The reliability of the augmented Lehnert-Schroth and Rigo classification in scoliosis management

2D and 3D Classification Systems for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Clinical Implications and Technological Advances

Classification systems for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) play an important role in guiding both surgical planning and conservative treatments. Traditional 2D classification systems, such as the Lenke, King and Lehnert-Schroth classifications, have been widely used for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of scoliosis. However, with the growing understanding of the three-dimensional nature of scoliosis and advancements in 3D reconstruction technologies, 3D classification systems are gaining increasing attention. This paper reviews the current applications, advantages, and limitations of different 2D and 3D classification systems, focusing on their clinical significance in treatment planning. While 3D classification systems offer clear advantages in capturing the complexity of spinal deformities, their clinical implementation faces challenges such as high costs and technical complexity. Additionally, studies show that computer-assisted technologies, artificial intelligence can significantly improve the accuracy and consistency of classification systems, reducing human errors. The paper also explores the future directions of classification system development, emphasizing the potential of combining 2D and 3D technologies and the impact of these advancements on personalized scoliosis treatment.

Can surface topography reliably determine the Rigo classification system?

PURPOSE

No studies have explored the reliability of the Rigo classification system using surface topography (ST), which would allow optimization without radiation exposure. This study aims to measure and compare the intra- and inter-observer reliability (Kappa values) and accuracy of the Rigo system between ST and X-ray for overall types and subtypes.

METHODS

X-ray and ST images of 31 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients were selected. Three investigators were blinded to assess images using the Rigo system, twice for each patient on different weeks, with 372 overall image readings. Afterwards, all investigators agreed upon the correct Rigo scores for finalized classifications.

RESULTS

For Rigo types, the average intra-observer Kappa value was slightly better for ST (0.77, p<0.001) than X-ray (0.75, p<0.001). For Rigo subtypes, the average intra-observer Kappa value was again slightly better for ST (0.74, p<0.001) than X-ray (0.65, p<0.001). The inter-observer reliability was expectedly lower than intra-observer, with ST (0.53, p<0.001) comparable to X-ray (0.54, p<0.001) for the type. For subtype inter-observer reliability, ST (0.43, p<0.001) was slightly better than X-ray (0.36, p<0.001). For the type, the overall accuracy of the observers was slightly lower for ST (77.96%) than X-ray (79.57%). For the subtype, the accuracy of observers was slightly higher for ST (70.97%) than X-ray (65.05%).

CONCLUSION

ST-based Rigo system demonstrates very good intra-rater reproducibility and moderately good inter-rater reproducibility. Surface topography is comparable to X-ray for the Rigo system, and therefore can be considered a reliable alternative in clinical application.

Results of Gensingen Bracing in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Bracing is an essential part of scoliosis treatment. The standard of brace treatment for patients with scoliosis today is still very variable in terms of brace quality and outcome. The Gensingen brace is a further developed Chêneau brace derivative with individual design, which can be adapted through computer-aided design.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to generate a template to obtain a database for prospective multicenter studies study to analyze the results of high-corrective asymmetric Gensingen brace treatment for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

A template for the database was created, which contains the patients' basic data (age, menarcheal status, Risser Sign, curve pattern, and daily brace wearing time), the Cobb angles of curvature, and the cosmetically relevant angles of trunk rotation (ATR). A retrospective review of medical records of patients with AIS, who met the Scoliosis Research Society's inclusion criteria for brace studies, was performed to test the feasibility of the template. Template items were filled in by the researchers.

RESULTS

Out of 115 patients between 2014 and 2018, the complete data of 33 patients followed up at least 3 months after complete Gensingen brace weaning could be analyzed. The mean age was 12 years, the mean Cobb angle was 33.6°, and the mean Risser value was 0.7 at the beginning of the treatment. The mean improvement in the Cobb angle on in-brace x-ray imaging was -26.1० (80% of in-brace correction). The Cobb angle of the major curvature changed as follows: curve stabilization was achieved in 7 (21.2%) cases, and curve improvement was achieved in 26 (78.8%) cases. None of the patients showed a curve progression. The Cobb angle was significantly reduced in the brace at the end of treatment and at follow-up evaluation (P<.001). ATR improved significantly for thoracic (P<.001) and lumbar curves (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The database proved to be informative in the assessment of radiological and clinical outcome parameters. The example data set we have generated can be a helpful tool for professionals who work in clinics but do not store regular patient data. Especially with regard to different patient collectives worldwide, different results may be achieved with the same standards of care. In addition, the results of this study suggest that above-average correction effects with a full-time brace application lead to significant improvements in the Cobb angle after brace treatment has been completed.

Adaptation, reliability, and validation of the Turkish version of the Bad Sobernheim Stress Questionnaire-Deformity in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

There is a limited number of disease-specific outcome measurement scales in Turkish, which can be used for individuals with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The aim of this study was to translate, adapt, and evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Bad Sobernheim Stress Questionnaire-Deformity (TRv.BSSQD) questionnaire in Turkish patients with AIS.

OBJECTIVES

After the translation and back-translation process, the TRv.BSSQD and Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaires were completed in face-to-face interviews with 49 patients with AIS. The TRv.BSSQD questionnaire was readministered to the same patients 2 weeks later to assess test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

The Cronbach alpha value calculated for internal reliability was 0.806. The intraclass correlation coefficient values of the items of the TRv.BSSQD ranged from 0.809 ( P < 0.001) (question 8) to 0.955 ( P < 0.001) (question 7). The test-retest correlation coefficient for the item-total score was 0.960 ( P < 0.001). Validity analysis showed a significantly positive correlation between the TRv.BSSQD total score and pain, self-image, and mental subgroup and the total scores of the SRS-22r scale ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This patient-reported outcome instrument, the TRv.BSSQD, showed good internal consistency, good reliability with test-retest analysis, and construct validity, suggesting that it is an appropriate assessment instrument for Turkish patients with AIS.