Influence of pharmacy students on the attitudes of medical students following an interprofessional course

Clinical Interprofessional Education in Inpatient Pharmacy: Findings From a Secondary Analysis of a Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

Clinical interprofessional education (IPE) is defined as learning that occurs within clinical learning environments such as hospitals, primary care clinics, and long-term care facilities where learners collaborate to deliver care to real patients. The objective of this secondary analysis of a scoping review is to identify, characterize, and summarize evidence from the published literature regarding clinical IPE for pharmacy learners in the inpatient setting.

FINDINGS

PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases were searched for clinical IPE articles that met the following inclusion criteria: ≥ 2 health professions, ≥ 2 learner groups, and involvement of real patients/patient care. For this secondary analysis, 12 articles involving pharmacy learners in an inpatient setting were included. The most common interprofessional partner was medicine (66%), and the median number of student participants involved in the activity was 19 (range, 10-525). Five studies conducted clinical IPE in the context of advanced pharmacy practice experiences. Clinical IPE activities were described primarily as inpatient rounding with the medical team, but were often outside the normal clinical workflow (66%). Incorporation of Interprofessional Education Collaborative competencies was limited, as was the use of validated IPE assessment tools to measure outcomes.

SUMMARY

Current literature is limited in reports of pharmacy learner involvement in inpatient clinical IPE. Expansion of pharmacy partnerships and alignment of team outcomes with the Interprofessional Education Collaborative competencies are needed to demonstrate the relationship between clinical IPE and patient care outcomes within established workflows.

Comparison of students' readiness from six health education programs for interprofessional learning in Vietnam: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Interprofessional education (IPE) is expected to help prepare undergraduate health profession students to collaborate with other healthcare professionals in realising quality of care. Studies stress the necessity of students' readiness for interprofessional learning (IPL) in view of designing IPE programs. The present study aims to determine students' IPL-readiness and looks at related differences in students enrolled in different programs and at different phases in their educational program.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey study was set up among 1139 students from six health programs at HueUMP, using the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS). Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis H and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

The overall mean RIPLS score was 68.89. RIPLS scores significantly differed between programs and between phases in the educational programs. Medical students presented a lower readiness level for IPL than students from other programs. In contrast to a significant increase in RIPLS scores of students in the clinical phase in Vietnamese traditional medicine, medicine, and pharmacy, a decrease in RIPLS scores was observed in students in the clinical phase in odonto-stomatology.

CONCLUSIONS

The differences could be related to differences in educational programs and the study phases in a particular program. These results offer insights to direct the design and implementation of IPE in health education curricula and especially underscore the need to provide IPE throughout the curriculum.

[Evaluation of simulation-based training program intended to improve interprofessional communication skills of community pharmacy and general medicine students]

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this work is to assess the impact of a simulation session on the ability of pharmacy and medicine students in general practice to communicate in the resolution of patient-facing situations.

METHODS

The evaluation of the impact of the session on the representation of the professions used a questionnaire to be completed before and after the session by the students. The evaluation of the impact of the session on the perception of communication and associated skills was based on an audio recording of the debriefings, which, after transcription and thematic analysis, was used as a preliminary analysis for the drafting of a questionnaire proposed the following year. This questionnaire focused on the issues of interprofessional communication and on the seminar process.

RESULTS

During the 2018 and 2019 seminars, 518 students attended, 39% were pharmacy students (n=201) and 61% were medical students (n=317). The majority of medical students initially responded that physician-pharmacist communication was confraternal and rare. More pharmacy students felt that the quality of the physician-pharmacist relationship was poor. However, there was a marked improvement for all students on this aspect of communication after the seminar. Both groups also generally agreed that this relationship could be improved.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluation shows that an interprofessional simulation program improves the ability of pharmacy and general practice students to communicate in patient-facing situations.