Tracheal intubation practices and adverse events in trauma victims on arrival to trauma triage: A single centre prospective observational study

Emergency airway management in resource limited setting

BACKGROUND

Emergency airway management in resource-limited settings presents multifaceted challenges due to shortages in essential medical resources, healthcare professionals, and infrastructure.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search using keywords "Emergency Airway Management" "Low Resource" "Africa" "Asia" from databases such as Pubmed, and Google Scholar, from where we extracted relevant literature for our study.

FINDINGS

These limitations resulted in delayed interventions, suboptimal care, and higher complication rates during intubation procedures. However, innovative solutions have emerged to address these challenges, including cost-effective airway management devices and training programs tailored for non-medical personnel. Capacity building and local empowerment are critical components of improving emergency airway management in these settings. Additionally, advocating for policy support and investment in healthcare infrastructure is essential to ensure access to essential equipment and adequate staffing. Collaboration and knowledge-sharing networks among healthcare professionals and organisations are pivotal in disseminating best practices and advancing healthcare delivery in resource-limited regions.

CONCLUSION

Future efforts should focus on tailored training programs, rigorous research, innovative device development, telemedicine solutions, sustainable capacity building, and advocacy to enhance emergency airway management in resource-limited settings.

Glasgow Coma Scale Intubation Thresholds and Outcomes of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: The Need for Tailored Practice Management Guidelines

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to re-evaluate the GCS threshold for intubation in patients presenting to the ED with a traumatic brain injury to optimize outcomes and provide evidence for future practice management guidelines.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the ACS-TQIP-Participant Use File (PUF) 2015-2019 for adult trauma patients 18 years and older who experienced a blunt traumatic head injury and received computerized tomography. Multivariable regressions were performed to assess associations between outcomes and GCS intubation thresholds of 5, 8, and 10.

RESULTS

In patients with a GCS ≤5, there were no differences in mortality (GCS ≤5: 26.3% vs GCS >5: 28.3%, adjusted P = .08), complication rates (GCS ≤5: 9.1% vs GCS >5: 10.3%, adjusted P = .91), or ICU length of stay (GCS ≤5: 5.4 vs GCS >5: 4.7, adjusted P = .36) between intubated and non-intubated patients. Intubated patients at GCS thresholds ≤8 (26.2% vs 19.1%, adjusted P < .0001) and ≤10 (25.6% vs 15.8%, adjusted P < .0001) had significantly higher mortality rates than non-intubated patients. Intubation at all GCS thresholds >5 resulted in higher rates of complications, H-LOS, and ICU-LOS when compared to non-intubated patients with the same GCS score.

CONCLUSION

A GCS ≤5 was the threshold at which intubation in TBI patients conferred an additional benefit in disposition without worsened outcomes of mortality, H-LOS, or ICU-LOS. Trauma societies and hospital institutions should consider revisiting existing guidelines and protocols concerning the appropriate GCS threshold for safer intubation and better outcomes among these patient population.