Antibiotic stewardship initiative in a Medicine unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital in India: A pilot study

Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship on Antimicrobial Utilization and Resistance Patterns in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Western Maharashtra

BACKGROUND

Non-judicious use of antibiotics by health professionals has been identified as an area for interventions and improvement by the World Health Organization for controlling antimicrobial resistance. Following the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) guidelines, we established an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program at the 950-bedded multispecialty private sector hospital located in western Maharashtra by the end of the year 2021.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of an AMS program intervention on the utilization of antibiotics and resistance patterns of organisms isolated from the patients.

RESULT

A significant reduction in the utilization of ceftriaxone (23.3 to 6.75), piperacillin-tazobactam (7.7 to 6.0), amikacin (9.03 to 5.15), clindamycin (6.25 to 5.75), linezolid (5.8 to 4.8), and ceftazidime (0.9 to 0.2) in defined daily doses (DDD/100 bed days) was seen after intervention. Antibiotic resistance decreased in gentamicin, amikacin, and teicoplanin. Overall antibiotic consumption reduced from 1,681.0 to 1,420.0 DDD/100 days. Culture-based therapy increased from 61% to 90%. Surgical prophylaxis compliance increased from 58% to 96%.

CONCLUSION

The constant perseverance of the AMS team of our hospital had a positive impact on reducing the overall consumption of antibiotics. Stringent infection prevention and control practices, timely provision of treatment guidelines, frequent interactions and discussions with treating doctors, audits by clinical pharmacists, and feedback to the doctors along with various training programs and sensitization sessions by the AMS team have brought significant behavioral changes among the treating physicians.

Antimicrobial stewardship implementation in primary and secondary tier hospitals in India: interim findings from a need assessment study using mixed method design

Anti-microbial stewardship program (AMSP) is practiced only in tertiary hospitals in India, though, the lower tier hospitals remain the first point of contact in patient care. This study was conducted in lower tier hospitals to calculate antibiotic and multiple antibiotic prescription rate (APR, MPR) for common infections and finding existing strength of health system for optimizing antibiotic prescription. We conducted a cross sectional convergent parallel mix-method study in eight lower tier hospitals of three districts of West Bengal, India. Six hundred OPD prescriptions of UTI, ARI, AUFI, ADD were evaluated. Qualitative data collected through in-depth interviews of medical officers/officers in administrative positions, infection control nurses were analyzed using content analysis method. APR was 63.8% in primary tier hospitals and 60.8% in secondary tier hospitals. The MPR was higher in secondary tier hospital (23.8%). Presence of infection control committee, designated nursing staff, initiation of prescription audit, increased monitoring were identified as few facilitators for future implementation of AMSP in lower tier hospitals. The routine infection control activities of lower tier hospitals are currently delinked from AMR containment measures and thus, customized AMSP needs to be established in these hospitals catering two third of the population of India.

Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of pathogens isolated from hospitalized patients with advanced HIV disease (AHD) in Bihar, India

Objectives

To describe the prevalence of common bacterial pathogens and antibiotic susceptibility patterns amongst advanced HIV disease (AHD) patients admitted between May 2019 and March 2021 to a Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)-supported AHD inpatient unit in Bihar, India.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of routinely collected demographic, clinical and microbiological data. Antibacterial susceptibility testing was done by an accredited referral laboratory using the modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method.

Results

A total of 238 isolates from 577 patients were identified through culture testing. Patient median (IQR) age was 38 (31-45) years, and 75% were male. Predominant sample types included blood (600; 38%), urine (266; 17%) and sputum (178; 11%). Of the isolated bacteria, Escherichia coli (80; 13.9%) was the most prevalent, followed by Klebsiella pneumonia (54; 9.4%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22; 3.8%), Klebsiella oxytoca (10; 1.7%), Proteus mirabilis (9; 1.6%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (7; 1.2%). The resistance pattern showed that most bacterial isolates were highly resistant to commonly prescribed antibiotics such as third-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones and co-trimoxazole. Most pathogens were moderately resistant to antibiotics from the WHO Watch group, such as meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam. In contrast, isolates were more susceptible to aminoglycosides, such as amikacin, gentamicin and nitrofurantoin.

Conclusions

In Bihar, inpatients with AHD displayed a concerning array of antibiotic-resistant infections. This study provides a starting point from which further work on antimicrobial resistance in this vulnerable cohort of patients can be conducted.

Barriers, facilitators, perceptions and impact of interventions in implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs in hospitals of low-middle and middle countries: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are pivotal components of the World Health Organization's Global Action Plan to combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR). ASPs advocate rational antibiotic usage to enhance patient-centered outcomes. However, existing evidence on ASPs and their determinants is largely limited to well-equipped hospitals in high-income nations.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aimed to examine the current state of hospital-based ASPs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), shedding light on barriers, facilitators, prescribers' perceptions and practices, and the impact of ASP interventions.

DESIGN

Scoping review on ASP.

METHODS

Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we conducted electronic database searches on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, covering ASP articles published between January 2015 and October 2023. Our review focused on four key domains: barriers to ASP implementation, facilitators for establishing ASP, ASP perceptions and practices of prescribers, and the impact of ASP interventions. Three reviewers separately retrieved relevant data from the included citations using EndNote 21.0.

RESULTS

Among the 7016 articles searched, 84 met the inclusion criteria, representing 34 LMICs. Notably, 58% (49/84) of these studies were published after 2020. Barriers to ASP implementation, including human-resources shortage, lack of microbiology laboratory support, absence of leadership, and limited governmental support, were reported by 26% (22/84) of the studies. Facilitators for hospital ASP implementation identified in five publications included the availability of antibiotic guidelines, ASP protocol, dedicated multidisciplinary ASP committee, and prompt laboratory support. The majority of the research (63%, 53/84) explored the impacts of ASP intervention on clinical, microbiological, and economic aspects. Key outcomes included increased antibiotic prescription appropriateness, reduced antimicrobial consumption, shorter hospital stays, decreased mortality rate, and reduced antibiotic therapy cost.

CONCLUSIONS

The published data underscores the imperative need for widespread antimicrobial stewardship in LMIC hospital settings. Substantial ASP success can be achieved through increasing human resources, context-specific interventions, the development of accessible antibiotic usage guidelines, and heightened awareness via training and education.

Effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on early switch from intravenous-to-oral antimicrobials in hospitalized adults: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

This review aimed to summarize the available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of antimicrobial stewardship interventions to improve the practice of IV-to-PO antimicrobial switch therapy in hospitalized adults.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE/PubMed, and Scopus from inception to September 1, 2020, for original articles investigating any interventions aimed to improve the practice of IV-to-PO antimicrobial switch therapy in hospitalized adults with infectious diseases. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies. Studies were excluded if they evaluated drugs other than antimicrobials, head-to-head comparison of interventions, included pediatrics or oncology patients.

RESULTS

Of 506 unique citations identified, 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. The 36 included studies reported 92 interventions as a single (n = 10) or a bundle of interventions (n = 26). The most common interventions used were guideline/protocol/pathway (n = 25), audit and feedback (n = 20), and education (n = 17).

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides health care providers with a comprehensive summary on the interventions to promote IV-to-PO antimicrobial switch. While no one intervention could be identified as the safest and most effective as most of the included studies used a bundle of interventions, all interventions resulted in optimizing antibiotic use and reducing health care expenditures without compromising the clinical outcomes. As such, each hospital should design and utilize interventions that are applicable based on available resources and expertise.

E-Learning versus Face-to-Face Methodology for Learning Antimicrobial Resistance and Prescription Practice in a Tertiary Hospital of a Middle-Income Country

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a growing health problem worldwide. One strategy to face this problem in a reasonable way is training health personnel for the rational use of antimicrobials. There are some difficulties associated with medical staff to receiving training with E-learning education, but there is a lack of studies and insufficient evidence of the effectiveness of this method compared to face-to-face learning. Methods: An educational intervention on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and antimicrobial prescription practice (APP) was designed and implemented using two approaches: face-to-face and E-learning among physicians of the intensive care unit (ICU) and internal medicine ward (IMW) at Eugenio Espejo Hospital in Quito. Modalities of interventions were compared to propose a strategy of continuous professional development (CPD) for all hospital staff. An interventional study was proposed using a quasi-experimental approach that included 91 physicians, of which 49 belong to the IMW and 42 to the ICU. All of them received training on AMR—half in a face-to-face mode and the other half in an asynchronous E-learning mode. They then all participated on APP training but with switched groups; those who previously participated in the face-to-face experience participated in an E-learning module and vice-versa. We evaluated self-perception about basic knowledge, attitudes and referred practices towards AMR and APP before and after the intervention. A review of medical records was conducted before and after training by checking antimicrobial prescriptions for all patients in the ICU and IMW with bacteremia, urinary tract infection (UTI), pneumonia, and skin and soft tissue infection. The study received IRB clearance, and we used SPSS for statistical analysis. Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between the E-learning and the face-to-face methodology for AMR and APP. Both methodologies improved knowledge, attitudes and referred practices. In the case of E-learning, there was a self-perception of improved attitudes (p < 0.05) and practices (p < 0.001) for both AMR and APP. In face-to-face, there was a perception of improvement only in attitudes (p < 0.001) for APP. In clinical practice, the use of antimicrobials significantly improved in all domains after training, including empirical and targeted treatment of bacteremia and pneumonia (p < 0.001) and targeted treatment of UTI (p < 0.05). For the empirical treatment of pneumonia, the mean number of antibiotics was reduced from 1.87 before to 1.05 after the intervention (p = 0.003), whereas in the targeted management of bacteremia, the number of antibiotics was reduced from 2.19 to 1.53 (p = 0.010). Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference between the effect of E-learning and face-to-face strategy in terms of teaching AMR and APP. Adequate self-reported attitudes and practices in E-learning exceed those of the face-to-face approach. The empiric and targeted use of antimicrobials improved in all reviewed cases, and we observed an overall decrease in antibiotic use. Satisfaction with training was high for both methods, and participants valued the flexibility and accessibility of E-learning.

Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention on Usage of Antibiotics in Coronavirus Disease-2019 at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in India

•

High empirical usage of beta-lactams and macrolides seen in COVID 19 patients.

•

Interrupted time series analysis showed significant reduction in antibiotic usage.

•

Stewardship interventions in resource-limited areas can garner positive outcomes.

Background

There was evidence that antibiotic usage increased in hospitalized COVID-19 patients during the early days of the pandemic.

Objective

We assessed the impact of stewardship interventions on antibiotic usage in these patients.

Methods

We designed a quasi-experimental study using an interrupted time series. Patients were stratified according to the severity category of the illness – mild and moderate-to-severe (O2 saturation ≥94% and <93% respectively). Baseline antibiotic usage data was collected in the pre-intervention phase. Intervention was given in the form of focus group discussion (FGD) and followed up with feedback-audit during the post-intervention phase. Primary outcome was the change in days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days.

Results

361 adult patients were recruited in both phases during July to December, 2020. In the post-intervention phase, DOT per 1000 patient-days reduced from 589 to 523 (P=0.013) and from 843 to 585 (P <0.0001) in mild and moderate-to-severe categories, respectively. De-escalations at 48 hours increased significantly from 21% to 41% (P=0.0079) and from 31% to 62% (P=0.0006), respectively. No difference in mortality was observed.

Conclusion

We found high usage of empirical antibiotics in adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19. FGD and feedback audits can successfully reduce antibiotic overuse in these patients.

Hospital-Based Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs Used in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review

The burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is considerable in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and it is important to describe the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) activities found in these countries and report their impact. Importantly, as these programs target prescribing behavior, the factors influencing prescription of antimicrobials must also be taken into account. This scoping review aimed to (1) describe hospital-based ASP activities, (2) report methods used to measure the impact of ASPs, and (3) explore factors influencing antimicrobial prescribing behavior in LMICs. PubMed was searched from database inception until April 2021. Factors influencing antimicrobial prescribing behavior were canvassed using the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation and Behavior framework. Most of ASP studies in LMICs were predominantly conducted in tertiary care and university-based hospitals. Audit of antimicrobial prescriptions with feedback and restrictive-based strategies was the main reported activity. Total antimicrobial consumption was the main method used to measure the impact of ASPs. Positive outcomes were observed for both clinical and microbiological outcomes; however, these were measured from nonrandomized controlled trials. Dominant factors identified through the behavioral framework were a limited awareness of AMR as a local problem, a perception that overprescription of antimicrobials had limited consequences and was mainly driven by a motivation to help improve patient outcomes. In addition, antimicrobial prescribing practices were largely influenced by existing hierarchy among prescribers. Our scoping review suggests that LMICs need to evaluate antimicrobial appropriateness as an added measure to assess impact. Furthermore, improvements in the access of microbiology and diagnostic facilities and ensuring ASP champions are recruited from senior prescribers will positively influence antimicrobial prescribing behavior, helping improve stewardship of antimicrobials in these countries.

Keeping It Real: Antibiotic Use Problems and Stewardship Solutions in Low- and Middle-income Countries

Antimicrobial resistance is a global health threat and there is an urgent need to manage antibiotic use to slow its development. However, antimicrobial stewardship interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) have been limited in terms of their resourcing, feasibility and effectiveness in the face of greater challenges in child mortality. We sought to gather together examples of antibiotic use problems faced by clinicians in LMIC, many of which are unique to these settings, and real-world antimicrobial stewardship solutions identified, with the goal of learning broader lessons that might be applicable across LMIC.

Compliance with the 4Ds of antimicrobial stewardship practice in a tertiary care centre

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial stewardship describes the practice of promoting the selection of the right drug, dosage, delivery and duration of antimicrobial therapy (the 4Ds) in order to curtail the emergence of resistant organisms. It is important to quantify the inappropriate use of antimicrobials in terms of percentage adherence to each of the 4Ds mentioned.

METHODS

We undertook a prospective review of medical records of patients admitted to the medical wards of a tertiary care centre in North India. All patients on antimicrobials were included and their records reviewed for indication, drug, dose, delivery and duration (or by asking the treating physician if not documented). Adherence to the 4Ds was determined by referring to updated literature-based standard treatment guidelines (STGs) for each specific disease.

RESULTS

Of 304 patients, drugs were appropriate and matched STGs in 218 (72%) patients, with adherence to the right dose in 210 (69%), route of delivery in 216 (71%) and duration in 197 (65%). Full adherence to the 4Ds was observed in 196 (64.5%). Maximum adherence was observed in treating skin and soft tissue infections (100%), while minimum adherence was observed in administering medical prophylaxis (40%). WHO Access, Watch and Reserve categories comprised 29%, 63% and 8.5% of all prescribed antibiotics, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The right drug, dose, delivery and duration of therapy are prescribed in 72%, 69%, 71%, and 65% of patients, respectively. In order to increase the adherence to 100%, bedside stewardship practices in the form of prospective audits and feedback must be improved. There is a need to integrate WHO AWaRe classification of antibiotics into treatment guidelines.

Self-prescribing of antibiotics by patients seeking care in Indian emergency departments

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Antibiotic resistance is a global health threat. India has one of the highest rates of antibiotic use in the world. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of self-prescribed antibiotic use of patients presenting with febrile and infectious disease-related complaints to Indian emergency departments.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study conducted at 6 Indian emergency departments (EDs) between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019. Adult patients who presented with a chief complaint of febrile illness or infectious disease complaints were included. Our principal outcomes of interest were self-prescribed use of antibiotics within the prior 6 months or for the presenting complaint. We queried respondents about source of antibiotics as well as about demographic characteristics that influenced use.

RESULTS

A total of 1421 patients were enrolled. Sixty percent (n = 856) of respondents reported using antibiotics in the prior 6 months or for their current complaint. Those who reported self-prescribing antibiotics either in the past or currently had at least some college education (P < 0.001), tended to use the pharmacy (P < 0.001) or the ED (P = 0.001) for their care when sick, and were more likely to have some comorbid conditions (P = 0.014) as compared to the group that did not self-prescribe antibiotics. The most common reason respondents reported self-prescribing antibiotics was because they did not want to wait to see their doctor (n = 278, 33%). Thirty-five percent of patients who were self-prescribed antibiotics before presentation did not receive and were not prescribed antibiotics in the ED, at discharge, or both.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-prescribing of antibiotics occurs commonly in India. This use increases the risk for resistance due to inappropriate or unnecessary use. Promotion of antibiotic stewardship is needed to curtail such use.