The Efficacy of Posterior Cervical Laminectomy for Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy in Long Term Period

Duration of symptoms before diagnosis in degenerative cervical myelopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), the commonest cause of spinal cord injury, can lead to progressive disability. Due to overlapping symptoms with other conditions and low awareness among healthcare professionals, many patients experience delayed diagnosis.

Research question

What is the typical duration of symptoms of DCM before diagnosis?

Materials and methods

We searched multiple databases for primary studies reporting duration of symptoms in people with confirmed diagnosis of DCM. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, full-text articles, extracted data and appraised study quality. We performed random-effects meta-analyses to pool duration of symptoms to presentation, diagnosis, and intervention.

Results

We identified 78 studies from 18 countries, with 12,450 participants. Time from symptom onset to first clinical presentation (two studies, n = 232 participants) was 3.3 (95 % confidence interval, -0.3-6.8) months. Time from symptom onset to diagnosis (five studies, n = 897) was 15.0 (5.0-25.0) months. In 29 studies (n = 3052) that measured from symptom onset to surgery/pre-operative assessment the duration was 14.5 (12.1-17.0) months. Thirty-seven studies had an undefined endpoint, in which when pooled, duration of symptoms was 15.2 (12.4-18.0) months. Most studies did not define the symptoms at onset, however when onset was defined as first occurrence of myelopathic (upper motor neurone) symptoms (five studies, n = 1006), time to surgery was 10.7 (2.3-18.5) months.

Discussion and conclusion

Most people with DCM experience symptoms for more than one year before diagnosis. These data may be useful to inform initiatives to promote early diagnosis. Standardised methodology would improve further research in this area.

Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound Guided Inter-semispinal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Posterior Cervical Laminectomy - A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study

Study designProspective, randomized controlled study.ObjectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of an ultrasound-guided ISP block for postoperative analgesia in posterior cervical laminectomy.Methods88 patients requiring posterior cervical laminectomy were randomized into two groups, those who underwent ISP block with multimodal analgesia (ISPB group) and those with only multimodal analgesia (control group). Demographic details, intraoperative parameters (blood loss, duration of surgery, perioperative total opioid consumption, muscle relaxants used), and postoperative parameters (numeric rating scale, satisfaction score, mobilization time, and complications) were recorded.ResultsThe total opioid consumption (128.41 + 39.65vs 284.09 + 140.92mcg; P < .001), muscle relaxant usage (46.14 + 6.18 mg vs 59.32 + 3.97 mg; P < .001), surgical duration (128.61 + 26.08/160.23 + 30.99mins; P < .01), and intra-operative blood loss (233.18 + 66.08 mL vs 409.77 + 115.41 mL; P < .01) were significantly less in the ISPB group compared to the control. In the postoperative period, the control group's pain score was significantly higher (P < .001) in the initial 48 hours. The Modified Observer Alertness/Sedation Score (MOASS) score and satisfaction scores were significantly better in the ISPB compared to the control (P < .001). The mean time required to ambulate was statistically less in ISPB (4.30 + 1.64hours) when compared to controls (9.48 + 3.07hours) (P < .001).ConclusionIn patients undergoing posterior cervical laminectomy, ISP block is a safe and effective technique with better outcomes than standard multi-modal analgesia alone, in terms of reduced intra-operative opioid requirements and blood loss, better postoperative analgesia, and early mobilization.

Factors Associated With Return to Work Following Laminoplasty for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors predictive of returning to work within 90 days of laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).

BACKGROUND

DCM is a debilitating condition resulting from spinal canal stenosis and spinal cord compression. One surgical option for cord decompression is cervical laminoplasty. Factors influencing return to work (RTW) postsurgery are unknown.

METHODS

This study included adult patients previously employed, undergoing primary elective laminoplasty for DCM, and with documented RTW status. Variables included demographic information, medical history, illness characteristics, and baseline patient-reported outcomes. The primary outcome of interest was RTW status at 90 days. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify predictors.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (67.6%) returned to work within 90 days, whereas 22 (32.3%) either RTW between 90 and 365 days (n = 3) or did not RTW within 365 days (n = 19). Significantly more patients who RTW within 90 days worked full-time (90.9% vs 64.3%, P = 0.030). Patients who RTW within 90 days had significantly lower preoperative Neck Disability Index scores (23.7 ± 17.5 vs 35.6 ± 14.3, P = 0.008) and higher preoperative modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores (13.7 ± 2.5 vs 12.2 ± 2.7, P = 0.018) compared with those who did not RTW. No differences were found in other baseline patient-reported outcomes. Patients who RTW within 90 days had significantly lower postoperative 3-month neck pain (2.0 ± 2.1 vs 3.8 ± 2.6, P = 0.007), 3-month arm pain (1.3 ± 1.9 vs 3.6 ± 2.8, P < 0.001), 12-month neck pain (1.4 ± 1.6 vs 3.1 ± 2.4, P = 0.019) and 12-month arm pain (1.1 ± 1.8 vs 2.4 ± 2.4, P = 0.048) compared with those who did not RTW within 90 days. Higher preoperative modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores were significantly associated with truncated time to RTW (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.01-1.29, P = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

Patients with better preoperative neck and arm pain and functional scores were more likely to RTW within 90 days postlaminoplasty. Preoperative functional status plays an important role in assessing RTW postlaminoplasty. This information is valuable for preoperative patient counseling.

Correlation of imaging characteristics of degenerative cervical myelopathy and the surgical approach with improvement for postoperative neck pain and neural function: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Complex degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy (DCM) is characterized by a variety of complex imaging features. The surgical method for DCM remains controversial. This study aimed to examine the correlation between the imaging characteristics of DCM with varying degrees of complexity and the surgical approach and clinical outcome.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study involving retrospective data collection was performed. A total of 139 patients with DCM who underwent surgery between January 2015 and January 2018 in the Orthopedics Department of Shanxi Bethune Hospital were divided into 3 groups according to the complexity of imaging features: 18 patients in the mild group, 66 patients in the moderate group, and 55 patients in the severe group. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were used to compare the effects of neck pain and neural function prior to surgery according to the rate of improvement as of the last follow-up. Routine X-ray films were obtained at the follow-up of 3-6 months. The necessity of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations was determined based on clinical findings and X-ray images. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare groups, the least significant difference (LSD) test was used for multiple comparisons, and the Chi-square test was used to compare classification indicators (imaging manifestations, gender), with P<0.05 being statistically significant. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the primary influencing factors of the JOA recovery rate.

Results

In all three groups, JOA and VAS scores at the final follow-up were significantly higher than those before surgery (P<0.001). There were significant differences in the preoperative VAS and JOA scores between any two groups, as well as in the VAS and JOA scores and improvement rates at the last follow-up between the mild group and the moderate group and between the mild group and the severe group (P<0.001). Age, preoperative JOA scores, MRI intramedullary hyperintensity signal, and the degree of spinal cord compression were primarily related to the nervous system recovery rate (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Age, MRI intramedullary hyperintensity signal, degree of spinal cord compression, and other variables were associated with the improvement of neural function in patients with DCM. Therefore, in addition to the JOA improvement rate or VAS score, additional factors, such as the patient's condition, the improvement in quality of life, and the patient's financial capacity, should be considered in evaluating the improvement of postoperative neck pain and neural function.

Current Concepts of Cervical Spine Alignment, Sagittal Deformity, and Cervical Spine Surgery

There are not many reports on cervical spine alignment, and only a few analyze ideal surgical approaches and optimal amounts of correction needed for the various types of deformity. We comprehensively reviewed the present literature on cervical spinal deformities (with or without myelopathy) and their surgical management to provide a framework for surgical planning. A general assessment of the parameters actually in use and correlations between cervical and thoracolumbar spine alignment are provided. We also analyzed posterior, anterior, and combined cervical surgical approaches and indications for the associated techniques of laminoplasty, laminectomy and fusion, and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Finally, on the basis of the NDI, SF-36, VAS, and mJOA questionnaires, we fully evaluated the outcomes and measures of postoperative health-related quality of life. We found the need for additional prospective studies to further enhance our understanding of the importance of cervical alignment when assessing and treating cervical deformities with or without myelopathy. Future studies need to focus on correlations between cervical alignment parameters, disability scores, and myelopathy outcomes. Through this comprehensive literature review, we offer guidance on practical and important points of surgical technique, cervical alignment, and goals surgeons can meet to improve symptoms in all patients.

Clinical parameters of laminoplasty and laminectomy with fusion in the treatment of cervical spondylosis and analysis of postoperative sagittal balance

Background/aim

Cervical spondylosis is a progressive disease that causes degenerative changes affecting the spine, intervertebral discs, facets, and ligaments. With anterior and posterior surgical interventions, effective treatments can be applied in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). The relationship between regional and global spinal alignment and functional and pain outcomes was examined and it was revealed that these parameters play a significant role in obtaining good results. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative and follow-up results of patients with CSM who underwent laminoplasty or laminectomy with fusion.

Materials and method

CSM patients who were operated on between 2015 and 2020 and had at least 2 years of clinical and radiological follow-up were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups as the laminoplasty group and the laminectomy with fusion group, according to a simple random method. Demographic, clinical, radiological, and perioperative parameters were examined. Measurements were made by an independent observer using Surgimap and 2 years was considered to be sufficient time for the spine to take its final shape.

Result

A total of 112 patients, including 68 males and 44 females, were included. Of these patients, 69 were in the laminectomy with fusion group, and 43 were in the laminoplasty group. Patient ages ranged from 39 to 85 years. The mean follow-up period was 36.28 months. In both groups, at the 3-month follow-up, a statistically significant improvement in the clinical parameters (neck disability index, visual analogue scale, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores) was observed. When the preoperative cervical radiological parameters were evaluated, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups. The C2-C7 lordotic angles and the cervical SVA values were increased in the postoperative period, for both groups (p < 0.001). Although it is noteworthy that the increases were higher in the laminectomy with fusion group, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups.

Conclusion

Deformity in a spinal segment may indirectly affect another segment. Being aware of the compensatory mechanisms and radiological parameters will help in determining the effective treatment plan.

Perioperative analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in posterior cervical spine surgery-a double blinded, randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND CONTENT

Posterior cervical spine surgery (PCSS) are typically open surgeries and entail significant postoperative pain. Current perioperative pain management in PCSS is reliant on multimodal analgesia. While perioperative epidural anesthetic infusion can be used in lumbar surgeries, this is not an option in the cervical spine. Pre-emptive regional analgesia through erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has shown significant perioperative analgesic benefits in lumbar spine surgeries. There are no such clinical studies in PCSS.

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided ESPB for perioperative analgesia in PCSS.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized controlled, double-blinded study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Eighty-six patients requiring sub-axial PCSS with or without instrumentation were randomized into two groups, those who underwent ESPB with multimodal analgesia (case) and those with only multimodal analgesia (control).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Demographic and surgical data (blood loss, duration of surgery, perioperative total opioid consumption, muscle relaxants used) were assessed. Postoperatively, the surgical site pain, alertness scale, satisfaction score, time to mobilization and complications were recorded.

METHODS

After anesthesia and prone position, case patients received ultrasound-guided ESPB at the T1 level using 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 8 mg Dexamethasone bilaterally while the control patients received only standard postoperative multimodal analgesia.

RESULTS

There were 43 patients in each group; the two groups were identical in demographic and surgical profile. The intraoperative opioid consumption (119.53±40.35 vs. 308.6±189.78; p<.001) in mcg), muscle relaxant usage (50.00±0.00 mg vs. 59.53±3.75 mg, p<.001), surgical duration (124.77±26.63/ 156.74±37.01 min; p<.01) and intraoperative blood loss (310.47±130.73 ml vs. 429.77±148.50 ml; p<.05) were significantly less in the ESPB group. In the postoperative period, the control group's pain score was significantly higher (p<.001). The Modified Observer Alertness/Sedation Score (MOASS) score and satisfaction scores also showed significant differences between the case and control groups (p<.001). The mean time required to ambulate (sitting/walking) was statistically less in cases (15.81±6.15/20.72±4.02 h) when compared to controls (16.86±6.18/ 23.05±8.88 h; p<.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing PCSS, ESPB is a safe and effective technique with better outcomes than standard multimodal analgesia alone, in terms of reduced intraoperative opioid requirements and blood loss, better postoperative analgesia and early mobilization.

Current surgical practice for multi-level degenerative cervical myelopathy: Findings from an international survey of spinal surgeons

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) results from compression of the cervical spine cord as a result of age related changes in the cervical spine, and affects up to 2% of adults, leading to progressive disability. Surgical decompression is the mainstay of treatment, but there remains significant variation in surgical approaches used. This survey was conducted in order to define current practice amongst spine surgeons worldwide, as a possible prelude to further studies comparing surgical approaches.

METHODS

An electronic survey was developed and piloted by the investigators using SurveyMonkey. Collected data was categorical and is presented using summary statistics. Where applicable, statistical comparisons were made using a Chi-Squared test. The level of significance for all statistical analyses was defined as p < 0.05. All analysis, including graphs was performed using R (R Studio).

RESULTS

127 surgeons, from 30 countries completed the survey; principally UK (66, 52%) and North America (15, 12%). Respondents were predominantly Neurosurgeons by training (108, 85%) of whom 84 (75%) reported Spinal Surgery as the principal part of their practice. The majority indicated they selected their surgical procedure for multi-level DCM on a case by case basis (62, 49%). Overall, a posterior approach was more popular for multi-level DCM (74, 58%). Region, speciality or annual multi-level case load did not influence this significantly. However, there was a trend for North American surgeons to be more likely to favour a posterior approach.

CONCLUSIONS

A posterior approach was favoured and more commonly used to treat multi-level DCM, in an international cohort of surgeons. Posterior techniques including laminectomy, laminectomy and fusion or laminoplasty appeared to be equally popular.