1
|
Rennert RC, Khan U, Bartek J, Tatter SB, Field M, Toyota B, Fecci PE, Judy K, Mohammadi AM, Landazuri P, Sloan AE, Kim AH, Leuthardt EC, Chen CC. Laser Ablation of Abnormal Neurological Tissue Using Robotic Neuroblate System (LAANTERN): Procedural Safety and Hospitalization. Neurosurgery 2020; 86:538-547. [PMID: 31076762 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic laser ablation (SLA) has demonstrated potential utility for a spectrum of difficult to treat neurosurgical pathologies in multiple small and/or retrospective single-institutional series. Here, we present the safety profile of SLA of intracranial lesions from the Laser Ablation of Abnormal Neurological Tissue using Robotic NeuroBlate System (LAANTERN; Monteris Medical) multi-institutional, international prospective observational registry. OBJECTIVE To determine the procedural safety of SLA for intracranial lesions. METHODS Prospective procedural safety and hospitalization data from the first 100 treated LAANTERN patients was collected and analyzed. RESULTS Mean age and baseline Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) were 51(± 17) yr and 83(± 15), respectively. In total, 81.2% of patients had undergone prior surgical or radiation treatment. Most patients had a single lesion (79%) ablated through 1 burr hole (1.2 ± 0.7 per patient), immediately following a lesion biopsy. In total, >90% of the lesion was ablated in 72% of treated lesions. Average total procedural time was 188.2 ± 69.6 min, and average blood loss was 17.7 ± 55.6 ccs. The average length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays before discharge were 38.1 ± 62.7 h and 61.1 ± 87.2 h, respectively. There were 5 adverse events (AEs) attributable to SLA (5/100; 5%). After the procedure, 84.8% of patients were discharged home. There was 1 mortality within 30 d of the procedure (1/100; 1%), which was not attributable to SLA. CONCLUSION SLA is a safe, minimally invasive procedure with favorable postprocedural ICU and hospital utilization profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert C Rennert
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Usman Khan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Jiri Bartek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stephen B Tatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | | - Brian Toyota
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kevin Judy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Patrick Landazuri
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Andrew E Sloan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Albert H Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Eric C Leuthardt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Clark C Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Patil AD, Singh V, Sukumar V, Shetty PM, Moiyadi AV. Comparison of outcomes of free-hand 2-dimensional ultrasound-guided versus navigated 3-dimensional ultrasound-guided biopsy for supratentorial tumours: a single-institution experience with 125 cases. Ultrasonography 2018; 38:255-263. [PMID: 30779873 PMCID: PMC6595123 DOI: 10.14366/usg.18036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative utility and benefits of free-hand 2-dimensional intraoperative ultrasound (FUS) and navigated 3-dimensional intraoperative ultrasound (NUS) as ultrasound-guided biopsy (USGB) techniques for supratentorial lesions. Methods All patients who underwent USGB for suspected supratentorial tumours from January 2008 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The charts and electronic medical records of these patients were studied. Demographic, surgical, and pathological variables were collected and analyzed. The study group consisted of patients who underwent either FUS or NUS for biopsy. Results A total of 125 patients (112 adults and 13 children) underwent USGB during the study period (89 FUS and 36 NUS). NUS was used more often for deep-seated lesions (58% vs. 18% for FUS, P<0.001). The mean operating time for NUS was longer than for FUS (156 minutes vs. 124 minutes, P=0.001). Representative yield was found in 97.7% of biopsies using FUS and in 100% of biopsies using NUS (diagnostic yield, 93.6% and 91.3%, respectively). The majority of lesions (89%) were high-grade gliomas or lymphomas. Postoperative complications were more common in the NUS group (8.3% vs. 1.2%), but were related to the tumour location (deep). Conclusion Despite the longer operating time and higher rate of postoperative complications, NUS has the benefit of being suitable for biopsies of deep-seated supratentorial lesions, while FUS remains valuable for superficial lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya D Patil
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Vikas Singh
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Vivek Sukumar
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Prakash M Shetty
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Aliasgar V Moiyadi
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|