Treatment Outcomes of Cerebral Aneurysms Presenting with Optic Neuropathy: A Retrospective Case Series

Neuropsychological outcomes in patients with ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms treated by clipping versus coiling: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ruptured anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms are frequently associated with neuropsychological deficits. This review aims to compare neuropsychological outcomes between surgical and endovascular approaches to ACoA. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies comparing the endovascular and surgical approaches to ruptured ACoA aneurysms. Outcomes of interest were the cognitive function, covered by memory, attention, intelligence, executive, and language domains, as well as motor and visual functions. Nine studies, comprising 524 patients were included. Endovascularly-treated patients showed better memory than those treated surgically (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = -2; 95% CI: -3.40 to -0.61; p < 0.01). Surgically clipped patients had poorer motor ability than those with coiling embolization (p = 0.01). Executive function (SMD = -0.20; 95% CI: -0.47 to 0.88; p = 0.55), language (SMD = -0.33; 95% CI: -0.95 to 0.30; p = 0.30), visuospatial function (SMD = -1.12; 95% CI: -2.79 to 0.56; p = 0.19), attention (SMD = -0.94; 95% CI: -2.79to 0.91; p = 0.32), intelligence (SMD = -0.25; 95% CI: -0.73 to 0.22; p = 0.30), and self-reported cognitive status (SMD = -0.51; 95% CI: -1.38 to 0.35; p = 0.25) revealed parity between groups. Patients with ACoA treated endovascularly had superior memory and motor abilities. Other cognitive domains, including executive function, language, visuospatial function, attention, intelligence and self-reported cognitive status revealed no statistically significant differences between the two approaches. Trial Registration PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42023461283; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=461283.

Incomplete occlusion and visual symptoms of peri-ophthalmic aneurysm after treatment with a pipeline embolization device: a multi-center cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Peri-ophthalmic aneurysm is a special type of aneurysm. We assessed the relationship between ophthalmic artery (OA) origin and aneurysm and examined the effect of a pipeline embolization device (PED, Covidien/Medtronic) with or without coils on aneurysm occlusion rate and visual outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 194 peri-ophthalmic aneurysms in 189 patients among 1171 patients treated with a PED in a Chinese post-market multi-center registry study from November 2014 to October 2019. Peri-ophthalmic aneurysms were defined as carotid-ophthalmic segment aneurysms arising from the internal carotid artery dorsal wall at, or distal to, the OA origin, with a superior or superomedial projection. The relationship between OA origin and the aneurysm was classified as follows: type A, OA originating separate from the aneurysm; type B, OA originating from the aneurysm neck or dome. Patients with aneurysm were divided into the PED-only group and the PED + coils group according to treatment.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 6.8 months (range, 5.3-20.2 months). There were 163 occluded aneurysms (84%) and 31 aneurysms with incomplete occlusion (16%). A multivariate analysis showed that type B aneurysm was a risk factor for incomplete occlusion in the PED-only group (odds ratio [OR] 4.854, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.878-12.548, P = 0.001). Visual symptoms at final follow-up correlated with preoperative visual symptoms (OR 22.777, 95% CI 3.115-166.555, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Type B aneurysm is associated with a lower occlusion rate after PED-only treatment. Patients with preoperative visual symptoms should be treated promptly to avoid permanent visual symptoms.

Optic nerve injury in preoperative imaging is associated with visual improvement outcome in endoscopic optic nerve decompression

Objective

To evaluate potential clinical parameters having an impact on visual outcome after endoscopic optic nerve decompression in acute optic neuropathy patients.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of patients with acute optic neuropathy, who underwent endoscopic optic nerve decompression between June 2001 and November 2018 at an academic center was performed. Patients were divided into groups according to visual improvement after surgical treatment (yes/no). Following clinical parameters were compared between groups: perioperative steroid use, evidence of optic nerve affection in preoperative neuroimaging, additional optic nerve sheath incision, surgery delay and preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Further subgroups analyses were conducted based on etiology (trauma/tumor).

Results

Among 32 included cases, 16 patients (50%) reported visual improvement after endoscopic optic nerve decompression. There was no significant difference in visual improvement between etiology subgroups (trauma: n = 9/20 (45%) vs. tumor: n = 7/12 (58.3%), p = 0.465). Tumor subgroup patients with visual improvement had a significantly higher prevalence of optic nerve affection in preoperative neuroimaging than those without visual improvement (p = 0.018, φ = 0.683). Perioperative steroid administration was negatively associated with visual outcome (p = 0.034, φ = 0.375). Nerve sheath incision, surgery delay and preoperative CRP levels did not have a significant impact on visual outcome (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Radiological findings can help as an indicator for surgical treatment since an affected optic nerve in preoperative neuroimaging resulted in better visual outcome after surgery. The use of steroids should be considered more carefully since it did not show any beneficial effect.