The relationship between attitude toward labor pain and length of the first, second, and third stages in primigravida women

Non-Pharmacological Pain Management in Labor: A Systematic Review

Childbirth is a remarkable, life-changing process and is frequently regarded as an excruciating, physically and emotionally demanding experience that women endure. Labor pain management poses a significant challenge for obstetricians and expectant mothers. Although pharmacological pain management is the gold standard, it still imposes risks on the mother and baby. Recently, non-pharmacological pain management (NPPM) has emerged as a safe, effective option. Six databases were searched for articles published up to 2023 using specific related keywords and defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The extraction and gathering of data was made so as to be categorized into physical, psychological, and complementary NPPM techniques. In light of the enormous development and diversity of NPPM techniques, the present review aims to examine contemporary NPPM knowledge and application, discussing efficacy, advantages, limitations, and potential adverse effects, with a specific focus on women's individual requirements, to strengthen obstetricians' knowledge in guiding decision-making for women in childbirth.

Cesarean section or normal vaginal delivery: A cross-sectional study of attitude of medical students

INTRODUCTION

Childbirth is regarded as an important life event for women, and growing numbers of them are making the choice to give birth by cesarean delivery. Increasing rate of births by cesarean section is an issue of concern in many countries. In order to reduce the rates of unnecessary cesarean sections, it is essential to acquire information of the reasons that motivate physicians to carry out cesarean sections rather than vaginal deliveries. The objective of present study is to evaluate whether the education process for undergraduate medical students affects their decision-making.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was cross-sectional and questionnaire based. A total of 292 students participated in the study. Out of which, 150 were first-year students and 142 were doing internship in Maharashtra Institute of Medical Education and Research (MIMER), Talegaon Dabhade, Maharashtra, India. The study was conducted in the months of June and July 2019. Data was collected with the help of person to person interview of all the participants who satisfied the inclusion criteria after obtaining their informed consent. The data was entered by using Microsoft Excel 2007 and was analyzed using Epi Info version 3.3.2. The data was tabulated and analyzed according to responses which were given by the respondents.

RESULTS

A total of 292 students answered the questionnaire. Age of participants varied between 19 and 23 years. 130 males and 162 females were the subjects, out of which 40 students declared fear of labor. Most of the students preferred vaginal delivery over cesarean sections in all the four scenarios. The difference of opinion was significant in case of an uneventful pregnancy and normal pregnancy under their care. For general population as healthcare manager this difference of opinion was not significant. In case of one's own or partner's delivery, internship students preferred cesarean section but this difference was statistically non-significant.

CONCLUSION

Most of the students would recommend vaginal delivery because this form of delivery has fewer risks as compared to cesarean section. Majority of students chose vaginal delivery for the birth of their own child; however, a higher number of interns as compared to first year students preferred cesarean section. Pain associated with vaginal delivery was the most common reason given for choosing cesarean section. The student's preference for childbirth changed in due course of graduation toward cesarean section. This indicates a probable effect of medical education on permissive culture of cesarean section as a mode of delivery.

A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women's Satisfaction

Introduction: Pain experienced during labor is a symptom of contractile activity and is a physiological feature of the uterus that occurs at the appropriate stages of labor. For the majority of women, labor pain is the most severe pain they will ever experience, and therefore should be relieved. Objective: (1) To evaluate labor pain intensity before and after using non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions; (2) to assess women’s satisfaction of labor pain management. Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional survey study was performed on 500 women who gave birth in different reference level hospitals (i.e., I, II, III). Pain intensity was assessed according the Numeric Rating Scale (range 0–10), whereas women’s satisfaction was measured with a 5 point Likert scale. Results: The use of both non-pharmacological (median 6.7 (5; 8) vs. 4.5 (3.3; 5.5)) and pharmacological methods (median 8 (7; 9) vs. 5 (3; 6)) resulted in a significant reduction in pain (p < 0.01). Water immersion and epidural anesthesia proved to be the most effective non-pharmacological and pharmacological methods, respectively. In hospitals of reference I, analgesic management was based primarily on the use of non-pharmacological techniques, less often mixed, i.e., non-pharmacological and pharmacological techniques (27.5%). On the other hand, in hospitals with higher referentiality, mixed methods were used more often (level II—65.8%; level III—81.2%). Pain intensity was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in hospitals with reference level I (median 5 (4; 6)) than in the hospitals with reference level II (median 4.2 (3; 5)) or level III (median 4.2 (3.3; 5.4)). Epidural anesthesia was most often performed (60%) in the hospital of reference II. Women’s satisfaction (median 4 (3; 5)), inter alia, was associated with the effectiveness of applied methods. Conclusions: The study findings suggest that women giving birth in hospitals of higher referentiality have better control of labor pain due to access to pharmacological methods. Epidural anesthesia remains the gold standard for relieving labor pain. The choice of a specific method is determined by the degree of hospital and associated with the pain referentiality.