Adult soft-tissue sarcomas of the head and neck

Patient and Tumour Characteristics of Adult Head and Neck Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Head and neck soft tissue sarcomas (HNSTS) constitute a rare and heterogeneous cancer entity. Management remains a challenge due to the rarity and varied biological behaviour among various subtypes. This systematic review examines the characteristics of tumours and patients with HNSTS.

Materials and Methods

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed using the electronic databases PubMed and Embase. Eight eligible studies were identified, and 13 variables were extracted from each study including 5-year overall survival (OS) rate and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate.

Results

We identified eight studies (n = 1,120 patients; 739 males (66%)) from six different countries). In total, 24 histological subtypes were found, and 20% of the sarcomas (n = 215) could not be subclassified. 607 sarcomas (57%) were <5 cm in diameter, and 945 sarcomas (84%) were grade 3. 1,059 patients (90%) underwent surgery. Estimated 5-year OS was 74% (95% CI; 0.63-0.84%) and 5-year DFS was 56% (95% CI; 38-74%).

Conclusion

HNSTS holds a relative poor prognosis possibly explained by the heterogeneity of the disease. Treatment of HNSTS has shown to be highly diverse, underlining the importance of uniformed treatment guidelines in order to achieve improved survival outcomes.

Multimodality treatment of head-and-neck soft-tissue sarcomas and short-term outcomes: Analysis from sarcoma medical oncology clinic

Background

Head-and-neck soft-tissue sarcomas (HNSTS) are extremely rare and lack definite guidelines.

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive adult patients with HNSTS who presented to our sarcoma medical oncology clinic from January 2016 to October 2017.

Results:

There were a total of 30 patients. Unresectable localized disease was seen in 13 (43%) patients, metastatic disease 10 (34%) patients, while resectable disease in 7 (23%) patients only. Among unresectable localized disease, 3 (25%) patients could be converted to resectable disease after neoadjuvant therapy. Median follow period was 11 months. Progression-free survival was 19 months in patients with resectable disease and 6 months in patients with the unresectable/metastatic disease. Median OS was not reached.

Conclusion:

Unresectable HNSTS has a poor outcome. Neoadjuvant therapy can be tried in selected cases for achieving respectability or for vital organ preservation until robust data are available. A multidisciplinary approach for local control is crucial in managing unresectable HNSTS.

Epidemiological Evaluation of Head and Neck Sarcomas in Iran (the Study of 105 Cases Over 13 Years)

Background:

Head and neck sarcomas are exceedingly rare and they include 4% - 10% of all sarcomas and less than 1% of all neoplasm of head and neck.

Objectives:

The aim of this study is to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics of head and neck sarcomas of patients in Isfahan, Iran.

Patients and Methods:

In this retrospective study, from the 16000 patients whose files were evaluated, the total number of 105 head and neck sarcomas were collected. They were evaluated with due attention to age, gender of the patients and the most common location of the lesion.

Results:

From the total number of 105 (0.6%) patients with sarcomas, 56 were men (53.33%) and 49 women (46.66%). The most common head and neck sarcomas among this population were Osteosarcoma (32 cases, 30.47%), Chondrosarcoma (14 cases, 13.33%), and Ewing sarcoma (11 cases, 10.47%).The most common soft tissue sarcoma was Rabdomiosarcoma. Mandible was the most common location for these lesions.

Conclusions:

In this study, the hard tissue sarcomas were more prevalent than soft tissue ones. Hence, special attention should be paid to the patients when being diagnosed.

Adult sinonasal soft tissue sarcoma: analysis of 48 cases from the French Sarcoma Group database

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of primary sinonasal adult sarcoma, identify histological subtypes, and analyze prognostic factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHOD

Forty-eight adult sinonasal sarcomas included in the French Sarcoma Group database (Conticabase) were reviewed.

RESULTS

The most frequent tumor types were alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (33.3%), embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (14,6%), unclassified sarcoma (14.6%), and leiomyosarcoma (12.5%). All round cell tumors were rhabdomyosarcomas. The 5-year overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates were 62.3%, 73%, and 88.8%, respectively. Histotype was a prognostic factor for OS, MFS, and LRFS, with the worst prognosis associated with rhabdomyosarcomas, regardless of the subtype. The tumor grade influenced the OS and MFS. Surgery was a predictive factor for a complete response.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that sinonasal tract should be considered as an unfavorable site for rhabdomyosarcoma. Moreover, surgery should always be considered in treatment.

Prognostic factors and treatment strategies for adult head and neck soft tissue sarcoma

Adult head and neck soft tissue sarcomas are rare and display a variety of histological types and clinical characteristics; they are also associated with a variety of mortality risks. The purpose of this study was to examine all patients treated at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia for head and neck sarcoma during a 5-year period. Fifty-one adult patients were examined and treated for head and neck sarcomas from 2004 to 2009. The 51 tumours were histologically re-evaluated by expert pathologists and classified as low, intermediate or high grade sarcomas. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the surgical margins, histological grades, and clinical stages as prognostic factors for the disease. Adult head and neck soft tissue tumours are rare, and they are associated with poor prognosis for patients, especially at clinical stages III and IV. The average survival rate after 2 years is 45%, and most of these patients die because of disease progression and metastases.