The effect of craniectomy size on mortality, outcome, and complications after decompressive craniectomy at a rural trauma center

Intracranial pressure changes in traumatic brain injury patients undergoing unilateral decompressive craniectomy with dural expansion

Background

The aim of this study is to assess the ICP changes induced by a unilateral fronto-temporo-parietal DC with dural expansion after moderate to severe TBI. The effect of different bone flap sizes on ICP and the neurological outcomes were also evaluated after the decompressive surgery.

Methods

52 TBI patients with clinical and radiological evidences of increased ICP were included in this prospective study. All patients received unilateral fronto-temporo-parietal DC with dural expansion and ventriculostomy at contralateral Kocher's point. Postoperatively, ICP values and the largest antero-posterior (AP) diameter of bone flap removed was measured, and the clinical outcomes were assessed using Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) at discharge and 6 months after DC.

Results

The median ICP significantly decreased with an average of 56.7 % reduction from the initial opening ICP. Similar ICP changes were observed in all groups. This study also found that the large bone flap group (AP diameter >15 cm) demonstrated better postoperative ICP control as compared to the small bone flap group (AP diameter 12-15 cm), although not statistically significant. The SDH and cerebral swelling groups did better in the GOS-E at 6 months after TBI compared with cerebral contusion group.

Conclusion

The ICP reduction in moderate to severe TBI patients undergoing unilateral fronto-temporo-parietal DC with dural expansion occurred in accordance with decompressive steps, regardless of intracranial lesions and the surgical procedure should be performed with the bone flap size of at least 12 cm in AP diameter for adequate and sustained ICP control.

Posttraumatic hydrocephalus as a complication of decompressive craniectomy-same old story, new perspectives

Objective

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) serves as a vital life-saving intervention, demonstrating efficacy in reducing intracranial pressure (ICP). However, its efficacy hinges on meticulous surgical execution, perioperative management, and vigilance toward potential complications. The incidence of complications associated with DC plays a pivotal role in determining its superiority over medical management for patients experiencing intracranial hypertension following traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods

Severe cases often require more intensive therapy, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor treatment. Identifying the optimal moment for early extubation and minimizing vasopressor use is crucial to reducing the risk of complications, including PTH. Our study aims to highlight the potential risks associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and long-term vasopressor administration. The collected data were demographics, the craniectomy size, the distance from the midline of the craniectomy, the presence or absence of hydrocephalus, duration of mechanical ventilation and vasopressor treatment, and outcome at 30 days.

Results

Seventy-two patients with a mean age of 44.2 (range 5-83) were included in the study, with a median craniectomy size of 119.3 cm2. In our series, craniectomy areas ranged between 30 and 207.5 cm2 and had a similar decrease in midline shift in all cases. We did not observe any associations between the surface of craniectomy and the complication rate (p = 0.6302). There was no association between craniectomy size and mortality rate or length of hospital stay. The most common complication of decompressive craniectomy in our study group was posttraumatic hydrocephalus, with an incidence of 13.8%. Our results showed that craniectomy size did not independently affect PTH development (p = 0.5125). Still, there was a strong correlation between prolonged time of vasopressor treatment (p = 0.01843), period of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.04928), and the development of PTH.

Conclusions

This study suggests that there is no clear correlation between craniectomy size, midline shift reduction, and survival rate. An extended period of vasopressor treatment or mechanical ventilation is linked with the development of posttraumatic hydrocephalus. Further studies on larger series or randomized controlled studies are needed to better define this correlation.

Evidence-based management of adult traumatic brain injury with raised intracranial pressure in intensive critical care unit at resource-limited settings: a literature review

Background

In underdeveloped countries, there is a greater incidence of mortality and morbidity arising from trauma, with traumatic brain injury (TBI) accounting for 50% of all trauma-related deaths. The occurrence of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), which is a common pathophysiological phenomenon in cases of TBI, acts as a contributing factor to unfavorable outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the existing literature regarding the management of adult TBI with raised ICP in an intensive critical care unit, despite limited resources.

Methods

This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis protocol. Search engines such as PubMed, the Cochrane database, and Google Scholar were utilized to locate high-level evidence that would facilitate the formation of sound conclusions.

Result

A total of 11 715 articles were identified and individually assessed to determine their eligibility for inclusion or exclusion based on predetermined criteria and outcome variables. The methodological quality of each study was evaluated using recommended criteria. Ultimately, the review consisted of 51 articles.

Conclusion

Physical examination results and noninvasive assessments of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) via sonography are positively associated with elevated ICP, and are employed as diagnostic and monitoring tools for elevated ICP in resource-limited settings. Management of elevated ICP necessitates an algorithmic approach that utilizes prophylactic measures and acute intervention treatments to mitigate the risk of secondary brain injury.

Bilateral Frontoparietotemporal Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Case Report

There is no conclusive agreement on the optimal approach to managing severe traumatic brain injury. This article details the methodology and outcomes of bilateral frontoparietotemporal decompression surgery performed on a three-year-old patient with severe traumatic brain injury. As the patient had fixed dilated pupils, GCS (Glasgow coma scale) 4, and marked edema in the frontal and parietal regions, the Kjellberg approach was modified, and decompression including part of the parietal bone was performed. The patient was intubated and sedated in the intensive care unit for one week postoperatively. After extubation, the patient had reactive pupils and a GCS of 13. The patient underwent a cranioplasty two months after the trauma, combining the bone grafts placed in the abdomen. The patient was followed for three days after cranioplasty and discharged with a GCS:15 and intact motor examination.

Recent Updates on Controversies in Decompressive Craniectomy and Cranioplasty: Physiological Effect, Indication, Complication, and Management

Decompressive craniectomy (DCE) and cranioplasty (CP) are surgical procedures used to manage elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in various clinical scenarios, including ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and traumatic brain injury. The physiological changes following DCE, such as cerebral blood flow, perfusion, brain tissue oxygenation, and autoregulation, are essential for understanding the benefits and limitations of these procedures. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to systematically review the recent updates in DCE and CP, focusing on the fundamentals of DCE for ICP reduction, indications for DCE, optimal sizes and timing for DCE and CP, the syndrome of trephined, and the debate on suboccipital CP. The review highlights the need for further research on hemodynamic and metabolic indicators following DCE, particularly in relation to the pressure reactivity index. It provides recommendations for early CP within three months of controlling increased ICP to facilitate neurological recovery. Additionally, the review emphasizes the importance of considering suboccipital CP in patients with persistent headaches, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, or cerebellar sag after suboccipital craniectomy. A better understanding of the physiological effects, indications, complications, and management strategies for DCE and CP to control elevated ICP will help optimize patient outcomes and improve the overall effectiveness of these procedures.

Size of Craniectomy Predicts Approach-Related Shear Bleeding in Poor-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Decompressive craniectomy is an option to decrease elevated intracranial pressure in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients. The aim of the present study was to analyze the size of the bone flap according to approach-related complications in patients with poor-grade SAH. We retrospectively analyzed poor-grade SAH patients (WFNS 4 and 5) who underwent aneurysm clipping and craniectomy (DC or ommitance of bone flap reinsertion). Postoperative CT scans were analyzed for approach-related tissue injury at the margin of the craniectomy (shear bleeding). The size of the bone flap was calculated using the De Bonis equation. Between 01/2012 and 01/2020, 67 poor-grade SAH patients underwent clipping and craniectomy at our institution. We found 14 patients with new shear bleeding lesion in postoperative CT scan. In patients with shear bleeding, the size of the bone flap was significantly smaller compared to patients without shear bleeding (102.1 ± 45.2 cm2 vs. 150.8 ± 37.43 cm2, p > 0.0001). However, we found no difference in mortality rates (10/14 vs. 23/53, p = 0.07) or number of implanted VP shunts (2/14 vs. 18/53, p = 0.2). We found no difference regarding modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 6 months postoperatively. In poor-grade aneurysmal SAH, the initial planning of DC—if deemed necessary —and enlargement of the flap size seems to decrease the rate of postoperatively developed shear bleeding lesions.

Complete hemispheric exposure vs. superior sagittal sinus sparing craniectomy: incidence of shear-bleeding and shunt-dependency

PURPOSE

Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DC) has been established as a standard therapeutical procedure for raised intracranial pressure. However, the size of the DC remains unspecified. The aim of this study was to analyze size related complications following DC.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2019, 306 patients underwent DC for elevated intracranial pressure at author´s institution. Anteroposterior and craniocaudal DC size was measured according to the postoperative CT scans. Patients were divided into two groups with (1) exposed superior sagittal sinus (SE) and (2) without superior sagittal sinus exposure (SC). DC related complications e.g. shear-bleeding at the margins of craniectomy and secondary hydrocephalus were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Craniectomy size according to anteroposterior diameter and surface was larger in the SE group; 14.1 ± 1 cm vs. 13.7 ± 1.2 cm, p = 0.003, resp. 222.5 ± 40 cm2 vs. 182.7 ± 36.9 cm2, p < 0.0001. The SE group had significantly lower rates of shear-bleeding: 20/176 patients; (11%), compared to patients of the SC group; 36/130 patients (27%), p = 0.0003, OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.6-5.5. There was no significant difference in the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus; 19/130 patients (14.6%) vs. 24/176 patients (13.6%), p = 0.9.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete hemispheric exposure in terms of DC with SE was associated with significantly lower levels of iatrogenic shear-bleedings compared to a SC-surgical regime. Although we did not find significant outcome difference, our findings suggest aggressive craniectomy regimes including SE to constitute the surgical treatment strategy of choice for malignant intracranial pressure.

The Retroauricular Incision as an Effective and Safe Alternative Incision for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy

BACKGROUND

The reverse question mark (RQM) incision has been traditionally utilized to perform decompressive hemicraniectomies (DHC) to relieve refractory intracranial hypertension. Alternative incisions have been proposed in the literature but have not been compared directly.

OBJECTIVE

To present the retroauricular (RA) incision as an alternative incision that we hypothesize will increase calvarium exposure to maximize the removal of the hemicranium and will decrease wound-related complications compared to the RQM incision.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of all DHCs performed at our institution over a span of 34 mo, stratified based on the type of scalp incision. The surface areas of the cranial defects were calculated, normalizing to their respective skull diameters. For those patients surviving beyond 1 wk, complications were examined from both cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients in the RQM group and 43 patients in the RA group were included. The average surface area for the RA and RQM incisions was 117.0 and 107.8 cm2 (P = .0009), respectively. The ratio of average defect size to skull size for RA incision was 0.81 compared to 0.77 for the RQM group (P = .0163). Of those who survived beyond 1 wk, the absolute risk for surgical site complications was 14.0% and 8.3% for RQM and RA group (P = .5201), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The RA incision provides a safe and effective alternative incision to the traditional RQM incision used for DHC. This incision affords a potentially larger craniectomy while mitigating postoperative wound complications.

Size does matter: The role of decompressive craniectomy extent for outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In previous studies in patients with traumatic brain injury and ischemic stroke, the size of decompressive craniectomy (DC) was reported to be paramount with regard to patient outcomes. We aimed to identify the impact of DC size on treatment results in individuals with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).

METHODS

The extent of DC in 232 patients with SAH who underwent bifrontal or hemicraniectomy between January 2003 and December 2015 was analyzed using semi-automated surface measurements. The study endpoints were course of intracranial pressure (ICP) treatment after DC, occurrence of cerebral infarcts, in-hospital mortality, and unfavorable outcome at 6 months (defined as modified Rankin scale score >3). The associations of DC size with the study endpoints were adjusted for DC timing, patient age, clinical and radiographic severity of SAH, aneurysm location, and treatment modality.

RESULTS

The mean DC surface area was 100.9 (±45.8) cm² . In multivariate analysis, a large DC (>105 cm² ) was independently associated with a lower risk of cerebral infarcts (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.56), in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14-0.56) and unfavorable outcome (aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.98). Moreover, SAH patients with a small DC size (<75 cm² ) were more likely to require prolonged (>3 days, aOR 3.60, 95% CI 1.37-9.42) and enhanced (aOR 2.31, 95% CI 1.12-4.74) postoperative ICP treatment.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study showing the impact of DC size on postoperative ICP control and patient outcome in the context of SAH; specifically, a large craniectomy flap (>105 cm² ) might lead to better outcomes in SAH patients requiring decompressive surgery.

Does the Size of Unilateral Decompressive Craniectomy Impact Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intracranial Mass Effect after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury?

Objective

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is one of the treatment modalities in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), however, there was a lack of evidence for optimal craniectomy size. The authors aimed to investigate optimal DC size and analyze clinical outcome according to craniectomy size.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical data of 87 patients with a space occupying lesion following TBI who underwent unilateral DC. Craniectomy size was measured by anterior-posterior (AP) diameter and surface estimate (SE). Mortality, clinical outcome, and complications were collected and analyzed according to craniectomy size.

Results

Nineteen patients (21.8%) died and 35 patients (40.2%) had a favorable outcome at last follow-up (a mean duration, 30.3±39.4 months; range, 0.2-132.6 months). Receiver operating curve analyses identified AP diameter more than 12.5 cm (area under the curve [AUC]=0.740; p=0.002) and SE more than 98.0 cm² (AUC=0.752; p=0.001) as cut-off values for survival, and AP diameter more than 13.4 cm (AUC=0.650; p=0.018) and SE more than 107.3 cm² (AUC=0.685; p=0.003) for favorable outcome. Large craniectomy resulted in a significantly lower mortality rate and a higher rate of favorable outcome than small craniectomy (p=0.005 and p=0.014, respectively). However, procedure related bleeding occurred more frequently in the large craniectomy group (p=0.044).

Conclusion

Unilateral DC size is associated with clinical outcome of patients with a space occupying lesion following severe TBI. Large craniectomy is needed for survival and favorable outcome.

Simulating Expansion of the Intracranial Space to Accommodate Brain Swelling after Decompressive Craniectomy: Volumetric Quantification in a 3D CAD Skull Model with Contour Elevation

Background: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) can be used to augment intracranial space and halt brainstem compromise. However, a widely adopted recommendation for optimal surgical extent of the DC procedure is lacking. In the current study, we utilized three-dimensional (3D) computer-assisted design (CAD) skull models with defect contour elevation for quantitative assessment. Methods: DC was performed for 15 consecutive patients, and 3D CAD models of defective skulls with contour elevations (0-50 mm) were reconstructed using commercial software. Quantitative assessments were conducted in these CAD subjects to analyze the effects of volumetric augmentation when elevating the length of the contour and the skull defect size. The final positive results were mathematically verified using a computerized system for numerical integration with the rectangle method. Results: Defect areas of the skull CAD models ranged from 55.7-168.8 cm2, with a mean of 132.3 ± 29.7 cm2. As the contour was elevated outward for 6 mm or above, statistical significance was detected in the volume and the volume-increasing rate, when compared to the results obtained from the regular CAD model. The volume and the volume-increasing rate increased by 3.665 cm3, 0.285% (p < 0.001) per 1 mm of contour elevation), and 0.034% (p < 0.001) per 1 cm2 of increase of defect area, respectively. Moreover, a 1 mm elevation of the contour in Groups 2 (defect area 125-150 cm2) and 3 (defect area >150 cm2, as a proxy for an extremely large skull defect) was shown to augment the volume and the volume-increasing rate by 1.553 cm3, 0.101% (p < 0.001) and 1.126 cm3, 0.072% (p < 0.001), respectively, when compared to those in Group 1 (defect area <125 cm2). The volumetric augmentation achieved by contour elevation for an extremely large skull defect was smaller than that achieved for a large skull defect. Conclusions: The 3D CAD skull model contour elevation method can be effectively used to simulate the extent of a space-occupying swollen brain and to quantitatively assess the extent of brainstem protection in terms of volume augmentation and volume-increasing rate following DC. As the tangential diameter (representing the degree of DC) exceeded the plateau value, volumetric augmentation was attenuated. However, an increasing volumetric augmentation was detected before the plateau value was reached.

Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury: In-hospital Mortality-Associated Factors

Objective  Determine predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) who underwent decompressive craniectomy. Materials and Methods  This retrospective study reviewed consecutive patients who underwent a decompressive craniectomy between March 2017 and March 2020 at our institution, and analyzed clinical characteristics, brain tomographic images, surgical details and morbimortality associated with this procedure. Results  Thirty-three (30 unilateral and 3 bifrontal) decompressive craniectomies were performed, of which 27 patients were male (81.8%). The mean age was 52.18 years, the mean Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score at admission was 9, and 24 patients had anisocoria (72.7%). Falls were the principal cause of the trauma (51.5%), the mean anterior-posterior diameter (APD) of the bone flap in unilateral cases was 106.81 mm (standard deviation [SD] 20.42) and 16 patients (53.3%) underwent a right-sided hemicraniectomy. The temporal bone enlargement was done in 20 cases (66.7%), the mean time of surgery was 2 hours and 27 minutes, the skull flap was preserved in the subcutaneous layer in 29 cases (87.8%), the mean of blood loss was 636.36 mL,and in-hospital mortality was 12%. Univariate analysis found differences between the APD diameter (120.3 mm vs. 85.3 mm; p = 0.003) and the presence of midline shift > 5 mm ( p = 0.033). Conclusion  The size of the skull flap and the presence of midline shift > 5 mm were predictors of mortality. In the absence of intercranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, clinical and radiological criteria are mandatory to perform a decompressive craniectomy.

Optimal Bone Flap Size for Decompressive Craniectomy for Refractory Increased Intracranial Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury: Taking the Patient's Head Size into Account

BACKGROUND

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a widely used treatment for refractory high intracranial pressure (ICP). While the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines favor large DC, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the optimal size of DC in relationship to the patient's head size. The aim of this study is to determine the optimal size of DC to effectively control refractory ICP in traumatic brain injury and to measure that size with a method that takes into consideration the patient's head size.

METHODS

All cases of unilateral DC performed to control refractory increased ICP due to cerebral edema during a 7½-year period were included. Demographic and injury-related data were collected by retrospective chart review. The patients were categorized in 2 groups: 21 patients with a "small flaps" and 9 patients with a "large flap."

RESULTS

Two groups had similar preoperative characteristics. The amount of cerebrospinal fluid drained and the doses of hyperosmolar therapy given were not different between the 2 groups. The postoperative ICP was significantly lower for the large craniectomy flap group: 13.3 mm Hg confidence interval 99% [12.7, 13.8] versus 16.9 mm Hg confidence interval 99% [16.5, 17.2] (P = 0.01), and this difference was maintained for 96 hours postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Better ICP control was achieved in patients who underwent a large decompressive craniectomy (ratio >65%) when compared with smaller craniectomy sizes. The proposed method of measuring the craniectomy size, to our knowledge, is the first to take into account the patient's head size and can be easily measured intraoperatively.

Primary bilateral fronto-temporoparietal decompressive craniectomy-An alternative treatment for severe traumatic brain injury: Case report and technical note

Bilateral fronto-temporoparietal decompressive craniectomy provides bigger area of the decompression that decreases the brain tissue herniation; therefore, it leads to a decrease in the neuronal stretching effect that is probably related to functional outcomes.

How I do it: supra-tentorial unilateral decompressive craniectomy

BACKGROUND

Decompressive craniectomy is a surgical way to treat intracranial hypertension, by removing a large flap of skull bone.

METHOD

We report the case of a 48 years old right-handed man presenting an acute ischaemic stroke of all the right sylvian artery area, with rapid clinic deterioration then coma. Severe intracranial hypertension was confirmed by transcranial Doppler. In emergency, we decided to perform a right-side decompressive craniectomy.

CONCLUSION

Six months later, he is in rehabilitation with "only" a left hemiplegia and a very good relational life. His modified Rankin score is 3. Decompressive craniectomy saved this patient's life, that is why we think this surgical technique must be explained and mastered.

The Evolving Concept of Damage Control in Neurotrauma: Application of Military Protocols in Civilian Settings with Limited Resources

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present review was to describe the evolution of the damage control concept in neurotrauma, including the surgical technique and medical postoperative care, from the lessons learned from civilian and military neurosurgeons who have applied the concept regularly in practice at military hospitals and civilian institutions in areas with limited resources.

METHODS

The present narrative review was based on the experience of a group of neurosurgeons who participated in the development of the concept from their practice working in military theaters and low-resources settings with an important burden of blunt and penetrating cranial neurotrauma.

RESULTS

Damage control surgery in neurotrauma has been described as a sequential therapeutic strategy that supports physiological restoration before anatomical repair in patients with critical injuries. The application of the concept has evolved since the early definitions in 1998. Current strategies have been supported by military neurosurgery experience, and the concept has been applied in civilian settings with limited resources.

CONCLUSION

Damage control in neurotrauma is a therapeutic option for severe traumatic brain injury management in austere environments. To apply the concept while using an appropriate approach, lessons must be learned from experienced neurosurgeons who use this technique regularly.

Estimation of the Craniectomy Surface Area by Using Postoperative Images

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a neurosurgical procedure performed to relieve the intracranial pressure engendered by brain swelling. However, no easy and accurate method exists for determining the craniectomy surface area. In this study, we implemented and compared three methods of estimating the craniectomy surface area for evaluating the decompressive effort. We collected 118 sets of preoperative and postoperative brain computed tomography images from patients who underwent craniectomy procedures between April 2009 and April 2011. The surface area associated with each craniectomy was estimated using the marching cube and quasi-Monte Carlo methods. The surface area was also estimated using a simple AC method, in which the area is calculated by multiplying the craniectomy length (A) by its height (C). The estimated surface area ranged from 9.46 to 205.32 cm², with a median of 134.80 cm². The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) between the marching cube and quasi-Monte Carlo methods was 7.53 cm². Furthermore, the RMSD was 14.45 cm² between the marching cube and AC methods and 12.70 cm² between the quasi-Monte Carlo and AC methods. Paired t-tests indicated no statistically significant difference between these methods. The marching cube and quasi-Monte Carlo methods yield similar results. The results calculated using the AC method are also clinically acceptable for estimating the DC surface area. Our results can facilitate additional studies on the association of decompressive effort with the effect of craniectomy.

Development of Posttraumatic Hydrocephalus Requiring Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt After Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Retrospective Studies

BACKGROUND

Decompressive craniotomy (DC) is a known risk factor for the development of posttraumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) in the patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Herein, the present study reported the development of PTH requiring ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt after DC for TBI.

METHODS

Four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were searched from 1983 to April 2018. The studies evaluating the prevalence of PTH requiring VP shunt after DC in the patients with TBIwere selected without language restriction. A random-effects meta-analysis using event rate (ER) and 95% confidence intervals(CIs), was runby RevMan5.3 software.

RESULTS

Out of 355 studies obtained from the databases, 25 studies were included and analyzed in the meta-analysis. The studies included 2402 patients undergoing DC for TBI, 354 of whohad PTH. The pooled ER of hydrocephalus in the patients undergoing DC for TBI was 17.7% [95%CI: 13.2 to 23.4%; P<0.001]. In addition, the pooled analysis showed that ER of hydrocephalus was 13% in adults [95%CI: 9 to 18.5%; P<0.001] and 37.6% in children [95%CI: 27.79 to 48.7%; P=0.029; I2=0%].

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that DC after TBI was associated with the development of PTH, especially in children compared to adults.

Brain death after decompressive craniectomy: Incidence and pathophysiological mechanisms

PURPOSE

Patients who received decompressive craniectomy (DC) are usually not regarded to qualify for brain death (BD) as intracranial pressure (ICP) is not assumed to reach levels critical enough to cause cerebral perfusion failure. Here we investigated the incidence of BD after DC and analyzed the pathophysiological mechanisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched our chart records of patients with DC for individuals who developed BD (2010-2016). We then analyzed the course of ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) prior to BD and results from radiological tests that aim at demonstrating loss of cerebral perfusion in BD.

RESULTS

BD was diagnosed in 12 of 164 (incidence 7.3%) patients (age=16-70years; male=7; mean longitudinal diameter: 136.2mm). Mean latency between DC and BD was 69.4h. Immediately after DC, mean ICP was 30.0mmHg (standard deviation±24.7mmHg), CPP was 56.8mmHg (±28.1). In the course to BD, ICP increased to 95.8mmHg (±16.1), CPP decreased to -9.9mmHg (±11.2). In patients in whom radiological methods were performed (n=5) loss of cerebral perfusion was demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study evidences that DC does not exclude BD. Even after DC, BD is preceded by a severely reduced CPP, supporting loss of cerebral perfusion as a critical step in BD pathophysiology.

Clinical spectrum and radiographic features of the syndrome of the trephined

Object:

Craniectomy is a common neurosurgical procedure. Syndrome of the trephined (ST) occurring after craniectomy results in neurologic symptoms that are reversible with cranioplasty. While well-documented, previous literature consisted of case reports, symptom spectrum and risk factors have not been well characterized.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective review of 29 consecutive cases who underwent decompressive craniectomy within a 30-month period was performed. Patients were considered affected by ST if a previously stable neurological deficit improved within 3 weeks after cranioplasty. Prevalence of ST was measured and association with demographic information, clinical symptoms patterns, indication for and size of craniectomy, as well as radiological signs were tested.

Results:

Seven patients (24%) developed ST. Chronic rehabilitation arrest was more common than acute neurologic decline. Factors such as craniectomy size and patient age did not reach statistical significance in development of ST. Radiographic factors were predictive, with a sunken skin flap contour being most sensitive, while ventricular effacement was most specific.

Conclusion:

ST may have a higher incidence than previously thought, with a chronic rehabilitation arrest being a more common presentation than an acute decline. Medical providers involved in the post surgical care and rehabilitation of these patients should maintain a high index of suspicion for ST.