Comparative study of bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial brushing, and FNAC in diagnosing malignant neoplasms of lungs

Detection of early (T1) lung cancers and lepidic adenocarcinomas in sputum and bronchial cytology

BACKGROUND

The lung is an extensively epithelialized organ, producing ample exfoliated material for sputum and bronchial cytology. In view of the updates in the World Health Organization classification of early (T1/≤ 3 cm) lung cancer with respect to adenocarcinomas with lepidic pattern, this study retrospectively reviews sputum and bronchial cytology paired with resection-confirmed lung cancers.

METHODS

A computerized search for all lung resection specimens of carcinomas over a 20-year period was performed. Cytologic diagnoses of corresponding sputum and bronchial cytology were classified into five-tiered categories (C1-insufficient/inadequate, C2-benign, C3-atypia, C4-suspicious and C5-malignant). Reports and slides of the resection specimen were reviewed for reclassification of T1 cancers.

RESULTS

Totally 472 and 383 sputum and bronchial cytology specimens respectively were included. Sensitivity for T1 lesions on sputum cytology were 10.6 %, 2.1 % and 0.5 % at cutoffs of atypia/C3, suspicious/C4 and malignant/C5 categories, lower than bronchial cytology (35.1 %, 15.5 %, 8.1 %; p < 0.001). T1 lesions correlated with lower detection rates, whereas squamous cell carcinoma histology, larger size and bronchial invasion were associated with increased detection rates in sputum and bronchial cytology (p < 0.050). Detection rates for abrasive bronchial cytology (brushing) were overall higher (p = 0.018- < 0.001), but on subgroup comparison, non-abrasive (aspiration, lavage and washing) cytology demonstrated favorable trends (p = 0.063-0.088) in detecting T1 lesions. Adenocarcinomas with lepidic pattern had lower suspicious/C4 (p = 0.040) or above and malignant/C5 (p = 0.019), but not atypia/C3 or above (p = 0.517) rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Most adenocarcinomas with lepidic pattern are only diagnosed as atypia/C3 on cytology. With its modest sensitivity, interpretation of negative and indeterminate cytology results mandates caution.

Importance of Cytopathologic Diagnosis in Early Cancer Diagnosis in Resource-Constrained Countries

PURPOSE

The rising cancer burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) stresses already weak health care systems and poses unique challenges. In resource-constrained LMICs and in circumstances where most patients must pay out of pocket for diagnostic tests, these may not be available or affordable for many. Cytopathology provides a simple, inexpensive, standardized, and low-technology diagnostic procedure that is increasingly used as an effective tool to address the hurdles faced in cancer control programs in LMICs. This review explores the potential role of cytopathology in LMICs in reducing the cancer burden.

METHODS

This review studied the existing literature across the globe regarding the utilization of cytopathology as a diagnostic or screening tool for various types of malignancies as well as its advantages and disadvantages, depending on the local situation.

RESULTS

Apart from the usefulness of cytopathology, this review also sheds light on the barriers to using cytopathology in LMICs. Most recently, SARS-CoV-2 has produced several unique challenges for cytopathology. These are being met with innovative measures to combat the effects of the pandemic and ensure the safe delivery of essential cytopathology services.

CONCLUSION

The usefulness of cytopathologic techniques has been demonstrated via various studies, even during the recent pandemic. If cytology is to be used appropriately, the focus needs to be on integrating it into the national cancer screening and diagnostic programs as well as providing well-trained human resources.

Correlation between cytological and histopathological diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer and accuracy of cytology in the diagnosis of lung cancer

Background/Aim. Lung cancer is one of the most com-mon cancer types worldwide. More than 70% of patients are diagnosed with lung cancer in the advanced stages of the disease, with limited therapeutic options based on cytological and histopathological material. The value of cytology in diagnosing and subtyping non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is very important for modern personalized therapies. The aim of this study was to find out the concordance between cytological and histopathological diagnosis of NSCLC and the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive value of cytology in diagnosing lung cancer. Methods. A two-year retrospective study included 169 patients with cytological diagnosis of NSCLC, who, at the same time, had small biopsy and surgical specimens for histopathological diagnoses confirmation that were compared with cytological one. Histopathological diagnosis on surgical specimens was the golden standard for evaluation concordance to the cytological diagnosis of NSCLC and evaluation accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and the positive and negative prognostic value of cytology as a diagnostic method for detecting lung cancer. Results. This study included 129 (76.3%) male and 40 (23.7%) female patients, aged between 39 and 83, with the average of 62.53 ? 7.6. There was no statistically significant difference between the ages of different genders (p = 0.207). The most frequent diagnosis among cytological diagnoses was NSCLC in 99 (58.58%) patients. Concordance between cytological and histopathological diagnoses of surgical specimens was 61.48%. There was no statistically significant difference between cytological diagnoses and histopathological diagnoses of small biopsies specimens (p = 0.856). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative prognostic value, and accuracy of cytology as a diagnostic method of lung cancer were 94.98%, 98.60%, 95.72%, 98.35%, and 97.71%, respectively. Conclusion. Cytological diagnosis of NSCLC is accurate, with high sensitivity, specificity, and benefits for patients. Most patients are diagnosed with advanced cancer when there is no surgical therapy option, and the only available diagnostic material is a small biopsy sampled during bronchoscopy.

Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of bronchial brushing cytology in lung cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Flexible bronchoscopy is commonly used to examine patients suspected to have lung cancer. Bronchial brushing is one of the cytological technologies for lung specimens obtained through a bronchoscope. However, the accuracy of bronchial brushing cytology (BBC) for lung cancer diagnosis is still inconclusive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of BBC.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted with PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Biomed Central, Clinical Key, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies that assessed the efficacy of BBC in detecting lung cancer were included. Articles that estimated the accuracy on a per-patient basis were included. Review articles, case reports, and research that provided insufficient data to construct a 2 × 2 table were excluded. Both prospective trials and retrospective studies were included. English language studies were reviewed. Data synthesis was performed with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies with 2538 patients were included in the study. The meta-analysis for BBC generated a pooled sensitivity of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.70) and a pooled specificity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.89-0.93). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio for BBC was 24.55 (95% CI, 12.39-48.66). The subgroup analysis for studies using liquid-based cytology (LBC) generated a pooled sensitivity of 0.68 and a pooled specificity of 0.92. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio of studies using LBC was 114.18.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that BBC is a discriminative diagnostic approach with moderate sensitivity and high specificity for diagnosing peripheral pulmonary lesions. BBC using LBC has higher diagnostic performance.

Lung Cancer Cytology: Can Any of the Cytological Methods Replace Histopathology?

Background:

Diagnosis of lung cancer can be made in two ways: histopathological and cytopathological. Cytological methods in the diagnosis of lung lesions are generally thought to be one of the most successful tactics.

Aims:

This study aimed at comparing the efficiency of selected cytological techniques in lung lesions by correlating them with histopathological diagnosis. In addition, we had answered the question whether any of the cytological methods can replace histopathology.

Materials and Methods:

The study group consisted of 633 patients and 1085 cytological specimens. Cytology samples included: induced sputum, bronchial washing (BW), bronchial brushing (BB), fine needle aspiration (FNA), and cell block (CB). In every case of CB immunocytochemistry (ICC) was performed. For each cytological method sensitivity, specificity, effectiveness, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were assessed.

Results:

BW and BB showed the lowest diagnostic parameters. The most valuable diagnostic procedure was CB based on FNA. Close by CB, FNA had the highest diagnostic rate. However, possibility to evaluate tumor cell structure and apply the ICC, give CB an advantage over FNA. Using only morphologic criteria, we had subclassified nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) into squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) as 60.04% of SCC and 32.52% of AC. The use of CB and ICC decreased the NSCLC diagnoses from 22.1% to 2.8% while the percentage of AC and SCC diagnoses increased from 4.11% to 12.64% and from 6.64% to 11.06%, respectively. Metastatic lung tumors were diagnosed based on both the cell morphology and according to the ICC results.

Conclusion:

Despite the limitations of the cytological procedures, we recommend using CB and ICC to evaluate cytological samples derived from FNA. It can in many cases replace a conventional histopathology.

Preoperative bronchial cytology for the assessment of tumor spread through air spaces in lung adenocarcinoma resection specimens

BACKGROUND

Tumor spread through air spaces (STAS), a significant prognostic indicator, has been described recently as a pattern of invasion in pulmonary carcinomas. However, questions remain regarding preoperative identification of STAS and whether it represents an in vivo phenomenon versus an ex vivo artifact.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 67 paired preoperative bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or bronchial washing (BW) cytology specimens with the subsequent lung adenocarcinoma surgical resection specimen to determine whether preoperative cytology could predict STAS. Other clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features of the resected lesions were also correlated with preoperative bronchial cytology results.

RESULTS

Positive bronchial cytology was observed in 28 cases (41.8%), 24 of which had STAS (85.7%); however, negative BAL/BW cytology was observed in 39 cases (58.2%), 29 of which had STAS (74.4%) (x²  = 1.27, P = .26, not significant). High-STAS burden was observed in 44 cases (83.0%), 21 (47.7%) with negative BAL/BW and 23 (52.3%) with positive BAL/BW. Low-STAS burden was observed in 9 cases (17.0%), 8 (88.9%) with negative BAL/BW and only 1 (11.1%) with positive BAL/BW (x²  = 5.11, P = .024, significant). For tumors with STAS, a statistically significant difference was identified in the maximal STAS distance from the main tumor edge between BAL/BW-positive and BAL/BW-negative groups (P = .007). Of the remaining clinicopathologic and radiologic features, only visceral pleural invasion was significantly associated with BAL/BW positivity.

CONCLUSION

Presurgical bronchial cytology alone cannot adequately predict tumor STAS; however, it may provide useful information regarding the extent and overall burden of STAS on the subsequent resection specimen.