Abdominal injury patterns in patients with seatbelt signs requiring laparotomy

Seat Belt Injury and Efferent Loop Laceration Following a Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch: A Case Report

Blunt abdominal trauma patients who have had prior bariatric procedures may present a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve (SADI-S) is a modified duodenal switch procedure that is relatively uncommon. This case report describes a patient who previously underwent a SADI-S for the management of obesity and subsequently sustained a seat belt injury in a motor vehicle collision resulting in a laceration of the efferent loop. The patient presented with symptoms of acute abdominal pain and was diagnosed through imaging studies. Prompt surgical intervention was performed with resection and primary anastomosis of the damaged section of the jejunum, and repair of a large mesenteric laceration. We discuss the importance of early recognition and intraoperative decision-making in the case of this patient concerning her SADI-S.

Prevalence, Pattern, Mortality, and Morbidity of Traumatic Small Bowel Perforation at King Abdulaziz Medical City: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction Bowel perforation, whether from trauma or other causes, presents with diverse clinical scenarios. Small bowel perforation (SBP), a potentially fatal condition often linked to blunt trauma like motor vehicle accidents, necessitates prompt detection and intervention, crucial for improved outcomes. This study investigated the prevalence, predictors, presentation, diagnostic findings, morbidity, and mortality of traumatic SBP for comprehensive insights. Methodology This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh. A review of 838 cases, which represent all abdominal trauma patients from January 2017 to March 2023, was done. Forty patients who developed SBP and have complete data were included in this study. One case was excluded due to incomplete medical records. Data were collected with the non-probability convenience sampling technique via the BestCare system using a data collection sheet. Data were analyzed with IBM SPSS 29 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Out of all abdominal trauma cases (n=838), 40 patients developed SBP (n=40, 4.77%). Males constituted 87.5%, and the most common mechanism was motor vehicle accidents (57.5%). Complications included cardiac arrest, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), and leak (7.5% each). In motor vehicle accidents, SBP primarily affected patients who were in the driver's position (78.3%). Clinical signs at presentation revealed abdominal tenderness (52.5%), abdominal distension (22.5%), and abnormal systolic blood pressure (mean 115.3 mmHg). Linear regression showed gender and age positively associated with morbidity (p=0.474, p=0.543) while BMI exhibited a negative relationship (p=0.314). Logistic regression revealed non-significant predictors of mortality, except for mean initial hematocrit (HCT) (p=0.721, aOR=0.098). Conclusion Our study provides crucial findings on the incidence, patterns, mortality, and morbidity of traumatic bowel perforation, contributing to the existing body of research. The identified prevalence of 4.77% and mortality at 17.5% from the studied population underline the serious impact of this condition, and the 37.5% complication rate observed demonstrates the potential risks involved. The average hospital stay is found to be 14 days, adding further to the disease burden. These findings underscore the importance of specific preventative measures, particularly related to motor vehicle accidents (MVAs), and highlight potential markers for predicting outcomes, such as age, gender, and mean initial HCT. This substantiates the need for further research involving larger cohorts and prospective designs to gain comprehensive insights and establish more robust preventative and treatment strategies.

Influence of operative timing on perioperative outcomes of patients with the seatbelt sign

Background

The seatbelt sign (SBS) is a pattern of bruising/contusions on the chest and abdominal wall following motor vehicle collisions. The aim of this analysis is to investigate the influence of time to surgery following identification of the SBS on perioperative outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective review of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2017 to 2019 was performed. Patients included in this retrospective analysis were involved in motor vehicle collisions, experienced blunt abdominal trauma, presented with skin abrasions/contusions in the SBS distribution, were hemodynamically stable, and underwent laparotomy. Demographics, vital signs, injury severity score, Glasgow coma scale, preoperative CT scans (P-CT), and time from presentation to surgery were recorded. Time from presentation to surgery was subdivided by data quartiles as immediate (<1.3 h), early (1.3-4 h), and delayed (>4 h). The influence of operative timing on postoperative mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and ventilator days was assessed in multivariate analyses.

Results

A total of 1523 patients were included; 280 underwent immediate, 610 early, and 633 delayed surgery. Patients undergoing surgery in the early and delayed groups who received P-CT scans had shorter mean times to operation (4.52 h vs 5.24 h, p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, patients who underwent delayed surgery stayed in the hospital 2.5 days longer (p < 0.001), spent 2.8 additional days in the ICU (p < 0.001), and spent 3.75 additional days on a ventilator (p < 0.001) than patients who received early surgery. Within the early and delayed surgical groups, P-CT was associated with lower mortality (OR 0.46 95 % CI 0.24-0.88, p < 0.01) in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Early surgical intervention was associated with improved patient outcomes by reducing hospital and ICU LOS and ventilator days. Conducting P-CT reduced the time to surgery and mortality. Utilization of P-CT for screening hemodynamically stable patients with the SBS upon admission may expedite identification of the potential need for surgical management of abdominal injury.

Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scale Can Help Identify Intra-Abdominal Injury in Children Injured in an MVC

Background: Motor vehicle crashes (MVC) cause variable injury to the thoracolumbar (TL) region of children secondary to rapid deceleration from seatbelts. This mechanism can also predispose a child to intraabdominal injury (IAI), which necessitates early diagnosis to limit morbidity and mortality. While the maximum extent of TL spine injury can be appreciated shortly after presentation, the severity of IAI may not be appreciated until days later. It is hypothesized that a measure of TL-injury severity will identify patients at risk of concomitant IAI. Methods: Retrospective chart review identified 72 children with MVC-related TL spine injuries from 2007-2020. Patients were grouped based on the presence of IAI and TL spine injury (N=33) compared to isolated TL spine injury (no IAI, N=39). TL spine injury severity was classified according to the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scale (TLICS). Results: Demographics were similar in both groups. Children with concomitant IAI had primarily lumbar spine injuries, while injuries without associated IAI were more broadly distributed throughout the thoracolumbar spine. Children without concomitant IAI were more likely to sustain compression fractures (n=31, 79%), while children with IAI had more distraction injuries (n=24, 73%). TL injuries associated with IAI were significantly more severe than isolated TL injuries (median TLICS=7 [range: 1-9] vs. 1 [range: 1-10], p<0.001). As hypothesized, increasing TLICS is associated with an increased risk of concomitant IAI, such that for every point increase in TLICS, the risk of IAI increases 49% (OR: 1.492, [95% CI 1.254-1.817], AROC 0.795). Conclusions: Given the association between severe spine injury and IAI, this study examines the utility of TLICS score at presentation to establish an index of suspicion for concomitant IAI. While other clinical signs may be suggestive of the presence of IAI, our study may provide clinicians with another data point suggestive of spine injury severity in their diagnostic toolbox to optimally manage pediatric patients after MVC. Level of Evidence: III, Retrospective Cohort Study Key Concepts•Pediatric patients are at risk for sustaining seatbelt syndrome (intraabdominal injury (IAI) associated with spinal column injury) after motor vehicle collisions when restraints are used improperly.•Occult IAIs may not be readily diagnosed with initial trauma workup and require a high index of suspicion to avoid delay in diagnosis and potential morbidity and mortality.•IAI is more frequently associated with spine fractures located in the lumbar spine.•IAI is associated with more severe spine injury (represented by Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scale [TLICS] score >5).

Lessons learned about the management of a traffic road accident victim with abdominal seatbelt sign: Case report

The abdominal seatbelt sign is well described in the literature as an indicative of intra-abdominal visceral injuries; it is considered rare because it is difficult to detect with no single observation providing reliable diagnosis. Consequently, it often presages a delayed diagnosis. We here report lessons from management of 44 year-old man professional driver, victim of a road traffic accident who underwent a damage control laparotomy and whose abdominal seatbelt sign was diagnosed late. To our knowledge, abdominal seatbelt sign has never been reported in a context of rural hospital with low technical facilities. The assessment of the injury revealed haemoperitoneum, rupture of the rectus abdominis, rupture of the appendix and the bowel loop with mesenteric tears. The patient had a second surgery due to a postoperative complication - a postoperative peritonitis with a parietal abscess; this resulted in a digestive fistula which was treated with twice-daily dressing. We learned from the management of this case that presence of an abdominal seatbelt sign in patient with good parameters should lead to paraclinical exploration. So, when faced with the presence of severe abdominal trauma, clinicians should always remember the principles of damage control laparotomy, regardless of the constraints encountered.

Validating the danger of vehicular protective devices and bowel injury

INTRODUCTION

Protective devices such as seat belts and airbags have improved the safety of motor vehicle occupants, but limited data suggest they may be associated with increased blunt bowel (small bowel or colon) injuries (BI). Unfortunately, this risk is unquantified.

METHODS

We analyzed the National Trauma Data Bank (2017-2019) using ICD-10 codes to identify adult motor vehicle occupants with BI who underwent surgical repair. We used logistic regression modeling to compare the risk of undergoing surgical repair for BI after using a protective device.

RESULTS

Of 2,848,592 injured patients, 475,546 (16.7%) were motor vehicle occupants. Only 1.2% (n = 5627/475,546) of patients underwent a bowel repair or resection. Using a seat belt only was associated with an adjusted OR of 2.09 (95% CI 1.91, 2.28) for undergoing a bowel repair/resection when adjusting for Injury Severity Score (ISS) and age. Airbag deployment without a seat belt had an adjusted OR of 1.46 (95% CI 1.31, 1.62), while both devices combined conferred an OR of 3.27 (95% CI 3.02, 3.54). However, using a seat belt was protective against death with an OR of 0.50 (95% CI 0.48, 0.53), adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Score, and ISS.

CONCLUSION

Seat belts and airbags are essential public health safety interventions and protect against death in motor vehicle-associated injuries. However, patients involved in MVCs with airbag deployment or while wearing a seat belt are at an increased risk of bowel injury requiring surgery compared to unrestrained patients, despite these events being relatively uncommon.

WSES guidelines on blunt and penetrating bowel injury: diagnosis, investigations, and treatment

The aim of this paper was to review the recent literature to create recommendations for the day-to-day diagnosis and surgical management of small bowel and colon injuries. Where knowledge gaps were identified, expert consensus was pursued during the 8th International Congress of the World Society of Emergency Surgery Annual (September 2021, Edinburgh). This process also aimed to guide future research.

Patients with Abrasion or Ecchymosis Seat Belt Sign Have High Risk for Abdominal Injury, but Initial Computed Tomography is 100% Sensitive

BACKGROUND

Trauma providers seek to accurately assess the risk of patients with abdominal seat belt sign (ASBS). As hospital costs continue to rise, identification of strategies to safely discharge emergency department (ED) patients has become crucial.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to 1) describe a large cohort of patients by type of ASBS and 2) determine the value of computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis as a screening tool to rule out intra-abdominal injury (IAI) and support discharge of stable patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case series of all patients presenting to our urban, Level I trauma center from 2013-2015. We studied motor vehicle collision patients who presented with ASBS. We further classified individuals into ASBS groups: Abrasion, Ecchymosis, Abrasion + Ecchymosis, or Unknown ASBS to examine differences between groups.

RESULTS

In one of the largest described cohorts, the ASBS remained associated with IAI, most commonly, solid organ injury. Of 425 patients, 36.1% had some IAI on CT, but only 13.6% required laparotomy. Categorizing the type of skin injury in ASBS, we found that both abrasion and ecchymosis were associated with IAI. Initial CT performed with 100% sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that ED trauma patients with significant seat belt abrasion or contusion can have IAI. With the very high sensitivity of modern abdominal CT scanners, clinicians could consider safe ED discharge of stable ASBS patients while providing strong return precautions. Our large cohort strengthens the evidence on decision-making in ASBS patients to ensure outcomes and use of health care resources.

Perforated Small Intestine: A Case of a Delayed Presentation of an Intra-Abdominal Injury in a Pediatric Patient With a Seatbelt Sign

With the use of seatbelts comes a unique injury profile that has been called “the seatbelt syndrome.” The classically described “seatbelt sign” has become a pattern of injury, describing potential underlying damage. As a clinician, clues to the underlying damage follow a thorough physical examination including the removal of all clothing to locate abrasions and bruises to the skin that potentially follow a seatbelt pattern. Delayed presentation of an intra-abdominal injury in the setting of a seatbelt sign has been well documented; however, the question is how long to observe these patients. We present the case of a 17-year-old woman involved in a motor vehicle collision who presented to the emergency department (ED) hemodynamically stable with a lower abdominal wall seatbelt sign. Her initial imaging revealed only an abdominal wall contusion. She was admitted for observation. Approximately 12 h later she started developing abdominal pain, and by 14 h abdominal distention, with repeat imaging showing free fluid and free air. She was taken to the operating room for an exploratory laparotomy and was ultimately discharged back home on day 7.

Surgical intervention for blunt bowel and mesenteric injury: indications and time intervals

PURPOSE

Decision making in management of blunt bowel and mesenteric injury (BBMI) is difficult. This study aimed to identify indicators for laparotomy and appropriate time intervals to surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our hospital's trauma registry to identify patients with a diagnosis of BBMI from February 2011 to July 2017. Patients requiring therapeutic surgical treatment (OM group) were compared with those who did not (NOM group). Preoperative risk factors for surgery (with p < 0.1 by univariate analysis) were integrated in a multivariate logistic regression model. In the OM group, we identified relevant factors for time intervals to surgical interventions.

RESULTS

Among 2808 trauma patients admitted to our hospital, 83 (3.0%) had bowel and mesenteric injury; 6 patients with penetrating trauma, 2 lethal, untreated cases, and 2 patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy were excluded. Finally, 73 patients (47 males), with a mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 23, were included. Results from univariate analysis identified three relevant factors between the OM and NOM groups: ISS score (p = 0.036), hemodynamic instability (p = 0.041), and free air (p = 0.0018). Multivariate analysis revealed one relevant factor, free air (p = 0.0002). Short intervals between hospital admission and intervention were associated with 7-day mortality (p = 0.029), hemodynamic instability (p = 0.0009), focused assessment with sonography for trauma positive (p < 0.0001), and mesenteric extravasation (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Early surgical intervention is essential in cases of hemodynamically unstable BBMI and bowel perforation with free air; nevertheless, it is associated with high mortality. We suggest that prompt transport along with early intervention could significantly lessen mortality.

Pattern Recognition: A Mechanism-based Approach to Injury Detection after Motor Vehicle Collisions

Motor vehicle collisions cause substantial mortality, morbidity, and expense worldwide. Certain types of injuries are more likely to result from frontal versus side-impact collisions, and knowledge of these specific patterns and why they occur aids in accurate and efficient diagnosis of traumatic injuries. Although the proper use of seat belts decreases crash-related mortality during frontal impact, certain injury patterns to the torso are directly attributed to restraint use. The spectrum of seat belt-related injuries ranges from mild skin and soft-tissue contusions to traumatic bowel injuries and unstable spine injuries that require surgery. Impact with the steering wheel or windshield during a frontal crash can cause characteristic injuries to the head, neck, torso, and distal upper extremity. Steering wheel deformity is an independent predictor of serious thoracic and abdominal injury among front-seat passengers. Impact of a flexed knee with the dashboard during a frontal collision can cause knee, thigh, and hip injuries. Distal lower extremity injuries are encountered frequently when the floorboard is driven into the foot. Lateral impact crashes often result in traumatic brain, thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic injuries, which are more often fatal to occupants on the side of the impact. The specific mechanism-based injury patterns are reviewed to establish a structured systematic search pattern that enables the radiologist to identify traumatic injuries with greater accuracy and speed, thereby improving the care of patients who experience acute trauma. ^©RSNA, 2019 See discussion on this article by Ballard and Mellnick .

Seatbelt use and risk of major injuries sustained by vehicle occupants during motor-vehicle crashes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Background

In 2004, a World Health Report on road safety called for enforcement of measures such as seatbelt use, effective at minimizing morbidity and mortality caused by road traffic accidents. However, injuries caused by seatbelt use have also been described. Over a decade after publication of the World Health Report on road safety, this study sought to investigate the relationship between seatbelt use and major injuries in belted compared to unbelted passengers.

Methods

Cohort studies published in English language from 2005 to 2018 were retrieved from seven databases. Critical appraisal of studies was carried out using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) checklist. Pooled risk of major injuries was assessed using the random effects meta-analytic model. Heterogeneity was quantified using I-squared and Tau-squared statistics. Funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to investigate publication bias. This review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42015020309).

Results

Eleven studies, all carried out in developed countries were included. Overall, the risk of any major injury was significantly lower in belted passengers compared to unbelted passengers (RR 0.47; 95%CI, 0.29 to 0.80; I² = 99.7; P = 0.000). When analysed by crash types, belt use significantly reduced the risk of any injury (RR 0.35; 95%CI, 0.24 to 0.52). Seatbelt use reduces the risk of facial injuries (RR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.84), abdominal injuries (RR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.98) and, spinal injuries (RR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.84). However, we found no statistically significant difference in risk of head injuries (RR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.22 to 1.08), neck injuries (RR = 0.69: 95%CI 0.07 to 6.44), thoracic injuries (RR 0.96, 95%CI, 0.74 to 1.24), upper limb injuries (RR = 1.05, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.34) and lower limb injuries (RR = 0.77, 95%CI 0.58 to 1.04) between belted and non-belted passengers.

Conclusion

In sum, the risk of most major road traffic injuries is lower in seatbelt users. Findings were inconclusive regarding seatbelt use and susceptibility to thoracic, head and neck injuries during road traffic accidents. Awareness should be raised about the dangers of inadequate seatbelt use. Future research should aim to assess the effects of seatbelt use on major injuries by crash type.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6280-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Two cases of intestinal injuries due to seat belt without seat belt sign

Although seat belts save lives after motor vehicle accidents, they may cause different types of injuries such as abdominal wall, intra-abdominal, neck and spine or vascular injuries. Seat belt sign indicates the severity of injuries, and usually the risk of intra-abdominal injuries is high when the seat belt sign exists. Here, we present two cases of intra-abdominal injuries caused by seat belts without seat belt sign.

Transection of the appendix and omentum following a seat belt injury; case report and literature review

Introduction

Appendiceal injuries following a blunt abdominal trauma are rare. Upon literature review, several cases have been reported to develop appendicitis following blunt abdominal trauma, but total transection of the appendix is extremely rare.

Case presentation

Our case involves a 24-year-old male restrained driver who was involved in a motor vehicle accident. He had bruising corresponding to the pattern of the seatbelt, the ‘seatbelt sign’, on admission. On his second day of admission, he was found to have a rigid abdomen. On exploratory laparotomy, the patient had a completely transected appendix with a 10 × 10 cm piece of transected omentum lying in the pelvic cavity.

Discussion

Literature suggests that seat belts may play a role in the mechanism of injury leading to transection.

Conclusion

Since the introduction of seatbelt in the 1970s, fatalities from road traffic accidents have fallen by up to 60%. However, the seat belt itself is associated with a unique injury profile, including intestinal tears, perforations, and transections, collectively termed “the seatbelt syndrome”. Seat belt syndrome injuries may sometimes have a delayed presentation, thus repeated abdominal examination is recommended even if the patient is initially stable. Appendiceal transection is rare but may occur. A thorough inspection of the abdominal soft tissue to look for accompanying injuries is important if case an exploratory laparotomy is warranted.

•

Appendiceal injuries following a blunt abdominal trauma are rare.

•

Appendiceal transection is associated with seat belt injury.

•

Solid organ injury is more common in patients presenting with hemodynamic instability from onset, whereas bowel injury including appendix is more common in patients with delayed clinical signs.

•

Although seatbelts provide significant protection in motor vehicle collisions and should be worn during driving, it can be a cause of intraabdominal injury, with the presence of a seatbelt sign raising suspicion.

•

Accompanying injuries such as omental transection can also happen following BAT.

•

A thorough inspection of the abdominal contents should be performed if an exploratory laparotomy is indicated.

Positive Seatbelt Sign with Avulsed Leiomyoma following Motor Vehicle Accident Leading to Hemoperitoneum

A positive seatbelt sign following a motor vehicle accident is associated with an increased risk of intra-abdominal injury and hemoperitoneum. Injury to the uterus in reproductive-age women can also occur. In this report, we describe a 29-year-old nulligravida female who presented to the emergency room following a motor vehicle accident at freeway speeds. A positive seatbelt sign was noted, and a focused assessment with sonography for trauma revealed hemoperitoneum with an incidental finding of uterine leiomyomata. Upon exploratory laparotomy, a free-floating intraperitoneal mass was identified as an avulsed uterine leiomyoma. A uterine laceration containing a subserosal leiomyoma was also identified. The gynecological team was consulted, and a myomectomy of the subserosal leiomyoma followed by a closure of the uterine laceration was performed. The patient was transfused with a total of three units of packed red blood cells and two units of fresh frozen plasma. The postoperative course was without major complication. A positive seatbelt sign and hemoperitoneum in a reproductive-age woman with leiomyomata should increase the clinical suspicion for uterine injury and decrease the threshold for obtaining a gynecological consultation.

Delayed hydronephrosis due to retroperitoneal hematoma after a seatbelt injury: A case report

RATIONALE

Hydronephrosis caused by retroperitoneal hematoma after a seatbelt injury is a unique clinical entity.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 21-year-old man, who had been wearing a seatbelt, was brought to our hospital after a motor vehicle collision, complaining of abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) revealed retroperitoneal hematoma in the upper pelvic region. Since he was hemodynamically stable throughout admission, he was managed conservatively. Seventeen days after initial discharge, the patient revisited our emergency department due to right back pain.

DIAGNOSES

CT scans indicated retroperitoneal hematoma growth resulting in hydronephrosis of the right kidney.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic drainage of the retroperitoneal hematoma was successfully performed.

OUTCOMES

His symptoms resolved after the surgery. Follow-up CT scans three months later demonstrated complete resolution of the hydronephrosis and retroperitoneal hematoma.

LESSONS

Our case highlights a patient with delayed hydronephrosis because of retroperitoneal hematoma expansion after a seatbelt injury.

L. Blunt Abdominal Wall Disruption by Seatbelt Injury; A Case Report and Review of the Literature

With the introduction of the use of seatbelts in cars, mortality following motor vehicle crashes has decreased significantly. However, two patterns of injuries, the ‘seatbelt sign’ and ‘seatbelt syndrome’ have emerged. Injuries may consist of traumatic abdominal wall disruption. We present two cases of severe abdominal wall disruption caused by a seatbelt injury and treated with primary repair. A review of the literature is provided. Two patients were brought in after a high velocity Motor Vehicle Collision. Both presented with an acute abdomen and a seatbelt sign upon which the decision was made to perform emergency laparotomies. Both patients had an abdominal wall disruption along the seatbelt sign. These disruptions were primarily closed and during six months of follow-up no complications occurred. A disruption of the abdominal wall is a rare complication. However, it is a diagnosis that may not be missed as patients have a higher risk of morbidity and mortality. CT-scanning is an accurate method to detect disruptions. Closure of blunt traumatic abdominal wall disruption can be done primarily with sutures or addition of a mesh. In both cases of the severe abdominal wall disruption, primary repair without mesh in the acute phase was successful. When a laparotomy is not indicated, the abdominal wall must be assessed for disruption. If there is a disruption primary repair is a good option.

Mesenteric Hematoma: Is there a Role for Selective Management?

Mesenteric hematomas may present as a radiologic finding after blunt abdominal trauma that may be associated with surgically significant mesenteric and/or bowel injury. The question of whether to operate or not to operate on patients with mesenteric hematoma remains a topic of debate, especially with the improved imaging technology. This study sought to identify clinical and radiological characteristics for patient selection for operative management (OM) of mesenteric hematoma. A retrospective review of 33 adults with blunt abdominal trauma and mesenteric hematoma on CT scan (2009–2012) was performed. Patients with other intra-abdominal injuries, penetrating trauma, isolated gastric hematoma, contrast extravasation, extraluminal air, and Glasgow Coma Scale < 14 were excluded. Patients requiring surgical treatment within 24 hours of admission were compared with those who did not using chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, and t test. Parameters included age, gender, race, Glasgow Coma Scale, vital signs, pain, tenderness, ecchymosis, Injury Severity Score, length of stay, and inhospital mortality. Logistic regression was used to determine positive associations with OM. Of the 33 patients, 19 underwent OM and 14 did not. Both groups were similar at baseline. Regression analysis revealed association for pain [odds ratio (OR) = 9.6, confidence interval (CI) = 1.8–49.9, P < 0.01], tenderness (OR = 32, CI = 4.6–222.2, P < 0.01), and free fluid (OR = 10.3, CI = 1.8–60, P < 0.01) with need for operative intervention. Nonoperative management patients had 100 per cent success rate. Of the OM patients, 100 per cent underwent therapeutic laparotomies. Findings of mesenteric hematoma on CT scan in examinable patients with no abdominal pain, tenderness, or free fluid predict successful nonoperative management.

A report of three cases and review of the literature on rectal disruption following abdominal seatbelt trauma

Seatbelt associated blunt trauma to the rectum is a rare but well recognised injury. The exact mechanism of hollow visceral injury in blunt trauma is unclear. Stress and shear waves generated by abdominal compression may in part account for injury to gas containing structures. A 'seatbelt sign' (linear ecchymosis across the abdomen in the distribution of the lap belt) should raise the suspicion of hollow visceral injuries and can be more severe with disruption of the abdominal wall musculature. Three consecutive cases of rectal injury following blunt abdominal trauma, requiring emergency laparotomy and resection, are described. Lumbar spine injury occurred in one case and in the other two cases, there was injury to the iliac wing of the pelvis; all three cases sustained significant abdominal wall contusion or muscle disruption. Abdominal wall reconstruction and closure posed a particular challenge, requiring a multidisciplinary approach. The literature on this topic is reviewed and potential mechanisms of injury are discussed.

Seatbelt syndrome with superior mesenteric artery syndrome: leave nothing to chance!

The introduction of seatbelts to legislation has dramatically reduced mortality and morbidity from motor vehicle accidents. However, overtime evidence has emerged of ‘seatbelt syndrome’ (SBS), particularly in the paediatric population. The report describes the diagnosis and management of this rare injury in a 12-year-old boy who sustained a chance lumbar fracture and mesenteric tear resulting in small bowel obstruction. His stay was subsequently complicated by superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome. This is the first documented case of SBS with SMA syndrome. High index of suspicion and continuity of care, particularly in the setting of a ‘seatbelt sign’, is paramount to timely diagnosis and management.

Seatbelt sign in a case of blunt abdominal trauma; what lies beneath it?

BACKGROUND

The reported incidence of hollow viscus injuries (HVI) in blunt trauma patients is approximately 1%. The most common site of injury to the intestine in blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) is the small bowel followed by colon, with mesenteric injuries occurring three times more commonly than bowel injuries. Isolated colon injury is a rarely encountered condition. Clinical assessment alone in patients with suspected intestinal or mesenteric injury after blunt trauma is associated with unacceptable diagnostic delays.

CASE PRESENTATION

This is a case of a 31-year-old man, admitted to the emergency department after being the restrained driver, involved in a car accident. After initial resuscitation, focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination (FAST) was performed revealing a subhepatic mass, suspicious for intraperitoneal hematoma. A computed tomography scan (CT) that followed showed a hematoma of the mesocolon of the ascending colon with active extravasation of intravenous contrast material. An exploratory laparotomy was performed, hemoperitomeum was evacuated, and a subserosal hematoma of the cecum and ascending colon with areas of totally disrupted serosal wall was found. Hematoma of the adjacent mesocolon expanding to the root of mesenteric vessels was also noted. A right hemicolectomy along with primary ileocolonic anastomosis was performed. Patient's recovery progressed uneventfully.

CONCLUSION

Identifying an isolated traumatic injury to the bowel or mesentery after BAT can be a clinical challenge because of its subtle and nonspecific clinical findings; meeting that challenge may eventually lead to a delay in diagnosis and treatment with subsequent increase in associated morbidity and mortality. Isolated colon injury is a rare finding after blunt trauma and usually accompanied by other intra-abdominal organ injuries. Abdominal 'seatbelt' sign, ecchymosis of the abdominal wall, increasing abdominal pain and distension are all associated with HVI. However, the accuracy of these findings remains low. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage, ultrasound, CT and diagnostic laparoscopy are used to evaluate BAT. Although CT has become the main diagnostic tool for this type of injuries, there are few pathognomonic signs of colon injury on CT. Given the potential for devastating outcomes, prompt diagnosis and treatment is necessary and high clinical suspicion is required.