Management of Recurrent Aneurysms after Endovascular Coiling: A Fujita Experience

Woven endo bridge device for recurrent intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recurrent intracranial aneurysms present a significant clinical challenge, demanding innovative and effective treatment approaches. The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device has emerged as a promising endovascular solution for managing these intricate cases. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of the WEB device in treating recurrent intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, from inception to June 5, 2023. Eligible studies focused on evaluating WEB device performance and included a minimum of five patients with recurrent intracranial aneurysms. The complete and adequate occlusion rates, neck remnant rates, and periprocedural complication rates were pooled using SATA V.17.

RESULTS

Our analysis included five studies collectively enrolling 73 participants. Participant ages ranged from 52.9 to 65 years, with 64.4% being female. Aneurysms were wide-necked and predominantly located in the middle cerebral artery, basilar artery, and anterior cerebral artery. Previous treatments encompassed coiling, clipping, and the use of WEB devices. Our study found an overall adequate occlusion rate of 0.80 (95% CI 0.71-0.89), a complete occlusion rate of 0.39 (95% CI 0.28-0.50), and a neck remnant rate of 0.38 (95% CI 0.27-0.48). Periprocedural complications were reported at a rate of 0%, although heterogeneity was observed in this data. Notably, evidence of publication bias was identified in the reporting of periprocedural complication rates.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the WEB device is associated with favorable outcomes for treating recurrent wide-neck intracranial aneurysms.

Flow diverter retreatment for intracranial aneurysms: A meta-analysis of efficacy and feasibility

BACKGROUND

Recurrent intracranial aneurysm carries a risk of rupture and retreatment is often necessary. However, there is no consensus on the best retreatment modality of choice. Flow diverter has emerged as a promising option for this population in recent years. Given its high cost, patient selection to optimize outcomes is very important.

PURPOSE

To identify patient factors predisposing to failure of flow diverter retreatment.

METHOD

We conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid/Medline, and ClinicalTrial.gov from 2000 to 2021. Studies regarding flow diverter retreatment of recurrent aneurysms were analyzed if they meet the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of twenty-six studies were identified. Among 374 patients retreated with flow diverters, about 0.86 [0.81; 0.92] were successfully occluded and only 0.06 [0.02; 0.10] had unfavorable neurological outcomes. Major complications included intracranial hemorrhage (n = 7), ischemic stroke or thromboembolic event (n = 12), and death (n = 2). In-stent stenosis was reported in 10 of the cases. Saccular aneurysms are associated with a higher occlusion rate while aneurysm location, size, status, and prior treatment modality have no significant impact on retreatment efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that flow diverter is an effective retreatment strategy except in patients with non-saccular aneurysms. It should be considered as a first-line option for patients with recurrent intracranial aneurysm.

Management of Complex Cerebral Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Complex intracranial aneurysms (CIAs) are challenging pathologies to treat. Characteristics making an aneurysm complex include dimension, history of previous treatment, location, absence of collateral circulation, intraluminal thrombosis, and calcification of the wall. The goal of the therapeutic process is to exclude the malformation from the cerebral circulation and both endovascular and surgical treatments are valid procedures.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 2020, 170 CIAs were treated at our institution (33 ruptured, 137 unruptured). They were 3 prepetrous segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA), 14 purely intracavernous sinus, 27 intracavernous with subarachnoid extension, 60 paraclinoid, 4 ICA bifurcation, 15 anterior communicating artery, 24 middle cerebral artery, and 23 in the posterior circulation. All the patients underwent neuroradiologic examinations and images were evaluated by the neurosurgical and interventional radiologist team. Endovascular treatment was considered as the treatment of choice. Alternative treatment was surgical clipping; revascularization procedures were performed when neither endovascular treatment nor direct clipping were possible.

RESULTS

Of 170 patients, 45 underwent endovascular treatment, 77 surgical clipping, and 55 revascularization procedures. In the unruptured group, 12 patients died, 22 reported major complications, 3 had minor complications, and 101 had an uneventful postoperative course. In the ruptured group, 9 patients died, 10 had minor complications, 1 minor complication, and 13 had a complete recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment should represent the treatment of choice for CIAs. Alternative treatments include direct surgical clipping and revascularization. Overall, the correct identification of the therapeutic process guarantees a good clinical outcome.