FcRn inhibitors: a novel option for the treatment of myasthenia gravis

The efficacy and safety of FcRn inhibitors in patients with myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease that causes local or generalized muscle weakness. Complement inhibitors and targeting of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) to block IgG cycling are two novel and successful mechanisms.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before May 18, 2023. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to assess the data.

RESULTS

We pooled 532 participants from six randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Compared to the placebo, the FcRn inhibitors were more efficacy in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) (MD = - 1.69 [- 2.35, - 1.03], P < 0.00001), MG-ADL responder (RR = 2.01 [1.62, 2.48], P < 0.00001), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) (MD = - 2.45 [- 4.35, - 0.55], P = 0.01), Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) (MD = - 2.97 [- 4.27, - 1.67], P < 0.00001), 15-item revised version of the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MGQoL15r) (MD = - 2.52 [- 3.54, - 1.50], P < 0.00001), without increasing the risk of safety. The subgroup analysis showed that efgartigimod was more effective than placebo in MG-ADL responders. Rozanolixizumab was more effective than the placebo except in QMG, and batoclimab was more effective than the placebo except in MG-ADL responder. Nipocalizumab did not show satisfactory efficacy in all outcomes. With the exception of rozanolixizumab, all drugs showed non-inferior safety profiles to placebo.

CONCLUSION

FcRn inhibitors have good efficacy and safety in patients with MG. Among them, efgartigimod and nipocalimab were effective without causing an increased safety risk. Rozanolixizumab, despite its superior efficacy, caused an increased incidence of adverse events. Current evidence does not suggest that nipocalimab is effective in patients with MG.

Autoimmune thyroid disease and myasthenia gravis: a study bidirectional Mendelian randomization

Background

Previous studies have suggested a potential association between AITD and MG, but the evidence is limited and controversial, and the exact causal relationship remains uncertain.

Objective

Therefore, we employed a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the causal relationship between AITD and MG.

Methods

To explore the interplay between AITD and MG, We conducted MR studies utilizing GWAS-based summary statistics in the European ancestry. Several techniques were used to ensure the stability of the causal effect, such as random-effect inverse variance weighted, weighted median, MR-Egger regression, and MR-PRESSO. Heterogeneity was evaluated by calculating Cochran's Q value. Moreover, the presence of horizontal pleiotropy was investigated through MR-Egger regression and MR-PRESSO.

Results

The IVW method indicates a causal relationship between both GD(OR 1.31,95%CI 1.08 to 1.60,P=0.005) and autoimmune hypothyroidism (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.47, P =0.002) with MG. However, there is no association found between FT4(OR 0.88,95%CI 0.65 to 1.18,P=0.406), TPOAb(OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.86 to 2.07, P =0.186), TSH(OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.23, P =0.846), and MG. The reverse MR analysis reveals a causal relationship between MG and GD(OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.98, P =3.57e-3), with stable results. On the other hand, there is a significant association with autoimmune hypothyroidism(OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.59, P =0.019), but it is considered unstable due to the influence of horizontal pleiotropy (MR PRESSO Distortion Test P < 0.001). MG has a higher prevalence of TPOAb(OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.39 to 2.42, P =1.47e-5) positivity and may be linked to elevated TSH levels(Beta:0.08,95% CI:0.01 to 0.14,P =0.011), while there is no correlation between MG and FT4(Beta:-9.03e-3,95% CI:-0.07 to 0.05,P =0.796).

Conclusion

AITD patients are more susceptible to developing MG, and MG patients also have a higher incidence of GD.

Myasthenia Gravis Treatment: From Old Drugs to Innovative Therapies with a Glimpse into the Future

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disease that causes debilitating muscle weakness due to impaired neuromuscular transmission. Since most (about 80-90%) MG patients present autoantibodies against the acetylcholine receptor, standard medical therapy consists of symptomatic treatment with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., pyridostigmine). In addition, considering the autoimmune basis of MG, standard therapy includes immunomodulating agents, such as corticosteroids, azathioprine, cyclosporine A, and cyclophosphamide. New strategies have been proposed for the treatment of MG and include complement blockade (i.e., eculizumab, ravulizumab, and zilucoplan) and neonatal Fc receptor antagonism (i.e., efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab). The aim of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the pre- and post-marketing evidence on the five pharmacological treatments most recently approved for the treatment of MG, by identifying both preclinical and clinical studies registered in clinicaltrials.gov. A description of the molecules currently under evaluation for the treatment of MG is also provided.

An evaluation of rozanolixizumab-noli for the treatment of anti-AChR and anti-MuSK antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an auto-immune disease characterized by fluctuating symptoms of muscle weakness and fatigue. Corticosteroids and corticosteroid-sparing broad-spectrum immunosuppression play a great role in the treatment of myasthenia gravis. However, debilitating side effects and long time to treatment effect highlight the need for development of novel target-specific medications. Rozanolixizumab is a highly specific neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitor that acts on immunoglobulin G (IgG) homeostasis. Results from the MycarinG Phase III randomized controlled trial demonstrated significant efficacy of rozanolixizumab in generalized MG in terms of primary outcome and all secondary endpoints, tolerability, and safety compared to placebo.

AREAS COVERED

We included different trials on myasthenia gravis and rozanolixizumab which include Phase II (NCT03052751) and Phase III MycarinG (NCT03971422) studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical trials have demonstrated that rozanolixizumab has strong efficacy with a 78% reduction in pathogenic IgG like plasma exchange (PLEX) and has therapeutic benefits comparable with PLEX and IVIG. It has less treatment adverse events and is easily accessible through subcutaneous infusion. The safety and effectiveness of rozanolixizumab need to be assessed further in the real-world context in post-marketing studies. If current trial information holds true, rozanolixizumab may become a medication of choice for MG in succeeding years.