Effects of right ventricular septal versus apical pacing on plasma natriuretic peptide levels

Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Leadless and Traditional Pacemakers: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

 Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is a clinical syndrome that is characterized by a drop in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) due to chronic high-burden right ventricular (RV) pacing. It has been postulated that leadless pacemakers (LPs) cause decreased risk of PICM compared to transvenous pacemakers (TVPs), but the exact risk reduction is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of adults who received an LP or TVP between January 1, 2014, and April 1, 2022, and had echocardiograms before and after the pacemaker implant. This study's outcomes were the RV pacing percentage, change in EF, the need for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) upgrade, and follow-up duration. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test calculated the change in EF. RV time, defined as the duration from pacemaker placement to the follow-up echocardiogram in months multiplied by the RV pacing percentage, served as a surrogate for how long the RV was paced.

RESULTS

A total of 614 patients were screened, and 198 patients were included in the study, where 72 received LP and 126 received TVP. The median follow-up was 480 days. The average of the reported RV percentage pacing was 63.43% for LP and 71.30% for TVP (p=0.14). The incidence of PICM and CRT upgrade was 44% and 9.7% in the LP group and 37% and 9.5% in the TVP group (p=0.3 and p>0.9), respectively. After accounting for age, sex, LP versus TVP, atrioventricular nodal ablation, RV pacing percentage, and follow-up duration, univariate analysis showed that RV time was significantly different between the two types of pacemakers (13.54 ± 14.21 months (LP) versus 9.26 ± 13.95 months (TVP), p=0.009). The difference in RV time between patients who underwent CRT upgrade and those who did not was statistically insignificant (12.11 ± 14.47 months (no CRT) versus 9.19 ± 12.00 months (CRT), p=0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrated that the incidence of PICM was high in both groups (44% (LP) versus 37% (TVP)), despite significantly more RV time in patients with LP. There was no difference in CRT upgrade between LP and TVP.

Do the predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy add up?

Objective

Knowledge of factors causing pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is incomplete. We sought to estimate the incidence and predisposing factors for PICM and evaluate if the risk they portend adds up.

Methods

Single centre retrospective study where consecutive patients with preserved LVEF undergoing pacemaker (PM) implantation between 2012 and 2018 were analysed.

Results

A total of 749 patients (68.4 % male; mean age 59.2 ± 14.08 years) were included in the analysis. PICM developed in 74 (9.9%) patients over a median follow up of 2.2 years (IQR 1.1–3.2). Pre-implant LVEF, paced QRS duration and RV pacing burden were independent predictors of PICM. Using 90 % specificity cut-off values for LVEF and paced QRS, and the value separating lowest tertile of RV pacing from the higher tertiles, three risk factors were identified: (i) baseline LVEF < 55 %, (ii) paced QRS duration > 160 msec, and (iii) RV pacing burden > 33 %. Patients with two or more risk factors were at the highest risk (OR 11.62, 95 % CI 4.62–29.21, p-value < 0.001) for developing PICM while those with one risk factor had an intermediate risk (OR 3.89, 95 % CI 1.62–9.34, p-value 0.002) when compared to those without any risk factors.

Conclusion

Low-normal baseline LVEF, wider paced QRS and higher RV pacing burden independently predicted the development of PICM. The presence of ≥2 factors increased the odds of PICM, twelve-fold. A narrower paced QRS, the only modifiable risk factor may help mitigate development of PICM.

Effects of cardiac pacemakers on left ventricular volumes and function assessed by 3D echocardiography, Doppler method, and global longitudinal strain

Background

Many previous studies reported the negative effects of right ventricular (RV) pacing on the left ventricular (LV) structure and ejection fraction. Studying pacing hemodynamics is essential to understand these detrimental effects. In this study, we tried to understand RV pacing effects on LV volumes and function using advanced tools like 3D echo and global longitudinal strain (GLS). This was a prospective study of 175 consecutive patients (LVEF>50%) presented permanent pacing. Of 175 patients, only 50 patients met study criteria, divided into two groups (single or dual pacing). LV volumes and function were assessed by full-volume 3D echocardiography and GLS before pacing, at 1-week and 6-month post-pacing. Cardiac output (COP) was calculated by pulsed wave Doppler method and 3D echo.

Results

Doppler method results were similar to 3D echo in calculating SV and COP. At 1-week post pacing, both groups showed a significant decrease in SV due to a drop in EDV while ESV did not change significantly. Despite the drop in SV, there was a significant increase in cardiac output (COP) due to achieving higher heart rates post-pacing. There was a significant drop in EF and GLS in both groups.

At 6 months, SV continued to decrease with a corresponding decrease in COP and LVEF. This drop in SV was due to a significant increase in ESV while EDV did not show a significant change at a 6-month follow-up. Also, the drop EF and GLS became more significant.

There were no significant differences between both groups regarding the changes in LV volumes (EDV, ESV, SV), LVEF or GLS throughout the study (pre-pacing, at 1-week and 6-months post pacing). However, dual-chamber pacing group provided higher heart rates and as a result higher COP than the single-chamber group.

Conclusions

RV pacing led to a significant drop in LV COP, ejection fraction (EF), and GLS over short- and long-term duration. Dual chamber pacing provided higher COP than a single chamber pacing. This was due to tracking the S. A node with pacing at higher heart rates not due to an increase in SV and preserving atrioventricular synchrony. Both Doppler method and 3D echo can be used to calculate SV and COP.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43044-021-00138-9.

Predictors of pacing induced left ventricular dysfunction and cardiomyopathy assessed by three-dimensional echocardiography and speckle tracking strain

Background

Long-term RV pacing leads to ventricular dyssynchrony, in the form of LBBB-like morphology, with subsequent detrimental effects on LV structure and function. Three-dimensional echocardiography allowed early detection of volumetric changes associated with PICMP and provided more accurate assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony. Speckle tracking strain is able to identify LV dysfunction even before any reduction in LVEF. Our aim was to study pacing effects on LV function and hemodynamics using 3D echo and speckle tracking strain.

Results

This was a prospective study of 175 consecutive patients without structural heart disease (LVEF > 50%) presented for permanent pacing. Full-volume 3D echocardiography done before implantation, 1 week, and 6 months together with GLS. Patients were followed for 6 months to detect incidence of PIVD (defined as reduction in LVEF > 10% but still above 50%) and PICMP (defined as decrease in LVEF by 10% from baseline in absence of other known causes of cardiomyopathy resulting in EF< 50%). PIVD and PICMP predictors and risk factors were analyzed. Only 50 patients met study criteria. Twenty-five (50%) patients developed LV systolic dysfunction; of these, 19 (38%) developed PIVD and 6 (12%) developed PICMP. Pre-implantation GLS was significantly lower in the 6 patients who subsequently developed PICMP, compared to those who developed PIVD and the preserved EF group (mean GLS − 15.50 vs. − 21.0, − 20.0 respectively; p = 0.005, 0.033, respectively). At 1 week, GLS was significantly lower in the 25 patients who subsequently developed PIVD, compared to those who did not (GLS − 13.0 vs. − 18.0, respectively; p = 0.002). A reduction of baseline GLS by 15% or more at 1 week was associated with the development of PIVD and PICMP (p = < 0.001). A wider native QRS complex was associated with PIVD and PICMP (p = 0.008, 0.018, respectively). The other predictors were found non-significant.

Conclusion

PICMP may be more common than previously reported and it may occur shortly after implantation. Pre-implantation GLS is a sensitive parameter for PICMP. One-week GLS, pre-implantation QRS complex width are early predictors for PICMP and PIVD before any reduction in EF.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43044-021-00136-x.

Incidence and predictors of pacemaker induced cardiomyopathy: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Pacemaker induced Cardiomyopathy (PICM) is an easily overlooked cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Data regarding this complication are sparse. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the incidence and predictors of PICM.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2017, 857 consecutive patients undergoing pacemaker (PM) implantation, were reviewed, and according to our inclusion criteria 173 individuals were enrolled in this retrospective single center study. All patients included had normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) before implantation, underwent single-chamber ventricular or dual-chamber PM implantation, had RV pacing burden ≥20%, and repeated echocardiogram was available ≥1 year after implantation. PICM was defined as deterioration LVEF ≥10%, resulting in LVEF <50%, which cannot be explained by other causes.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 39.9 ± 21.0 months, PICM occurred in 26 patients (16%). RV pacing percentage did not differ significantly between the both groups (76.5 vs 76.2%, p = 0.65). The PICM group patients were likely to be men (p = 0.002) and had a lower rate of arterial hypertension (p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed male sex (HR 6.45, 0.95 CI 1.90-21.86, p = 0.003) and wider paced QRS complex (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07, p < 0.001) as predictors of PICM.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with frequent RV pacing, the prevalence of PICM is not uncommon. Male sex and wider paced QRS complex are independent predictors of PICM and these patients may require closer follow-up.

Impacto dos Modos de Estimulação DDD e VVIR na Capacidade Funcional e Qualidade de Vida de Pacientes Chagásicos

Introdução: A estimulação atrioventricular propicia benefícios hemodinâmicos em relação à ventricular isolada, mas essa vantagem não está completamente estabelecida em pacientes chagásicos com disfunção sistólica. Objetivo:Avaliar a infl uência dos modos de estimulação DDD e VVIR na capacidade funcional, qualidade de vida (QV) e alterações laboratoriais de peptídeo natriurético em pacientes chagásicos com disfunção ventricular submetidos a implante de marcapasso. Métodos: Estudaram-se prospectivamente 20 pacientes (55% do sexo masculino) com média de idade de 62,7(± 9,9 anos) e média da fração de ejeção de 41,8% (± 2,8). Alternadamente, os pacientes receberam a estimulação nos modos DDD e VVIR por um período de três meses sob cada programação. O mínimo percentual de estimulação ventricular admitido foi de 80%. Após cada período, o paciente foi submetido ao teste de caminhada de seis minutos (TC6M), avaliação de QV pelo Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) e pelo Assesment of QUAlity of life and RELated events (AQUAREL). A avaliação laboratorial foi realizada com a dosagem da fração N-terminal do peptídeo natriurético cerebral (N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide – NT-proBNP). Resultados: A média da distância percorrida no TC6M nos modos DDD e VVIR foram respectivamente 390,60 (± 52,71) e 396,30 (± 52,71) metros (p = 0,160). Verifi caram-se resultados de QV inferiores, considerando o domínio físico do MLHFQ (p = 0,03) e os domínios dispneia de esforço(p = 0,05) e arritmia (p < 0,001) do AQUAREL, com o modo VVIR. Os níveis de NT-proBNP aumentaram signifi cativamente com a estimulação no modoVVIR (p < 0,001). Conclusão: Após três meses de estimulação com omodo VVIR, houve piora da QV dos pacientes chagásicos e aumento dos níveis de NT-proBNP (registro de ensaio clínico: ReBEc RBR-53x476)

Impact of DDD and VVIR Stimulation Modes on Functional Capacity and Quality of Life of Chagasic Patients

Introduction: Atrioventricular stimulation provides hemodynamic benefits over the isolated ventricular rate, but this advantage is not completely established in chagasic patients with systolic dysfunction. Objectives: To evaluate the influence of DDD and VVIR stimulation modes on functional capacity, quality of life (QoL) and laboratory abnormalities of a natriuretic peptide in chagasic patients with ventricular dysfunction submitted to pacemaker implantation. Methods: Twenty patients (55% male) with a mean age of 62.7 (± 9.9 years) and a mean ejection fraction of 41.8% (± 2.8) were prospectively studied. Alternately, patients received pacing in the DDD and VVIR modes for a period of three months under each schedule. The minimum percentage of ventricular pacing was 80%. After each period, the patient was submitted to the six-minute walk test (6MWT), QOL assessment by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and the Assay of QUAlity of life and RELated events (AQUAREL). Laboratory evaluation was performed with the N-terminal fraction of the brain natriuretic peptide (N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide - NT-proBNP). Results: The mean distance walked on the 6MWT in the DDD and VVIR modes were 390.60 (± 52.71) and 396.30 (± 52.71) meters respectively (p = 0.160). Results of lower QOL were found, considering the physical domain of the MLHFQ (p = 0.03) and the domains of effort dyspnea (p = 0.05) and arrhythmia (p <0.001) of the AQUAREL with the VVIR mode. NT-proBNP levels increased significantly with stimulation in VVIR mode (p < 0.001). Conclusion: After three months of stimulation with the VVIR mode, there was worsening of the QoL of the chagasic patients and increase of the levels of NT-proBNP (clinical trial record: ReBEc RBR-53x476).

[Right ventricular septal stimulation would produce similar bi-ventricular dyssynchrony as does apical stimulation in patients with normal ejection fraction]

OBJECTIVE

To determine in patients with normal ejection fraction, undergoing permanent VVI pacing, if medial septal stimulation has lower dyssynchrony than apical stimulation assessed by echocardiography.

METHOD

A prospective trial, 19 patients>70 years old, scheduled for VVI pacemaker implantation for complete degenerative atrioventricular block, ventricular frequency<50beat per minute and ejection fraction≥45%. Patients with atrial fibrillation, heart failure, left bundle branch block and QRS durations longer than 120milliseconds in surface electrocardiogram with sinus rhythm were excluded. Patients were randomized to apical implantation group A: 47% and septal implantation group B: 53%. Echocardiographic parameters were measured previous to the implant, 48h, 5 and 48 months after implantation.

RESULTS

No patients had diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy or heart failure. Echocardiographic parameters for interventricular dyssynchrony between groups were A: 14.44±19.76msec vs. B: 9±36.45msec; A: 6.11±62.11msec vs. B: 13±38.31msec; A: 77±53.51msec vs. B: 24.29±80.90msec, P=NS). For interventricular dyssynchrony were A: 46.44±19.76msec vs. B: 42.20±29.56msec; A: 45.33±45.67msec vs. B: 29.80±44.66msec; A: 46,38±20 msec vs. B: 21±27.20msec, P=NS) at 48h, 5 and 48 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Apical site of stimulation does not increase ventricular dyssynchrony rate in patients with preserved ejection fraction. Septal stimulation showed decreased trend in interventricular dyssynchrony.

Is conventional cardiac pacing harmful in patients with normal ventricular function?

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular pacing may be deleterious in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, but in patients with normal function the impact of this stimulation triggering clinically relevant ventricular dysfunction is not fully established.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical, echocardiographic findings of patients with previously normal left ventricular function underwent implantation of a pacemaker.

METHODS

Observational, cross-sectional study with 20 patients, who underwent implantation of pacemaker, prospectively followed-up, with the following inclusion criteria: normal left ventricular function defined by echocardiography and ventricular pacing higher than 90%. Were evaluated functional class (FC) (New York Heart Association), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), echocardiographic assessment (conventional and dyssynchrony parameters), and quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) (SF-36). The assessment was performed at ten days (t1), four months (t2), eight months (t3), 12 months (t4) and 24 months (t5).

RESULTS

Conventional echocardiographic parameters and dyssynchrony parameters showed statistically significant variation over time. The 6MWT, FC, and BNP showed worsening at the end of two years. QLQ showed initial improvement and worsening at the end of two years.

CONCLUSION

The implantation of conventional pacemaker was associated with worsening in functional class, worsening in walk test, increased BNP levels, increased duration of QRS, and worsening in some domains of the QLQ at the end of two years. There were no changes in echocardiography measurements (conventional and asynchrony measures).

Effects of right ventricular nonapical pacing on cardiac function: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to compare the effects of right ventricular nonapical (RVNA) and right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing on cardiac function.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify RCTs comparing RVNA pacing with RVA pacing with follow-up ≥2 months. Twenty RCTs involving 1,114 patients were included.

RESULTS

Compared with RVA pacing, RVNA (mainly right ventricular septum [RVS]) pacing exhibited not only excellent pacing threshold and R-wave amplitude but also higher impedance. RVNA pacing showed a significant increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at the end of follow-up (weighted mean difference = 3.58, 95% confidence interval = 1.80-5.35), and the effects were observed in the following subgroups: 6-month follow-up, ≤12-month follow-up, >12-month follow-up, baseline LVEF ≤45%, and baseline LVEF >45%. RVS and RVA pacing significantly differed in improving LVEF (weighted mean difference = 4.82, 95% confidence interval = 2.78-6.87). In addition, RVNA pacing resulted in a narrower QRS duration, a smaller left ventricular end-systolic volume, and a lower New York Heart Association functional class.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis found that RVNA (mainly RVS) pacing exhibited satisfactory long-term lead performance compared with RVA pacing and demonstrated beneficial effects in improving LVEF after the 6-month follow-up. Furthermore, it proved superior to RVA pacing in terms of interventricular synchrony and cardiac function.