Could Intrathymic Injection of Myelin Basic Protein Suppress Inflammatory Response After Co-culture of T Lymphocytes and BV-2 Microglia Cells?

Orally Administered Brain Protein Combined With Probiotics Increases Treg Differentiation to Reduce Secondary Inflammatory Damage Following Craniocerebral Trauma

Craniocerebral trauma is caused by external forces that can have detrimental effects on the vasculature and adjacent nerve cells at the site. After the mechanical and structural primary injury, a complex series of secondary cascades of injury exacerbates brain damage and cognitive dysfunction following mechanical and structural primary injury. Disruption of the blood-brain barrier and exposure of brain proteins following craniocerebral trauma, recognition by the immune system triggering autoimmune attack, and excessive secondary inflammatory responses causing malignant brain swelling, cerebral edema, and subsequent brain cell apoptosis provide a new direction for the suppression of brain inflammatory responses in the treatment of craniocerebral trauma. We observed that CD4⁺T/CD8⁺T in peripheral blood T cells of craniocerebral trauma rats were significantly higher than those of normal rats, and the ratio of CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3 (Foxp3)⁺Regulatory T cell (Treg) was significantly lower than that of normal rats and caused increased secondary inflammation. We constructed a rat model of post-surgical brain injury and orally administered brain protein combined with probiotics, which was observed to significantly reduce CD4⁺T/CD8⁺T and induce T-cell differentiation into CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺Treg, thus, reducing secondary inflammatory responses following craniocerebral trauma. However, collecting intestinal stool and small intestinal tissues for broad target metabolomics, 16s rRNA bacteriomics, and the combined analysis of intestinal tissue proteomics revealed that oral administration of brain protein combined with probiotics activates glycerophospholipid and vitamin B6 metabolic pathways to promote the production of CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺Treg. Therefore, we propose the novel idea that oral administration of brain protein combined with probiotics can induce immune tolerance by increasing Treg differentiation, thus, reducing secondary inflammatory injury following craniocerebral trauma.

LPS and palmitic acid Co-upregulate microglia activation and neuroinflammatory response

Growing evidence indicates that disturbances in the inflammatory response system can have deleterious effects on neuronal function and mental health. While the correlation between elevated peripheral inflammatory markers and psychiatric disorders are well documented, the exact molecular and neuronal mechanism underlying the connection between activated inflammation and neuropsychiatric behaviour remain elusive. Microglia activation is the key interface between neuro-inflammation and manifestation of psychiatric symptoms. Microglia are immunocompetent cells in the central nervous system (CNS) which are primarily involved in the response to inflammatory stimulation and are widely used to study neuroinflammation and test anti-inflammatory chemicals. In the brain, activated microglia play very important roles during neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. Both stress-related disorders such as Depression and PTSD, and medical conditions such as metabolic syndrome (Mets) and type 2 diabetes (TD2) are associated with increased levels of both saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in circulation. This work was aimed at determining whether SFA interacts with LPS to activate microglia, thus up-regulating neuroinflammatory processes and, if so which pathways were involved in this process. Our results showed that low-dose LPS and palmitic acid (PA) robustly stimulated the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, and the combination of PA and LPS further upregulated proinflammatory cytokines through MAPK, NFκB and AP-1 signaling pathways in the HMC3-human microglial cell line. In addition, PA stimulated ceramide production via de novo synthesis and sphingomyelin hydrolysis, and the combination of LPS and PA further increased ceramide production. HMC3 co-cultured with macrophage and lymphocyte enhanced LPS and PA induced-inflammatory response more than that in HMC3 alone. These results indicate that LPS interacts with PA to activated microglia; induced neuroinflammatory responses, upregulate proinflammatory cytokine expression via MAPK, NFκB, and AP-1 signaling pathways, and induced sphingolipid metabolism in HMC3. These observations suggest that inhibiting microglia activation and reducing LPS and PA-induced inflammatory response may be useful in the treatment of neuronal inflammatory diseases.

•

Microglial activation plays critical role in the pathology of various psychiatric conditions.

•

PA interacts with LPS to active microglia induce proinflammatory cytokine and gene expression.

•

PA and LPS stimulate the MAPK and NFκB signaling pathway regulated IL-6 secretion in microglia.

•

U937 and lymphocyte enhance IL-6 secretion in microglia.

•

PA and LPS plus PA increase ceramide and decrease sphingomyelin productions.

Treatment of Surgical Brain Injury by Immune Tolerance Induced by Peripheral Intravenous Injection of Biotargeting Nanoparticles Loaded With Brain Antigens

Once excessive, neurological disorders associated with inflammatory conditions will inevitably cause secondary inflammatory damage to brain tissue. Immunosuppressive therapy can reduce the inflammatory state, but resulting infections can expose the patient to greater risk. Using specific immune tolerance organs or tissues from the body, brain antigen immune tolerance treatment can create a minimal immune response to the brain antigens that does not excessively affect the body's immunity. However, commonly used immune tolerance treatment approaches, such as those involving the nasal, gastrointestinal mucosa, thymus or liver portal vein injections, affect the clinical conversion of the therapy due to uncertain drug absorption, or inconvenient routes of administration. If hepatic portal intravenous injections of brain antigens could be replaced by normal peripheral venous infusion, the convenience of immune tolerance treatment could certainly be greatly increased. We attempted to encapsulate brain antigens with minimally immunogenic nanomaterials, to control the sizes of nanoparticles within the range of liver Kupffer cell phagocytosis and to coat the antigens with a coating material that had an affinity for liver cells. We injected these liver drug-loaded nanomaterials via peripheral intravenous injection. With the use of microparticles with liver characteristics, the brain antigens were transported into the liver out of the detection of immune armies in the blood. This approach has been demonstrated in rat models of surgical brain injury. It has been proven that the immune tolerance of brain antigens can be accomplished by peripheral intravenous infusion to achieve the effect of treating brain trauma after operations, which simplifies the clinical operation and could elicit substantial improvements in the future.

Immune Tolerance Therapy: A New Method for Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury

Objective:

Due to the special anatomical structure and pathophysiological mechanism of the central nervous system (CNS), there is a big difference between the repair of brain injury and other systems of the body. More and more evidence shows that targetedly reducing the autoimmune response of brain tissue without affecting the immune function in other parts of the body will be the best optimized treatment for brain injury.

Data Sources:

This review was based on data in articles published in PubMed up to June 5, 2017, with the following keywords: “immune tolerance”, “traumatic brain injury”, and “central nervous system”.

Study Selection:

Original articles and critical reviews on immune tolerance and brain damage were selected for this review. References of the retrieved articles were also screened to search for potentially relevant papers.

Results:

The CNS is isolated from the immune system through the blood-brain barrier. After brain injury, brain antigens are released into the systemic circulation to induce damaging immune responses. Immune tolerance can effectively reduce the brain edema and neurological inflammatory response after brain injury, which is beneficial to the recovery of neurological function. The clinical application prospect and theoretical research value of the treatment of immune tolerance on traumatic brain injury (TBI) is worth attention.

Conclusions:

The establishment of immune tolerance mechanism has a high clinical value in the treatment of TBI. It opens up new opportunities for the treatment of brain damage.

Treatment of surgical brain injury by immune tolerance induced by intrathymic and hepatic portal vein injection of brain antigens

Surgical brain injury (SBI) defines complications induced by intracranial surgery, such as cerebral edema and other secondary injuries. In our study, intrathymic and hepatic portal vein injection of allogeneic myelin basic protein (MBP) or autogeneic brain cell suspensions were administered to a standard SBI model. Serum pro-inflammatory IL-2, anti-inflammatory IL-4 concentrations and the CD4⁺T/CD8⁺T ratio were measured at 1, 3, 7, 14 and 21 d after surgery to verify the establishment of immune tolerance. Furthermore, we confirmed neuroprotective effects by evaluating neurological scores at 1, 3, 7, 14 and 21 d after SBI. Anti-Fas ligand (FasL) immunohistochemistry and TUNEL assays of brain sections were tested at 21 d after surgery. Intrathymic injections of MBP or autogeneic brain cell suspensions functioned by both suppressing secondary inflammatory reactions and improving prognoses, whereas hepatic portal vein injections of autogeneic brain cell suspensions exerted a better effect than MBP. Intrathymic and hepatic portal vein injections of MBP had equal effects on reducing secondary inflammation and improving prognoses. Otherwise, hepatic portal vein injections of autogeneic brain cell suspensions had better outcomes than intrathymic injections of autogeneic brain cell suspensions. Moreover, the benefit of injecting antigens into the thymus was outweighed by hepatic portal vein injections.