Outcomes and predictors of success of noninvasive ventilation in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Role of Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) in Managing Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Systematic Review

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a significant global health issue that is characterized by airflow constriction and breathing difficulties. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is a recommended treatment for acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD), offering benefits over invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and impact of NIV in managing AECOPD. The study adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar for relevant studies published between 2015 and 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies involving AECOPD patients treated with NIV, including randomized controlled, cohort, and observational studies. We included 10 studies that fit our inclusion criteria for a thorough review. From the studies selected, NIV demonstrated significant reductions in mortality rates, intubation rates, and hospital stays compared to IMV. Albeit the need to train healthcare providers is essential, high adherence to NIV guidelines was observed. Different NIV modes showed comparable efficacy, and structured weaning protocols reduced relapse rates. NIV is a highly effective and safe treatment for patients with AECOPD than IMV. High-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) is a viable alternative for patients intolerant to NIV. Further research should standardize treatment protocols and optimize NIV use in clinical practice.

Effectiveness and Outcomes of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients With Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BACKGROUND

Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in individuals experiencing acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with several complications. Therefore, utilizing noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is the suggested initial management for these individuals. The current study was done to assess and compare the clinical and physiological parameters before and after the application of NIPPV and also to evaluate the outcomes of NIPPV.

METHODOLOGY

A prospective observational study was conducted on 50 patients with COPD experiencing acute exacerbations. These patients were treated with NIPPV. Measurements of blood pressure, respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), dyspnea using the modified Borg scale, and arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters (pH, PaCO2, and PaO2) were recorded at baseline, one hour, six hours, 24 hours, and daily until discharge. The study's outcomes included the subjects who successfully underwent NIPPV and failed during NIPPV.

RESULTS

NIPPV effectively reduced the dyspnea score from 7.24 ± 1.58 at baseline to 5.53 ± 1.82 at one hour, 4.11 ± 1.75 at six hours, 2.60 ± 1.03 at 24 hours, and 1.26 ± 0.44 at the time of discharge. Significant improvements were also observed in HR and RR (P < 0.001). When compared to the baseline, the pH level was significantly maintained, PaCO2 was decreased, and PaO2 was increased at various times. Mortality was observed in four patients.

CONCLUSIONS

NIPPV was successful in 42 (84%) patients, with improvements in ABG and pH for early recovery and reduced hospital stay.