A randomized study to compare sequential chemoradiotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer

Postoperative tumor bed radiation versus T-shaped field radiation in the treatment of locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase IIb multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is crucial for patients with thoracic locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC, pT3-4aN0-3M0) following esophagectomy. However, the appropriate radiation volume has not been well established. This study aimed to determine the optimal PORT volume for LA-ESCC patients.

METHODS

LA-ESCC patients post-esophagectomy were randomly assigned to either the large-field irradiation (LFI, primary lesion and lymph node tumor bed plus elective nodal irradiation) group or the small-field irradiation (SFI, primary lesion and lymph node tumor bed alone) group. Stratification was based on T stage and the number of lymph node metastases. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), while the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), adverse events, and patterns of initial failure.

RESULTS

A total of 401 patients were randomly assigned to the intention-to-treat analysis(LFI group, n = 210; SFI group, n = 191). The median DFS of patients in the LFI group was 47.9 months and 48.1 months in the SFI group (HR = 0.87, 95%CI, 0.65 to 1.16; p = 0.32). The estimated one-year and three-year OS rates were 89.2% and 63.2% for patients in the LFI group, compared to 86.6% and 60.7% for the SFI group, respectively. The difference of OS between the two groups was not significant (HR = 0.86, 95%CI, 0.63 to 1.16; p = 0.35). Fewer patients in the LFI group experienced locoregional recurrence compared to the SFI group (12.9% vs 20.4%, p = 0.013). Additionally, locoregional recurrence-free survival of the LFI group was significantly longer than that of SFI group (HR = 0.54, 95%CI, 0.34-0.87; p = 0.01). The most common toxicity was grade 2 esophagitis, observed in 22.9% of the LFI group and 16.8% of the SFI group. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 6.7% of the LFI group and 2.6% of the SFI group. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. Adverse events did not significantly differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative radiotherapy, with the specified radiation volume shows encouraging survival outcomes that are comparable to those of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with thoracic LA-ESCC. Both postoperative irradiation fields were found to be feasible and safe.

Clinicopathological profile and survival analysis of esophageal carcinoma: A retrospective study in a tertiary care hospital in Northeast India

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer (EC) is an extremely aggressive tumor with one of the highest geographic, ethnic, and gender variations. Various factors including tobacco consumption, unhealthy diet, and socioeconomic status have been implicated in the etiology of EC. Despite the advent of modern treatments, the prognosis of EC is dismal. This study has been undertaken to review the clinical and pathologic profiles, treatment approach, and survival pattern in patients with EC in a tertiary care hospital in northeast India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective descriptive study was done with 179 EC patients presented to our department between January 2013 and December 2020. Statistical analysis was done by using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 21. P- value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The majority of the patients presented in the sixth decade of life from rural areas with male to female ratio of 3.7:1. Dysphagia was the most common presenting feature. High incidence of tobacco and alcohol use was found. Mid-esophagus is the most common site and squamous cell carcinoma is the most common type. Fifty-two (29.1%) and 71 (39.6%) patients presented in stages III and IV, respectively. Twenty-four (13.4%) patients presented with metastatic disease, the lung being the most common site. Patients were treated with surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or combination of any of these. Overall median survival for the EC patients was 6 months. Patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation had better survival.

CONCLUSION

EC is a serious malignancy with a dismal prognosis due to the advanced stage at presentation. Larger clinical trials using new therapeutic strategies are the need of the hour.

Late Toxicity and Health-Related Quality of Life Following Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is a treatment option with curative intent for patients with esophageal cancer that could result in late toxicities and affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to review the literature and perform a meta-analysis to investigate the effect of dCRT on late toxicities and HRQoL in esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsychINFO. Prospective phase II and III clinical trials, population-based studies, and retrospective chart reviews investigating late toxicity or HRQoL after dCRT (≥50 Gy) were included. The HRQoL outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed-effect models with restricted cubic spline transformation. Any HRQoL changes of ≥10 points were considered clinically relevant. The risk of toxicities was calculated using the number of events and the total study population.

RESULTS

Among 41 included studies, 10 assessed HRQoL and 31 late toxicity. Global health status remained stable over time and improved after 36 months compared with baseline (mean change, +11). Several tumor-specific symptoms, including dysphagia, eating restrictions, and pain, improved after 6 months compared with baseline. Compared with baseline, dyspnea worsened after 6 months (mean change, +16 points). The risk of any late toxicity was 48% (95% CI, 33%-64%). Late toxicity risk of any grade for the esophagus was 17% (95% CI, 12%-21%), pulmonary 21% (95% CI, 11%-31%), cardiac 12% (95% CI, 6%-17%), and any other organ 24% (95% CI, 2%-45%).

CONCLUSIONS

Global health status remained stable over time, and tumor-specific symptoms improved within 6 months after dCRT compared with baseline, with the exception of dyspnea. In addition, substantial risks of late toxicity were observed.

Clinical Outcome-Related Cancer Pathways and Mutational Signatures in Patients With Unresectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is a standard-of-care for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, even in individuals treated with the same dCRT regimen, differences in the local control rate and radiation-induced thoracic toxicity exist (radiation-induced esophagitis [RIE]).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Here, we describe a comprehensive genomic evaluation of pretreatment tumor tissue samples from 183 patients with ESCC using targeted sequencing of 474 cancer-related genes. The association between endpoints (progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival), toxicity (RIE) and genomic features, including altered pathways and the mutational signature, was analyzed. An independent cohort of 84 stage II-III patients with ESCC was used for validation.

RESULTS

Gene alterations in the cell cycle pathway were identified in 87% of cases. Other frequently altered pathways included PI3K-AKT (45.9%), NOTCH (38.3%), NRF2 (36.6%), RKT-RAS (28.4%), and homologous recombination repair (HRR; 20.2%). HRR pathway alterations correlated with shortened PFS (mutation vs wild-type: 9.00 vs 14.40 months, hazard ratio, 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-3.44), while altered RTK-RAS pathways were correlated with worse overall survival in patients with ESCC treated with chemoradiotherapy (mutation vs wild-type: 23.70 vs 33.50 months; hazard ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.69). Furthermore, enrichment of apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide (APOBEC) signatures (signatures 2 and 13) was identified in ESCC tumors with altered HRR pathways. High APOBEC signatures and an altered HRR pathway were correlated with poor prognoses in dCRT-treated ESCC. Moreover, the APOBEC signature and/or the presence of HRR pathway alterations were associated with poor PFS and overall survival, which was validated in an independent whole exome sequence cohort. Notably, the altered HRR pathway was also associated with high-grade RIE toxicity in patients with ESCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, our results support the use of comprehensive genomic profiling to guide treatment and minimize RIE in patients with ESCC.

Comparative clinical studies of primary chemoradiotherapy versus S-1 and nedaplatin chemotherapy against stage IVb oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is one of the most commonly occurring devastating tumours worldwide, including in China. To date, the standard care of patients with stage IV OSCC is systemic chemotherapy and palliative care, which results in poor prognosis. However, no consensus has been established regarding the role of radiotherapy in targeting the primary tumour in patients with stage IVa OSCC. Thus, the aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of primary radiotherapy combined with S-1 and nedaplatin (NPD) chemotherapy in the patients with stage IV OSCC.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study is a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. A total of 180 eligible patients with stage IV OSCC will be randomised into a study group (90 patients) and a control group (90 patients). Patients in the study group will receive radiotherapy to the primary tumour at a dose of 50.4 Gy combined with 4-6 cycles of S-1 and NPD chemotherapy. In the control group, patients will only receive 4-6 cycles of S-1 and NPD chemotherapy. The primary and secondary outcomes will be measured. The differences between the two groups will be statistically analysed with regard to overall survival, the progression-free survival and safety. All outcomes will be ascertained before treatment, after treatment and after the follow-up period.The results of this study will provide evidence on the role of radiotherapy in patients with stage IV OSCC in China, which will show new options for patients with advanced oesophageal cancer.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of The First Hospital Affiliated of Zhengzhou University (approval number: SS-2018-04).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800015765) on 1 November 2018; retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx.

Survival Comparision of Three-dimensional Radiotherapy Alone vs. Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To compare the survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who received chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or radiotherapy (RT) alone.

METHODS

A total of 753 well-matched patients were enrolled. A total of 299 patients were treated with CRT, and 454 patients were treated with RT alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed with the R project. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates, and the log-rank test was used to assess differences in survival.

RESULTS

The response rate was 99.0% with CRT and 98.3% with RT alone (p = 0.651). The 1-, 3-, 5- and 10 year overall survival (OS) rates were as follows: 72.2, 40.1, 30.7 and 13.9% with CRT, 68.1, 35.2%, 23.3 and 12.5% with RT alone (p = 0.033); 73.4, 40.1, 31.0 and 16.1% with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT); and 68.1, 35.2, 23.3 and 12.5% with RT alone (p = 0.028). There was no significant difference in OS between the CCRT group and the sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) group (p = 0.527). Consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) after CCRT led to a significant increase in the OS rate compared with no CCT after CCRT (p = 0.003). Compared with the OS of patients who received 1∼2 cycles of CCT, the OS of patients who received 3∼4 cycles of CCT was significantly improved (p = 0.011). Acute toxic effects were more severe in the CRT, but no significant differences in late reactions. CRT exhibited more appetite loss and fatigue symptoms than RT alone, and dysphagia of CRT relief more obviously. The CRT group had a significantly lower rate of local control failure than the RT alone group (p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with ESCC, CRT led to a significantly improved OS compared to RT alone, and this trend was more obvious with CCRT. CCT after CCRT prolonged OS, especially in patients who received at least 2 cycles of CCT. CRT can reduce the deaths due to local control failure compared to RT alone.

Randomized phase II trial comparing tumor bed alone with tumor bed and elective nodal postoperative radiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

This study compares the outcomes of different postoperative radiation fields for locoregionally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. This is a multi-institution randomized phase II trial and noninferior study. Patients with ESCC who had undergone esophagectomy (stage T3-4N0-3M0) were enrolled and randomized into the large-field irradiation arm (LFI; tumor bed and elective lymph node region) and small-field irradiation arm (SFI; tumor bed only). The primary endpoint was whether the disease-free survival (DFS) of SFI was not inferior to LFI. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the rationality of the radiation target volume by analyzing failure patterns. One hundred twenty-one patients (64 patients for LFI and 57 patients for SFI, respectively) were eligible in this mid-time analysis. The 1- and 3-year DFS was 79.9%, 46.2% for LFI and 67.6%, 44.3% for SFI, respectively (P = 0.414). The locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) of LFI was significantly better than that of SFI (P = 0.003). However, there were no significant differences in the distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival between the two arms (P = 0.332, P = 0.405, respectively). The failure patterns of the two arms were significantly different (P = 0.002). For pT3-4N0-3M0 ESCC patients, postoperative radiotherapy with SFI showed a similar survival outcome to LFI. However, the LRFS of patients with SFI was worse than that of patients with LFI.

Nimotuzumab Plus Paclitaxel and Cisplatin as a 1st-Line Treatment for Esophageal Cancer: Long Term Follow-up of a Phase II Study

The effect of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor targeted treatment in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is still unclear. We conducted a prospective phase II study of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and nimotuzumab (TPN) as a first-line treatment for unresectable or metastatic ESCC and the objective response rate was 51.8%. Here, we report the long-term follow-up results of the initial trial. Fifty-nine patients were enrolled from Mar 2011 to Apr 2013 and were treated with the TPN regimen. Palliative sequential radiotherapy was given if all tumor lesions were confined to 1-2 radiation fields. Fifty-six patients were eligible for evaluation. After a median follow-up of 32.2months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS) time were 18.1±4.2 months (95% CI: 9.8-26.4) and 26.2±10.0 months (95% CI: 6.6-45.8), respectively, in 29 patients with unresectable local-regional disease, while they were 6.6±0.4 months (95% CI: 5.8-7.5) and 11.5±3.7 months (95% CI: 4.2-18.8), respectively, in 27 patients with metastatic disease. Patients who were male, those with multiple station lymph node metastases, those with visceral metastasis, those who did not response to TPN treatment, and those who did not receive radiotherapy, had a worse OS. In 6 patients with multiple station lymph node metastasis and in 3 patients with recurrent disease and oligo-metastasis (local lymph nodes), TPN with sequential radiation resulted in a mean OS of 17.67±9.50 months and a mean OS of over 40 months, respectively. In conclusion, TPN is effective as a first-line treatment for patients with unresectable and metastatic ESCC. In addition, TPN treatment with sequential radiation might improve survival in patients with limited or oligo lymph node metastases.

Clinical Effect of Radiotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy for Non-Surgical Treatment of the Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is widely accepted and is considered a standard treatment, particularly for unresectable and inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the optimal use of the combined modalities of chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) remains controversial. In addition, no consensus has been reached regarding the exact efficacy of consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) and the most appropriate radiotherapy dose.

Material/Methods

Clinical data from 262 ESCC patients treated with CRT (n=165) or RT alone (n=97) were collected and reviewed. The long-term outcomes were analyzed, and treatment related acute toxicity reactions were compared.

Result

The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 75.3%, 35.6%, and 25.3%, respectively, for the CRT group and 61.5%, 26.7%, and 17.6% for the RT-alone group (P=0.015). The concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) groups exhibited similar survival outcomes (for OS, P=0.568; for progression-free survival (PFS,) P=0.145). CCT after CCRT did not influence OS (P=0.236) but was associated with a more favorable PFS (P=0.020). In addition, high-dose of 60–65 Gy tended to prolong OS compared with low-dose (<60 Gy) or excessive-dose (>65 Gy). The incidence of adverse reactions, such as esophagitis and leukopenia, in the CRT group were significantly higher than in the RT-alone group (P=0.019, P=0.001, respectively), and no significant difference was observed between patients treated with CCRT and CCT after CCRT.

Conclusions

Treating non-surgical ESCC patients with CCRT conferred a significant survival benefit compared with RT alone. CCT after CCRT prolongs PFS but does not increase acute toxicity. High-dose (60–65 Gy) CCRT could generate more favorable survival outcomes.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Improving Survival Outcomes for Esophageal Carcinoma: An Updated Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) treatment for patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of NCRT followed by surgery (NCRTS) with surgery alone (SA) for EC.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched up to August 2015 for all the published studies that investigated EC patients receiving either NCRTS or SA, and the reference lists were also manually examined for the eligible studies. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI s) as effective size was determined to assess the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates (SRs), postoperative morbidity, and postoperative mortality. Heterogeneity was determined using the Q-test. The Begg's test and Egger's test were used for assessing any potential publication bias.

RESULTS

Of 1120 identified studies, 16 eligible studies were included in this analysis (involving 2549 patients). Overall, the pooled results suggested that NCRTS was associated with significantly improved 1-year (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13), 3-year (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.14-1.39), and 5-year (RR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.18-1.56) SRs. However, the results also indicated that NCRTS had no or little effect on postoperative morbidity (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.82-1.05) and postoperative mortality (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.56-2.44).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with SA, NCRTS can increase 1-, 3-, and 5-year SRs in patients with EC.