Second primary malignancy: A retrospective analysis report from a tertiary cancer center of North India

Clinicopathological analysis of patients with dual malignancies: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aims to report the increasing incidence of second primary malignancies to better understand the association of multiple primary cancers and the duration of their occurrence. Keeping in view the current trends in dual malignancies and to further emphasize the importance of screening and follow-up diagnosis, we reviewed the records of patients who were diagnosed with dual malignancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study. We collected data from the hospital database, of patients presenting with either histologically proven synchronous or metachronous double primaries between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. The time interval to differentiate between synchronous and metachronous has been taken as 6 months.

RESULTS

During the period of five years, twenty-three patients presented with dual malignancy. Out of 23 cases, seven were synchronous (30.43%), and 16 were metachronous (69.56%). In the synchronous malignancy group, the most common site of first and second primary malignancy was breast [5 cases (71.4%) and 3 cases (42.8%), respectively]. In the metachronous malignancy group, the most common site of the first primary was breast (7 cases; 43.75%), followed by the head and neck (4 cases; 25%), and the most common site of the second primary was also the breast (6 cases; 37.5%), followed by the lung (5 cases; 31.25%).

CONCLUSION

Second primary malignancies are not rare and can occur at any age. Regular follow-up and screening procedures by the treating oncologist can play a major role in early detection followed by appropriate treatment of second primary tumors.

Deciphering the Patterns of Dual Primary Cases Registered at the Hospital-Based Cancer Registry: First Experience from Rural Cancer Center in North India

Objectives  The objective is to present the patterns of dual primary malignancies diagnosed at the Pathology Laboratory of Cancer Hospital with the support from hospital-based cancer registry (HBCR), Sangrur, Punjab, India for the years 2018 and 2019. Methods  HBCR abstracts data from electronic medical records. Trained cancer registry staff abstracts cases in standard pro forma. Dual primary was coded as per the International Agency for Research on Cancer rule and was rechecked by the pathologist. Statistical Analysis  Data about multiple primary was entered and documented in an Excel sheet. Time interval was calculated by subtracting the date of diagnosis for second primary and first primary. Results  A total of 6,933 cases were registered, 45 cases are dual primary (26 females, 19 males) of which 64.4% are synchronous and 35.6% metachronous cases. Seventy-nine percent received cancer-directed treatment for synchronous and 87% for metachronous. The most common sites of the primary tumor were breast (33%), head and neck (22.2%), gynecological sites (11%), prostate (9%), esophagus (4%), and remaining other tumors (20.8%). Most common sites for second malignancies were gastrointestinal (GI) tract (31%), gynecological sites (18%), head and neck (16%), hematological malignancies (7%), soft tissue sarcoma (4%), breast (2%), and other sites (22%). Conclusion  More than 70% of cases of primary tumors were in breast, head and neck, gynecological, and prostate. Of these, more than 60% of the second malignancy was found in the GI tract, gynecological, and head and neck sites. Around two-thirds of dual tumors are synchronous. Breast cancer cases have higher incidence of second malignancy. Regular follow-up is necessary to assess the survival of the second primary.

Multiple malignant primary tumors (non-head and neck): Contemplation needed

BACKGROUND

The incidence of multiple malignant primary tumors (MMPT) is increasing which needs attention. Hence, we undertook this study to analyze clinico-demographic details and treatment outcomes in patients with non-head and neck MMPT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hospital case records of patients with histopathology proven MMPT registered in the radiation oncology department from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2020 were retrospectively studied. Modified Warren-Gates criteria were used to define MMPT. Patients with MMPT of the head and neck (both an index and second primary as head-neck) were excluded from the study. Demographic and clinical details were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-two eligible cases of non-head and neck MMPT were studied. The median age at diagnosis of an index case was 55 years (minimum 21, maximum 85) with a male to a female sex ratio of 5:37. Twelve patients had synchronous (28.57%) and 30 had metachronous (71.42%) MMPT. The average period between metachronous tumors was 77.77 months (minimum 12, maximum 312). The most common site of an index and second primary tumor was the breast (26; 61.90% and 23; 54.76%, respectively). Seventeen (65.38%) out of 26 index breast cancer were bilateral breast cancer and nine were others. In six cases of MMPT, there was an association between the breast and cervix.

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer was the most common site for both an index and second primary malignancy followed by genital cancers. With cautious monitoring and patient education, second primary tumor could be detected earlier and managed better giving a good quality of life to patients.

Definitive radiotherapy in patients of synchronous esophageal and head and neck cancer-treatment outcome and toxicity

AIM

The aim is to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes and treatment related toxicities in patients of synchronous esophageal and head & neck cancer when treated with definitive radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND

Patients of esophageal cancer with a synchronous second primary in head and neck region can be treated with definitive radiotherapy but the clinical outcome has been reported to be poor.

METHOD AND DESIGN

This is a single institutional retrospective study. Twenty-five patients fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria were evaluated. The survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meir method and their relations with various clinicopathologic parameters were compared.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up time of 14 months, the 1 year and 2 year survival was 60% and 17% respectively. Significant improvement in overall survival was observed in patients with early staged esophageal cancer then locally advanced disease (P = 0.03). Patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer had poor survival than with early stage disease (P = 0.06). Those who received concurrent chemotherapy had better survival than those with radiotherapy alone. 40% patients developed grade III & IV dermatitis and 48% patients developed grade III oral mucositis.

CONCLUSION

Chemoradiotherapy can safely be offered to patients with synchronous esophageal and head and neck cancer.

Triple Metachronous Malignancies with Thyroid Involvement: A Brief Overview of Five Case Reports over 20 Years of Institutional Experience

Multiple primary malignant tumors are defined by the development of more than one malignancy in a single patient. These can be subdivided into synchronous or metachronous malignant tumors, depending on their time of appearance, relative to the first malignancy. Triple primary malignancies are a relatively rare occurrence in day-to-day practice and triple synchronous or metachronous carcinomas involving a thyroid localization are even less common. In this case series, we report our 20-year experience in diagnosing and managing five patients with triple malignant tumors with thyroid involvement.

Metachronous Second Primary Malignancies in Known Breast Cancer Patients on 18F-Fluoro-2-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computerized Tomography in a Tertiary Care Center

Introduction:

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women all over the world, which accounts to 25% of all cancers. In known cases of breast cancer, the risk of developing another denovo malignancy is more when compared to low risk groups, which might be due to common environmental risk factors, treatment induced risk factors, Genetic susceptibility for mutations, presence of cancer syndromes or better detection due to close surveillance.

Objective:

To study the profile of Metachronous 2^nd primary malignancies suspected on 18F-FDG PET CT in known Breast cancer patients. In this Retrospective study from January 2014 to April 2018, all the consecutive patients with known Breast cancer, who were referred to Nuclear Medicine department for 18F- FDG PET CT for follow up evaluation were included. Suspected 2^nd primary malignancies were correlated with Histopathological examination (HPE).

Results:

During the study period, a total of 233 Breast cancer patients (all are females), with a mean age of 54.2+13.4 years were studied. On 18F-FDG PET CT scan, suspicion for 2^nd primary malignancy was observed in 37 patients. HPE was done in 28/37 patients at the site of suspected lesions. 15/28 were positive for second malignancy, and remaining 13/28 were either a benign pathology or a part of metastatic disease from the primary breast cancer. The sites of 2^nd primary malignancies included Contralateral breast in 8/15 (53.3%), Ovary in 2/15 (13.3%), Endometrium in 2/15 (13.3%), Lung in 1/15 (6.6%), Stomach in 1/15 (6.6%) and Urinary bladder in 1/15 (6.6%) patients respectively. The incidence of metachronous 2^nd primaries in breast cancer is 67.3 per 1000 breast cancer patients.

Conclusion:

Metachronous second primary cancers in breast cancer patients are not very rare. A high imaging suspicion on 18F-FDG PET CT helps in early detection of 2^nd primary cancer, thereby facilitating early and appropriate management.

The Conundrum of Dual Primary Malignancies: Four Years’ Experience of a Single Tertiary Care Institute in India

Background: Encountering more than one malignancy in a cancer patient is no longer uncommon; this increasing incidence is mostly attributable to the improvements in life expectancy, awareness, and diagnostic facilities. This article aims to highlight this institute’s experience in diagnosis and treatment of patients of multiple primary malignancies and a comprehensive review of literature. Materials and Methods: This is a descriptive study of retrospectively collected data of a single institution over 4 years from 2013 to 2016. Known cases of cancer who were diagnosed with a second primary malignancy were included in the study. Various details such as age, sex, site of disease, temporal relation of two cancers (synchronous or metachronous), family history, tobacco use, treatment given, and survival at 1 year were recorded, organized in a tabular form, analyzed, and described. Results: A total of 29 cases of dual malignancies comprising 0.74% of a total of 3879 patients of cancer were encountered. Seventy-two percent of the cases were metachronous and 5 years was the mean time interval between tumors. There was a female preponderance, and the average age was 56 years. Breast was the most common site of malignancy. At 1 year from diagnosis of second primary, 69% of the patients were alive and 27% were disease-free. Conclusion: Second primary in a patient of cancer is becoming increasingly common and the suspicion of the same should always be borne in mind during follow-up. Prognosis as well as intent of treatment depends on respective stages of the two malignancies.