Nursing Management of Cancer Cachexia: A New Frontier

The barriers to interprofessional care for cancer cachexia among Japanese healthcare providers: A nationwide survey

BACKGROUND

Cancer cachexia is a severe complication of advanced malignancy, with few therapeutic options. To promote interprofessional care for cancer cachexia, healthcare providers' needs should be addressed in detail. This pre-planned subgroup analysis of the Global Educational Needs Evaluation: a systemic interprofessional study in cancer cachexia (GENESIS-CC) survey aimed to identify barriers to interprofessional care of cancer cachexia in Japan.

METHODS

A nationwide survey was electronically conducted for healthcare providers in oncological or general healthcare facilities from January to March 2021 in Japan. The Japanese Regional Advisory Board developed a barrier scoring system with 33 from the 58 original survey items to quantify six domains of barriers: (1) lack of confidence, (2) lack of knowledge, (3) barriers in personal practice, (4) barriers in perception, (5) barriers in team practice and (6) barriers in education. The largest possible barrier score was set at 100 points. We compared the scores by profession.

RESULTS

A total of 1227 valid responses were obtained from 302 (24.6%) physicians, 252 (20.5%) pharmacists, 236 (19.2%) nurses, 218 (17.8%) dietitians, 193 (15.7%) rehabilitation therapists and 26 (2.0%) other professionals. Overall, 460 (37.5%) were not very or at all confident about cancer cachexia care, 791 (84.1%) agreed or strongly agreed that care was influenced by reimbursement availability and 774 (81.9%) did not have cancer cachexia as a mandatory curriculum. The largest mean barrier score (± standard deviation) was 63.7 ± 31.3 for education, followed by 55.6 ± 21.8 for team practice, 43.7 ± 32.5 for knowledge, 42.8 ± 17.7 for perception and 36.5 ± 16.7 for personal practice. There were statistically significant interprofessional differences in all domains (P < 0.05), especially for pharmacists and nurses with the highest or second highest scores in most domains.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to improve the educational system and team practices of cancer cachexia for most Japanese healthcare providers, especially pharmacists and nurses. Our study suggests the need to reform the mandatory educational curriculum and reimbursement system on cancer cachexia to promote interprofessional care for cancer cachexia in Japan.

R-CSS: A clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in patients with cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Objective

Accurate cachexia staging is the key to its management. However, there is currently a lack of tools to distinguish the staging of cachexia in patients with cancer undergoing radiotherapy. The Radiotherapy Cachexia Staging Scale (R-CSS) was developed for the stratification of cachexia in patients undergoing cancer radiotherapy.

Methods

Patients with cancer undergoing radiotherapy were divided into four stages - noncachexia, precachexia, cachexia, and refractory cachexia - by the R-CSS scale, and the clinical outcomes of the four groups were compared.

Results

A total of 270 patients with cancer undergoing radiation therapy were included in the study. All participants were classified into four stages of cachexia: stage 0, I, II, and III. Patients with a higher cachexia stage had a higher prevalence of sarcopenia (P ​= ​0.015). Scores on the 16-item M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory were higher in patients with higher cachexia stages (P ​< ​0.05), but levels of forgetfulness, numbness, and shortness of breath were not higher in these patients (P ​> ​0.05). Patients with higher cachexia stages exhibited better scores on the QLQ-C30 scale (P ​< ​0.05), except for in the domains of cognitive functioning, diarrhea, and dyspnea (P ​> ​0.05). The incidence of treatment-related events (any grade III or higher grade of [non-]hematologic adverse events, the need for hospitalization, emergency room admission) was higher in patients with higher cachexia stages.

Conclusions

The R-CSS scale is a screening tool that can simultaneously distinguish different stages of cachexia.

Successful Management of Exudate and Odor Using a Pouch System in a Patient with Malignant Facial Wound: A Case Report

Malignant fungating wounds are associated with heavy exudate and malodor, and can thus have a devastating impact on the physical, psychological, and functional health of patients at the end of life. Management is typically limited to the use of more absorbent dressings and frequent changing of dressings. However, this method is associated with a large amount of time needed for wound care, and does not always resolve the problem of malodor. Herein, we report the use of an inexpensive ostomy pouch to manage facial fungating wounds caused by maxillary gingival carcinoma. The pouches are adhered to the skin, and collect a large amount of malodorous exudate for days without leaking. Fewer dressing changes and the absence of malodor result in an improved quality of life for the patient and family.