Evaluation of Dermoscopic Patterns of Vesiculobullous Disorders

A Systematic Review of Diagnoses with Rosettes Under Dermoscopy

INTRODUCTION

Rosettes are a cluster of shiny white dots in the shape of a four-leaf clover seen under polarized dermoscopic light. Historically, rosettes were primarily reported in actinic keratoses and squamous cell carcinoma. However, rosettes have also been reported in other conditions.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review to elucidate the breadth of diagnoses exhibiting this unique dermoscopic phenomenon.

METHODS

A review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science, as well as a manual search of the reference lists of screened articles.

RESULTS

A total of 73 articles met the inclusion criteria. Out of these, 47 distinct diagnoses with rosette were identified. Among neoplastic conditions, keratinizing neoplasms had the highest number of articles reported (N = 19). Discoid lupus was the most commonly reported diagnosis within the inflammatory category (N = 6). Molluscum contagiosum was the predominant diagnosis among infectious entities (N = 3), while acroangiodermatitis was the sole diagnosis reported in the vascular category (N = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm rosettes are not specific to keratinocytic growths and are observed in a wide range of conditions. Knowledge of the breadth of conditions with rosettes may aid clinicians when developing a differential diagnosis of a growth or an eruption with rosettes under dermoscopy.

Utility of Dermoscopy in the Diagnosis of Erythroderma: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background

It is difficult to diagnose the underlying cause of erythroderma on mere clinical presentation. The role of dermoscopy in diagnosing erythroderma secondary to various etiologies is evolving.

Aim and Objectives

This study aimed to observe the dermoscopic features of erythroderma secondary to different cutaneous disorders and compare them with clinical features and histopathology.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-nine consecutive patients of erythroderma were enrolled in the study. Dermoscopy was performed on every case using a Heine Delta II Dermatoscope with 10x magnification in polarized mode. A histopathological examination was conducted to confirm the diagnosis.

Results

Eight patients were diagnosed with psoriasis, five with endogenous eczema, four with pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP), three with pustular psoriasis, two with drug rash secondary to antitubercular therapy, two with dermatophytic infection, one patient each of atopic dermatitis, crusted scabies, pemphigus foliaceous, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, and mycosis fungoides. Characteristic dermoscopic features were observed in erythroderma due to psoriasis, PRP, pustular psoriasis, endogenous eczema, scabies, and dermatophytosis. Differentiation of other disorders based on dermoscopy alone was difficult, and clinico-histopathological correlation was crucial to reach a diagnosis.

Conclusion

Dermoscopic features of classical patterns of skin disorders are preserved even in the corresponding erythrodermic or unstable stage. Dermoscopic features of erythroderma secondary to psoriasis, pustular psoriasis, PRP, endogenous eczema, scabies, and dermatophytosis are clearly differentiating, whereas the dermoscopic features in other causes of erythroderma are overlapping. Thus, dermoscopy can be a good screening tool in the clinical assessment of erythroderma.

A Case Report of Monkeypox in an Adult Patient from Italy: Clinical and Dermoscopic Manifestations, Diagnosis and Management

Monkeypox infection is an emerging problem and a new challenge for modern medicine. With an increasing number of new cases worldwide, new data regarding the clinical manifestations, characteristics of the patients, risk factors and treatment options are coming to light. Knowing more about the disease will allow to elaborate new helpful methods to facilitate its diagnosis. Special attention should be paid to the careful dermatologic and dermoscopic examination of the patient. The analysis of available data also suggests possible strategies for the prevention of Monkeypox virus spread; the vaccine against Smallpox seems to be an effective solution. This case report describes the diagnostic approach and management of a non-vaccinated adult patient with several risk factors and a history of sexually transmitted disease. The patient had no history of travel abroad. Even though a clinical diagnose of Monkeypox can be challenging due to its similarities with skin rashes caused by other Orthopoxviral infections, there are fine differences between the rashes which can be helpful in their differentiation, although laboratory analysis is required for a definitive identification. A careful study of the characteristics of the rash, such as diameter, its presence on palms and soles and its evolution in time, provided important clues for the diagnosis of Monkeypox infection. The lack of vaccinations in the history of the patient was another crucial finding in the diagnostic process.

Dermoscopic Differentiation of Blister Beetle Dermatitis and Herpes Zoster: an Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Blister beetle dermatitis (BBD) and herpes zoster (HZ) manifest suddenly with vesicular lesions mimicking each other and progress rapidly. But a lack of definite differentiating criteria yearns the need for better investigating modality. Though histopathology persuades the need, is an invasive procedure, commonly deferred. Thus, dermoscopy, a non-invasive rapid diagnostic tool, can help in differentiating.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate different dermoscopic patterns of BBD and HZ to differentiate both and to study dermoscopic features in early and late stages of lesions.

METHODS

An observational cross-section study conducted in southern India. Nine patients with clinical features suggestive of BBD and HZ were recruited. Lesions were divided arbitrarily into early and late. Dermoscopic examination was performed with handheld dermoscope. Diagnosis was confirmed by skin biopsy and Tzanck smear wherever necessary. Statistical analysis performed using data in terms of frequencies and percentages.

RESULTS

Dermoscopy of early BBD lesions showed multiple discrete and confluent yellowish-white structures, brown dots, roundish white globules, gray structures, 'targetoid pattern', brown areas over intense reddish pink background. Late BBD lesions revealed pinkish-white area, reduced gray structures and, dotted and globular vessels. Early HZ lesions showed poly-lobular gray and brown globules, bright pink background, gray globules covered by grayish veil-like structure with gray rim. Late HZ lesions revealed 'solar eclipse' pattern and 'crumpled fabric' patterns. The dermoscopic findings correlated with histopathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Dermoscopic patterns show peculiar features consistently pertaining to BBD and HZ, thus help in early diagnosis assisting in accurate treatment in both conditions.