Locked META intramedullary nailing fixation for tibial fractures via a suprapatellar approach

Suprapatellar intramedullary nail combined with screw fixation has comparable surgical outcomes to minimally invasive locking plate fixation in ipsilateral tibial plateau and shaft fractures

PURPOSE

To compare union rate, union time, alignment, and complication rate in ipsilateral tibia plateau and shaft fractures treated via suprapatellar intramedullary nailing with screw fixation and minimally invasive locking plate fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 48 patients who underwent minimally invasive plate fixation (n = 35) or suprapatellar intramedullary nailing with screw fixation (n = 13), for the treatment of ipsilateral tibial plateau and shaft fractures with at least 1-year follow-up. Union rate, union time, radiologic alignment, and complication rate such as malalignment, nonunion, and fracture-related infection (FRI) were investigated.

RESULTS

Demographic data were not different between the two groups. Coronal plane alignment was 0.17 ± 4.23 in the plate group and -0.48 ± 4.17 in the intramedullary nail group (p = 0.637). Sagittal plane alignment was -0.13 ± 5.20 in the plate group and -1.50 ± 4.01 in the suprapatellar intramedullary nail group (p = 0.313). Coronal and sagittal malalignment recorded equal results: (p > 0.99), FRI (p = 0.602), nonunion and union times recorded (p = 0.656) and (p = 0.683, 0.829), respectively, and showed no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Suprapatellar intramedullary nailing with screw fixation had similar surgical outcomes with minimally invasive locking plate fixation in ipsilateral tibial plateau and shaft fractures in terms of union rate, union time, alignment, and complication rate. Thus, frequent use of intramedullary nailing combined with screw fixation is anticipated in patients with ipsilateral tibial plateau and shaft fractures when the soft tissue condition is not desirable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Reduction of Operative Time, Intraoperative Radiographs, and Anterior Knee Pain With the Lateral Parapatellar Approach for Tibial Shaft Fracture Nailing: A Case Series

Background Tibia fracture is a common indication for operative intervention in orthopedics. Usage of Intramedullary nailing provides a minimally invasive technique with good results. Positioning, operative time, and radiation exposure are major points in such cases. This study described the semi-extended lateral parapatellar intramedullary technique as a technique that helps achieve and maintain reduction, simplifies nail insertion, and decreases fluoroscopy and operative time. Methodology This prospective case series study included nine patients with tibial shaft fractures operated at Royal Rehabilitation Center from April to October 2023 by intramedullary nailing and extra-articular lateral parapatellar insertion technique using the semi-extended knee position. Duration of surgery, intraoperative radiation exposure, and anterior knee pain score were assessed for all patients. Results The average duration of surgery was 63.78 ± 5.3 minutes, and the average intraoperative imaging was 94 (85-103). The average union time was 18 ±2 weeks. The mean Kujala score was 90.9% ± 2.3% six months after the surgery. All patients regained a comparable range of motion in their knees and ankles. One patient reported minimal pain at the pin site but did not require any analgesia. Conclusion The lateral parapatellar approach for tibial shaft fracture nailing has the advantage of reducing operative time, the number of intraoperative radiographs, and lower postoperative anterior knee pain. Additionally, this approach did not cause patellar instability.

Functional Outcomes of Tibia Fractures Treated With Intramedullary Interlocking Nails by Suprapatellar Approach: A Prospective Study

Background Tibia fractures are the most common lower extremity fractures. The subcutaneous anatomy of this long bone predisposes it to high fracture frequency in a high-energy trauma. The tibia is a major weight-bearing, long tubular bone that is axially and rotationally unstable when fractured, which ideally necessitates its surgical fixation in adults. Tibia fractures can be treated with a variety of choice of implants and surgical approaches. This study aims to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of a tibia fracture treated with intramedullary interlocking nails by a suprapatellar approach. Methodology A total of 32 patients were selected from patients admitted at Shri B. M. Patil Medical College and Research Centre with tibia fractures between January 2021 and May 2022. All the patients were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary interlocking nails by suprapatellar approach with a semi-extended knee position. All patients were followed up clinically and radiologically at regular intervals of six weeks, three months, six months, and one year. All functional outcomes were assessed based on modified Lysholm knee scores. Results A total of 31 patients showed union at the fracture site. One patient had nonunion and implant failure at the distal locking site, and two patients had persistent anterior knee pain at the end of one year. Functional outcome assessment based on modified Lysholm scores had excellent results, with a mean score of 95. Patients were followed up for a mean of 11.5 months. The mean time of union was observed as 12.5 months. Conclusions Suprapatellar tibia nailing is an effective alternative approach with ease of reduction and decreased intraoperative fluoroscopy time. The entry is in line with the medullary cavity preventing malreduction of proximal and distal tibia fractures. The additional proximal locking option also increases the stability of implant fixation.

Difference in Pain, Complication Rates, and Clinical Outcomes After Suprapatellar Versus Infrapatellar Nailing for Tibia Fractures? A Systematic Review of 1447 Patients

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of suprapatellar (SP)-nailing versus infrapatellar (IP)-nailing of tibia fractures in anterior knee pain, complications (retropatellar chondropathy, infection, and malalignment) and physical functioning and quality of life. A clinical question-driven and thorough systematic review of current literature is provided.

DATA SOURCE

PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies published between 2010 and 2020 relating to SP and IP-nailing of tibia fractures. The study is performed in concordance with PRISMA-guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies eligible for inclusion were randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies reporting on outcomes of interest.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extraction was performed independently by 2 assessors. Methodological quality and risk of bias was assessed according to the guidelines of the McMaster Critical Appraisal.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Continuous variables are presented as means with SD and dichotomous variables as frequency and percentages. The weighted mean, standardized weighted mean differences, and 95% confidence interval were calculated. A pooled analysis could not be performed because of differences in outcome measures, time-points, and heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 1447 patients were analyzed. The weighted incidence of anterior knee pain was 29% after SP-nailing and 39% after IP-nailing, without reported significance. There was a significant lower rate of malalignment after the SP-approach (4% vs. 26%) with small absolute differences in all planes. No substantial differences were observed in retropatellar chondropathy, infection, physical functioning, and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review does not reveal superiority of either technique in any of the respective outcomes of interest. Definitive choice should depend on the surgeon's experience and available resources.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in clinical diagnosis and treatment of tibial platform fractures

BACKGROUND

Tibial plateau fracture is one of the common fracture types. It occurs mainly in teenagers and is usually caused by a fall. After the occurrence of fracture, knee swelling, pain, limited activity, etc. greatly affect the patient’s exercise habits and lifestyle. X-ray, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used in this examination. X-rays are relatively new and easy to operate. However, there are some errors in the observation of fracture collapse and fracture displacement. In recent years, CT and MRI have been actively used to diagnose various types of clinical fractures. They have more diagnostic power than X-ray film. However, some scholars believe that CT is also prone to errors in clinical application. The volume effect leads to missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis in some cases, while the multidirection scanning of MRI technology can effectively overcome the shortcomings of CT. To facilitate the selection of clinical examination regimens, this study further observed the diagnostic ability of these two regimens in the diagnosis of tibial plateau fractures.

AIM

To explore the value of nuclear MRI and CT in the clinical diagnosis of tibial plateau fractures.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients with tibial plateau fractures admitted from September 2017 to August 2019 were included. All patients were examined by nuclear MRI and CT scanning. The results were sent to senior physicians in our hospital to complete the diagnosis.

RESULTS

Nuclear magnetic resonance showed the same effects as CT in four aspects: fracture displacement, bone defect, fracture site and fracture comminution. There was no significant difference in the score data (P > 0.05). Nuclear magnetic resonance and CT tended to be consistent in the B3, C2 and C3 fracture diagnosis coincidence rate, combined injury detection rate and fracture detection rate. The diagnostic coincidence rate of type B1, B2 and C1 fractures and the accuracy rate of overall fracture classification indicated that the MRI technique was significantly better than that of CT (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

MRI and CT have good diagnostic typing in the diagnosis of tibial plateau fractures, but MRI is more accurate and may be preferred.

Anterior knee pain and functional outcome following different surgical techniques for tibial nailing: a systematic review

Purpose

The aim of this systematic review was to compare knee pain and function after tibial nail insertion through an infrapatellar, semi-extended and suprapatellar technique.

Methods

A search was carried out to identify articles with an exact description of the method used for insertion of the tibial nail and description of the outcome parameters (knee pain or function). Data on study design, population, rate and severity of anterior knee pain and function scores were extracted. Pooled rates and scores were calculated.

Results

67 studies with 3,499 patients were included. The pooled rate of patients with anterior knee pain was 38% (95% CI 32–44) after nail insertion through an infrapatellar approach and 10% (95% CI 1–26) after insertion through a suprapatellar approach. Pooled analysis was not possible for the semi-extended technique. Knee pain scores as measured by visual analogue score (0–10) ranged from 0.2 (95% CI − 0.1–0.5) for general knee pain to 3.7 (95% CI 1.3–6.1) for pain during kneeling. Pooled estimates for the Lysholm score were 87 points (range 77–97) for the infrapatellar technique and 85 points (range 82–85) for the suprapatellar technique. Iowa Knee scores were 94 (range 86–96) and Anterior Knee Pain Scale scores were 76 (range 75–80) after infrapatellar nail insertion.

Discussion

Depending on the technique used, the proportion of patients with knee pain after tibial nailing varied between 10 and 38%. The actual measured knee pain scores were, however, surprisingly low. Knee function was good for both the infra- and suprapatellar technique.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00068-020-01458-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Suprapatellar nailing in proximal third tibial fractures - Clinicoradiological outcome

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of proximal third tibia fractures managed by suprapatellar nailing with a minimum follow-up of 12 months.

METHODOLOGY

In our retrospective cohort study of 43 consecutive proximal third tibia fractures from January 2015 to September 2018 treated with intramedullary nailing through suprapatellar approach in semiextended knee position were included. The patients were followed up regularly at 6 weeks, 3 months, 4.5 months, 6 months, 12 months and every 6 months thereafter. At each visit patients were assessed for union, shortening and rotational alignment. The clinical outcome was analysed using Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and anterior knee pain. The radiological outcomes are analysed by evaluating the radiographs for progression of fracture union and tibial alignments.

RESULTS

After fulfilling the exclusion and inclusion criteria, 43 out of 60 consecutive proximal third tibia fracture were included in the study with an average age of 38.4 years (20-71 years), follow up of 20.4 months (12-45 months) after the index procedure. The radiological union was achieved in 7.3 months (4-13 months). At the end of 1 year follow up, the average LEFS was 89.4% (60%-95%). 4 patients had Malunion - with 1 valgus and 3 anterior angulations, 8 delayed unions and 1 non-union (with bone loss- which required bone grafting). All the fractures united eventually. No incidence of anterior knee pain.

CONCLUSION

We recommend suprapatellar nailing in proximal third tibial fractures when meticulously performed using the current surgical principles and techniques with proper implant selection. It results in excellent clinical and radiological outcomes with minimal complications when compared to other modalities of management. Suprapatellar nailing is a viable option for proximal third tibia fractures due to its inherent advantages of positioning, perfect nail entry and placement. Additionally, noteworthy absence of anterior knee pain is an additional benefit of this technique.

Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The treatment for distal tibial fractures remains controversial to date. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are well-accepted and effective methods for distal tibial fractures, but these methods were associated with complications. This study aimed to assess and compare the clinical and functional outcomes in patients with distal tibial fractures treated with MIPPO or IMN.

Methods

We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared MIPPO with IMN in patients with distal tibial fractures from inception till 15 August 2019. Also, quantitative summaries of time to reunion, rate of complications, and functional outcomes were evaluated.

Results

The pooled results suggested that patients in the MIPPO group had a longer time to reunion with a mean difference of 1.21 weeks [P = 0.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16–2.26)] than those in the IMN group. The overall union complications and deep infection between IMN and MIPPO were similar (P > 0.05). IMN had a significantly low risk of wound complications [risk ratio (RR) = 0.51, P = 0.00, 95% CI 0.34–0.77)]. The pooled functional outcomes of the two groups remained controversial by different evaluating scores.

Conclusions

Compared to MIPPO, IMN had a significantly low risk of wound complications and associated with limited time for reunion. Although the pooled functional outcomes of the two groups were controversial due to different evaluating scores, IMN was the preferred surgical technique than MIPPO for treating distal tibial fractures.

Intra-operative fluoroscopy time and radiation dose during suprapatellar tibial nailing versus infrapatellar tibial nailing

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the tibial shaft are routinely managed with intramedullary nailing. An increasingly accepted technique is the suprapatellar extended leg method. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the suprapatellar tibial nailing technique offers shorter intraoperative fluoroscopy times and lower radiation doses when compared to the traditional infrapatellar technique.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Data from 200 consecutive intramedullary tibial nailing operations in our level 1 Major Trauma Centre were retrospectively collected from a prospective database (January 2014-December 2017). Only acute diaphyseal nailing procedures were included. The operations were performed by seven senior trauma consultants experienced in both suprapatellar and infrapatellar tibial nailing. The operations were divided into two groups: infrapatellar and suprapatellar. Intraoperative radiation time and dose data were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 90 cases were included and analysed. The majority of the patients were male (82%). 37 operations were infrapatellar and 53 were suprapatellar. Independent samples t-test revealed lower radiation time and dose for the suprapatellar group. The infrapatellar group had a mean radiation time of 129.7 ± 56.6 s versus 94.4 ± 47.9 s for the suprapatellar group. The infrapatellar group had a mean radiation dose (Dose Area Product) 53.6 ± 34.2 cGY cm² versus 38.2 ± 26.7 cGY cm² for the suprapatellar group. The difference in mean radiation time and mean radiation dose were both significant (p = 0.002 and p = 0.02 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Suprapatellar tibial nailing is an increasingly accepted technique in the management of tibial fractures. It is shown here that amongst surgeons experienced in both suprapatellar and infrapatellar nailing techniques, the suprapatellar approach trends towards lower use of intra-operative fluoroscopy as measured by time and dose and thus potentially lower radiation exposure to the operating surgeon, assistants and patient.

Effect of etomidate on the oxidative stress response and levels of inflammatory factors from ischemia-reperfusion injury after tibial fracture surgery

The effect of etomidate on the oxidative stress response and levels of inflammatory factors resulting from ischemia-reperfusion injury of the lower extremities during tibial fracture surgery were investigated. From December 2013 to June 2015, 60 tibial fracture patients with surgical indications for open reduction and internal fixation were selected. Patients were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group. All patients were stanched by tourniquet hemostasis. Patients in the observation group were anesthetized with etomidate (3–6 mg/kg·h) + remifentanil (0.1–0.25 µg/kg/min) administered with an injection pump to maintain intraoperative sedation and analgesia anesthesia. Patients in the control group received propofol (3–6 mg/kg·h) + remifentanil (0.1–0.25 µg/kg/min). Before surgery (T0), before surgery was completed and anesthesia was stopped (T1), 24 h after surgery (T3), 48 h after surgery (T4), and 1 week after surgery (T5), serum superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was determined with a kit, and ELISA was used to measure the levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1, and IL-6 in peripheral blood from both groups of patients. Surgery in both groups was completed smoothly. We found that serum SOD levels of patients in the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group, while the levels of TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6 released by neutrophils were significantly decreased after ischemia-reperfusion injury (P<0.05). Postoperative length of stay in hospital of the observation group was significantly shorter and the occurrence rate of anesthesia complications was significantly lower than in the control group (P<0.05). In conclusion, during surgery for lower limb fracture, the use of etomidate for maintaining sedation can effectively maintain serum SOD activity and inhibit the release of inflammatory factors after ischemia-reperfusion injury of the fracture, to reduce the occurrence rate of anesthesia complications after surgery.