Distal forearm radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula creation in calcified vessels: Technical challenges in anastomosis and early outcome

Percutaneous ecoguided endovascular lithotripsy to recruit failed-to-mature arteriovenous fistula due to completely calcified radial artery

The first-choice vascular access for starting dialysis is autogenous distal forearm arteriovenous-fistula (AVF); the increasing demand to create more fistulas may lead to their creation in borderline vessels and, in this setting, the early failure (EF) and failure of maturation (FTM) remain the main issues. The size of vessels or preexisting stenotic lesions of artery or vein are no longer considered absolute exclusion criteria for the creation of distal AVF, but huge arterial calcification still represents an indication to create upper arm AVF. A novel approach to treat arterial calcifications is represented by intravascular lithotripsy (IVL). This technique could represent a valid option to save failed to mature AVF due to extended calcified artery. We describe a case of a male patient, 43 years old with middle forearm AVF failed to mature with a completely calcified radial artery, low brachial flow (Qa) and small efferent vein. We treated the patient AVF with less invasive, percutaneous, endovascular, eco-guided IVL on the entire radial artery. After the procedure was observed a rapid increase of Qa, with reduction of calcification in the arterial wall, increase of arterial caliper and flow. This procedure could represent a valid alternative to surgical upper-arm AVF creation in patient with functioning but failed to mature fistula due to spread artery calcification, with a rapid, less invasive procedure.

Distal AVF creation with marginal calcified radial artery: Multicentric experience of intraoperative intravascular lithotripsy

INTRODUCTION

The first-choice vascular access to starting dialysis in patients with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) is autogenous distal arteriovenous-fistula (AVF) to spare vascular district avoiding proximal fistula complications. One of most significant exclusion criteria to create distal AVF is still now the presence of huge calcification of the feeding artery due to large numbers of early failure (EF) and failure in maturation (FTM). In recent years the possibility to use new devices able to deliver intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) to treat high calcified stenosis could be a possibility to recruit these marginal arteries to create distal AVF.

METHODS

ESRD patients with totally calcified radial artery wall were enrolled to participate to this prospective, single arm, multicentric study. The selected patients were treated with intraoperative IVL at surgical time, during anastomosis creation to soften calcified radial artery. Patients were followed 1 month after surgery with eco-doppler, for flow and vessels maturation assessment. At 3 month was investigated how many patients have started dialysis treatment with two needle cannulation and good efficiency.

RESULTS

Nineteen distal forearm radio-cephalic fistula were built in 19 patients. One-month doppler assessment showed mean AVF flow of 743 ml/min and efferent vein caliper of 6.46 mm. At 3 months 14 patient have started stable 2 needles dialysis (other three patients were not yet dialysis dependent CKD). Were observed one immediate failure, one failure in maturation, and two late failures at 4 and 16 months respectively. Sixteen months primary and secondary patency was 78.9% and 89.5% respectively.

CONCLUSION

These results showed how intraoperative IVL could help to recruit huge calcified marginal artery to create autogenous distal forearm AVF, avoiding proximal AVF, risking distal ischemia syndrome, and sparing vascular district to eventually rebuilt more proximal AVF in future.

Ulnar-Basilic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access: Utility as the "Second Procedure" after Radio Cephalic Fistula

Objectives: As per standard guidelines, the recommended order of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation for hemodialysis (HD) access is radiocephalic (RC), followed by proximal elbow fistulas and arteriovenous graft. Although ulnar-basilic (UB) fistula has been an alternative to RC-AVF, still this procedure searches clear recommendations. We present here our experience on UB-AVF as the preferred “second procedure” instead of proximal fistula after the RC-AVF.

Methods: Forty-two UB-AVF were created in nonfeasible and failed RC-AVF cases between 2016 and 2018. They were reviewed retrospectively and outcomes were compared with 480 RC-AVF constructed within the same period.

Results: The primary patency at 18 months was 73.8%, 69.6% and mean maturation time was 33.7±6.6 days, 32.1±4.7 days for UB-AVF and RC-AVF respectively (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Our altered order of preference enabled us to create all the first-time fistula in the distal forearm, providing all the advantages of distal fistula like RC-AVF and avoiding proximal fistula, improved patient convenience and short-term benefit. In an inference that may be used for references and needs support from a larger sample and longer duration study from other centers, UB-AVF may be considered as the second option after RC-AVF depending on the clinical scenario.