Early Administration of Selenium in Patients with Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Double-blinded Controlled Trial

Efficacy and safety of selenium or vitamin E administration alone or in combination in ICU patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Micronutrient administration that contributes to antioxidant defense has been extensively studied in critically ill patients, but consensus remains elusive. Selenium and vitamin E are two important micronutrients that have synergistic antioxidant effects. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of selenium or vitamin E administration alone and the combination of both on clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized in the ICU.

METHODS

After electronic searches on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), SinoMed, VIP database and Wanfang data, initially 1767 papers were found, and 30 interventional studies were included in this analysis. We assessed the risk-difference between treatment and control (standard treatment) groups by pooling available data on length of stay (ICU length of stay and hospital length of stay), mortality (ICU mortality, hospital mortality, 28-day mortality, 6-month mortality and all-cause mortality), duration of mechanical ventilation, adverse events and new infections.

RESULTS

By analyzing the included studies, we found no significant effect of selenium administration alone on mortality, mechanical ventilation duration, or adverse events in ICU patients. However, after excluding studies with high heterogeneity, the meta-analysis showed that selenium alone reduced the length of hospital stay (MD: -1.38; 95% CI: -2.52, -0.23; I-square: 0%). Vitamin E administration alone had no significant effect on mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, or adverse events in ICU patients. However, after excluding studies with high heterogeneity, the meta-analysis showed that vitamin E alone could reduce the length of ICU stay (MD: -1.27; 95% CI: -1.86, -0.67; I-square: 16%). Combined administration of selenium and vitamin E had no significant effect on primary outcomes in ICU patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Selenium administration alone may shorten the length of hospital stay, while vitamin E alone may reduce the length of ICU stay. The putative synergistic beneficial effect of combined administration of selenium and vitamin E in ICU patients has not been observed, but more clinical studies are pending to confirm it further.

Nutritional Support Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Comprehensive Review

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can contribute to extensive dysbiosis of the gastrointestinal system, leading to worsened outcomes. The importance of nutrition in recovery is underappreciated but highly important. In this focused review, we discuss the timing of nutritional interventions with supporting data. We highlight routes of administration that are important given the extent of injury often seen in TBI. The increased energy demands can be met through these approaches. Furthermore, patients need increased vitamins, minerals, and supplements. These interventions are constantly being refined. The current standards are reviewed with an emphasis on evidence-based practices.

The effect of selenium therapy in critically ill patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Selenium is an essential nutrient with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immuno-regulatory properties. Studies have displayed that in critically ill patients, selenium supplementation may be a potentially promising adjunctive therapy.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to present an overview of the effects of selenium supplementation in adult critically ill patients based on published systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A literature search in three electronic databases, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, was performed to find eligible SRMAs until July 2022. For each outcome, the risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were recalculated using either random or fixed effect models. The methodological quality and quality of evidence of the SRMAs were assessed by applying "A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews" (AMSTAR2) and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation(GRADE) tools, respectively.

RESULTS

We included 17 meta-analyses containing 24 RCTs based on inclusion criteria. Selenium supplementation can reduce the incidence of mortality (RR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.71, 0.98, P = 0.024) and incidence of acute renal failure (RR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.46, 0.98, P: 0.038) significantly; however, the certainty of evidence was low. Moreover, with moderate to very low certainty of evidence, no significant effects were found for risk of infection (RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.80, 1.05, P: 0.207), pneumonia (RR: 1.11, 95% CI 0.72, 1.72, P: 0.675), as well as the length of ICU (MD: 0.15, 95% CI - 1.75, 2.05, P: 0.876) and hospital stay (MD: - 0.51, 95% CI - 3.74, 2.72, P: 0.757) and days on ventilation (MD: - 0.98, 95% CI - 2.93, 0.98, P: 0.329).

CONCLUSIONS

With low quality of evidence, the use of selenium supplementation could improve the risk of mortality and acute renal failure, but not other outcomes in critically ill patients.

Effect of drug therapy on nerve repair of moderate-severe traumatic brain injury: A network meta-analysis

Objective: This network meta-analysis aimed to explore the effect of different drugs on mortality and neurological improvement in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), and to clarify which drug might be used as a more promising intervention for treating such patients by ranking.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search from PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from the establishment of the database to 31 January 2022. Data were extracted from the included studies, and the quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The primary outcome measure was mortality in patients with TBI. The secondary outcome measures were the proportion of favorable outcomes and the occurrence of drug treatment–related side effects in patients with TBI in each drug treatment group. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata v16.0 and RevMan v5.3.0.

Results: We included 30 randomized controlled trials that included 13 interventions (TXA, EPO, progesterone, progesterone + vitamin D, atorvastatin, beta-blocker therapy, Bradycor, Enoxaparin, Tracoprodi, dexanabinol, selenium, simvastatin, and placebo). The analysis revealed that these drugs significantly reduced mortality in patients with TBI and increased the proportion of patients with favorable outcomes after TBI compared with placebo. In terms of mortality after drug treatment, the order from the lowest to the highest was progesterone + vitamin D, beta-blocker therapy, EPO, simvastatin, Enoxaparin, Bradycor, Tracoprodi, selenium, atorvastatin, TXA, progesterone, dexanabinol, and placebo. In terms of the proportion of patients with favorable outcomes after drug treatment, the order from the highest to the lowest was as follows: Enoxaparin, progesterone + vitamin D, atorvastatin, simvastatin, Bradycor, EPO, beta-blocker therapy, progesterone, Tracoprodi, TXA, selenium, dexanabinol, and placebo. In addition, based on the classification of Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores after each drug treatment, this study also analyzed the three aspects of good recovery, moderate disability, and severe disability. It involved 10 interventions and revealed that compared with placebo treatment, a higher proportion of patients had a good recovery and moderate disability after treatment with progesterone + vitamin D, Bradycor, EPO, and progesterone. Meanwhile, the proportion of patients with a severe disability after treatment with progesterone + vitamin D and Bradycor was also low.

Conclusion: The analysis of this study revealed that in patients with TBI, TXA, EPO, progesterone, progesterone + vitamin D, atorvastatin, beta-blocker therapy, Bradycor, Enoxaparin, Tracoprodi, dexanabinol, selenium, and simvastatin all reduced mortality and increased the proportion of patients with favorable outcomes in such patients compared with placebo. Among these, the progesterone + vitamin D had not only a higher proportion of patients with good recovery and moderate disability but also a lower proportion of patients with severe disability and mortality. However, whether this intervention can be used for clinical promotion still needs further exploration.

Antioxidant micronutrient supplements for adult critically ill patients: A bayesian multiple treatment comparisons meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Antioxidant micronutrients (AxMs) have been administered to critically ill adults attempting to counteract the oxidative stress imposed during critical illness. However, results are conflicting and relative effectiveness of AxMs regimens is unknown. We conducted a Bayesian multi-treatment comparison (MTC) meta-analysis to identify the best AxM treatment regimen that will improve clinical outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched from the inception of databases through August 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing AxMs supplementations with placebo among critically ill adults were included. Two authors assessed trial quality using Cochrane risk of bias tool and assessed certainty of evidence (CoE). A random effect model, non-informative priors Bayesian MTC meta-analysis using gemtc package in R version 3.6.2 was performed. AxMs treatment effect on clinical outcomes (mortality, infection rates, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays and ventilator days) were represented by absolute risk differences (ARD) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. Prior to final analysis, we repeated the search through January 2021.

RESULTS

37 RCT (4905 patients) were included with 16 direct comparisons. With respect to mortality, the ARD for "vitamin E" compared with placebo was centred at -0.19 [95%CrI: -0.54,0.16; very low CoE] and was ranked the best treatment for mortality reduction as per surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA 0.71, 95%CrI: 0.07,1.00). A combination of "selenium, zinc and copper" was ranked the best for lowest ICU stay [-9.40, 95% CrI: -20.0,1.50; low CoE]. A combination of "selenium, zinc, copper and vitamin E" was ranked the best treatment for infection risk reduction [-0.22, 95% CrI: -0.61,0.17; very low CoE]. Ventilator days were least with a combination of "selenium, zinc and manganese" [2.80, 95% CrI: -6.30,0.89; low CoE]. Hospital stay was the lowest using a combination of "selenium, zinc and copper" [-13.00, 95% CrI: -38.00,13.00; very low CoE]. There is substantial uncertainty present in the rankings due to wide and overlapping 95% CrIs of SUCRA scores for the treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies on critically ill adult patients have suggested a possible beneficial effects of certain AxM supplementations over and above the recommended dietary allowance. However, evidence does not support their use in clinical practice due to the low confidence in the estimates. Current studies evaluating specific AxMs or their combinations are limited with small sample sizes.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42020210199.

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

Evidence suggesting a potential benefit of AxMs use more than recommended doses in critically ill adults is weak, indicating that there is no justification for this practice.

Is Selenium Supplementation Beneficial in Acute Ischemic Stroke?

BACKGROUND

Selenium (Se) plays a significant role in brain physiology. The existing human data demonstrate that stroke is associated with significantly reduced Se levels and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity. This study proposed to investigate the effect of intravenous Se (Selenase) administration in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) on neurological outcomes, antioxidant enzyme activity, and inflammatory marker levels.

METHODS

AIS patients (n=50) were recruited from a neurology unit of a university-affiliated hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Selenase or placebo (saline) for 5 days. The modified ranking scale, the national institute of health stroke scale, and the mini-mental state examination, as primary outcomes, and the serum GPx concentration, total antioxidant activity, and tumor necrosis factor-α levels, as secondary outcomes, were measured at the baseline and on day 30.

RESULTS

Eventually, 44 patients with AIS completed the intervention study. A notable increase in GPx and total antioxidant activity levels was detected in the treatment group compared with the placebo group (110.63±52.48 m/mL, 1.34±0.30 mmol/L, P<0.05), whereas the serum tumor necrosis factor-α level in the Selenase group was significantly lower than that of the placebo group (58.58±61.33 pg/mL, P<0.05). In addition, Selenase improved the modified ranking scale and national institute of health stroke scale scores significantly (P<0.05 and <0.04, respectively), but no statistical difference was observed between the 2 groups in the mini-mental state examination score.

CONCLUSION

Selenase, plausibly due to its antioxidant function, results in positive outcomes in terms of neurological deficits, antioxidant enzyme activity, and inflammatory marker levels.

A Retrospective Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury: Evaluation of CONSORT Item Adherence

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) contributes to death and disability, resulting in an enormous individual and socio-economic challenges. Despite huge efforts, there are still controversies on treatment strategies and early outcome estimation. We evaluate current randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on TBI according to their fulfillment of the CONSORT (Consolidated Statement of Reporting Trials) statement’s criteria as a marker of transparency and the quality of study planning and realization. A PubMed search for RCTs on TBI (January 2014–December 2019) was carried out. After screening of the abstracts (n = 1.926), the suitable full text manuscripts (n = 72) were assessed for the fulfillment of the CONSORT criteria. The mean ratio of consort statement fulfillment was 59% (±13%), 31% of the included studies (n = 22) complied with less than 50% of the CONSORT criteria. Citation frequency was moderately related to ratio of CONSORT item fulfillment (r = 0.4877; p < 0.0001) and citation frequency per year (r = 0.5249; p < 0.0001). The ratio of CONSORT criteria fulfillment was associated with the impact factor of the publishing journal (r = 0.6428; p < 0.0001). Essential data for study interpretation, such as sample size determination (item 7a), participant flow (item 13a) as well as losses and exclusions (item 13b), were only reported in 53%, 60% and 63%, respectively. Reporting and methodological aspects in RCTs on TBI still may be improved. Thus, the interpretation of study results may be hampered due to methodological weaknesses.

Daily parenteral selenium therapy in critically ill patients: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Patients hospitalized at the intensive care unit (ICU) are more prone to oxidative stress. Antioxidants such as selenium (Se) may have beneficial effects on outcomes in these patients. Studies and systematic reviews in this field have inconclusive results.

METHODS

An updated systematic search was done to find clinical trials published in PubMed, Cochrane's library, ISI web of Science, Scopus, and Ovid databases from January 1980 up to April 2020, to assess the effects of daily Se supplementation on patient's survival, hospital and ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, infection, acute renal failure (ARF) occurrence and serum creatinine levels.

RESULTS

From 1394 papers found in the first step of the search, after deleting duplicate findings, 24 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Results of the pooled random-effect size analysis of 24 trials showed no remarkable effect of daily parenteral Se administration on patient's hospital and ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, infectious complications, ARF, survival and serum creatinine levels (p > 0.05). The subgroup analysis showed that daily parenteral Se administration (in doses higher than 1000 μg/d) increased the length of ICU stay by 4.48-folds (95%CI: -0.5, 9.46, p = 0.07). Parenteral Se supplementation at the first and following dose of ≤1000 μg reduced the number of ARF at the hospitalized patients by 76% and 45%, respectively (p = 0.02, and p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

High doses of Se increases days of ICU stay, but low doses decreases the number of ARF occurrence in ICU patients. More trials are needed to assess its effect on ARF occurrence.

Selenium and hydrogen selenide: essential micronutrient and the fourth gasotransmitter?

Selenium (Se) is an essential micronutrient required by organisms of diverse lineage. Dietary Se is converted to hydrogen selenide either enzymatically or by endogenous antioxidant proteins. This convergent biochemical step crucially underlies the subsequent biological activity of Se and argues for inclusion of hydrogen selenide as the fourth endogenous gasotransmitter alongside nitric oxide, carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide.Endogenously generated hydrogen selenide is incorporated into numerous 'selenoprotein' oxidoreductase enzymes, essential for maintaining redox-status homeostasis in health and disease. Direct effects of endogenous hydrogen selenide on cellular and molecular targets are currently unknown. Given exogenously, hydrogen selenide acts as a modulator of metabolism via transient inhibition of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase. Here we provide an overview of Se biology, its impact on several physiological systems (immune, endocrine, cardiovascular and metabolic) and its utility as a supplement in acute and critical illness states. We further explore the evidence base supporting its role as the fourth gasotransmitter and propose a strategic case towards generation of novel selenomimetic therapeutics.

The clinical outcomes of selenium supplementation on critically ill patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

Selenium supplementation is a potentially promising adjunctive therapy for critically ill patients, but the results are controversy among studies. Accordingly, we performed this meta-analysis to more clearly detect the efficacy and safety of selenium supplementation on critically ill patients.

METHODS

Systematic literature retrieval was carried out to obtain RCTs on selenium supplementation for critically ill patients up to August 2017. Data extraction and quality evaluation of these studies were performed by 2 investigators. Statistical analyses was performed by RevMan 5.3. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to control the risks of type I and type II errors and calculate required information size (RIS).

RESULTS

Totally 19 RCTs involving 3341 critically ill patients were carried out in which 1694 participates were in the selenium supplementation group, and 1647 in the control. The aggregated results suggested that compared with the control, intravenous selenium supplement as a single therapy could decrease the total mortality (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78-0.95, P = .002, TSA-adjusted 95% CI = 0.77-0.96, RIS = 4108, n = 3297) and may shorten the length of stay in hospital (MD -2.30, 95% CI -4.03 to -0.57, P = .009), but had no significant treatment effect on 28-days mortality (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.85-1.09, P = .54) and could not shorten the length of ICU stay (MD -0.15, 95% CI -1.68 to 1.38, P = .84) in critically ill patients. Our results also showed that selenium supplementation did not increase incidence of drug-induced side effect compared with the control (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.30, P = .73).

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence suggests that the use of selenium could reduce the total mortality, and TSA results showed that our outcome is reliable and no more randomized controlled trials are needed. But selenium supplementation might have no effect on reducing 28-days mortality as well as the incidence of new infections, or on length of stay in ICU or mechanical ventilation. However, the results should be used carefully because of potential limitations.

Multiple Micronutrient Plasma Level Changes Are Related to Oxidative Stress Intensity in Critically Ill Children

OBJECTIVES

Micronutrient supplementation in critically ill adults remains controversial. In the pediatric setting, the impact of oxidative stress on the overall micronutrient status has been poorly explored, due to the limited number of studies and to confounding factors (i.e., malnutrition or extra losses). In order to better understand this phenomenon, we aim to describe micronutrient status, focusing on seven micronutrients, in well-nourished critically ill children presenting with severe oxidative stress.

DESIGN

Prospective, transversal, observational, single-center study.

SETTING

PICU, and anesthesiology department, Lyon, France.

PATIENTS

Three groups of patients were clinically defined: severe oxidative stress PICU group (at least two organ dysfunctions), moderate oxidative stress PICU group (single organ dysfunction), and healthy control group (prior to elective surgery); oxidative stress intensity was controlled by measuring plasma levels of glutathione peroxidase and glutathione. Children presenting any former condition leading to micronutrient deficiency were excluded (malnutrition, external losses).

INTERVENTIONS

Plasma levels of selenium, zinc, copper, vitamin A, vitamin E, vitamin C, and β-carotene were measured in PICU oxidative stress conditions and compared with those of healthy children.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Two hundred one patients were enrolled (51, 48, and 102 in severe, moderate, and healthy control groups, respectively). Median age was 7.1 years (interquartile range, 2.1-13.8 yr). There was a significant trend (p < 0.02) toward plasma level decrease of six micronutrients (selenium, zinc, copper, vitamin E, vitamin C, and β-carotene) while oxidative stress intensity increased. Biological markers of oxidative stress (glutathione peroxidase and glutathione) were in accordance with the clinical definition of the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A multiple micronutrient deficiency or redistribution occurs in critically ill children presenting with severe oxidative stress. These findings will help to better identify children who might benefit from micronutrient supplementation and to design adapted supplementation trials in this particular setting.

Early selenium treatment for traumatic brain injury: Does it improve survival and functional outcome?

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and debility following trauma. The initial brain tissue insult is worsened by secondary reactive responses including oxidative stress reactions, inflammatory changes and subsequent permanent neurologic deficits. Effective agents to improve functional outcome and survival following TBI are scarce. Selenium is an antioxidant which has shown to reduce oxidative stress. This study examines the effect of intravenous selenium (Selenase^®) treatment in patients with severe TBI on functional outcome and survival in a prospective study design.

METHODS

Patients sustaining TBI were prospectively identified during a 12-month period at an academic urban trauma center. Study inclusion criteria applied were: age ≥18 years, blunt injury mechanism and admission to neurosurgical intensive care unit (NICU). Early deaths (≤48h) and patients suffering extracranial injuries requiring invasive interventions or surgery were excluded. All consecutive admissions during a six-month period were administered intravenous Selenase^® for a maximum 10-day period and constituted cases. Patient demographics and outcomes up to six-months post-discharge were collected for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 307 patients met inclusion criteria of which 125 were administered Selenase^®. Stepwise Poisson regression analysis identified five common predictors of poor functional outcome and in-hospital mortality: GCS ≤8, age ≥55 years, hypotension at admission, high Rotterdam score and invasive neurosurgical intervention. Selenase^® significantly reduced the risk of unfavourable functional outcomes, defined as GOS-E ≤4, at both discharge (adjusted RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.92, p=0.012) and at six months follow-up (adjusted RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.83, p=0.002). Following adjustment for significant group differences similar results were seen for functional outcome. Selenase^® did not improve survival (adjusted RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.62-2.02, p=0.709).

CONCLUSION

Intravenous Selenase^® treatment demonstrates a significant improvement in functional neurologic outcome. This effect is sustained at six months following discharge.