Periodontically accelerated orthodontic tooth movement: A narrative review

Comparison Between the Effect of Low-Energy Laser Application and Piezocision on Acceleration of Orthodontic Tooth Movement

 ABSTRACT the aim of the study was to study the effectiveness of Low Energy Laser Application or piezocisions in accelerating tooth movement, during canine retraction, compared to conventional canine retraction. Patients and Methods: A split mouth study design was done with two groups A and B. Each group confined 10 patients; in each patient one side was used as a control side and the contralateral side received either low-level laser therapy (LLLT) (group A) or piezocisions (group B). The evaluation data was gathered by Intra-oral measurements directly, every 2 weeks, over a 3 months retraction period. Results: Statistical analysis using Repeated measure ANOVA test was used to compare between more than two groups in related samples. Paired sample t-test was used to compare between two groups in related samples. Independent sample t-test was used to compare between two groups in non-related samples. direct intra-oral measurements from Group A illustrated that there was a statistically significant difference between the study and control sides (p<0.001) a total of 4.19 ± 0.5 mm canine retraction has been achieved in the low-level laser therapy (LLLT) assisted canine retraction side versus a 2.83 ± 0.2 mm total canine retraction in the control side. which was statistically significant. Group B illustrated that there was a statistically significant difference between the study and control sides ( p<0.001) that a total of 3.65± 0.4 mm canine retraction has been achieved in the piezocisions assisted canine retraction side versus a 2.79± 0.2 mm total canine retraction in the control side which was a highly statistically significant difference Conclusion: low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and Piezocisions techniques accelerated the rate of canine retraction during orthodontic treatment, with the low-level laser therapy (LLLT)  being slightly more effective.

Preliminary feasibility torque mechanical evaluation for 3D printed orthodontic springs with different parameters: in vitro study

Background

The purpose of the presented investigation is to evaluate the resulting torque on loaded 3D printed springs using different coil thickness and length.

Methods

Specimens were designed and printed using the 3D printer MAX (Asiga, Sydney, Australia) with 3D printable, experimental, flexible material (Code:BM2008, GC, Tokyo, Japan). The specimens were divided into three groups according to spring coil design. Control group (n = 18), length group (n = 19) and thickness group (n = 22). Groups were tested using a Sauter Machine for torque calculation (DB, Grindelwald, Switzerland) in conjunction with a universal testing machine (Zwick Z010, Ulm, Germany) for clock-wise and anti-clockwise testing. Statistical analysis was performed using the Steel–Dwass test to compare median values of the three groups in both testing directions (p < 0.001).

Results

The highest torque value was determined in the thickness group for both clockwise and anti-clockwise testing directions, achieving 44.00 N/mm and 39.62 N/mm respectively. The length group ranged from 21.65 to 11.04 N/mm in clockwise direction and from 18.04 to 11.38 N/mm in counter-clockwise testing. The control group ranged from 22.72 to 17.18 N/mm in the clock-wise direction while in the anti-clock wise testing it ranged from 21.34 to 16.02 N/mm.

Conclusions

The amount of torque produced from the computer aided designing/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) springs is being affected by diameter more than the length design parameter in comparison to the control group. The values of the thickness group are significantly higher than those of the length group (P < 0.001).

Comparison of rate of orthodontic tooth movement in adolescent patients undergoing treatment by first bicuspid extraction and en-mass retraction, associated with low level laser therapy in passive self-ligating and conventional brackets: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) is one of the various interventions to accelerate the rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement (OTM) in adolescent patients who are undergoing en-mass retraction after all first bicuspid extractions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of LLLT in increasing the rate of OTM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Setting and sample population: Institutional Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics. Participants, study design and methods: 65 Patients requiring all first premolar extractions were randomly allocated to three groups. Two groups (Comprising of passive self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets) were treated with LLLT and one group served as the control (conventional brackets). The allocation ratio was 1:1:1.32. Eligibility criteria: adolescent patients with sound and healthy permanent dentition with Little's Irregularity Index<5mm.

MAIN OUTCOME

rate of tooth movement in mm/month. Randomization and blinding: computer-generated random allocation sequence; only the data analyser was blinded by coding the digital models. Patients were reviewed once every month till the completion of space closure.

STATISTICS

data normality was checked using Shapiro-Wilks test and Q-Q Plot. Parametric tests were applied for the inferential statistics (ANCOVA) with Dunnett's t test being used for post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant enhancement in the rate of OTM in the 2 experimental groups (0.68/0.67mm/month in the right and left side of the maxilla and 0.66/0.65mm/month in the right and left side of the mandible) when compared with the control group (0.48mm/month in the maxilla and 0.48mm/month in the mandible) (P<0.05), but when the 2 experimental groups were compared no difference was observed (P>0.05). No serious harms were reported.

CONCLUSION

A significant increase in the rate of OTM was observed with the application of LLLT. No difference was observed in the rate of OTM when comparing different ligation methods treated with LLLT.

REGISTRATION

National Trial Registry (CTRI No- CTRI/2018/04/013156). Protocol was not published before trial commencement.

Comparison of orthodontic space closure using micro-osteoperforation and passive self-ligating appliances or conventional fixed appliances

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effect of micro-osteoperforation (MOP) on the space closure rate using passive self-ligating or conventional brackets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial undertaken at the outpatient department of a dental college. There were 60 participants (30 women and 30 men) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Both the study and control groups were subjected to MOPs throughout the period of space closure. MOPs were repeated every 28 days. The experimental group (mean age 19.5 ± 1.66 years) was bonded with passive self-ligating brackets while the control group (mean age 19.9 ± 1.13 years) was bonded with conventional brackets. Both groups were examined and compared for rate of space closure. An evaluation was conducted for both groups until the entire extraction space was closed and confirmed by evaluation of a tight contact between the canine and the second premolar using a piece of dental floss.

RESULTS

Before the initiation of retraction, all initial criteria were similar between the two groups (P > .05). No difference was observed between the two groups in the rate of space closure (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

MOP in conjunction with passive self-ligation does not increase the rate of orthodontic space closure when compared with MOP used with conventional brackets.