Anti-C reactive protein antibodies in Indian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

The Role of Anti-mCRP Autoantibodies in Lupus Nephritis

Background

Lupus nephritis is characterized by multiple autoantibodies production. However, there are few autoantibodies associated with disease activity and prognosis. CRP exists in at least two conformationally distinct forms: native pentameric C-reactive protein (pCRP) and modified/monomeric CRP (mCRP). Autoantibodies against mCRP are prevalent in sera of patients with lupus nephritis and are reported to be pathogenic.

Summary

The levels of serum anti-mCRP autoantibodies are associated with clinical disease activity, tubulointerstitial lesions, treatment response, and prognosis in patients with lupus nephritis. The key epitope of mCRP was amino acid 35-47. Furthermore, emerging evidence indicated that anti-mCRP autoantibodies could participate in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis by forming in situ immune complexes or interfering with the biological functions of mCRP, such as binding to complement C1q and factor H.

Key Messages

Here, we review the recent advances in the prevalence, clinical-pathological associations, and potential pathogenesis of anti-mCRP autoantibodies in lupus nephritis, which may provide a promising novel therapeutic strategy for lupus nephritis.

A Review of Anti-C Reactive Protein Antibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the prototype autoimmune disease, is characterized by the production of a plethora of autoantibodies with various roles in the development of disease-related tissue damage. C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute phase reactant with a pentameric structure. Under acidic or alkaline conditions, or when urea levels are high and/or calcium levels are low, the pentamer (pCRP) dissociates irreversibly into monomeric CRP (mCRP) and exposes new epitopes (neo-CRP). Importantly, anti-mCRP (but not anti-pCRP) antibodies have been described in patients with SLE, their prevalence varying from 4% to 78% in different cohorts. Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between autoantibodies directed against CRP (anti-CRP) and disease activity as well as their association with lupus nephritis (LN), frequently reporting discrepant findings. The main objective of the present review is to describe the role of anti-mCRP antibodies in SLE according to the currently available data.

Anti-Pentraxin Antibodies in Autoimmune Diseases: Bystanders or Pathophysiological Actors?

Pentraxins are soluble innate immunity receptors involved in sensing danger molecules. They are classified as short (CRP, SAP) and long pentraxin subfamilies, including the prototypic long pentraxin PTX3. Pentraxins act mainly as bridging molecules favoring the clearance of microbes and dead cells. They are also involved in many other biological processes, such as regulation of complement activation, inflammation and tissue homeostasis. Autoantibodies directed against pentraxins have been reported in various autoimmune diseases, especially in systemic lupus erythematosus and ANCA-associated vasculitis. In this review, we review the main biological characteristics and functions of pentraxins and summarize data concerning autoantibodies directed against pentraxins in the context of autoimmune diseases and discuss their potential pathological role.

The relationship between anti-C-reactive protein and disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Anti-C-reactive protein (CRP) antibody has been introduced as a potential biologic marker in Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The aim of study is to evaluate the level of anti-CRP antibody in patients with SLE.

METHODS

This study investigated the relationship between levels of anti-CRP antibodies and disease activity markers, such as complement, anti-double-stranded DNA antibody, and SLE disease activity index in 34 patients with SLE.

RESULTS

The serum anti-CRP antibody levels of the patients with SLE were significantly higher than those of the healthy controls (11.3 ± 5.6 µg/mL vs. 9.1 ± 2.8 µg/mL). The percentages of the positive anti-CRP antibody were 52.9% in SLE and 27.8% in controls. Disease duration of SLE showed significant correlation with the anti-CRP antibody (r = 0.234, p = 0.026). However no significant relationship was observed between the levels of anti-CRP antibodies and disease activity markers.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that the anti-CRP antibody levels of the patients with SLE were significantly higher than those of healthy controls. We observed that the presence of the anti-CRP anti-CRP antibody was not associated with disease activity of SLE.

Is there still a place for erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein in systemic lupus erythematosus?

The inflammatory response during systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares is known to be atypical, characterized by a disproportionately lower C-reactive protein (CRP) elevation when compared with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Thus, in these patients, the analysis of inflammatory markers might be challenging in daily clinical practice. Clinicians need frequently to distinguish lupus reactivations and infectious conditions, and the significance of ESR and CRP seems to be different. Even though a non-specific marker of inflammation, ESR utility in SLE should not be neglected and it appears to be a useful biomarker for SLE activity assessment. Describing a specific cut-off for ESR in SLE is important for patients' follow-up, and levels up to 25-30 mm/h have been proposed as an upper limit of the normal range. Regarding CRP, even though higher baseline levels are described in SLE when compared with controls, including in remission periods, its response during flares seems to be incomplete and not always correlated with disease activity; while CRP values greater than 10 mg/l could be indicative for severe flares, when there is no serositis or arthritis, higher CRP levels above 50-60 mg/l may be associated with infection.

Prognostic value of anti-CRP antibodies in lupus nephritis in long-term follow-up

Background

Autoantibodies against monomeric C-reactive protein (anti-CRP-Ab) observed in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN) were suggested to be associated with active LN and a poor response to therapy during short-term follow-up.

The aim of this study was to confirm this finding and to investigate the prognostic value of anti-CRP-Ab in patients with LN during long-term follow-up.

Methods

Sera of 57 SLE patients (47 women, 10 men) with biopsy proven LN and 122 healthy individuals were analyzed for the presence of anti-CRP-Ab by in-house ELISA.

Anti-CRP-Ab levels were studied in relation to routine laboratory tests, urine analysis, levels of C3, C4, other immunological markers and the overall disease activity as assessed by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI).

The prognostic value of anti-CRP-Ab was tested in a subgroup of 29 newly diagnosed LN patients (median follow-up 5.9 years). Response to therapy at various time points was assessed with respect to baseline anti-CRP-Ab levels. At least partial response in the first/second year of treatment was considered as a “favorable outcome”, while non-response, renal flare or end stage renal disease were considered as “unfavorable outcome”.

Results

Anti-CRP-Ab were only detected in patients with active renal disease and their levels correlated with SLEDAI (r_s = 0.165, p = 0.002). The time to response was shorter in patients being anti-CRP-Ab negative at baseline compared to anti-CRP-Ab positive patients, p = 0.037. In the second year of therapy, baseline anti-CRP-Ab positivity was a significant predictor of “unfavorable outcome” (OR [95 % CI] = 15.6 [1.2-771]; p = 0.021). The predictive value of “baseline anti-CRP positivity” further increased when combined with “non-response to therapy in the first year”. Baseline anti-CRP-Ab positivity was not a predictor of “unfavorable outcome” at the end of follow-up, (OR [95 % CI] = 5.5 [0.6-71.1], p = 0.169).

Conclusions

Baseline serum levels of anti-CRP-Ab seem to be a strong risk factor for a composite outcome of non-response, renal flare or end stage renal disease after two years of standard treatment of LN. The response to therapy seems to be delayed in anti-CRP-Ab positive patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-015-0879-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Elevation of peripheral BDNF promoter methylation links to the risk of Alzheimer's disease

Brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has been known to play an important role in various mental disorders or diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aim of our study was to assess whether BDNF promoter methylation in peripheral blood was able to predict the risk of AD. A total of 44 AD patients and 62 age- and gender-matched controls were recruited in the current case-control study. Using the bisulphite pyrosequencing technology, we evaluated four CpG sites in the promoter of the BDNF. Our results showed that BDNF methylation was significantly higher in AD cases than in the controls (CpG1: p = 10.021; CpG2: p = 0.002; CpG3: p = 0.007; CpG4: p = 0.005; average methylation: p = 0.004). In addition, BDNF promoter methylation was shown to be significantly correlated with the levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), glucose, Lp(a), ApoE and ApoA in males (ALP: r = -0.308, p = 0.042; glucose: r = -0.383, p = 0.010; Lp(a): r = 0.333, p = 0.027; ApoE: r = -0.345, p = 0.032;), ApoA levels in females (r = 0.362, p = 0.033), and C Reactive Protein (CRP) levels in both genders (males: r = -0.373, p = 0.016; females: r = -0.399, p = 0.021). Our work suggested that peripheral BDNF promoter methylation might be a diagnostic marker of AD risk, although its underlying function remains to be elaborated in the future.