An open randomized controlled trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients of acute on chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure in a general respiratory ward setting

Non-invasive ventilation in children and adults in low- and low-middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

We systematically reviewed the effects of NIV for acute respiratory failure (ARF) in low- and low-middle income countries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE (to January 2016) for observational studies and trials of NIV for ARF or in the peri-extubation period in adults and post-neonatal children. We abstracted outcomes data and assessed quality. Meta-analyses used random-effect models.

RESULTS

Fifty-four studies (ten pediatric/n=1099; 44 adult/n=2904), mostly South Asian, were included. Common diagnoses were pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Considering observational studies and the NIV arm of trials, NIV was associated with moderate risks of mortality (pooled risk 9.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.6-14.5% in children; 16.2% [11.2-21.2%] in adults); NIV failure (10.5% [4.6-16.5%] in children; 28.5% [22.4-34.6%] in adults); and intubation (5.3% [0.8-9.7%] in children; 28.8% [21.9-35.8%] in adults). The risk of mortality was greater (p=0.035) in adults with hypoxemic (25.7% [15.2-36.1%]) vs. hypercapneic (12.8% [7.0-18.6%]) ARF. NIV reduced mortality in COPD (relative risk [RR] 0.47 [0.27-0.79]) and in patients weaning from ventilation (RR 0.48 [0.28-0.80]). The pooled pneumothorax risk was 2.4% (0.8-3.9%) in children and 5.2% (1.0-9.4%) in adults. Meta-analyses had high heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

NIV for ARF in these settings appears to be effective.

Cost-effectiveness of noninvasive ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-related respiratory failure in Indian hospitals without ICU facilities

Introduction:

The majority of Indian hospitals do not provide intensive care unit (ICU) care or ward-based noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV). Because no mechanical ventilation or NIV is available in these hospitals, the majority of patients suffering from respiratory failure die.

Objective:

To perform a cost-effective analysis of two strategies (ward-based NIV with concurrent standard treatment vs standard treatment alone) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) respiratory failure patients treated in Indian hospitals without ICU care.

Materials and Methods:

A decision-analytical model was created to compare the cost-effectiveness for the two strategies. Estimates from the literature were used for parameters in the model. Future costs were discounted at 3%. All costs were reported in USD (2012). One-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed. The time horizon was lifetime and perspective was societal.

Results:

The NIV strategy resulted in 17.7% more survival and was slightly more costly (increased cost of $101 (USD 2012) but resulted in increased quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (1.67 QALY). The cost-effectiveness (2012 USD)/QALY in the standard and NIV groups was $78/QALY ($535.02/6.82) and $75/QALY ($636.33/8.49), respectively. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was only $61 USD/QALY. This was substantially lower than the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita for India (1489 USD), suggesting the NIV strategy was very cost effective. Using a 5% discount rate resulted in only minimally different results. Probabilistic analysis suggests that NIV strategy was preferred 100% of the time when willingness to pay was >$250 2012 USD.

Conclusion:

Ward-based NIV treatment is cost-effective in India, and may increase survival of patients with COPD respiratory failure when ICU is not available.