and is designed to be used in conjunction with the previous publications.The recommendations for the management of acute mania remain largely unchanged. Lithium, valproate, and several atypical antipsychotic agents continue to be first-line treatments for acute mania. Monotherapy with asenapine, paliperidone extended release (ER), and divalproex ER, as well as adjunctive asenapine, have been added as first-line options.For the management of bipolar depression, lithium, lamotrigine, and quetiapine monotherapy, as well as olanzapine plus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), and lithium or divalproex plus SSRI/bupropion remain first-line options. Lurasidone monotherapy and the combination of lurasidone or lamotrigine plus lithium or divalproex have been added as a second-line options. Ziprasidone alone or as adjunctive therapy, and adjunctive levetiracetam have been added as not-recommended options for the treatment of bipolar depression. Lithium, lamotrigine, valproate, olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, risperidone long-acting injection, and adjunctive ziprasidone continue to be first-line options for maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder. Asenapine alone or as adjunctive therapy have been added as third-line options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lakshmi N Yatham
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Bipolar disorder and alcohol use disorder represent a significant comorbid population, which is significantly worse than either diagnosis alone in presentation, duration, co-morbidity, cost, suicide rate, and poor response to treatment. They share some common characteristics in relation to genetic background, neuroimaging findings, and some biochemical findings. They can be treated with separate care, or ideally some form of integrated care. There are a number of pharmacotherapy trials, and psychotherapy trials that can aid program development. Post-treatment prognosis can be influenced by a number of factors including early abstinence, baseline low anxiety, engagement with an aftercare program and female gender. The future development of novel therapies relies upon increased psychiatric and medical awareness of the co-morbidity, and further research into novel therapies for the comorbid group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor K Farren
- Trinity College Dublin, St Patrick's University Hospital, James Street, Dublin 8, Ireland.
| | - Kevin P Hill
- McLean Hospital, Harvard University, Belmont, Boston, MA,
| | - Roger D Weiss
- McLean Hospital, Harvard University, Belmont Boston MA,
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kemp DE, Gao K, Fein EB, Chan PK, Conroy C, Obral S, Ganocy SJ, Calabrese JR. Lamotrigine as add-on treatment to lithium and divalproex: lessons learned from a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in rapid-cycling bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2012; 14:780-9. [PMID: 23107222 PMCID: PMC3640341 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A substantial portion of the morbidity associated with rapid-cycling bipolar disorder (RCBD) stems from refractory depression. This study assessed the antidepressant effects of lamotrigine as compared with placebo when used as add-on therapy for rapid-cycling bipolar depression non-responsive to the combination of lithium plus divalproex. METHODS During Phase 1 of this trial, hypomanic, manic, mixed, and/or depressed outpatients (n = 133) aged 18-65 years with DSM-IV RCBD type I or II were initially treated with the open combination of lithium and divalproex for up to 16 weeks. During Phase 2, subjects who did not meet the criteria for stabilization (n = 49) (i.e., remained in or cycled into the depressed phase) were randomly assigned to double-blind, adjunctive lamotrigine (n = 23) or adjunctive placebo (n = 26). The primary endpoint was the mean change in depression symptom severity from the beginning of Phase 2 to the end of Phase 2 (week 12) on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. Data were analyzed by analysis of covariance with last observation carried forward and a mixed-models analysis. RESULTS During Phase 1, a high rate of study discontinuations occurred due to intolerable side effects (13/133; 10%) and study non-adherence (22/133; 17%). Only 14% (19/133) stabilized on the open combination of lithium and divalproex. Among the 49 (37%) patients randomized to the double-blind adjunctive treatment phase, mean ± standard error change from baseline on the MADRS total score was -8.5 ± 1.7 points for lamotrigine and -9.1 ± 1.5 points for placebo (p = not significant; mixed-models analysis). No significant differences were observed in the rates of response, remission, or bimodal response between lamotrigine and placebo. CONCLUSIONS The poor tolerability, lack of efficacy, and high rate of early discontinuation with the combination of lithium and divalproex suggests this regimen was ineffective for the majority of patients with RCBD. Among patients who did not stabilize on lithium and divalproex, the addition of lamotrigine was no more effective than placebo in reducing depression severity. The findings suggest an opportunity for several design modifications to enhance signal detection in future trials of RCBD. The main limitation is the small number of subjects randomized to double-blind treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E Kemp
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lingford-Hughes AR, Welch S, Peters L, Nutt DJ. BAP updated guidelines: evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological management of substance abuse, harmful use, addiction and comorbidity: recommendations from BAP. J Psychopharmacol 2012; 26:899-952. [PMID: 22628390 DOI: 10.1177/0269881112444324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 154] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines for the treatment of substance abuse, harmful use, addiction and comorbidity with psychiatric disorders primarily focus on their pharmacological management. They are based explicitly on the available evidence and presented as recommendations to aid clinical decision making for practitioners alongside a detailed review of the evidence. A consensus meeting, involving experts in the treatment of these disorders, reviewed key areas and considered the strength of the evidence and clinical implications. The guidelines were drawn up after feedback from participants. The guidelines primarily cover the pharmacological management of withdrawal, short- and long-term substitution, maintenance of abstinence and prevention of complications, where appropriate, for substance abuse or harmful use or addiction as well management in pregnancy, comorbidity with psychiatric disorders and in younger and older people.
Collapse
|
43
|
Fountoulakis KN, Kasper S, Andreassen O, Blier P, Okasha A, Severus E, Versiani M, Tandon R, Möller HJ, Vieta E. Efficacy of pharmacotherapy in bipolar disorder: a report by the WPA section on pharmacopsychiatry. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2012; 262 Suppl 1:1-48. [PMID: 22622948 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-012-0323-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The current statement is a systematic review of the available data concerning the efficacy of medication treatment of bipolar disorder (BP). A systematic MEDLINE search was made concerning the treatment of BP (RCTs) with the names of treatment options as keywords. The search was updated on 10 March 2012. The literature suggests that lithium, first and second generation antipsychotics and valproate and carbamazepine are efficacious in the treatment of acute mania. Quetiapine and the olanzapine-fluoxetine combination are also efficacious for treating bipolar depression. Antidepressants should only be used in combination with an antimanic agent, because they can induce switching to mania/hypomania/mixed states/rapid cycling when utilized as monotherapy. Lithium, olanzapine, quetiapine and aripiprazole are efficacious during the maintenance phase. Lamotrigine is efficacious in the prevention of depression, and it remains to be clarified whether it is also efficacious for mania. There is some evidence on the efficacy of psychosocial interventions as an adjunctive treatment to medication. Electroconvulsive therapy is an option for refractory patients. In acute manic patients who are partial responders to lithium/valproate/carbamazepine, adding an antipsychotic is a reasonable choice. The combination with best data in acute bipolar depression is lithium plus lamotrigine. Patients stabilized on combination treatment might do worse if shifted to monotherapy during maintenance, and patients could benefit with add-on treatment with olanzapine, valproate, an antidepressant, or lamotrigine, depending on the index acute phase. A variety of treatment options for BP are available today, but still unmet needs are huge. Combination therapy may improve the treatment outcome but it also carries more side-effect burden. Further research is necessary as well as the development of better guidelines and algorithms for the step-by-step rational treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos N Fountoulakis
- 3rd Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 6 Odysseos str./1st Parodos Ampelonon str., Pylaia, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tolliver BK, Hartwell KJ. Implications and Strategies for Clinical Management of Co-occurring Substance Use in Bipolar Disorder. Psychiatr Ann 2012. [DOI: 10.3928/00485713-20120507-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
45
|
Post RM, Fleming J, Kapczinski F. Neurobiological correlates of illness progression in the recurrent affective disorders. J Psychiatr Res 2012; 46:561-73. [PMID: 22444599 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2011] [Revised: 01/02/2012] [Accepted: 02/09/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Some clinical aspects of affective illness progression, such as episode-, stress-, and substance-induced sensitization, have been well documented in the literature, but others have received less attention. These include cognitive deficits, treatment-refractoriness, and neurobiological correlates of illness progression, which are the primary focus of this paper. We review the evidence that cognitive dysfunction, treatment resistance, medical comorbidities, and neurobiological abnormalities increase as a function of the number of prior episodes or duration of illness in the recurrent unipolar and bipolar disorders. Substantial evidence supports the view that cognitive dysfunction and vulnerability to a diagnosis of dementia in old age increases as a function of number of prior mood episodes as does non-response to many therapeutic interventions as well as naturalistic treatment. Neurobiological abnormalities that correlate with the number of mood episodes or duration of illness include: anatomical, functional, and biochemical deficits in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, as well as amygdala hyperactivity and cortisol hyper-secretion. Some neurotrophic factors and inflammatory markers may also change with greater illness burden. Causality cannot be inferred from these correlative relationships. Nonetheless, given the potentially grave consequences of episode recurrence and progression for morbidity and treatment non-responsiveness, it is clinically wise to assume episodes are causing some of the progressive cognitive and neurobiological abnormalities. As such, earlier and more sustained long-term prophylaxis to attempt to reduce these adverse outcomes is indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Post
- Bipolar Collaborative Network, 5415 W Cedar Lane, Suite 201-B, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Malhi GS, Bargh DM, Cashman E, Frye MA, Gitlin M. The clinical management of bipolar disorder complexity using a stratified model. Bipolar Disord 2012; 14 Suppl 2:66-89. [PMID: 22510037 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.00993.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide practical and clinically meaningful treatment recommendations that amalgamate clinical and research considerations for several common, and as yet understudied, bipolar disorder complex presentations, within the framework of a proposed stratified model. METHODS A comprehensive search of the literature was undertaken using electronic database search engines (Medline, PubMed, Web of Science) using key words (e.g., bipolar disorder, anxiety, rapid cycling, and subsyndromal). All relevant randomised controlled trials were examined, in addition to review papers, meta-analyses, and book chapters known to the authors. The findings formed the basis of the treatment recommendations within this paper. RESULTS In light of the many broad presentations of bipolar disorder, a stratified model of bipolar disorder complexity was developed to facilitate consideration of the myriad of complexities that can occur during the longitudinal course of illness and the appropriate selection of treatment. Evidence-based treatment recommendations are provided for the following bipolar disorder presentations: bipolar II disorder, subsyndromal symptoms, mixed states, rapid cycling, comorbid anxiety, comorbid substance abuse, and for the following special populations: young, elderly, and bipolar disorder around the time of pregnancy and birth. In addition, some key strategies for countering treatment non-response and alternative medication recommendations are provided. CONCLUSIONS Treatment recommendations for the more challenging presentations of bipolar disorder have historically received less attention, despite their prevalence. This review acknowledges the weaknesses in the current evidence base on which treatment recommendations are generally formulated, and additionally emphasises the need for high-quality research in this area. The stratified model provides a means for conceptualizing the complexity of many bipolar disorder presentations and considering their management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gin S Malhi
- CADE Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Treatment of substance abusing patients with comorbid psychiatric disorders. Addict Behav 2012; 37:11-24. [PMID: 21981788 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2011] [Revised: 08/29/2011] [Accepted: 09/06/2011] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To update clinicians on the latest in evidence-based treatments for substance use disorders (SUD) and non-substance use disorders among adults and suggest how these treatments can be combined into an evidence-based process that enhances treatment effectiveness in comorbid patients. METHOD Articles were extracted from Pubmed using the search terms "dual diagnosis," "comorbidity" and "co-occurring" and were reviewed for evidence of effectiveness for pharmacologic and psychotherapeutic treatments of comorbidity. RESULTS Twenty-four research reviews and 43 research trials were reviewed. The preponderance of the evidence suggests that antidepressants prescribed to improve substance-related symptoms among patients with mood and anxiety disorders are either not highly effective or involve risk due to high side-effect profiles or toxicity. Second generation antipsychotics are more effective for treatment of schizophrenia and comorbid substance abuse and current evidence suggests clozapine, olanzapine and risperidone are among the best. Clozapine appears to be the most effective of the antipsychotics for reducing alcohol, cocaine and cannabis abuse among patients with schizophrenia. Motivational interviewing has robust support as a highly effective psychotherapy for establishing a therapeutic alliance. This finding is critical since retention in treatment is essential for maintaining effectiveness. Highly structured therapy programs that integrate intensive outpatient treatments, case management services and behavioral therapies such as Contingency Management (CM) are most effective for treatment of severe comorbid conditions. CONCLUSIONS Creative combinations of psychotherapies, behavioral and pharmacological interventions offer the most effective treatment for comorbidity. Intensity of treatment must be increased for severe comorbid conditions such as the schizophrenia/cannabis dependence comorbidity due to the limitations of pharmacological treatments.
Collapse
|
48
|
Prisciandaro JJ, Rembold J, Brown DG, Brady KT, Tolliver BK. Predictors of clinical trial dropout in individuals with co-occurring bipolar disorder and alcohol dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend 2011; 118:493-6. [PMID: 21549529 PMCID: PMC4745117 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.03.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2011] [Revised: 03/30/2011] [Accepted: 03/31/2011] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with co-occurring bipolar disorder and alcohol dependence have particularly low rates of retention in clinical trials. Past research has identified a variety of factors associated with dropout in this population, but few have been replicated. The present study investigated the ability of several baseline variables to predict clinical trial dropout in a sample of individuals with co-morbid bipolar and alcohol use disorders. METHODS Demographics, psychiatric diagnoses, recent alcohol use, mood pathology, and risk taking behavior (measured with the Balloon Analogue Risk Task) were evaluated as predictors of dropout from a randomized clinical trial of acamprosate for individuals with co-morbid bipolar and alcohol use disorders (n=30) using stepwise logistic regression. RESULTS Risk taking behavior was the only significant predictor of dropout in the present study (OR=1.44, p=0.03); opiate dependence marginally predicted dropout as well (OR=13.46, p=0.08). A model consisting of these predictors, as well as acamprosate group status (p=0.13), provided excellent prediction of dropout (i.e., area under the ROC curve=0.94; R(2)=0.53). CONCLUSIONS Given the robust relationship between risk taking and dropout in the present study, the Balloon Analogue Risk Task may represent a valuable tool for researchers to predict who will drop out of clinical trials for comorbid bipolar and substance use disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James J Prisciandaro
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Clinical Neuroscience Division, 67 President Street, MSC861, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Prisciandaro JJ, Brown DG, Brady KT, Tolliver BK. Comorbid anxiety disorders and baseline medication regimens predict clinical outcomes in individuals with co-occurring bipolar disorder and alcohol dependence: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry Res 2011; 188:361-5. [PMID: 21641663 PMCID: PMC4750381 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2011] [Revised: 04/12/2011] [Accepted: 04/29/2011] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Despite the high prevalence and detrimental impact of alcoholism on bipolar patients, the diagnostic and treatment factors associated with better or worse clinical outcomes in alcohol-dependent patients with bipolar disorder are not well understood. The present study investigated the prospective impact of baseline psychiatric comorbidities and treatment regimens on clinical outcomes in bipolar alcoholics. Data were drawn from an 8-week randomized controlled clinical trial of acamprosate for individuals (n=30) with co-occurring bipolar disorder and alcohol dependence. Depressive and manic symptoms, and alcohol craving and consumption were monitored longitudinally using standardized instruments. Path analysis was used to estimate the prospective associations between patient characteristics and outcomes. More than 50% of patients were diagnosed with at least one anxiety (76.7%) or drug dependence disorder (60.0%). Comorbid anxiety disorders were prospectively associated with increased depressive symptoms and alcohol use. Participants were prescribed an average of 2.6 psychotropic medications at baseline. Antipsychotics and anticonvulsants were prospectively associated with increased alcohol use; anticonvulsants and benzodiazepines were associated with increased alcohol craving. Antidepressants were associated with increased depressive symptoms. Conversely, lithium was associated with decreased alcohol craving and depressive symptoms. The findings from the present study suggest areas for future research in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James J Prisciandaro
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Clinical Neurosciences Division, 67 President Street, MSC861, Charleston, SC 29425, United States.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Richardson T. Correlates of substance use disorder in bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011. [DOI: 10.1080/17523281.2011.578583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|