Indian clinical practice consensus guidelines for the management of oropharyngeal cancer

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity, Oropharynx, and Larynx: A Scoping Review of Treatment Guidelines Worldwide

Head and neck cancer (HNC) treatments have been based on single or multimodal therapies with surgery, radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. However, treatment recommendations among countries may differ due to technological/human resources and usual local practices. This scoping review aims to identify, compare, and map the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for treating squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx worldwide. A search strategy on global CPGs for HNC was performed by using five electronic databases and grey literature. CPGs were selected for inclusion using EndNote-20 and Rayyan online software. No language or publication date restrictions were applied. The results were analyzed descriptively considering the most updated CPG version. In total, 25 CPGs covering the head and neck region (10), the larynx (7), the oral cavity (5), and the oropharynx (3), were found in 13 geographical regions, and 19 were developed by medical societies from 1996 to 2023. Surgery and RT remain the main modalities for early-stage HNC, with surgery preferred in low-resource countries, and RT in selected cases, especially in the larynx/oropharynx aiming to achieve a cure with organ preservation. Human papillomavirus infection for oropharyngeal SCC is not tested in some Asian countries and there is still no consensus to treat p16-positive cases differently from p16-negative. Recommendations for larynx preservation vary according to facilities in each country, however, individualized choice is emphasized. Inequality across countries/continents is evident, with a similar pattern of recommendations among developed as well as developing ones. No CPGs were found in Latin America as well as Oceania countries, where the incidence of HNC is high and limitations of access to treatment may be encountered.

Healthcare Scheme to Overcome Financial Burden Associated with Chemoradiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Single Centre Study

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is third highest prevalent cancer among Indian which constitutes about 25-30% of all the cancer in India. Further, out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) covers around 67% of total healthcare expenditure and direct medical cost is key factor responsible for raised OOPE in India. Thus, we aimed to quantify total direct medical cost and OOPE associated with HNC management among HNC patients using "Ayushman Bharat Arogya Karnataka scheme" (ABArK scheme). A retrospective study was conducted for the duration of 6 months to collect the data related to total direct medical cost, coverage of "ABArK Scheme" and OOPE of past 2 years of HNC patients. The data of HNC patients above 18 years of age utilizing "ABArK scheme" were included in the study whereas data of patients utilizing other healthcare schemes and incomplete data on target schemes were excluded. A total of 196 patients (54.1%) utilized the "ABArK Scheme" out of 362 HNC patients treated in past 2 years. Among 196 patients, males (76.5%) were predominant over females (23.5%) with the mean age of 53.60 ± 11.58 years. We found that INR 17,370,279 as the total direct medical expenditure for the management of HNC patients of which around 87.465% was covered by "ABArK Scheme" minimizing the OOPE up to INR 3,297,970. Thus, Introduction and implementation of novel healthcare policies like "ABArK Scheme" can counteract financial burden of cancer management by significantly reducing OOPE which could be milestone achievement for the low-middle income countries like India.

Making the Best of Limited Resources: Improving Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer

The overwhelming majority of head and neck cancers and related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, which have challenges related to burden of disease versus access to care. Yet the additional health care burden of the COVID-19 pandemic has also impacted access to care for patients with head and neck cancer in the United States. This article focuses on challenges and innovation in prioritizing head and neck cancer care in Sub-Saharan Africa, the Indian experience of value-added head and neck cancer care in busy and densely populated regions, and strategies to optimize the management of head and neck cancer in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Validation of a Novel 'Supportive Oral Care Protocol' (SOCP), a Model for Care in Head and Neck Cancer Patients at Tertiary Cancer Centre in India

India has a huge burden of head and neck cancer and specifically oral cancer. Supportive oral care is not a standard of care in our population and is often neglected. Currently, there are no specific guidelines for such care in India which could be followed. The aim of this study is to validate a novel institutional supportive oral care protocol (SOCP) for head and neck cancer patients. This protocol is specific to our population developed for head and neck/dental oncology experts working in cancer centres to provide comprehensive care. This is a cross-sectional validity study. Fifteen dental oncology experts working in cancer centres/hospitals across India and six oncology experts from our centre were enrolled. All experts provided their inputs on 41 points of the SOCP. The data was analysed for item validity, content validity index and inter-rater agreement. The statistical analyses used were kappa measure for inter-rater agreement and content validity index for item-wise agreement. Out of 861 responses from all the reviewers, 91% agreed, 8.4% agreed with modification and 0.6% disagreed. The content validity index and agreement between reviewers ranged from 0.9 to 1 for kappa measure. The SOCP of our institution was shown to be a valid protocol. SOCP addresses oral and dental supportive care and rehabilitation as part of overall comprehensive care for head and neck cancer patients in our population.