Is early removal of prophylactic ureteric stents beneficial in live donor renal transplantation?

Bacterial Colonization in Double J Stent and Bacteriuria in Post-Renal Transplant Patients

Background and objective

Urinary tract infections (UTI) in kidney transplant recipients can cause significant morbidity and negatively impact both, graft and patient survival. Ureteric stenting in renal transplantation is aimed at reducing the risks of complications like ureteric leak and stenosis. Ureteric stents are not without their potential complications which may include UTI. We aimed to compare urine bacteriology and bacterial colonization of DJ stent following kidney transplantation, and to establish antimicrobial susceptibility to guide the choice of empirical antibiotics in the event of UTI in post-transplant patients with DJ stent.

Materials and methods

This was a prospective study carried out over a year period (February 2020 to January 2021). Eighty post-renal transplant patients with indwelling ureteral stents were recruited for the study. An early morning midstream urine sample was taken for analysis from consenting patients that met the inclusion criteria. All stents were removed via rigid cystoscopy and the distal end of the stent (4cm) was cut off and put in a sterile bottle for microbiological analysis. Sensitivity and resistance were tested against a panel of 19 antibiotics on all microbial isolates. Results were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 47.9+ 12.1 years. Male patients were 60 (75%) while 20 (25%) were females. Fifty-one (52%) patients had hypertension while 25 (26%) had diabetes mellitus. Hypertension and diabetes were noted in 20 (21%) patients while only one patient (1%) had HCV. Prior to renal transplantation, patients had negative urine cultures. The majority of the patients (76, 95%) had their stent retrieved after 4 weeks, 2 (2.5%) of them had stents retrieved after 2 weeks, and 2 (2.5%) had stents retrieved after 8 weeks. There was a significant association between the duration of stent and stent colonization (p=0.031).

No organism was cultured in both the urine and stent in 13 (14.4%) patients. Nine (10%) had positive stent culture with a negative urine culture while 5 (5.6%) had positive urine culture with a negative stent culture. The same organism was noted in both urine and stent in 58 (64.4%) of patients while different organisms were cultured in 5 (5.6%) of the patients. Escherichia coli was the most common organism cultured in the urine of 38 (65.5%) patients and 36 (58.1%) stents, respectively.

The sensitivity pattern shows that the organisms were more susceptible to nitrofurantoin and gentamicin, and resistant to tetracycline and ceftriaxone. Tigecycline showed good susceptibility and poor resistance.

Conclusion

This study shows that stent colonization was slightly higher than urine bacteriology, with both demonstrating similar microbiological patterns. Selection of the initial empiric treatment should be based on local epidemiological data. Initial therapy should be de-escalated to the most narrow-spectrum antibiotics to complete the course of therapy once culture and sensitivity data is available. Antibiotics stewardship will help in reducing the trend of MDR pathogens.

Identifying Early Extraperitoneal High-Volume Urine Leak Post Kidney Transplantation

Transplant clinicians need to be watchful of several potential surgical complications in the early post-transplant period, including haemorrhage, extraperitoneal urine leak, and lymphocele. While haemorrhage and extraperitoneal urine leak usually present in the early post kidney transplant period, lymphoceles usually present 2–6 weeks after transplantation. While the colour and volume of the drained fluid can give some indication of the problem, is not enough evidence for a confident urine leak diagnosis. Further investigations, such as serum biochemical parameter analysis of the drained fluid and ultrasonography, help to identify the true cause. This paper discusses how to identify high-volume extraperitoneal urine leaks in the early post kidney transplant period and considers the differential diagnoses. Different ureteroneocystostomy procedures, including the Lich–Grégoir, Politano–Leadbetter, and U-stitch techniques, are discussed and compared regarding complication rates (especially urine leak and haematuria). The authors also address the management of low- and high-volume extraperitoneal urine leak, the follow-up needed, and the impact of urine leak on graft and patient survival, length of hospital stay, and rate of hospital readmission.

Timing of Ureteric Stent Removal and Occurrence of Urological Complications after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Implanting a ureteric stent during ureteroneocystostomy reduces the risk of leakage and ureteral stenosis after kidney transplantation (KTx), but it may also predispose to urinary tract infections (UTIs). The aim of this study is to determine the optimal timing for ureteric stent removal after KTx. Searches were performed in EMBASE, MEDLINE Ovid, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (until November 2017). For this systematic review, all aspects of the Cochrane Handbook for Interventional Systematic Reviews were followed and it was written based on the PRISMA-statement. Articles discussing JJ-stents (double-J stents) and their time of removal in relation to outcomes, UTIs, urinary leakage, ureteral stenosis or reintervention were included. One-thousand-and-forty-three articles were identified, of which fourteen articles (three randomised controlled trials, nine retrospective cohort studies, and two prospective cohort studies) were included (describing in total n = 3612 patients). Meta-analysis using random effect models showed a significant reduction of UTIs when stents were removed earlier than three weeks (OR 0.49, CI 95%, 0.33 to 0.75, p = 0.0009). Regarding incidence of urinary leakage, there was no significant difference between early (<3 weeks) and late stent removal (>3 weeks) (OR 0.60, CI 95%, 0.29 to 1.23, p = 0.16). Based on our results, earlier stent removal (<3 weeks) was associated with a decreased incidence of UTIs and did not show a higher incidence of urinary leakage compared to later removal (>3 weeks). We recommend that the routine removal of ureteric stents implanted during KTx should be performed around three weeks post-operatively.

Early Versus Delayed Double J Stent Removal in Deceased Donor Renal Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Comparative Study

Introduction: Prophylactic ureteric stents have been commonly employed to reduce the incidence of ureteric obstruction and anastomotic leaks following renal transplantation. There are very few studies on the duration of ureteric stenting in deceased donor renal transplantation (DDRT). We performed a prospective study to compare early and late double J stent removal in DDRT.

Aims and methods: The aim of this study was to compare the early and delayed removal of ureteric stents after DDRT. We performed 80 DDRTs at our center from August 2012 to December 2016, which were included in the study. However, we enrolled 48 patients as the remaining had to be excluded based on the high-risk factors. The recipients were allocated on the 14th postoperative day to two groups. Group 1 underwent early stent removal on the fourteenth postoperative day and in group 2, the stent was removed in the sixth postoperative week. The two groups were followed up for six months and the incidence of urological complications and urinary tract infections (UTI) was compared.

Results: The incidence of UTI during the follow-up period of six months was significantly lower in the early stent removal group (two out of 24) than in delayed stent removal group (eight out of 24) (p=0.016). Asymptomatic bacteriuria occurred in six out of 24 (25%) in group 1 and 10 out of 24 (41.6%) in group 2 (p=0.120). There was no significant difference in the incidence of urinary leak, hematuria, or ureteric obstruction between the two groups (p=0.900). However, stent-related symptoms were significantly more in the delayed stent removal group (three in group 1 versus 18 in group 2) (p=0.001).

Conclusion: Prolonged stenting is associated with an increased risk of UTI and stent-related symptoms in immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients. The early removal of double J stents can be done in carefully selected patients to reduce stent-related complications in DDRT.

Routine Stenting of Extravesical Ureteroneocystostomy in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although rare, major urologic complications (MUC) in kidney transplantation can cause significant morbidity, increased cost, and may even lead to graft loss. Ureteric stents are routinely used to prevent MUC, although complications related to their use have been reported. Here, we systematically reviewed the role of routine stenting in preventing MUC in kidney transplantation with extravesical ureteric implantation and performed a meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed for studies on MUC and stents in kidney transplant recipients. Randomized controlled trials were shortlisted for the review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RevMan 5 was used for statistical analysis, and outcome analysis was done with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test using random effect model.

RESULTS

Six trials meeting the criteria were identified. Although stent use did not decrease the incidence of urinary leak (odds ratio [OR], 0.39; 95% CI, 0.14-1.11; P = .08) or obstruction (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.13-1.24; P = .11), it was associated with a higher incidence of urinary tract infection (OR, 3.59; 95% CI, 1.33-9.75; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

In the present era of extravesical ureterovesical anastomosis, routine stenting has a limited role in decreasing major urologic complications and may be associated with higher incidence of urinary tract infections.

How to stent the ureter after kidney transplantation in children?-A comparison of two methods of urinary drainage

Ureteral stenting after pediatric renal transplantation serves to prevent obstruction and urinary leakage, but can also cause complications. This study compares the complication rates of both methods. Data were retrospectively collected at Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (splint group, n = 61) and Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada (JJ catheter group, n = 50). Outcome measures included urological interventions and incidence of UTIs during the first 3 months post-transplantation. The splint was removed after a median of 9 (IQR 8-12), the JJ catheter after 42 (IQR 36-50) days. Seven (11.5%) children in the splint group needed at least one urological re-intervention versus two in the JJ catheter group (P-value .20). UTIs developed in 19 children (31.1%) in the splint group and in twenty-five (50.0%) children in the JJ catheter group (P-value .04), with a total number of 27 vs. 57 UTIs (P-value .02). Nine (33.3%) vs. 35 (61.4%) of these, respectively, occurred during the presence of the splint (P-value <.001). Children with a JJ catheter developed more UTIs than children with a splint; the latter, however, tended to require more re-interventions. Modification of either method is needed to find the best way to stent the ureter.

Early versus late ureteric stent removal after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage kidney disease. In a previous review we concluded that the routine use of ureteric stents in kidney transplantation reduces the incidence of major urological complications (MUC). Unfortunately, this reduction appears to lead to a concomitant rise in urinary tract infections (UTI). For kidney recipients UTI is now the commonest post-transplant complication. This represents a considerable risk to the immunosuppressed transplant recipient, particularly in the era of increased immunologically challenging transplants. There are a number of different approaches taken when considering ureteric stenting and these are associated with differing degrees of morbidity and hospital cost.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to look at the benefits and harms of early versus late removal of the ureteric stent in kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register up to 27 March 2017 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE; handsearching conference proceedings; and searching the International Clinical Trials Register Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All RCTs and quasi-RCTs were included in our meta-analysis. We included recipients of kidney transplants regardless of demography (adults or children) or the type of stent used.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors reviewed the identified studies to ascertain if they met inclusion criteria. We designated removal of a ureteric stent before the third postoperative week (< day 15) or during the index transplant admission as "early" removal. The studies were assessed for quality using the risk of bias tool. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of MUC. Further outcomes of interest were the incidence of UTI, idiosyncratic stent-related complications, hospital-related costs and adverse events. A subgroup analysis was performed examining the difference in complications reported depending on the type of ureteric stent used; bladder indwelling (BI) versus per-urethral (PU). Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Five studies (1127 patients) were included in our analysis. Generally the risk of bias of the included studies was judged low or unclear; they addressed the research question and utilised a prospective randomised design. It is uncertain whether early stent removal verus late stent removal improved the incidence of MUC (5 studies, 1127 participants: RR 1.87, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.71; I² = 21%; low certainty evidence). The incidence of UTI may be reduced in the early stent removal group (5 studies, 1127 participants: RR 0.49 95% CI 0.30 to 0.81; I² = 59%; moderate certainty evidence). This possible reduction in the UTI incidence was only apparent if a BI stent was used, (3 studies, 539 participants, RR 0.45 95% CI 0.29 to 0.70; I² = 13%; moderate certainty evidence). However, if an externalised PU stent was used there was no discernible difference in UTI incidence between the early and late group (2 studies, 588 participants: RR 0.60 95% CI 0.17, 2.03; I² = 83%; low certainty evidence). Data on health economics and quality of life outcomes were lacking.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Early removal of ureteric stents following kidney transplantation may reduce the incidence of UTI while it uncertain if there is a higher risk of MUC. BI stents are the optimum method for achieving this benefit.

Early double J stent removal in renal transplant patients to prevent urinary tract infection - systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Ureteral stents are routinely used in renal transplant and are associated with reduced urological complications but increased urinary tract infections (UTIs). There is no agreement on the preferred time to removal of stents after transplantation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing stent duration of <14 days vs > =14 days. Electronic databases were searched to identify RCTs that compared early vs late stent removal. Primary outcome was urinary tract infections. Secondary outcomes included various urological complications. No significant difference in UTI rates was demonstrated between short and long stent duration (relative risk (RR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-1.64), with significant heterogeneity (I² = 86%). Sensitivity analysis evaluating studies with low risk of bias for allocation concealment demonstrated statistically significant lower rates of UTI with short stent duration (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32-0.71) with no heterogeneity. No significant difference was demonstrated for the outcome of major urological complications (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.50-1.05), without heterogeneity. Ureteral stenosis rates were significantly lower in the short duration arm (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.98). Early removal of ureteral stents after renal transplant may be associated with reduced rates of UTI and ureteral stenosis. Additional RCTs are needed.

The Utility of Routine Ultrasound Imaging after Elective Transplant Ureteric Stent Removal

Background. Ureteric stent insertion during kidney transplantation reduces the incidence of major urological complications (MUCs). We evaluated whether routine poststent removal graft ultrasonography (PSRGU) was useful in detecting MUCs before they became clinically or biochemically apparent. Methods. A retrospective analysis was undertaken of clinical outcomes following elective stent removals from adult single renal transplant recipients (sRTRs) at our centre between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2013. Results. Elective stent removal was performed for 338 sRTRs. Of these patients, 222 had routine PSRGU (median (IQR) days after stent removal = 18 (11–31)), 79 had urgent PSRGU due to clinical or biochemical indications, 12 had CT imaging, and 25 had no further renal imaging. Of the 222 sRTRs who underwent routine PSRGU, 210 (94.6%) had no change of management, three (1.4%) required repeat imaging only, and eight patients (3.6%) had incidental (nonureteric) findings. One patient (0.5%) had nephrostomy insertion as a result of routine PSRGU findings, but no ureteric stenosis was identified. Of 79 patients having urgent PSRGU after elective stent removal, three patients required transplant ureteric reimplantation. Conclusions. This analysis found no evidence that routine PSRGU at two to three weeks after elective stent removal provides any added value beyond standard clinical and biochemical monitoring.

Routine intraoperative ureteric stenting for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Major urological complications (MUCs) after kidney transplantation contribute to patient morbidity and compromise graft function. The majority arise from the vesicoureteric anastomosis and present early after transplantation. Ureteric stents have been successfully used to treat such complications. A number of centres have adopted a policy of universal prophylactic stenting, at the time of graft implantation, to reduce the incidence of urine leaks and ureteric stenosis. Stents are associated with specific complications and some centres advocate a policy of only stenting selected anastomoses.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the benefits and harms of routine ureteric stenting to prevent urological complications in kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register (up to 8 January 2013) through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All RCTs and quasi-RCTs were included in our meta-analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four reviewers assessed the studies for quality against four criteria (allocation concealment, blinding, intention-to-treat and completeness of follow-up). The primary outcome was the incidence of MUCs. Further outcomes of interest were graft and patient survival and the incidence of adverse events (urinary tract infection (UTI), haematuria, irritative symptoms, pain and stent migration). Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and the results expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Seven RCTs (1154 patients) of low or moderate quality were identified. The incidence of MUCs was significantly reduced (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.77, P = 0.02, NNT 13) by universal prophylactic stenting. This was dependent on whether the same surgeon performed, or was in attendance, during the operations. Two patients lost their grafts to infective urinary tract complications in the stented group. UTIs, in general, were more common in stented patients (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.15) unless the patients were prescribed cotrimoxazole 480 mg/d: in which case the incidence was equivalent (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.33). Stents appeared generally well tolerated, although studies using longer stents (≥ 20 cm) for longer periods (> 6 weeks) had more problems with encrustation and migration.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Routine prophylactic stenting reduces the incidence of MUCs. Studies comparing selective stenting and universal prophylactic stenting, whilst difficult to design and analyse, would address the unresolved quality of life and economic issues.