Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Prolotherapy in Supraspinatus Tendon with Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injection of Subacromial Subdeltoid Bursa in Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain: A Clinical Trial Study

Effects of intra-articular versus peri-articular dextrose prolotherapy in knee osteoarthritis: A clinical trial study

Objectives

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of intra-articular and peri-articular dextrose prolotherapy (DPT) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) without effusion.

Patients and methods

Between August 2018 and November 2018, a total of 51 participants including 27 cases (12 males, 15 females; mean age: 55.7±5.2 years; range, 38 to 70 years) in Group A and 24 cases (9 males, 15 females; mean age: 54.7±4.6 years; range, 38 to 70 years) in Group B were recruited. Group A received intra-articular DPT, while Group B received peri-articular DPT. Treatment was administered two times with two-week intervals. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford Knee Scale (OKS) questionnaires were filled at baseline, and four and eight weeks after first injection.

Results

At four and eight weeks, the VAS, OKS, and WOMAC scores improved from baseline in both groups. There was no significant difference in the WOMAC and OKS scores between two methods. The VAS scores showed superiority of intra-articular method (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Both peri-articular and intra-articular DPT were effective in patients with KOA. There was no superiority in terms of functional improvement between two groups. However, intra-articular prolotherapy was more effective in decreasing pain in these patients.

Comparison Clinical Effects of Hypertonic Dextrose and Steroid Injections on Chronic Subacromial Bursitis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to determine and compare the treatment efficacy of subacromial steroid injections and dextrose prolotherapy for chronic subacromial bursitis patients.

DESIGN

Fifty-four patients with chronic subacromial bursitis were enrolled in this double-blind randomized controlled trial. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and visual analog scale were the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

The steroid group ( n = 26) exhibited significant visual analog scale score improvements comparing with baseline at weeks 2, 6, and 12; the dextrose prolotherapy group ( n = 28) exhibited visual analog scale score improvements at weeks 6 and 12. The steroid group displayed significant Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score improvements compared with baseline at weeks 2, 6, and 12; the dextrose prolotherapy group exhibited significant score decreases at weeks 2 and 6. Compared with the dextrose prolotherapy group, the steroid group demonstrated significantly greater decreases in visual analog scale scores at weeks 2 and 6; the steroid group showed significantly greater decreases in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores at weeks 2, 6, and 12.

CONCLUSIONS

Both hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy and steroid injections can provide short-term improvements of pain and disability among chronic subacromial bursitis patients. Moreover, steroid injections showed better effectiveness than hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy in ameliorating pain and improving function.

Efficacy comparison between ultrasound-guided injections of 5% dextrose with corticosteroids in carpal tunnel syndrome patients

BACKGROUND

There is no standard guideline for treating mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). 5% dextrose perineural injection has been a potential and innovative treatment with long-term effects for CTS; however, there is few published randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 5% dextrose perineural injection versus corticosteroid injection in treating CTS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this double-blinded randomized active-controlled trial, we randomly allocated 1 session of either 2 cc 5% dextrose or 1 cc methylprednisolone acetate mixed with 1 cc normal saline in 36 patients with mild to moderate CTS of single or both their wrists. The baseline VAS, BCTQ, electrophysiological studies, and sonography assessment of median nerve CSA were carried out at the baseline and 1-month and 3-month follow-ups, as well as recording demographic variables.

RESULTS

A statistically significant decreasing trend in VAS (P < 0.0001), BCTQ-ss (P < 0.0001), median nerve CSA (P = 0.05), SNAP-PL (P < 0.0001), and CMAP-OL (P = 0.048) in both methylprednisolone and 5% dextrose groups was observed. No significant difference was observed in slope of the trend of studied parameters, including VAS (P = 0.95), BCTQ-ss (P = 0.88), BCTQ-F (P = 0.34), median nerve CSA (P = 0.321), SNAP-PL (P = 0.9), CMAP-OL (P = 0.799), SNAP-amplitude (P = 0.798), and CMAP-amplitude (P = 0.584).

CONCLUSION

5% dextrose perineural injection is an effective and safe treatment for mild to moderate CTS, in comparison with the short-term results attained from corticosteroids. Further randomized clinical trials with longer follow-up periods are warranted.

Efficacy of perineural hypertonic saline injection versus acupoints of foot in the management of diabetic neuropathy: a multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Aim: Painful diabetic polyneuropathy is one of the most common disabling problems worldwide. We aimed to determine if a perineural injection of hypertonic saline compared with foot acupoints decreased the neuropathic pain score in patients with diabetes. Patients & methods/materials: Patients were assigned to receive either perineural or acupoints injection of hypertonic saline 5% in their feet for three weekly sessions. Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire for neuropathic pain was assessed. Results: Both groups observed a significant reduction of the DN4 score throughout 8 weeks of follow-up. Conclusion: Both perineural and acupoints hypertonic saline injections of the foot could improve neuropathic pain in patients with diabetes.

The Role of Hyaluronic Acid in Sport-Related Tendinopathies: A Narrative Review

Tendinopathy is a complex clinical condition with a rising incidence and prevalence, particularly during sports practice. For the return to play in affected patients, adequate functional and structural recovery of the tendon is the ultimate goal, avoiding the high risk of recurrence. In this perspective, local therapies alongside exercise are showing promising results. Despite evidence suggesting hyaluronic acid (HA) injections as effective in the treatment of tendinopathy, current recommendations about the management of this condition do not include this intervention. HA seems to be an effective therapeutic option for the management of sport-related tendinopathies, but further studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm available findings. In this narrative review, we analyzed available literature about the rationale of the use of HA in the management of tendon injury and, particularly, in sport-related tendinopathies.