Plain CT vs MR venography in acute cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: Triumphant dark horse

Diagnostic Accuracy of Hounsfield Unit Value and Hounsfield Unit to Hematocrit Ratio in Predicting Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

OBJECTIVE

Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) of the brain is a primary neuroimaging modality in emergency patients suspected of having cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). The objective of the study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of Hounsfield unit (HU) values and the ratio of HU to hematocrit value (HU/Htc) in predicting CVST in suspected patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective, case-control study was done in a tertiary care institute which included 35 patients with CVST constituted as cases and 41 patients without CVST as controls on the basis of magnetic resonance venography (MRV). Non-contrast CT brain of all 76 subjects were assessed by two experienced radiologists independently. HU values of dural venous sinuses were calculated in both groups, and HU/Htc ratio was also determined. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0 (SPSS© for Windows, IBM© Corp.) was used for statistical analysis. Independent samples t-test was applied to compare the means of continuous variables. The diagnostic values were computed using the Calculator 1 tool on clinical research calculators tab on vassarstats.net. The predictive values of HU and HU/Htc ratio were estimated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

In CVST group, the mean Hounsfield Unit (HU) value was "75.9±3.9 (mean±SD)", while in control group, it was 57.78±4.65 (mean±SD), p < 0.001. The mean HU/Htc ratio was 1.98±0.42 (mean±SD) in the CVST group and 1.51±0.12 (mean±SD) in the control group (p < 0.001). Optimum cut-off HU value was calculated as 68, with 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity. For HU/Htc ratio, optimum cut-off was calculated as 1.69, yielding 71.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity on the basis of ROC curves. The difference was not statistically significant in hemoglobin and hematocrit (Htc) values between the cases and controls.

CONCLUSION

The quantitative measurements like HU value and HU/Htc ratio provide an easily obtainable metric in patients with suspected CVST on non-contrast CT brain, thus enhancing the role of non-contrast CT brain in diagnosing CVST.

Diagnostic Sensitivity of Unenhanced CT for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Can Clot Density Measurement Replace CT Venogram?

Objectives Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis is an important cause of stroke in young adults. Noncontrast-enhanced CT head (NECT) is almost always the first investigation.

Our objectives were as follows:

1. How accurately does venous sinus density on NECT predict the presence of clot on CT venogram (CTV)?

2. Whether repeated measurements changed the confidence?

3. How many venous sinus thrombus would be missed if we do not do a CTV?

4. Can clot density measurement replace CTV?

Methods Multicenter case–control study was designed with data from seven hospitals. Inclusion criteria: all CT and magnetic resonance imaging venograms with a prior NECT, performed between 1.1.2018 and 31.12.2018 (12 months), were included. Hounsfield unit (HU) values were calculated at the site of highest density on the NECT. Logistic regression analysis was performed using STATA.

Result Two-hundred seventy-seven cases met the criteria with 33 positive cerebral venous thrombosis (density on NECT 60–92 HU) and 244 negative examinations (density on NECT 31–68 HU). Area under the curve for average clot density on NECT was 0.9984.

Conclusion We found a strong relationship between sinus density on NECT and outcome of CTV. Repeating density measurements did not add any predictive value or changed outcome.

Advances in Knowledge Density 70 HU or higher on NECT always resulted in a positive CTV but would miss a fifth of the positives. Cutoff at 60 HU would not miss any but result in significant false positives. An efficient option could be to limit CTV to sinus densities 60 to 70 HU only. However, a larger study would be required for such change in practice.

Deep cerebral venous system involvement in patients with cerebral sinus thrombosis. A proposal of neuroradiological score systems useful for clinical assessment

PURPOSE

To develop a neuroradiological score in patients with deep cerebral venous thrombosis (DCVT), capable of assessing extension of intracranial changes and venous occlusion at diagnosis; to assess the relationship between neuroradiological and clinical features at follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 14 patients with DCVT, we developed 2 score systems on non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced CT: Intracranial Imaging Score (IIS) and Venous Occlusion Imaging Score (VOIS). ISS considers parenchymal venous strokes, hemorrhage, mass effect, and hydrocephalus; VOIS evaluates unilateral or bilateral venous occlusion extension. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and vessel recanalization status were assessed at follow-up.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, higher IIS was related to bilateral venous thrombosis involvement (p 0,02; r:0,60), but parenchymal strokes were not related to venous occlusion extension (unilateral or bilateral) (p > 0,05). Moreover, the symptoms' onset time did not correlate with the severity scores (p > 0,05). At follow-up, 8 out of 14 patients showed good clinical outcomes with complete recanalization and neurological improvement, 1 patient showed a poor neurological outcome, whereas 5 patients died within 1 week. Positive correlations were found between IIS and mRS (p 0,003, r = 0,73), between IIS and vessels' recanalization status (p 0,002, r = 0,75), and between vessels' recanalization status and mRS (p < 0,001, r = 0,98).

CONCLUSION

Neuroradiological scores may enhance diagnostic accuracy, and they may have a predictive significance. In patients with DCVT, although intracranial involvement was not influenced by symptoms' onset time or extension of venous occlusion, clinical outcome was related to both intracranial involvement and venous recanalization state. Collateral venous drainage status may counterbalance the thrombotic process improving prognosis.

Diagnostic Value of Hounsfield Unit and Hematocrit Levels in Cerebral Vein Thrombosis in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Unenhanced computed tomography (CT) is a frequently used imaging method in patients who are evaluated in the emergency department with suspected cerebral vein thrombosis (CVT).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of the Hounsfield unit (HU) value determined by CT and its ratio to the patient's hematocrit (Htc) value in the diagnosis of cerebral vein thrombosis.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 41 patients with acute cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and 41 age- and sex-matched control participants. Two experienced observers independently evaluated the CT scan and measured the attenuation of the dural sinuses.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in age, gender, hemoglobin, and Htc values between the two groups. The mean HU value was 75 ± 7 HU in the CVT group and 52 ± 6 HU in the control group (p < 0.001). The mean HU/Htc ratio was 1.9 ± 0.3 in the CVT group and 1.3 ± 0.1 in the control group (p < 0.001). The optimal threshold value for HU was determined as 66, and sensitivity at this value was 93%, and specificity was 98%. The optimal threshold value for HU/Htc was determined as 1.64, and the sensitivity at this value was 90% and the specificity was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Hyperattenuation in the dural sinuses and the HU/Htc ratio in unenhanced brain CT scans have high diagnostic value in detecting CVT.

Pearls and Pitfalls in the Magnetic Resonance Diagnosis of Dural Sinus Thrombosis: A Comprehensive Guide for the Trainee Radiologist

Dural sinus thrombosis (DST) is a potentially fatal neurological condition that can be reversed with early diagnosis and prompt treatment. Non-enhanced CT scan is often the first imaging investigation in patients presenting with acute neurological symptoms; however, its poor sensitivity in detecting DST is a major drawback. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging offers multiple advantages such as excellent contrast resolution and unenhanced venography possibilities, making it the mainstay in the non-invasive diagnosis of DST. However, physiological variations, evolution of thrombi, and incorrect selection/application of MR techniques can lead to false positive and false negative interpretations impacting patient management and outcome. This article discusses the MR techniques useful to diagnose DST and describes pitfalls, with troubleshooting methods, to ensure an accurate diagnosis. We have used multiple diagrammatic illustrations and MR images to highlight pertinent take-home points and to serve as an easy guide for day-to-day clinical practice.

Bilateral cavernous sinus thrombosis complicating acute unilateral pansinusitis in a 15-year-old boy

Cavernous sinus thrombosis (CST) is a rare and potentially fatal complication of acute sinusitis. Timely diagnosis and management is, therefore, essential in preventing death and neurological disability. Here, we describe the case of a paediatric patient with bilateral CST secondary to acute unilateral pansinusitis that presented with rapidly progressing bilateral periorbital oedema. Initial imaging was negative. This case serves to emphasise the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion when managing paediatric patients with suspected CST with persistent symptoms. Expeditious investigation and management of our patient in this case resulted in a positive outcome, with resolution of symptoms and no residual neurological deficit.

Current imaging modalities for diagnosing cerebral vein thrombosis - A critical review

Cerebral vein thrombosis (CVT) is a rare presentation of venous thromboembolism. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is essential as delayed recognition and treatment may lead to permanent disability or even death. Since no validated diagnostic algorithms exist, the diagnosis of CVT mainly relies on neuroimaging. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the historical diagnostic standard for CVT, but is rarely used nowadays and replaced by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). High quality studies to evaluate the diagnostic test characteristics of state of the art imaging modalities are however unavailable to date. This review provides an overview of the best available evidence regarding the diagnostic performance of CT and MRI for the diagnosis of CVT. Notably, available studies are observational, mostly small, outdated, and with a high risk of bias. Therefore, direct comparison between studies is difficult due to large diversity in study design, imaging method, reference standard, patient selection and sample size. In general, contrast-enhanced techniques are more accurate for the diagnosis of CVT then non-contrast-enhanced techniques. CT venography and MRI have been both reported to be adequate for establishing a final diagnosis of CVT, but choice of modality as used in clinical practice depends on availability, local preference and experience, as well as patient characteristics. Our review underlines the need for high-quality diagnostic studies comparing CT venography and MRI in specific settings, to improve clinical care and standardize clinical trials.

Diagnostic value of non-contrast brain computed tomography in the evaluation of acute cerebral venous thrombosis

Acute cerebral vein thrombosis is usually seen as increased attenuation in brain non-contrast computed tomography. It is so helpful to define measurable parameters for subjective evaluation of sinus thrombosis in non-enhanced brain computed tomography, especially where advanced neuroimaging techniques are not available. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of venobasilar attenuation ratio and venobasilar attenuation difference in the evaluation of acute cerebral venous sinuous thrombosis in non-enhanced brain CT scan. Fifty confirmed cases of acute cerebral vein thrombosis were sex- and age-matched with 73 subjects who did not have the condition. Average venous sinus attenuation, Hounsfield to hematocrit ratio, basilar artery density, venobasilar attenuation ratio and venobasilar attenuation difference were measured. Mean attenuation was 65.8 in thrombosed and 44.9 in non-thrombosed sinuses (P < 0.0001). A cutoff absolute sinus attentuaion of 61 HU led to a sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 100% and accuracy of 92%. A cutoff ratio of 1.4 for venobasilar ratio led to a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 78% and accuracy of 87%. A cut-off value of 24 for venobasilar difference resulted in the sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 100% and accuracy of 92%. The additional measurement of venous sinus and basilar artery attenuations and calculation of venobasilar ratio and difference can increase the sensitivity and specificity of NCCT in the diagnosis of acute CVST.