External syrinx-introduction of a new term

Post-Traumatic Central or Axial Atlantoaxial Dislocation Presenting with "Atypical" Symptoms-Analyzing the Role of Dynamic Imaging on the Basis of Experience with 14 Patients Treated by Atlantoaxial Fixation surgery

BACKGROUND

This is a report of a series of 14 patients who presented with a range of "atypical" cranial, spinal, and systemic symptoms that started after they suffered a relatively severe injury to the head and/or neck several months or years before surgical treatment. The implications of diagnosing and treating central or axial atlantoaxial dislocation (CAAD) is discussed. Also, the role of dynamic rotatory and lateral head tilt imaging in the diagnosis and treatment is analyzed.

METHODS

Of the 14 patients, 7 were men and 7 were women, with an age range of 21-64 years (average, 42 years). Due to the severity of the presenting neurological and non-neurological symptoms, all the patients had lost their occupation and were heavily dependent on painkillers and/or antidepressant drugs. In addition to other characteristic clinical and radiological evidence, CAAD was diagnosed made based on the facet alignments on lateral profile imaging in the neutral head position. Dynamic head flexion-extension, lateral head tilt, and neck rotation imaging findings confirmed and subclassified CAAD. All 14 patients underwent atlantoaxial fixation surgery.

RESULT

A personalized self-assessment clinical scoring parameter and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 was used to evaluate the outcome. One patient did not follow-up after surgery. At a minimum follow-up of 6 months after atlantoaxial fixation surgery, the remaining 13 patients experienced relief from all major symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosing and treating CAAD can have major therapeutic implications for patients presenting with progressively worsening disabling clinical symptoms following relatively severe head and/or neck trauma.

Evolving Concepts of Craniovertebral and Spinal Instability

Weakness of the muscles of the nape of the neck and back of the spine and its related instability is the nodal point of pathogenesis of a number of clinical and pathological events at the craniovertebral junction and the spine. Whilst acute instability results in sudden and relatively severe symptoms, chronic or long-standing instability is associated with a range of musculoskeletal and structural spinal alterations. Telescoping of the spinal segments results in "vertical" spinal instability in the subaxial spine and central or axial atlantoaxial instability (CAAD) at the craniovertebral junction. Instability in such cases might not be observed on dynamic radiological imaging. Chiari formation, basilar invagination, syringomyelia, and Klippel-Feil alteration are some of the secondary alterations as a result of chronic atlantoaxial instability. Radiculopathy/myelopathy related to spinal degeneration or ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament appears to have their origin from vertical spinal instability. All the secondary alterations in the craniovertebral junction and subaxial spine that are traditionally considered pathological and to have compressive and deforming role are essentially protective in nature, are indicative of instability, and are potentially reversible following atlantoaxial stabilization. Stabilization of unstable spinal segments is the basis of surgical treatment.

Central Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Presenting Symptoms, Diagnostic Parameters, and Surgical Treatment from Reports on 15 Surgically Treated Patients

AIM

This chapter reviews the clinical entity of central or axial atlantoaxial instability (CAAD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2018 to November 2020, 15 patients were identified as having CAAD, wherein there was no atlantoaxial instability when analyzed by conventional radiological parameters and wherein there was no evidence of neural or dural compression due to the odontoid process. The patients were identified as having atlantoaxial instability on the basis of the alignment of facets on lateral profile imaging and a range of telltale clinical and radiological indicators. The clinical statuses of the patients were recorded both before and after surgical treatment by using the specially designed Goel symptom severity index and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. All patients were treated via atlantoaxial fixation.

RESULTS

There were six men and nine women ranging in age from 18 to 45 years (average: 37 years). The presenting clinical symptoms were relatively subtle and long-standing. Apart from symptoms that are generally related to neural compromise at the craniovertebral junction, a range of nonspecific cranial and spinal symptoms were prominent. The follow-up time after surgery ranged from 6 to 34 months. All patients showed early postoperative and sustained clinical recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

The correct diagnosis and appropriate surgical treatment of CAAD can provide an opportunity for quick and lasting clinical recovery.