Malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive tumour of the pleura, commonly linked to asbestos exposure. However, its diagnosis is challenging, especially without known exposure. We present the case of a woman in her early 70s with no history of asbestos exposure, who presented with progressive breathlessness and left-sided chest pain. Radiological assessment revealed a large pleural effusion and nodular pleural thickening. Malignant pleural mesothelioma was confirmed through histopathological analysis of biopsies obtained via medical thoracoscopy. The patient was initiated on a palliative chemotherapy regimen, underwent talc slurry pleurodesis for recurrent effusion, and is currently under follow-up. This case emphasises the importance of a high index of suspicion for malignant pleural mesothelioma in patients with unexplained pleural effusion, even in the absence of typical risk factors, and the need for a timely diagnosis due to the disease's dismal prognosis.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma: The disdained member of thoracic oncology!

Pleural mesothelioma is a very aggressive malignancy that arises from the pleural mesothelial cell lining and is linked strongly to prior asbestos exposure. The ban on asbestos has helped to lower the incidence, but in developing countries like India, it is expected to rise. It has an extended latency period usually progressing over decades and presents with nonspecific symptoms. It has a median survival ranging between 10-22 months. The diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma is challenging and is done using computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, or positron emission tomography-CT, with the last two predicting the resectability of the tumor better than CT alone. A pleural biopsy along with an array of immunohistochemical markers, such as p16, BRCA1 associated protein 1, and claudin-4, are required for a definitive diagnosis. Several genetic alterations have prognostic significance as well. The current histological subtype identification is indispensable for decision making because of the new therapeutic avenues being explored. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab-based immunotherapy outperformed platinum and pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in terms of survival benefit and improved quality of life especially for non-epithelioid subtypes. However, the latter continues to be a robust treatment option for patients with the epithelioid subtype. Surgery is recommended for resectable cases with radiotherapy being indicated in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative settings along with systemic treatment. This review article provides an overview of epidemiology, etiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic approaches (including immunohistochemical and genetic markers), staging, and multidisciplinary approaches to current treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma using surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy. It also sheds light on some recent studies (EMPHACIS, CALGB30901, Checkmate-743, etc.) that have led to significant developments in recent years with clinically meaningful results.

Analysis of mesothelioma cases and National Cancer Registry data to assess asbestos exposure in India

SETTING

Asbestos exposure can cause mesothelioma, a form of cancer which should be recorded by cancer registries. However, such registries currently cover only a small fraction (16%) of the population in India. Because India still uses asbestos, it is important to understand its health impact, especially the number of mesothelioma cases.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the number of mesothelioma cases in India and compare these to the number reported to the National Cancer Registry.

DESIGN

We used the Right to Information Act 2005 to gather data for 83 hospitals across India from 2012 to 2022-2023.

RESULTS

From a total of 83 hospitals, there were 2,213 cases of mesothelioma from 2012 onwards. During the 2012-2016 period, the number of reported cases in the Cancer Registry was 54, whereas 1,126 cases were reported by these hospitals for this period. Only 21 (25%) of the hospitals assessed in this study were part of the population-based national cancer registry programme. Overall, cases of mesothelioma occur far more frequently than are reported in cancer registries.

CONCLUSION

National record-keeping is inadequate and the system needs to be expanded and improved across all of India. This will provide more effective reporting and help to highlight the risk of exposure to asbestos.

Improving providers' survival estimates and selection of prognosis- and guidelines-appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic bone metastases: Development of the Bone Metastases Ensemble Trees for Survival Decision Support Platform

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

In the management of symptomatic bone metastases, current practice guidelines do not provide clear methodology for selecting palliative radiotherapy (RT) regimens based on specific patient and disease features. Decision support aids may offer an effective means for translating the complex data needed to render individualised treatment decisions, yet no such tools are available for use in this setting. Thus, we describe the development of the Bone Metastases Ensemble Trees for Survival-Decision Support Platform (BMETS-DSP), which aims to optimise selection of evidence-based, individualised palliative RT regimens.

METHOD

The Ottawa Decision Support Framework was used as the theoretical basis for development of BMETS-DSP. First, we utilised stakeholder input and review of the literature to assess determinants underlying the provider decision. Based on this assessment and iterative stakeholder feedback, we developed the web-based, provider-facing BMETS-DSP. Consistent with the underlying theoretical framework, our design also included assessment of decision quality using the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) certification checklist.

RESULTS

Stakeholder input and review of 54 evidence-based publications identified the following determinants of the provider decision: estimated prognosis, characteristics of the target symptomatic lesion and the primary cancer type, consideration of alternative interventions, access to patient-specific recommendations, and patient preferences. Based on these determinants, we developed the BMETS-DSP that (1) collects patient-specific data, (2) displays an individualised predicted survival curve, and (3) provides case-specific, evidence-based recommendations regarding RT, open surgery, systemic therapy, and hospice referral to aid in the decision-making process. The finalised tool met IPDAS quality requirements. Preliminary results of a pilot assessment suggest impact of clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe the successful development of a provider-facing decision support platform to aid in the provision of palliative RT in better alignment with patient and disease features. Impact of the BMETS-DSP on decision outcomes will be further assessed in a randomised, controlled study.

Malignant Mesothelioma - Report of Two Cases with Different Presentations

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive neoplasm that stems from the mesothelial cells lining the visceral cavities, namely, the pleura, peritoneum, pericardium, and tunica vaginalis of the testes. MPM is the most common variant of these and constitutes up to 80% of all malignant mesotheliomas. It is usually associated with asbestos exposure and is a locally invasive neoplasm that spreads along pleura and can involve lungs with locoregional metastasis. Diagnosis remains challenging due to the latency between asbestos exposure and clinical presentation and the variable clinicoradiological manifestations. Meticulous history taking, high index of, suspicion and multimodality approach toward diagnosis are the keys to better prognosis. We hereby present two interesting cases of MPM with different presentations.

Hyperthermic Intrathoracic Chemotherapy (HITHOC) for Pleural Malignancies-Experience from Indian Centers

Hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) has been used in addition to radical surgery for primary and secondary pleural malignancies to improve local control, prolong survival, and improve the quality of life. This study was performed to study the indications, methodology, perioperative outcomes, and survival in patients undergoing HITHOC at Indian centers. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected demographic and clinical data, perioperative and survival data of patients undergoing surgery with or without HITHOC was performed. From January 2011 to May 2018, seven patients underwent pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) or extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) with HITHOC and four had P/D or EPP alone at three Indian centers. P/D was performed in two and EPP in nine patients. The primary tumor was pleural mesothelioma in eight, metastases from thymoma in one, germ cell tumor in one, and solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura in one. HITHOC was performed using cisplatin. Grade 3-4 complications were seen in one patient in the HITHOC group and none in the non-HITHOC group, and one patient in the non-HITHOC group died of complications. At a median follow-up of 9 months, five patients of the HITHOC group were alive, four without recurrence, and one with recurrence. One patient in the non-HITHOC group was alive and disease-free at 24 months, and two died of progression at 18 and 36 months. HITHOC can be performed without increasing the morbidity of P/D or EPP. Most of these patients require multimodality treatment and are best managed by multidisciplinary teams.