Effect of esomeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between erlotinib and paracetamol: A potential risk for clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Erlotinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor available for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Paracetamol is an analgesic agent, commonly used in cancer patients. Because these drugs are often co-administered, there is an increasing issue of interaction between them.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of paracetamol on the pharmacokinetic parameters of erlotinib, as well as the influence of erlotinib on the pharmacokinetics of paracetamol.

METHODS

The rabbits were divided into three groups: the rabbits receiving erlotinib (I_ER), the group receiving paracetamol (II_PR), and the rabbits receiving erlotinib+paracetamol (III_ER+PR). A single dose of erlotinib was administered orally (25mg) and was administered intravenously (35mg/kg). Plasma concentrations of erlotinib, its metabolite (OSI420), paracetamol and its metabolites - glucuronide and sulphate were measured with the validated method.

RESULTS

During paracetamol co-administration we observed increased erlotinib maximum concentration (C_max) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC_0-∞) by 87.7% and 31.1%, respectively. In turn, erlotinib lead to decreased paracetamol AUC_0-∞ by 35.5% and C_max by 18.9%. The mean values of paracetamol glucuronide/paracetamol ratios for C_max were 32.2% higher, whereas paracetamol sulphate/paracetamol ratios for C_max and AUC_0-∞ were 37.1% and 57.1% lower in the II_PR group, when compared to the III_ER+PR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Paracetamol had significant effect on the enhanced plasma exposure of erlotinib. Additionally, erlotinib contributed to the lower concentrations of paracetamol. Decreased glucuronidation and increased sulphation of paracetamol after co-administration of erlotinib were also observed.

Measurement of levetiracetam drug levels to assist with seizure control and monitoring of drug interactions with other anti-epileptic medications (AEMs)

PURPOSE

Levetiracetam (LEV) therapeutic range (20-40mg/L) and potential drug interactions were assessed in people with epilepsy (PWE).

METHOD

Fifty-two PWE had LEV and concomitant medications [carbamazepine (CBZ); valproate (VPA); lamotrigine (LTG)] blood levels measured and compared to seizure activity. Lacosamide (LCM) levels were unavailable. Adopted therapeutic ranges were: 20-40mg/L - LEV; 25-50μmol/L - total CBZ; 6-13μmol/L - free CBZ; 300-750μmol/L - total VPA; 30-75μmol/L - free VPA; and 40-60μmol/L - LTG. Seizure-freedom was assessed and patients followed for almost two years.

RESULTS

23 of 52 PWE (44%) used LEV monotherapy and 16/23 (70%) had 'therapeutic' LEV with 13/16 (81%) seizure-free. 29 of 52 (56%) used polytherapy and 16/29 (55%) had 'therapeutic' LEV with 7/16 (44%) seizure-free. 11 of 29 (38%) used CBZ: 4/11 (36%) had therapeutic mean LEV levels and 7/11 (64%) were seizure-free. Fourteen (48%) used VPA: 9/14 (64%) had therapeutic mean LEV levels and 8/14 (57%) were seizure-free. 13 of 29 (45%) used LTG: 8/13 (62%) had therapeutic mean LEV levels and 5/13 (38%) were seizure-free. LEV did not alter CBZ, but CBZ affected LEV. LEV elevated VPA free levels but not VPA total levels. Dosage/concentration was lowered with polytherapy.

CONCLUSION

LEV range (20-40mg/L) assisted epilepsy management and anti-epileptic medication interactions were suggested with polytherapy thus possibly explaining the impaired efficacy of LEV with polytherapy.

The influence of the time of day on midazolam pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in rabbits

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the time-of-day effect on midazolam and 1-OH midazolam pharmacokinetics, and on the sedative pharmacodynamic response in rabbits. Also, circadian fluctuations in rabbits' vital signs, such as the blood pressure, heart rate and body temperature were examined. The water intake was measured in order to confirm the presence of the animals' diurnal activity. The secondary aim involved the comparison of two methods of data analysis: a noncompartmental and a population modeling approach.

METHODS

Twelve rabbits were sedated with intravenous midazolam 0.35 mg/kg at four local times: 09.00, 14.00, 18.00 and 22.00 h. Each rabbit served as its own control by being given a single infusion at the four different times of the day on four separate occasions. The values of the monitored physiological parameters were recorded during the experiment and arterial blood samples were collected for midazolam assay. The pedal withdrawal reflex was used as the measurement of the sedation response. Two and one compartmental models were successfully used to describe midazolam and 1-OH midazolam pharmacokinetics. The categorical pharmacodynamic data were described with a logistic model.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

We did not find any time-of-day effects for the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics parameters of midazolam. For 1-OH midazolam, statistically significant time-of-day differences in the apparent volume of distribution and clearance were noticed. They corresponded well with the rabbits' water intake. The noncompartmental and model-based parameters were essentially similar. However, more information can be obtained from the population model and this method should be preferred in chronopharmacokinetic and chronopharmacodynamic studies.