Acoustic immittance measures and middle ear assessment: Current practice by South African audiologists

Survey of Wideband Acoustic Immittance Use by Clinical Audiologists

PURPOSE

Wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) is a promising measure of middle-ear mechanics. In contrast to standard tympanometry, which is generally measured at a single stiffness-dominated low frequency, WAI detects mechanical effects on both the mass and stiffness properties of the middle ear across a wide range of frequencies, resulting in a more comprehensive assessment of middle-ear mechanics in healthy and pathological ears. Despite a plethora of research demonstrating the clinical utility of this measure, clinical adoption of WAI is still limited. This work explores audiologists' use and perceptions of WAI, with the goal of identifying the barriers to its clinical adoption.

METHOD

A survey on the perception and use of WAI by clinical audiologists in the United States was developed and administered using the Research Electronic Data Capture application. The survey was distributed broadly across the United States. Participation was voluntary and anonymous, and no compensation was provided.

RESULTS

Findings from 132 survey respondents across 32 states were included in the analyses. Overall, findings suggest the largest barriers to clinical adoption of WAI are lack of access to equipment that measures WAI and lack of training and/or confidence in measuring or interpreting WAI.

CONCLUSIONS

Several barriers to clinical adoption of WAI were identified. However, findings also provide optimism in that audiologists utilizing WAI find it more useful than standard tympanometry, and most audiologists who do not currently use WAI are open to implementing the measure in their clinical practice. We proposed steps to address the highest priority issues and increase the clinical viability of WAI.

Development and Application of a Reference-Interval Approach to Tympanometric Norms Using U.S. Population Data for Ages 6-80+ Years

PURPOSE

United States national data for tympanometric measures from 16,614 ears included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for 2015-2016 and 2017-2020 were analyzed and described.

METHOD

Analyses were primarily descriptive and relied on distribution-free medians and cumulative distribution functions (CDFs). Differences between CDFs were examined using Cohen's h effect size. Results are presented for the age range 6-80+ years. A reference interval (RI) approach was pursued in which the interval from the 2.5th to the 95th percentile for healthy ears was specified for peak-compensated static admittance (Ytm+), tympanometric peak pressure, tympanometric width, and equivalent acoustic ear-canal volume (Vea+).

RESULTS

Separate RIs were required for 6- to 13-year-olds compared to those 14-80+ years of age for all four tympanometric measures. For both age groups, a separate RI was warranted for each sex for Ytm+ and Vea+. For those 14-80+ years of age, a separate RI was also needed for non-Hispanic Asians for Ytm+. When these RIs were applied to the full data set, about 5%-10% of ears were found to be either below the lower limit or above the upper limit of the RI. Those ears outside the RI limits had about 5 dB higher low-frequency hearing thresholds than those within RI limits. Both Ytm+ and Vea+ were found to depend on body size.

CONCLUSION

RIs for tympanometric measures from individuals with healthy ears were established, and when applied to the general U.S. population 6-80+ years of age, 5%-10% of ears fell outside the RIs depending on the measure.

Audiology Clinical Practice Patterns in Acoustic Reflex Testing

Purpose:

Periodic reports of audiology clinical practice patterns, including acoustic reflex threshold (ART) protocols, provide insights into trends and assist in clinical decision making. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine audiologists' ART protocols, factors influencing audiologists' decision to test, and considerations for mentoring Doctor of Audiology (AuD) students in ART testing.

Method:

This study used a paper survey distributed by mail to a random sample of audiologists. Participants were 102 audiologists, representing diversity across age, clinical experience, and work setting. The survey asked participants to provide (a) demographics, (b) ART protocols, (c) rationale for ART testing, and (d) perspectives on mentoring of ART testing.

Results:

When ART testing is conducted, 100% of respondents conduct ipsilateral ART testing, compared to 75% for contralateral testing. Most use 500-, 1000-, and 2000-Hz stimulus frequencies, and 56% report 4000 Hz. Patient-related factors are the primary reason participants cite for conducting, or not conducting, ART tests. Most supervisor-participants encourage AuD students to conduct ART tests, based on patient-centered and student learning–centered reasons, and use a variety of strategies to guide students when ART findings are unusual.

Conclusions:

Fewer than half (43%) of participants conduct ART testing for all new patients, suggesting it is ancillary to the standard test battery for most participants. When ART testing is conducted, ipsilateral testing only or a combination of ipsilateral and contralateral testing is used. Ongoing trends in ART testing include continued popularity of 500–2000 Hz and ipsilateral-only or ipsilateral plus contralateral testing.

Supplemental Material:

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21513987

The sensitivity and specificity of wideband absorbance measure in identifying pathologic middle ears in adults living with HIV

BACKGROUND

Limited research exists on the sensitivity and specificity of wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) in adults living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This study forms part of the bigger study titled 'wideband acoustic immittance in adults living with HIV'.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the wideband absorbance measure at tympanic peak pressure (TPP), as a screening tool for detecting middle ear pathologies in adults living with HIV.

METHOD

A prospective nonexperimental study comprising 99 adults living with HIV was performed. All participants underwent a basic audiological test battery which included case history, video otoscopy, tympanometry, wideband absorbance at TPP and pure tone audiometry. Middle ear pathologies were established by two otorhinolaryngologists using asynchronous video otoscopic images analysis. The outcomes of the otorhinolaryngologists served as the gold standard against which the wideband absorbance at TPP and tympanometry were measured. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was calculated.

RESULTS

ROC revealed the sensitivity of wideband absorbance at TPP to be higher in low to mid frequencies, but significantly lower in frequencies above 971.53 Hz. The sensitivity of tympanometry was lower. However, there was no difference between the specificity of wideband absorbance at TPP and tympanometry, indicating that when there are no pathologies, tympanometry is equally accurate.

CONCLUSION

The current findings reveal that wideband absorbance at TPP can distinguish middle ear pathologies better than the tympanometry. Incorporating wideband absorbance at TPP in clinical practice may improve early identification and intervention of middle ear pathologies.