Usefulness of neuromuscular ultrasound in the diagnosis of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome

The cross-sectional morphology of median nerve in carpal tunnel of healthy, adult population: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The cross-section area is a crucial parameter to assess peripheral neuropathy. The ultrasonographic evaluation of cross-section area of median nerve is a low-cost and readily available tool for diagnosis and assessment. However, the intra-nerve dimensional variability and its normative reference value in a healthy subject are missing. The current meta-analysis aims to capture the median nerve cross-section area for healthy subjects and generate a comprehensive ultrasonographic reference data set for each population.

METHODS

The full text of manuscripts were collected after short-listing the abstracts collected from search strategy. A quality assurance tool was used to capture the risk of bias of each study after reviewing the included manuscripts. The pooled estimate of cross-section area was stratified according to anatomical landmarks, sex, and ancestry.

RESULTS

A total of 97 observational studies dealt with 6679 wrists of healthy subjects were included. The pooled estimate of the cross-section area of median nerve at carpal tunnel inlet was 8.54mm2 [95% CI: 8.34-8.74mm2]. The same pooled estimate at carpal tunnel outlet was 8.03mm2 [95% CI: 7.46-8.60mm2]. Both these pooled estimates have significant correlation with mean age of population. Age and sex were two primary predictors of the cross-section of median nerve. The flattening ratio, circularity, and wrist-forearm ratio of median nerve were also computed.

CONCLUSION

These normative data could serve as a reference for assessing median nerve pathologies, including carpal tunnel syndrome. The ethnic variation of pooled estimate and heterogeneity will guide clinician set up the reference value for diagnostic criteria.

Diagnostic utility of median nerve CSA to ulnar nerve CSA ratio in the diagnosis of mild idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome

Background

Ultrasonography (US) measurement of median nerve cross-sectional area (m-CSA) at pisiform is increasingly utilized in identification of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), but there is still no agreement about the ideal cut-off value to employ. The aim of the study was to explore whether the median CSA to ulnar CSA ratio at the level of pisiform may yield a more accurate diagnosis of CTS. The study included 50 patients with mild idiopathic CTS (ICTS), assessed clinically and by nerve conduction studies, and 50 matched controls. M-CSA, median nerve flattening ratio and swelling ratio (m-SR), palmer bowing, and median CSA to ulnar CSA ratio (m-CAS:u-CSA) were measured for patients and controls. The cutoff values for the US parameters for the diagnosis of ICTS were evaluated.

Results

Compared to the control group, the ICTS group had significantly higher m-CSA (p < 0.001), higher m-CSA:u-CSA ratio (p < 0.001), higher m-SR (p = 0.012, and higher palmar bowing (p < 0.001). Use of m-CSA cutoff value of 11.78 mm2 and CSA:u-CSA ratio cut-off point of 2.97 yielded the greatest sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of ICTS.

Conclusion

The m-CSA:u-CSA ratio is slightly superior to the m-CSA in the diagnosis of CTS in terms of sensitivity and specificity.