Adherence to Selective Serotonin and Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor Prescriptions Affects Overall Medication Adherence in Older Persons: Evidence From the Italian Nationwide OsMed Health-DB Database

Methylphenidate augmentation of escitalopram to enhance adherence to antidepressant treatment: a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Adherence to treatment, i.e. the extent to which a patient's therapeutic engagement coincides with the prescribed treatment, is among the most important problems in mental health care. The current study investigated the influence of pairing an acute positive reinforcing dopaminergic/noradrenergic effect (methylphenidate, MPH) with a standard antidepressant on the rates of adherence to medication treatment. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether MPH + escitalopram resulted in higher rates of medication adherence relative to placebo + escitalopram.

METHODS

Twenty participants with moderate to severe depression were 1-1 randomized to either (1) 5 mg MPH + 10 mg escitalopram or (2) placebo + 10 mg escitalopram with the possibility for a dose increase at 4 weeks. A Bayesian analysis was conducted to evaluate the outcomes.

RESULTS

First, neither percent Pill count nor Medication Electronic Monitoring System adherence showed that MPH was superior to placebo. In fact, placebo showed slightly higher adherence rates on the primary (7.82% better than MPH) and secondary (7.07% better than MPH) outcomes. There was a less than 25% chance of MPH augmentation showing at least as good or better adherence than placebo. Second, both groups showed a significant effect of treatment on the QIDS-SR with a median effect of an 8.6-point score reduction. Third, neither subjective measures of adherence attitudes nor socio-demographic covariates had a significant influence on the primary or secondary outcome variables.

CONCLUSIONS

These data do not support the use of MPH to increase adherence to antidepressant medication in individuals with moderate to severe depression. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03388164 , registered on 01/02/2018.

Adherence to COPD free triple inhaled therapy in the real world: a primary care based study

INTRODUCTION

The development of new pharmacological treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has improved health-related quality of life of patients. However, suboptimal adherence may limit its potential.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to assess the adherence to free triple inhaled therapy and to investigate poor adherence determinants among primary care patients.

METHODS

Data were derived from a primary care database in Italy. Patients aged 40+ affected by COPD and prescribed with inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (N = 3177) were enrolled. Low adherence was defined as a proportion of days covered (PDC) by medications prescription lower than 80%. Predictors of low adherence were tested using logistic regression models.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The 85% of enrolled patients showed poor adherence to free triple inhaled therapy. Comorbidities, such as heart failure (OR 1.78, 95%CI 1.19-2.75), depression (OR 1.41, 95%CI 1.06-1.88) and peripheral vascular disease (OR 1.32, 95%CI 1.01-1.74) were associated with poor adherence. Former (OR 0.52, 95%CI 0.34-0.78) or current smokers (OR 0.61, 95%CI 0.41-0.93) and patients with more severe airways obstruction or history of severe exacerbations (OR 0.64, 95%CI 0.52-0.79) were less likely to exhibit poor adherence. Real-world adherence to triple inhaled therapy with different inhalers is generally low. Higher GOLD airways obstruction stage and current or former smoking status are associated with increased adherence to treatment. Reduced perceived benefit on symptoms control is probably linked to poorer adherence to free triple therapy.

Using Information on Patient Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication to Understand Their Adherence to Other Medications

PURPOSE

To assess how patient adherence to atypical antipsychotic medications is associated with adherence to concurrently used medications that treat other serious mental illnesses (SMIs), type-2 diabetes, or hypertension.

METHODS

Among patients who had been diagnosed with an SMI (i.e., bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, or schizophrenia) in the previous year, we used health-insurance claims data to measure adherence based on medication fills. Patients diagnosed with an SMI were required to have 1) a prescription for an atypical oral antipsychotic, and 2) another SMI therapy or oral anti-diabetic or antihypertensive agent in the same year. The patient's concurrent adherence to an antipsychotic and one of 23 other medications was measured by the proportion of days covered (PDC) over a one-year period. Patients were considered adherent when the PDC was ≥ 80%. The strength of the association between their atypical antipsychotic adherence and their concurrent medication adherence was evaluated using the following metrics: accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

RESULTS

The average (standard deviation) age of patients (N = 129,614) was 44.8 (14.8) years and 62.2% of patients were female. The median accuracy based on atypical antipsychotic adherence to the other 23 medications was 67% (range, 55-71%; statistically different from 50% accuracy in all cases, P < 0.001). Accuracy was higher than physician predictions of adherence from previous studies (53%). The negative predictive value of antipsychotic adherence (75%; range, 62-88%) was generally higher than the PPV (62%; range, 43-67%; all, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Information on patient adherence to antipsychotics provides significant insight into adherence to other medications often used by patients with SMI. Because NPV is higher than PPV, adherence to antipsychotics is likely to be a necessary but not sufficient condition for patients with SMI regarding adherence to non-SMI medications.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use in hip fracture patients: a Danish nationwide prevalence study

Background and purpose - Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are often used in the elderly and are associated with adverse effects. Therefore, it is important to ascertain the prevalence of SSRI use in fragile and surgery-treated hip fracture patients. Methods - This population-based prevalence study included Danish hip fracture patients aged ≥ 65 years operated in 2006-2016 (n = 68,607) and matched individuals from the background population (n = 343,020). Using Poisson regression, prevalence risk ratios (PRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to compare hip fracture patients with the general population, and to estimate the association between hip fracture patient characteristics and SSRI prescriptions. Results - The prevalence of SSRI use among hip fracture patients was 23% compared with 12% in the general population. During 2006-2016, the prevalence decreased from 26% to 18% among hip fracture patients and from 13% to 10% in the general population. Factors associated with SSRI use in hip fracture patients were age 75-84 years (PRR 1.18, CI 1.13-1.23), age ≥ 85 years (PRR 1.17, CI 1.11-1.22), female sex (PRR 1.13, CI 1.09-1.17), unmarried status (PRR 1.15, CI 1.11-1.19), living in a residential institution (PRR 2.30, CI 2.19-2.40), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score 1-2 (PRR 1.50, CI 1.45-1.55), CCI score 3+ (PRR 1.62, CI 1.55-1.69), and several medications. Interpretation - The prevalence of SSRI use was high among hip fracture patients compared with the general population. Our data stress the importance of continued clinical awareness of frailty, comorbidity, and polypharmacy of hip fracture patients and the potentially adverse drug effects of SSRI treatment.