A case of carinal schwannoma resected under cardiopulmonary bypass

Craniosynostosis incision: scalpel or cautery?

There is an ongoing debate regarding the optimal instrument for scalp incisions: the scalpel or electrocautery. The argument generally focuses on improved healing after an incision made with a knife and decreased bleeding when using electrocautery. This study compares the use of scalpel and electrocautery in making coronal incisions for patients undergoing surgical correction of craniosynostosis. The outcome metric used is wound healing within 6 months after surgery. All patients presenting to the University of North Carolina Children's Hospital with craniosynostosis between July 1, 2007 and January 1, 2010 requiring a coronal incision for surgical correction were prospectively enrolled. In all of these patients, half of the coronal incision was made with knife; the other half, with needle tip cautery. Side of the incision was specified at the time of surgery in the operative report. Patients were excluded from the study if the instrument for incision was not specified or if only 1 modality was used for the entire incision. Sixty-eight patients underwent cranial vault reconstruction, of which 58 met inclusion criteria. Of the 58 matched pairs, 55 were analyzed statistically. The 3 excluded cases were those who had midline complications. There were 17 wound complications (15%): 8 in the knife group, 6 in the cautery group, and 3 at midline (with indeterminate side for the problem). We found no statistically significant difference in wound healing between incisions made with a knife or with electrocautery.

Optimal treatment for primary benign intratracheal schwannoma: A case report and review of the literature

A 53-year-old male was admitted to Xinhua Hospital (Shanghai, China) due to coughing and dyspnea that had persisted for half a year, with aggravation of chest tightness and dyspnea for 1 week. Chest computed tomography (CT) revealed a mass within the distal third of the trachea. Flexible bronchoscopy confirmed an ~2.0 cm, smooth, tan-colored mass in the trachea, 2 cm above the carina. Endoscopic resection by argon plasma coagulation combined with electronic snaring was applied, however, recurrence was found 2 weeks later. Finally, the tumor was completely removed by surgery and the post-operative course was uneventful. Since schwannoma is rare in the intrapulmonary region and extremely rare in the trachea, a review of 51 cases of primary tracheal schwannoma previously reported in the English literature was performed. The majority of cases occurred in adults and were usually located in the distal third of the trachea. The predominant tumor size was 1-3 cm and airway obstruction symptoms were common. Half of the patients were misdiagnosed with asthma, and CT scan and bronchoscopy were contributory to the correct diagnosis. The treatment of choice depended on the patient's condition, however, surgery should be chosen in the event of local recurrence following endoscopic treatment.

Tracheal schwannoma: Completely resected with therapeutic bronchoscopic techniques

Tracheal schwannomas are rare benign tumors of the trachea. There are only a few reported cases in the literature. Surgeons have generally resected these tumors, whereas bronchoscopists have attempted to remove them bronchoscopically. We report a case of tracheal schwannoma which was completely resected using bronchoscopic techniques.

Advanced Cutting Effect System versus Cold Steel Scalpel: Comparative Wound Healing and Scar Formation in Targeted Surgical Applications

Background:

Use of electrosurgery for skin incisions has been controversial due to concerns of delayed healing, excessive scarring, and increased infection. Recent studies using modern electrosurgical generators that produce pure sinusoidal “CUT” waveforms have shown reductions in thermal damage along incisions made with these devices compared with their predecessors. This study compares scar formation in incisions made using a cold steel scalpel (CSS) or the ACE Blade and Mega Power Generator (ACE system, Megadyne Medical Products, Draper, Utah) from patient and blinded observer perspectives.

Methods:

Subjects seeking plastic surgery were enrolled in the study. Incisions on one side of each subject’s body were made with a CSS while equivalent incisions on the contralateral side were made with the ACE system. Differences between incision methods were evaluated by assessment of scar formation by observers and assessment of patient satisfaction relating to scar formation at 120 days postsurgery.

Results:

Observers rated incision vascularization, pigmentation, thickness, and relief. The mean observer score (± SD) of incisions made with the ACE system was 11.1 ± 4.4 while that of incisions made with the CSS was 10.8 ± 3.7 (P < 0.0001). Patients rated incision pain, itching, discoloration, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity. The mean patient score of incisions made with the ACE system was 9.4 ± 9.2 while that of incisions made with the CSS was 9.3 ± 8.5 (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions:

Results showed noninferior wound healing/scar formation in skin incisions made with the ACE system compared with incisions made with a CSS.

Sharps injuries: the risks and relevance to plastic surgeons

Surgeons are at risk for injury in the operating room daily. Because of the ubiquity of occupational hazards, injuries remain prevalent and expensive. Although occupational hazards can include musculoskeletal conditions, psychosocial stress, radiation exposure, and the risk of communicable diseases, sharps injuries remain the most common among surgeons in practice and the most frequent route of transmission of blood-borne pathogens. Therefore, increased attention to the health, economic, personal, and social implications of these injuries is essential for appropriate management and future prevention.