Outcome of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in an intensive care unit: An experience from a tertiary care center of central Nepal

Early versus Delayed Strategies for Renal Replacement Therapy Initiation in Adult Patients with Severe Acute Kidney Injury Complicating Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication in hospitalized patients and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is used to manage AKI. The optimal timing of starting RRT in patients with AKI is still uncertain. This study is aimed to assess the effect of different timing strategies of RRT (early vs. standard) on mortality and dependence on dialysis in severe AKI complicating septic shock. A systematic review was conducted using the Ovid Medline database, trial registries, and manual searches of key journals from January 2000 to October 2020. Appropriate outcomes were pooled and analyzed via a meta-analysis. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included to compare between the early vs. delayed strategies of RRT. The inverse generic method was used, and the data were pooled using random effects. Five studies were included in this review, with 4329 participants. Overall, most domains were assessed as low-risk or with some concerns about the risk of bias. Compared with standard therapy, early initiation probably results in little or no difference regarding death, and may also result in no or little difference in independence on dialysis. The early strategy may result in a slight increase in adverse events. Compared with the standard strategy, earlier RRT initiation may slightly reduce the length of hospital stay. Further RCTs are needed to define the optimal timing of RRT initiation in this population.

Long-term Renal Outcomes in Adults With Sepsis-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in medical technologies and intervention occurrences, acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence continues to rise. Early interventions after sepsis are essential to prevent AKI and its long-term consequences. Acute kidney injury is the leading cause of organ failure in sepsis; therefore, more research is needed on its long-term consequences and progression to kidney injury.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to review the state of the science on long-term renal outcomes after sepsis-induced AKI and long-term renal consequences.

METHODS

We identified research articles from PubMed and CINAHL databases using relevant key words for sepsis-induced AKI within 5 years delimited to full-text articles in English.

RESULTS

Among 1280 abstracts identified, we ultimately analyzed 12 full-text articles, identifying four common themes in the literature: (1) AKI determination criteria, (2) severity/prognosis-related factors, (3) time frame for long-term outcome measures, and (4) chronic kidney disease (CKD) and renal related exclusions. Researchers primarily used KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines to define AKI. All of these studies excluded patients with CKD. The range of time for long-term renal outcomes was 28 days to 3 years, with the majority being 1 year. Renal outcomes ranged from recovery to renal replacement therapy to death.

CONCLUSIONS

To better understand the long-term renal outcomes after sepsis-induced AKI, more consistent measures are needed across all studies regarding the time frame and specific renal outcomes. Because all of these articles excluded patients with CKD, a gap exists on long-term renal outcome in acute on CKD.

Incidence, characteristics and prognosis of acute kidney injury in Cameroon: a prospective study at the Douala General Hospital

Objective: There are limited data on AKI in sub-Saharan Africa. We aim to determine the incidence, characteristics and prognosis of AKI in Cameroon.

Patients and methods: A prospective study including all consenting acute admissions in the internal medicine and the ICU of a tertiary referral hospital in Cameroon from January 2015 to June 2016. Serum creatinine assay was done on admission, days 2 and 7 to diagnose AKI. For patients with AKI, serum creatinine was done on discharge, days 30, 60 and 90. AKI was defined according to the modified KDIGO 2012 criteria as an increase or decrease in serum creatinine of 3 mg/l or greater, or an increase of 50% or more from the reference value obtained at admission or the known baseline value. AKI severity was graded using KDIGO2012 criteria. Outcome measures were renal recovery, mortality and causes of death. Renal recovery was complete if serum creatinine between the first 90 days was less than baseline or reference, partial if less than diagnosis but not baseline or reference, no-recovery if creatinine did not decrease or if the patient remained on dialysis.

Results: Of the 2402 patients included, 536 developed AKI giving a global incidence of 22.3% and annual incidence of 15 per 100 patients-years. Of the 536 patients with AKI, 43.3% were at stage 3, 54.7% were males, median age was 56 years. Pre-renal AKI (61.4%) and acute tubular necrosis (28.9%) were the most frequent forms. Main etiologies were sepsis (50.4%) and volume depletion (31.6%). Renal outcome was unknown in 34% of patients. Of the 354 patients with known renal function at 3 months, 84.2% recovered completely, 14.7% partially and 1.1% progressed to CKD. Global mortality rate was 36.9% mainly due to sepsis.

Conclusions: AKI is frequent in our setting, mainly due to sepsis and hypovolemia. It carries a poor prognosis.