1
|
Sethi S, Mangat G, Soundararajan A, Marakini AB, Pecoits-Filho R, Shah R, Davenport A, Raina R. Archetypal sustained low-efficiency daily diafiltration (SLEDD-f) for critically ill patients requiring kidney replacement therapy: towards an adequate therapy. J Nephrol 2023; 36:1789-1804. [PMID: 37341966 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-023-01665-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
Sustained low-efficiency dialysis is a hybrid form of kidney replacement therapy that has gained increasing popularity as an alternative to continuous forms of kidney replacement therapy in intensive care unit settings. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the shortage of continuous kidney replacement therapy equipment led to increasing usage of sustained low-efficiency dialysis as an alternative treatment for acute kidney injury. Sustained low-efficiency dialysis is an efficient method for treating hemodynamically unstable patients and is quite widely available, making it especially useful in resource-limited settings. In this review, we aim to discuss the various attributes of sustained low-efficiency dialysis and how it is comparable to continuous kidney replacement therapy in efficacy, in terms of solute kinetics and urea clearance, and the various formulae used to compare intermittent and continuous forms of kidney replacement therapy, along with hemodynamic stability. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was increased clotting of continuous kidney replacement therapy circuits, which led to increased use of sustained low-efficiency dialysis alone or together with extra corporeal membrane oxygenation circuits. Although sustained low-efficiency dialysis can be delivered with continuous kidney replacement therapy machines, most centers use standard hemodialysis machines or batch dialysis systems. Even though antibiotic dosing differs between continuous kidney replacement therapy and sustained low-efficiency dialysis, reports of patient survival and renal recovery are similar for continuous kidney replacement therapy and sustained low-efficiency dialysis. Health care studies indicate that sustained low-efficiency dialysis has emerged as a cost-effective alternative to continuous kidney replacement therapy. Although there is considerable data to support sustained low-efficiency dialysis treatments for critically ill adult patients with acute kidney injury, there are fewer pediatric data, even so, currently available studies support the use of sustained low-efficiency dialysis for pediatric patients, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sidharth Sethi
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Kidney Institute, Medanta, The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Guneive Mangat
- Akron Nephrology Associates/Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, OH, USA
| | - Anvitha Soundararajan
- Akron Nephrology Associates/Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, OH, USA
| | - Abhilash Bhat Marakini
- Akron Nephrology Associates/Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, OH, USA
| | - Roberto Pecoits-Filho
- School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidade Catolica Do Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Raghav Shah
- Akron Nephrology Associates/Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, OH, USA
| | - Andrew Davenport
- UCL Centre for Nephrology, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rupesh Raina
- Akron Nephrology Associates/Cleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, OH, USA.
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH, USA.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Asia is the largest and most populous continent and has huge differences in socioeconomic status, development, and health care between the different countries and regions within each country. This manifests in the varied causes of acute kidney injury (AKI), particularly higher rates of community-acquired AKI and in the differential access to health care for the population. Because of resource limitations, prevention and treatment of AKI is a difficult challenge. This review highlights the differences in AKI in Asia compared with the developed world and discusses prevention and treatment of AKI within the context of resource limitations.
Collapse
|