1
|
Yadav BS, Dey T. Hypofractionation for Regional Nodal Irradiation in Breast Cancer: Best of Both the Worlds. Clin Breast Cancer 2024; 24:399-410. [PMID: 38614852 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
Locoregional radiotherapy play an important role in controlling the disease after surgery in patients with breast cancer. Radiotherapy schedules vary from conventional fraction to hypofractionation. The purpose of this review is to get an insight into the data on regional nodal irradiation (RNI) with hypofractionation in patients with breast cancer. This systematic review was constructed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) framework. Electronic databases such as PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE were searched from January 1, 2023 to March 31, 2023 to identify studies published in English language on hypofractionated RNI in post mastectomy patients. The search was carried out with the National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms like "regional nodal irradiation," "hypofractionated" and "hypofractionation in breast cancer" with different Boolean operators (and/or). A manual search of reference lists of included articles was also performed to make sure there were no additional cases unidentified from the primary search. Studies deemed potentially eligible were identified and assessed by same independent reviewers to confirm eligibility. RNI data are mainly from a randomized study from Beijing and pooled data from START trials. There are also data from retrospective and single institutional studies and a few phase II studies with limited number of patients using different dose fractionations and techniques of radiotherapy. Doses used in these trials ranged from 26-47.7 Gy in 5-19 fractions over 1-4 weeks. Grade ≥ 2 pulmonary fibrosis and lymphedema rate ranged from 2%-7.9% and 3%-19.8% respectively. Grade ≥ 2 shoulder dysfunction and brachial plexopathy ranged from 0.2%-28% and 0%-< 1%, respectively. Late effects with a dose range of 26-40 Gy delivered in 5 to 15 fractions over 1-3 weeks were less/similar to conventional fraction. Current data showed lower/similar rates of toxicity with hypofractionated RNI compared with conventional fractionation RNI. Doses of 26 Gy to 40 Gy delivered in 5 to 15 fractions over 1-3 weeks are safe for RNI. With limited data, ultra-hypofractionation 26 Gy/5 fractions/1 week also seems to be safe. However, long-term outcome is awaited and many trials are going on to address its efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Budhi Singh Yadav
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
| | - Treshita Dey
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yadav BS, Dahiya D, Kannan P, Goyal S, Laroiya I, Irrinki S, Singh NR, Sharma R. HYPofractionated Adjuvant RadioTherapy in 1 versus 2 weeks in high-risk patients with breast cancer (HYPART): a non-inferiority, open-label, phase III randomised trial. Trials 2024; 25:21. [PMID: 38167339 PMCID: PMC10763219 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07851-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Radiotherapy is an important part of breast cancer treatment after surgery. Breast cancer radiotherapy is usually delivered in 3-5 weeks. This is a long duration for women with breast cancer to stay away from the family and work. We wanted to reduce this duration so that the wages loss and the logistics can be minimised for these patients. Hypofractionation, i.e. high dose per fraction, is delivered in a smaller number of days. In this study, we will compare a 1-week schedule of hypofractionated adjuvant whole breast/chest wall and/or regional nodal radiotherapy against 2 weeks for locoregional disease control, toxicities, quality of life (QoL), survival and second cancers after primary surgery in patients with breast cancer. METHODS Eligible patients with breast cancer after mastectomy or breast conserving surgery (BCS) will be treated with a radiotherapy dose of 26 Gy in 5 fractions over 1 week in the study arm and 34 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks in the control arm. The primary endpoint of this noninferiority study will be locoregional tumour control. Secondary endpoints will be early and late radiation toxicities, quality of life, contralateral primary tumours, regional and distant metastases, survival and second cancers. A total of 1018 patients will be randomised (1:1) to receive 1 week or 2 weeks of radiotherapy. An event-driven analysis will be performed after at least 94 patients have documented locoregional recurrences. Acute radiation toxicity will be assessed and scaled according to the RTOG grading system. Late radiation toxicity will be assessed with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer late radiation morbidity scale. Cosmetic assessment will be done using Harvard/NSABP/RTOG breast cosmesis grading scale at baseline and 3 and 5 years. QoL will be assessed with EORTC QLQ-30 and EORTC QLQ-BR 23 at baseline and 3 and 5 years. DISCUSSION Hypofractionation reduces treatment time to half while maintaining breast cosmesis and gives control rates equal to conventional fractionation. This is possible because breast tissue can tolerate high dose per fraction. In this study, we presume that 1-week radiotherapy will be non-inferior to 2 week radiotherapy, i.e. disease control will be similar with both the schedules without additional side effects, and QoL of these patients will be maintained. If we are able to achieve these outcomes, then patients will be able to complete their radiotherapy in less duration. There is not much data on regional nodal irradiation with hypofraction in breast cancer. We have used hypofraction for regional nodal irradiation in the past and not encountered any safety issue. If we are able to prove that late-term effects are comparable in the two schedules, it will make the radiation oncologist confident about hypofractionation in breast cancer. As breast cancer is a leading cancer in females and radiation therapy is an integral part of its local management, hypofractionation will help radiation centres worldwide to meet the growing need for radiation treatment in breast cancer, particularly in developing countries where resources are limited. It will also reduce the financial burden on the patient and family. Since we will treat these patients with both simple and complex radiotherapy techniques, it will also be possible for the low-income countries to follow this trial without needing a high-end or expensive radiotherapy equipment as the planning and treatment process will be very simple. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04472845 and CTRI with REF/2020/09/037050.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Budhi Singh Yadav
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
| | - Divya Dahiya
- Department of General Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - P Kannan
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Shikha Goyal
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ishita Laroiya
- Department of General Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Santhosh Irrinki
- Department of General Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ngangom Robert Singh
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Reena Sharma
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yadav BS, Bansal A, Kuttikat PG, Das D, Gupta A, Dahiya D. Late-term effects of hypofractionated chest wall and regional nodal radiotherapy with two-dimensional technique in patients with breast cancer. Radiat Oncol J 2020; 38:109-118. [PMID: 33012154 PMCID: PMC7533408 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2020.00129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) is becoming a new standard in postoperative treatment of patients with early stage breast cancer after breast conservation surgery. However, data on hypofractionation in patients with advanced stage disease who undergo mastectomy followed by local and regional nodal irradiation (RNI) is lacking. In this retrospective study, we report late-term effects of 3 weeks post-mastectomy hypofractionated local and RNI with two-dimensional (2D) technique in patients with stage II and III breast cancer. METHODS Between January 1990 and December 2007, 1,770 women with breast cancer who were given radical treatment with mastectomy, systemic therapy and RT at least 10 years ago were included. RT dose was 35 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks to chest wall by two tangential fields and 40 Gy in same fractions to supraclavicular fossa (SCF) and internal mammary nodes (IMNs). SCF and IMNs dose was prescribed at dmax and 3 cm depth, respectively. Chemotherapy and hormonal therapy was given in 64% and 74% patients, respectively. Late-term toxicities were assessed with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scores and LENT-SOMA scales (the Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic scales). RESULTS Mean age was 48 years (range, 19 to 75 years). Median follow-up was 12 years (range, 10 to 27 years). Moderate/marked arm/shoulder pain was reported by 254 (14.3%) patients. Moderate/marked shoulder stiffness was reported by 219 (12.3%) patients. Moderate/marked arm edema was seen in 131 (7.4%) patients. Brachial plexopathy was not seen in any patient. Rib fractures were noted in 6 (0.3%) patients. Late cardiac and lung toxicity was seen in 29 (1.6%) and 23 (1.3%) patients, respectively. Second malignancy developed in 105 (5.9%) patients. CONCLUSION RNI with 40 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks hypofractionation with 2D technique seems safe and comparable to historical data of conventional fractionation (ClinicalTrial.gov Registration No. XXXX).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Budhi Singh Yadav
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Anshuma Bansal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India
| | - Philip George Kuttikat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Deepak Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ankita Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Divya Dahiya
- Department of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yadav BS, Sharma SC. A Phase 2 Study of 2 Weeks of Adjuvant Whole Breast/Chest Wall and/or Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Patients With Breast Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100:874-881. [PMID: 29485066 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Revised: 05/12/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the results in terms of feasibility and early toxicity of hypofractionated adjuvant whole breast/chest wall and/or regional nodal radiation therapy for patients with breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS From June 2013 to October 2014, 50 patients with breast cancer after mastectomy or after breast conservation surgery (BCS) were prospectively included. The institutional ethics committee approved the study, which was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT02460744). Treatment planning was performed using a simulator with 2 tangential fields to the breast/chest wall and an incident field to the supraclavicular fossa. The radiation dose delivered was 34 Gy in 10 fractions within 2 weeks, followed by a boost of 10 Gy in 5 fractions within 1 week for patients who underwent BCS. Acute skin toxicities were recorded during and after treatment according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group acute radiation toxicity scoring criteria. The primary objective was to obtain estimates of the acute toxicity rates and cosmetic outcomes that could be used to design a subsequent phase III comparative study. Acute skin and late toxicities were recorded during and after treatment. Cosmetic outcomes were assessed before and after treatment and during the regular follow-up period. A cost/benefit analysis was also performed and compared with that for standard treatment of 35 Gy in 15 fractions within 3 weeks. RESULTS The median follow-up was 39 months (range 14-48). The mean age was 51 years (range 26-75). A left-sided tumor was present in 25 patients (50%). Total mastectomy with axillary clearance was performed in 40 (80%) and BCS in 10 (20%) patients. Acute grade 2 and 3 skin toxicity was seen in 16 (32%) and 1 (2%) patient, respectively. In the BCS patients, grade 2 skin and subcutaneous toxicity was seen in 2 (20%) and 1 (10%) patient, respectively. Grade 2 edema was seen in 1 patient (10%). The cosmesis was excellent or good in 8 (80%) and fair or poor in 2 (20%) patients. The cost/benefit analysis revealed significantly less financial burden on the patients with 2 weeks of treatment. Disease-free and overall survival at 3 years was 94% and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Hypofractionated radiation therapy within 2 weeks appears to be feasible for patients with breast cancer and was associated with acute and late skin toxicity profiles similar to those observed with 3 weeks of treatment. The financial burden on the patient and family could be reduced with 2 weeks of treatment. Long-term follow-up data and a prospective comparative study are needed to strengthen these results. Hypofractionation might help radiation centers worldwide to meet the increasing need for radiation for breast cancer, especially in developing countries where resources are limited and patients must travel long distances for treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Budhi Singh Yadav
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
| | - Suresh C Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; Department of Radiotherapy, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rangarajan B, Shet T, Wadasadawala T, Nair NS, Sairam RM, Hingmire SS, Bajpai J. Breast cancer: An overview of published Indian data. South Asian J Cancer 2016; 5:86-92. [PMID: 27606288 PMCID: PMC4991144 DOI: 10.4103/2278-330x.187561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The Incidence of breast cancer has been steadily increasing in the last two decades, more so in urban areas of the sub-continent. Cancer ceters across the country have large numbers of patients being treated with multiple publications in this field. Inspite of paucity of prospective data and randomised clinical trials from India, there are large number of retrospective publications on various aspects of the disease including pathology, radiology, surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, palliative care and alternatitive treatment modalities. These published data provide an insight into the trends of breast cancer in the country and this comprehensive data review of Indian data will provide a basis for designing trials relevant to our population and planning health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bharath Rangarajan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, India
| | - Tanuja Shet
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharastra, India
| | | | - Nita S Nair
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharastra, India
| | - R Madhu Sairam
- Department of Radiotherapy, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, India
| | - Sachin S Hingmire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital, Pune, India
| | - Jyoti Bajpai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharastra, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Minami CA, Bilimoria KY, Hansen NM, Strauss JB, Hayes JP, Feinglass JM, Bethke KP, Rydzewski NR, Winchester DP, Palis BE, Yang AD. National Evaluation of the New Commission on Cancer Quality Measure for Postmastectomy Radiation Treatment for Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:2446-55. [PMID: 27169774 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5257-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current guidelines recommend postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) for patients with ≥4 positive lymph nodes and suggest strong consideration of PMRT in those with 1-3 positive nodes. These recommendations were incorporated into a Commission on Cancer quality measure in 2014. However, national adherence with these recommendations is unknown. Our objectives were to describe PMRT use in the United States in patients with stage I to III invasive breast cancer and to examine possible factors associated with the omission of PMRT. METHODS From the National Cancer Data Base, 753,536 mastectomies at 1123 hospitals were identified from 1998 to 2011. PMRT use over time was examined using random effects logistic regression analyses, adjusting for patient, tumor, and hospital characteristics. Analyses were stratified by nodal status (≥4 nodes positive, 1-3 nodes positive, node negative). RESULTS The proportion of patients receiving PMRT increased from 1998 to 2011 (>4 positive nodes: 56.2 to 66.6 %; 1-3 positive nodes: 28.0 to 39.1 %; node-negative: 8.3 to 10.0 %, p < 0.001 for all). In adjusted analyses, patients with ≥4 positive nodes were more likely to have PMRT omitted if they had smaller tumors. Patients with 1-3 positive nodes were more likely to have PMRT omitted if they had lower grade or smaller tumors. Irrespective of patients' nodal status, PMRT utilization rates decreased as age increased. CONCLUSIONS Though PMRT rates increased over time in patients with ≥4 and 1-3 positive nodes, PMRT in patients with ≥4 positive nodes remains underutilized. Feedback to hospitals using the new Commission on Cancer PMRT measure may help to improve adherence rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina A Minami
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University and Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA. .,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology, Northwestern University and Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA. .,Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Karl Y Bilimoria
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University and Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology, Northwestern University and Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.,Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nora M Hansen
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jonathan B Strauss
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John P Hayes
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Joe M Feinglass
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kevin P Bethke
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - David P Winchester
- National Cancer Data Base, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brian E Palis
- National Cancer Data Base, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Anthony D Yang
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University and Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology, Northwestern University and Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|