A change long overdue: Integrated biological & behavioural surveillance surveys to prioritize sub-national levels for measuring HIV prevalence & behavioural trends

HIV and HCV seroincidence, associated factors and drug use in people who inject drugs, SurvUDI network, eastern central Canada, 1995-2020

BACKGROUND

The SurvUDI network is a biobehavioural survey among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Eastern Central Canada.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to describe HIV and HCV seroincidence trends, associated factors and changes in drug use behaviours.

METHODS

The network was initiated in 1995 and targets hard-to-reach, mostly out-of- treatment PWID. Participants were recruited mostly in harm reduction programs, completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire, provided a sample of gingival exudate for HIV and HCV antibody testing and were identified using an encrypted code allowing identification of multiple participations. Time trends were examined for HIV and HCV seroincidence, selected characteristics and behaviours. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to examine factors associated to HIV and HCV seroincidence.

RESULTS

Between January 1995 and March 2020, 15,907 individuals have completed 31,051 questionnaires. HIV seroincidence decreased significantly from 5.0 per 100 person-years (p-y) in 1995 to 0.4 per 100 p-y in 2018. HCV seroincidence also decreased significantly between 1998 and 2011. The use of syringes already used by someone else decreased significantly, from 43.4 % in 1995 to 12.4 % in 2019, as well as the use of equipment other than syringe already used by someone else. Cocaine/crack injection decreased significantly while "opioids other than heroin" injection increased, concomitant to daily injection. Injection with syringes already used by someone else and cocaine as the most often injected drug were significantly associated with HIV seroincidence (1995-2020). Injected opioid other than heroin, injected cocaine/crack, injected 100 or more times in the past month, injected for less than 3 years, injected with syringes or equipment already used by someone else, injected with someone else and reported client sex partners were significantly associated with HCV seroincidence (2004-2020).

CONCLUSION

HIV seroincidence and syringe/equipment sharing behaviour trends are encouraging, but HCV seroincidence remains high.

Piloting a simplified bio-behavioural survey methodology, the BBS-Lite, among people who inject drugs in Georgia

BACKGROUND

During 2021 and 2023 two simplified Biological and Behavioural Study (BBS-Lite) surveys, and in 2022 one Standard Integrated Biological and Behavioural Study (IBBS), were conducted among people who inject drugs in seven cities in Georgia. From these, an opportunity to compare the implementation of these survey methods and results was able to be gained.

METHODS

The two survey types were compared to find points of similarity and difference in their methodologies. The methodologies of the IBBS and BBS-Lite studies shared many characteristics, including the cities where they were implemented, recruitment criteria, sample sizes, and common questionnaire items. All studies were multi-centre cross-sectional involving administration of a face-to-face behavioural questionnaire and collection of biological specimens for testing of HIV, syphilis, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). The main differences were in the sampling methods. The IBBS utilised respondent-driven sampling (RDS) while participants of the BBS-Lite studies were enrolled through consecutive recruitment at the harm reduction (HR) programme sites and on outreach and through snowball sampling. We compared the results from each study as well as the implementation modalities such as time taken and budgetary requirements, and the complexity of implementation.

RESULTS

Considerably less time was required for recruitment, as well as for interviewing, data entry (4 times less) and the analysis for the BSS-Lite studies compared to the IBBS. The BSS-Lite study budgets were at least 2.5 times less than of the IBBS study. The recruited samples were comparable for age distribution, median age at first injection, the last drug injected, sharing of drug injecting equipment or receiving opioid agonist maintenance treatment (OAMT) during the last 12 months. HIV and HCV prevalence were similar including for stratifications by age, client status and city of recruitment.

CONCLUSION

Our findings have demonstrated that if implemented on a regular basis, the BBS-Lite can be a complementary solution for systematic data collection, filling surveillance gaps and addressing the challenges that persist in obtaining important data on people who inject drugs (PWID) between IBBS rounds in the country. The methodology is recommended for testing in other settings and in other key populations. In addition, the data collected on a routine base can help the harm reduction (HR) program to better understand the changes in the drug scene and observe new trends in HIV risks and drug injecting behaviours, possible barriers for access to harm reduction, drug treatment, and HIV and/or viral hepatitis testing and treatment services.