Development of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in AmBisome treated visceral leishmaniasis: a possible challenge to elimination program in India

An In-depth Proteomic Map of Leishmania donovani Isolate from Post Kala-azar Dermal Leishmaniasis (PKDL) Patient

BACKGROUND

The trypanosomatid protozoan parasite Leishmania donovani is the etiological agent of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) or kala-azar. The patients that have undergone treatment may still harbor the parasite and in a small fraction of the patients the disease re-erupts in the form of post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL). PKDL is a pathological condition found to be intermediate between VL and complete cure of VL. The PKDL disease progression is determined by the host immune response to L. donovani. The majority of the proteomic studies on L. donovani till date have been undertaken on parasites either isolated from kala-azar patients or on established laboratory strains of L. donovani. However, no proteomic information is available on the cutaneous localized isolates of L. donovani from PKDL patients.

METHODS

The promastigote stage of L. donovani isolate from PKDL patient was cultured and harvested. The cell lysates were trypsin digested, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis. The LC-MS/MS raw data were analyzed on Proteome Discoverer. Further bioinformatics analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

In the present, we have used high-resolution mass spectrometry to map the global proteome of a L. donovani isolate from PKDL patient. This in-depth study resulted in the identification of 5537 unique proteins from PKDL isolate of L. donovani which covered 64% of its proteome.

OUTCOME

This study also identified proteins previously shown to be upregulated in PKDL L. donovani. This is the most in-depth proteome of Leishmania donovani parasite till date.

Combination Therapy Against Indian Visceral Leishmaniasis with Liposomal Amphotericin B (FungisomeTM) and Short-Course Miltefosine in Comparison to Miltefosine Monotherapy

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is endemic in Asia, East and North Africa, South America, and Southern Europe, and is a major public health problem in the Indian subcontinent. Miltefosine received approval in 2002 to treat VL in India, and the Indian National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme later adopted a single dose (10 mg/kg) of liposomal amphotericin B. We report results of a randomized trial comparing the efficacy of combination therapy with an Indian preparation of liposomal amphotericin B (single dose of 7.5 mg/kg) and short-course miltefosine (2.5 mg/kg/day for 14 days; n = 66) in comparison to miltefosine monotherapy (2.5 mg/kg/day for 28 days; n = 78). Nine patients in the miltefosine group and three in the combination therapy group had to discontinue therapy because of serious adverse events. At the end of the therapy, the clinical and parasitological cure rate was 100% in both groups. By per-protocol analysis, by 6 months after completion of treatment, 12 of 69 patients in the miltefosine monotherapy arm (17.4%, 95% CI: 10.24-28%) and none in the combination therapy arm had relapse. Over 5 years of follow-up, 10 patients in the miltefosine monotherapy arm (all within 0.5-2 years after completing therapy) and none in the combination therapy arm experienced post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Combination therapy offered benefits over miltefosine monotherapy for VL in India.

Relationship between treatment regimens for visceral leishmaniasis and development of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis and visceral leishmaniasis relapse: A cohort study from Bangladesh

Background

We investigated the relationship of treatment regimens for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) with post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) and visceral leishmaniasis relapse (VLR) development.

Methods

Study subjects included cohorts of patients cured of VL since treatment with monotherapy by sodium stibogluconate (SSG), miltefosine (MF), paromomycin intramuscular injection (PMIM), liposomal amphotericin B [AmBisome (AMB)] in a single dose (SDAMB) and in multidose (MDAMB), and combination therapies by AMB+PMIM, AMB+MF, and PMIM+MF. Follow up period was 4 years after treatment. Cohorts were prospective except SSG (retrospective) and MF (partially retrospective). We compared incidence proportion and rate in 100-person-4year of PKDL and VLR by treatment regimens using univariate and multivariate analysis.

Findings

974 of 984 enrolled participants completed the study. Overall incidence proportion for PKDL and VLR was 12.3% (95% CI, 10.4%–14.5%) and 7.0% (95% CI, 5.6%–8.8%) respectively. The incidence rate (95% CI) of PKDL and VLR was 14.0 (8.6–22.7) and 7.6 (4.1–14.7) accordingly. SSG cohort had the lowest incidence rate of PKDL at 3.0 (1.3–7.3) and VLR at 1.8 (0.6–5.6), followed by MDAMB at 8.2 (4.3–15.7) for PKDL and at 2.7 (0.9–8.4) for VLR.

Interpretation

Development of PKDL and VLR is related with treatment regimens for VL. SSG and MDAMB resulted in less incidence of PKDL and VLR compared to other treatment regimens. MDAMB should be considered for VL as a first step for prevention of PKDL and VLR since SSG is highly toxic and not recommended for VL.

Post-kala-azar Dermal Leishmaniasis (PKDL), a sequale of visceral leishmaniasis (VL), and reappearance VL (visceral leishmaniasis relapse, VLR) are intra-epidemic reservoirs of VL and threats control of VL in long run. Currently there is no strategy for prevention of PKDL and VLR. If a relationship between treatment for VL and development of PKDL and VLR is there, and then selection of proper treatment regimen for VL should prevent PKDL and VLR. So far no study has been carried out to investigate the relationship between treatment regimens for VL and development of PKDL and VLR. The study demonstrated that multi-dose liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) defined as MDAMB herein for VL results in least PKDL and VLR among all existing and recommended by WHO treatment regimens for VL. We recommend adaptation of MDAMB in the national visceral leishmaniasis elimination program for VL cases management during subsequent phases of the national program when VL burden is low and hospitalization of VL patients for 3-5-days is now feasible.

Systematic Review of Host-Mediated Activity of Miltefosine in Leishmaniasis through Immunomodulation

Host immune responses are pivotal for the successful treatment of the leishmaniases, a spectrum of infections caused by Leishmania parasites. Previous studies speculated that augmenting cytokines associated with a type 1 T-helper cell (Th1) response is necessary to combat severe forms of leishmaniasis, and it has been hypothesized that the antileishmanial drug miltefosine is capable of immunomodulation and induction of Th1 cytokines.

Host immune responses are pivotal for the successful treatment of the leishmaniases, a spectrum of infections caused by Leishmania parasites. Previous studies speculated that augmenting cytokines associated with a type 1 T-helper cell (Th1) response is necessary to combat severe forms of leishmaniasis, and it has been hypothesized that the antileishmanial drug miltefosine is capable of immunomodulation and induction of Th1 cytokines. A better understanding of the immunomodulatory effects of miltefosine is central to providing a rationale regarding synergistic mechanisms of activity to combine miltefosine optimally with other conventional and future antileishmanials that are currently under development. Therefore, a systematic literature search was performed to evaluate to what extent and how miltefosine influences the host Th1 response. Miltefosine’s effects observed in both a preclinical and a clinical context associated with immunomodulation in the treatment of leishmaniasis are evaluated in this review. A total of 27 studies were included in the analysis. Based on the current evidence, miltefosine is not only capable of inducing direct parasite killing but also of modulating the host immunity. Our findings suggest that miltefosine-induced activation of Th1 cytokines, particularly represented by increased gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and interleukin 12 (IL-12), is essential to prevail over the Leishmania-driven Th2 response. Differences in miltefosine-induced host-mediated effects between in vitro, ex vivo, animal model, and human studies are further discussed. All things considered, an effective treatment with miltefosine is acquired by enhanced functional Th1 cytokine responses and may further be enhanced in combination with immunostimulatory agents.

The immunology of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL)

Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) is a common complication of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) caused by Leishmania donovani. Because of its possible role in transmission it is considered a public health problem in VL endemic areas. The clinical features include a skin rash consisting of macules, papules or nodules in an otherwise healthy individual; this presentation is determined by the immune response towards parasites in the skin that probably persisted from the previous VL episode. The immune response in VL, cured VL and PKDL is the result of changes in the cytokine profile that only in part can be captured under the Th1 and Th2 dichotomy. Regulatory T cells and Th 17 cells also play a role. VL is characterized by an absent immune response to Leishmania with a predominantly Th2 type of response with high levels of IL-10; after successful treatment the patient will be immune with in vitro features of a Th1 type of response and in vivo a positive leishmanin skin test. PKDL takes an intermediate position with a dissociation of the immune response between the skin and the viscera, with a Th2 and Th1 type of response, respectively. It is likely that immune responses determine the different epidemiological and clinical characteristics of PKDL in Asia and Africa; various risk factors for PKDL may influence this, such as incomplete and inadequate treatment of VL, parasite resistance and genetic factors. It should be noted that PKDL is a heterogeneous and dynamic condition and patients differ with regard to time of onset after visceral leishmaniasis (VL), chronicity, extent and appearance of the rash including related immune responses, all of which may vary over time. Better understanding of these immune responses may offer opportunities for manipulation including combined chemotherapy and immunotherapy for VL to prevent PKDL from occurring and similarly in the treatment of chronic or treatment resistant PKDL cases.