Neuromodulation in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Appliances Therapy in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a recurrent partial or complete obstruction of the upper airway during sleep caused by narrowing or collapse of the pharyngeal wall. It leads to microstimulation and oxyhemoglobin desaturation, resulting in sleepiness and loud snoring. OSA negatively affects the cardiovascular system and may contribute to neurocognitive impairment. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficacy of appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea. The effectiveness was assessed by using the Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI). An electronic search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar was conducted between 1998 and 2021. Articles were independently assessed by three reviewers. The quality of a randomised control trial (RCT) is assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias method. The tool GRADE was used to achieve the desired level of confidence for each outcome reported. Several studies used continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), mandibular advancement devices (MAD), and tongue retention devices (TRD). The meta-analysis included a total of six papers that met the inclusion criteria. Results showed that CPAP significantly improved AHI compared with an oral appliance (random effects: difference in means = 8.40, 95% CI = 7.21 to 9.60). It was also found that oral appliance (OA) therapy significantly improved AHI compared with baseline before appliance therapy (random effects: mean difference = 13.40, 95% CI = 10.87 to 15.93; p.00001). For mild to moderate OSA, CPAP is considered the gold standard. Our meta-analysis of six RCTs found favorable evidence for OSA patients receiving oral devices; however, they were less effective than CPAP. A subgroup analysis found that MAD may be a beneficial treatment for mild to moderate OSA patients who do not respond to CPAP. The findings suggest that oral appliances may be an effective treatment for OSA, especially in patients with mild to moderate OSA.

Screening of plasma exosomal lncRNAs to identify potential biomarkers for obstructive sleep apnea

Background

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent, but frequently undiagnosed. The existing biomarkers of OSA are relatively insensitive and inaccurate. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have no protein-coding ability but have a role in regulating gene expression. They are stably expressed in exosomes, easily and rapidly measurable. Changes in expression of exosomal lncRNAs can be useful for disease diagnoses. However, there are few reports on the association of exosomal lncRNAs with OSA. We aimed to investigate the exosomal lncRNA profiles to establish the differences between non-OSA, OSA with or without hypertension (HTN) and serve as a potential diagnostic biomarker.

Methods

This diagnostic test included 63 participants: [normal control (NC) =25], (OSA =23), and (HTN-OSA =15). Expression profiling of lncRNAs in isolated exosomes was performed through high-throughput sequencing in 9 participants. Subsequently, OSA/HTN-OSA related lncRNAs were selected for validation by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the diagnostic value. The reliabilities of the screened gene were further validated in another independent cohort: (NC =10), (OSA mild =10), (OSA moderate =11), and (OSA severe =10), the correlation between clinical features and its expression was analyzed. The MiRanda software was used to predict the binding sites of interaction between microRNA (miRNA) and target genes regulated by screened lncRNA.

Results

We identified the differentially expressed lncRNAs and mRNAs in plasma exosomes of the NC, OSA, HTN-OSA groups. Most pathways enriched in differentially expressed lncRNAs and mRNAs had previously been linked to OSA. Among them, ENST00000592016 enables discrimination between NC and OSA individuals [area under curve (AUC) =0.846, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72–0.97]. The severity of OSA was associated with changes in the ENST00000592016 expression. Furthermore, ENST00000592016 affected the PI3K-Akt, MAPK, and TNF pathways by regulating miRNA expressions.

Conclusions

This is the first report about differential expression of lncRNA in OSA and HTN-OSA exosomes. ENST00000592016 enables discrimination between NC and OSA individuals. This work enabled characterization of OSA and provided the preliminary work for the study of biomarker of OSA.

Oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnea: Emerging issues, upcoming challenges, and possible solutions

Background

As per the current epidemiological studies, the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among the adult population is very high. Oral appliances (OAs) have emerged as the most recommended alternative treatment option for mild to moderate OSA.

Objective

The objective of this article is to propose or develop a new design of OA named "customized maxillary oral appliance (CMOA)," for managing moderate OSA syndrome.

Methods

The design proposed in this article is first of its kind that is fabricated on the maxillary arch. CMOA is developed by combining the principles of the three most popular OAs used in OSA, namely, soft palate lifters, tongue retaining devices, and mandibular advancement devices.

Conclusions

Given the potential impact of OSA on general and mental health and the side effects of existing appliances, there is a need for a new remedy to be introduced in the field of sleep medicine. This novel design can provide a new therapeutic option for patients with moderate OSA.