Comparison of two walk tests in determining the claudication distance in patients suffering from peripheral arterial occlusive disease

Objective assessment of functional capacity in patients with peripheral artery disease: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients with claudication symptoms exhibit impaired functional capacity, which has been associated with disease severity, worse quality of life and higher risk of cardiovascular events. Different tests have been used to assess functional capacity in PAD patients. Therefore, understanding the characteristics, strengths and limitations of these tests are important to support the choice of tests to be used in clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the main methods to assess functional capacity in PAD patients, discussing their psychometric properties, applications, and limitations.

EXPERT OPINION

Robust evidence supports the use of treadmill and six-minute walk tests in PAD patients, as their results are associated with clinically meaningful outcomes, adequate psychometric properties and are sensitive to effects of interventions. On the other hand, other functional tests (Shuttle-walk test, outdoor walking capacity test, timed-up and go, four-meter walk test, heel-rise test, short physical performance battery and modified physical performance battery) are related to activities of daily living and do not require sophisticated equipment and can be easily used in clinical practice. However, these other tests still need evidence regarding their clinical relevance, reliability, and ability to detect long-term intervention changes, providing further investigation directions.

Motivating Structured walking Activity in people with Intermittent Claudication (MOSAIC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a physiotherapist-led, behavioural change intervention versus usual care in adults with intermittent claudication

INTRODUCTION

Walking exercise is a recommended but underused treatment for intermittent claudication caused by peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Addressing the factors that influence walking exercise may increase patient uptake of and adherence to recommended walking. The primary aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the efficacy of a physiotherapist-led behavioural change intervention on walking ability in adults with intermittent claudication (MOtivating Structured walking Activity in people with Intermittent Claudication (MOSAIC)) in comparison with usual care.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The MOSAIC trial is a two-arm, parallel-group, single-blind RCT. 192 adults will be recruited from six National Health Service Hospital Trusts. Inclusion criteria are: aged ≥50 years, PAD (Ankle Brachial Pressure Index ≤0.90, radiographic evidence or clinician report) and intermittent claudication (San Diego Claudication Questionnaire), being able and willing to participate and provide informed consent. The primary outcome is walking ability (6 min walking distance) at 3 months. Outcomes will be obtained at baseline, 3 and 6 months by an assessor blind to group allocation. Participants will be individually randomised (n=96/group, stratified by centre) to receive either MOSAIC or usual care by an independent randomisation service. Estimates of treatment effects will use an intention-to-treat framework implemented using multiple regression adjusted for baseline values and centre.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial has full ethical approval (London-Bloomsbury Research Ethics Committee (17/LO/0568)). It will be disseminated via patient forums, peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN14501418.

Effectiveness of the Combined Treatment of Functional Electrical Stimulation and Deambulation in Diabetic Arteriopathy

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether functional electrical stimulation (FES) is able to improve ischemic pain and quality of life of patients with diabetic arteriopathy (DA) in grade-IIa Leriche-Le Fontaine.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a single-blinded, randomized, prospective cohort study. We included patients diagnosed with grade-IIa Leriche-Le Fontaine peripheral arterial disease in both lower extremities with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). The ankle-brachial index was 0.4-0.9. Patients were randomized into two experimental groups: nondiabetic (non-DM) (n = 71) and diabetic (DM) (n = 71). The patients received FES while walking for 1 hr on a supervised treadmill. Three months of follow-up were conducted after treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients were randomized; 142 completed the study, with 71 in each group. Both groups reported an improvement after the treatment, but the improvement was statistically significant in the DM group, in which all the parameters studied improved. Greater benefits were observed in all the parameters in the DM group after the follow-up, except for the test of the meters walked in 6 min.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of FES during daily walking is effective in patients with DA, reducing intermittent claudication and improving the quality of life of these patients.

Functional electrical stimulation improves quality of life by reducing intermittent claudication

OBJECTIVE

To determine if Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) would improve ischemic pain, walking distance, and quality of life of patients with intermittent claudication.

DESIGN

Single blind, randomized block, two factorial design.

PATIENTS

Patients diagnosed with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and intermittent claudication (IC). Ankle Brachial Index ranged 0.4-0.9 on at least one leg. Patients were randomly assigned to experimental (FES+Walk, N=13) or control (WALK, N=14) groups.

INTERVENTION

Experimental group patients received FES to the dorsiflexor and plantarflexor muscles while walking for 1h/day, six days/week for eight weeks. Control group patients received similar intervention without FES. A Follow-up period of both groups lasted eight weeks.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures were taken at baseline (T₀), after intervention (T₁), and after follow-up (T₂). Primary measures included Perceived Pain Intensity (PPI), Six minute walk (6MW), and Peripheral Arterial Disease Quality of Life (PADQOL). Secondary measures included Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) and Timed Up and Go (TUG).

RESULTS

Group by time interactions in PPI were significant (P<0.001) with differences of 27.9 points at T₁ and 36.9 points at T₂ favoring the FES+Walk group. Groups difference in Symptoms and Limitations in Physical Function of the PADQOL reached significance (T₁=8.9, and T₂=8.3 improvements; P=0.007). ICQ was significant (T₁=9.3 and T₂=13.1 improvements; P=0.003). Improvement in 6MW and TUG tests were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Walking with FES markedly reduced ischemic pain and enhanced QOL compared to just walking. FES while walking may offer an effective treatment option for the elderly with PAD and Intermittent Claudication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NIH-NIA 1R21AG048001 https://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_description.cfm?aid=8748641&icde=30695377&ddparam=&ddvalue=&ddsub=&cr=1&csb=default&cs=ASC. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02384980?term=David+Embrey&rank=1.