The Evaluation and Clinical Efficiency of Power Scope: An Original Research

Comparative evaluation of efficacy of two Class II correctors in treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

Background

This article aims to compare clinical efficacy of newly introduced PowerScope 2 appliance with Forsus FRD in the treatment of Skeletal Class II malocclusion.

Methods

This randomized controlled trial studied 40 patients at two centers (20 patients at each center, divided into two groups of 10 patients each as Group 1: Forsus FRD and Group 2: PowerScope 2 appliance. The skeletal, dental, soft tissue, and airway changes were noted at T0 (pretreatment), T1 (preappliance therapy), and T2 (postappliance therapy). Acoustic Pharyngometry (Eccovision® Acoustic Pharyngometer) was done to ascertain changes in mean airway volume and area with both modalities noninvasively. Treatment duration and chairside time in appliance installation and removal were noted. Patient comfort was compared using a customized questionnaire survey.

Results

A significant change was observed in skeletal, dental, soft tissue, and airway parameters after treatment with both modalities (p-value <0.05 for all) with no significant intergroup difference (p-value >0.05). Chairside time spent in appliance insertion was significantly lower with PowerScope 2 appliance (10.33 min) as compared to the Forsus FRD appliance (18.28 min) (p-value <0.05). Visual Analogue Scale scores for parameters such as problems in mastication, problems in speech, and problems in oral hygiene maintenance were significantly lower with PowerScope 2 appliance as compared to the Forsus FRD appliance (p-value <0.05).

Conclusions

Although both modalities are effective in the management of Class II malocclusion, the PowerScope 2 appliance scores better in terms of lesser chairside time in appliance installation and better patient comfort.

A Comparative Analysis of Treatment Effects of PowerScope and AdvanSync2 in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion: A Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Fixed functional appliances are widely used for the treatment of retrognathic mandibles in skeletal class II malocclusion. The primary objective of the present investigation was to evaluate and compare the treatment effects induced by PowerScope (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI) and AdvanSync2 (Ormco, Orange, CA). The hypothesis posited that there were no notable disparities in the therapeutic impacts of the two appliances.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was undertaken involving 90 subjects with retrognathic mandibles. Group 1 was treated with AdvanSync2, group 2 received PowerScope treatment, and group 3 consisted of an untreated class II control sample. Lateral cephalograms were traced at pre-treatment (T0) and post-treatment (T1), to measure various skeletal, dental, and soft tissue parameters. The comparison between the groups was done using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc analysis by Tukey's test.

RESULTS

Significant changes were observed in all the parameters, comparing the effects of both appliances to the control group (p < 0.05). AdvanSync2 displayed statistically significant skeletal effects on the maxilla and mandible (p < 0.05). The statistically significant differences were also seen for dental effects such as reduction in overbite and overjet. On the other hand, PowerScope exhibited effects that were not considered statistically significant on the maxilla, instead primarily manifesting dento-alveolar changes that led to a considerable reduction in overbite. In comparison to the control group, both appliances notably produced soft tissue changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study rejected the null hypothesis. AdvanSync2 yielded superior skeletal outcomes with greater mandibular advancement, compared to PowerScope, which exhibited enhanced dento-alveolar alterations. AdvanSync2 took less treatment time, compared to PowerScope.

Assessment of Soft Tissue, Airway Dimension and Hyoid Bone Position in Class II Patients Treated by PowerScope Class 2 Corrector

AIM

This study aims to assess the changes in the soft tissue, pharyngeal airway dimensions, and hyoid bone position in patients treated with PowerScope Class 2 corrector to correct the skeletal Class II pattern.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted on a sample of 20 cases diagnosed with Class II malocclusion. The lateral cephalograms were taken before (T1) and after functional appliance therapy (T2) and were traced. The outcomes were compared for the mean changes in soft tissue, airway way dimension, and hyoid bone position. The paired t-test was used for the data comparisons wherein p < 0.05 was kept for statistical significance.

RESULTS

The mean values before and after treatment for H angle, mentolabial angle, lower lip E-line, upper lip S-line, lower lip S-line, and lip strain were 19.88 ± 2.77 vs 17.13 ± 1.659, 94.09 ± 12.164 vs 101.75 ± 11.28, -2.47 ± 1.213 vs -1.38 ± 0.976, 3.99 ± 0.19 vs 2.64 ± 0.32, 9.01 ± 0.247 vs 9.43 ± 0.238, 10.24 ± 0.510 vs 10.64 ± 0.52, respectively, which were statistically significant (p < 0.05). All airway spaces (except for lower pharyngeal space) and hyoid bone parameters were significantly improved posttreatment.

CONCLUSION

The facial convexity, upper E-line, Z-angle, nasolabial angle, and lower pharyngeal space did not show statistically significant changes. The rest of the soft tissue parameters, oropharyngeal air spaces, and hyoid positioning measured in the study showed significant improvement after treatment with the PowerScope appliance in Class II patients.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Class II malocclusion is the most common dental anomaly with a high degree of prevalence in the population. This study will help the clinician in understanding the improvement of soft tissue, airway dimension, and hyoid bone position changes on treatment with a fixed functional appliance for the correction of Class II cases, thereby ensuring the greater success of orthodontic therapy in the future.

PowerScope 2 functional appliance: A 3D finite element simulation of its action on the mandible

PowerScope 2 is a fixed functional appliance for patients with Class II malocclusion and a retrognathic mandible, that has recently received attention due to its pronounced advantages, for both orthodontists and patients.

Objective

of study: This study evaluated the action of the PowerScope 2 appliance for correcting Class II malocclusion and the stresses and displacement of the mandible during loading using three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA). The sites of the mandibular skeletal and/or dental corrections were also distinguished.

Materials and methods

Using the AutoCAD (2010) Program, a 3D model of the human mandible with teeth was created based on a CT image of a 20-yr-old patient. Orthodontic stainless-steel brackets with Standard Edgewise (0.022 in) slots bonded to five mandibular teeth and inserted into a bounded tube on the first molar were simulated. A rectangular archwire (0.019 × 0.025 in) ligated the brackets. The created models were uploaded to the Autodesk Inventor Professional Computer Program (FE) version (2020).

Results

The FEA presented the three-dimensional results qualitatively and quantitatively as von Mises stress and displacement. The colour ruler on the upper left side demonstrates the stress and displacement distribution pattern of the mandible, with the minimum value in blue and the maximum value in red. Mandibular movement was achieved three-dimensionally. There was obvious sagittal forward mandibular movement, and high stress was observed at the chin prominence (the pogonion). In the transverse plane, the mandible was highly bent buccally, especially at the gonial angle and antegonial notch. In the vertical plane, the highest ranges of mandibular movements were seen in the chin, the anterior part of the mandibular body, and the associated dentoalveolar region.

Conclusions

The results of this FEA, PowerScope 2 functional appliance proved to be effective as a Class II malocclusion corrector. Its mode of action on the mandible was achieved in three planes of space, and its orthodontic effects were gained dentally and skeletally. An bbvious sagittal forward mandibular movement was observed, particularly at the chin prominence. Apparent buccal bending, especially at the gonial angle and antegonial notch, was observed. Vertically, the chin and anterior part of the mandible, with the associated dentoalveolar structures, were clearly stressed under the action of this appliance.

A Cephalometric Evaluation and Comparison of Skeletal, Dentoalveolar, and Soft Tissue Changes Brought about by the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device and PowerScope Fixed Functional Appliance

Background:

Though studies have been conducted on the PowerScope, not many researches are available in the literature which compare its effects with other fixed functional appliances. Therefore, the aim of our study was cephalometric evaluation and comparison of the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue changes brought about by the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device and PowerScope appliance.

Materials and Methods:

Pre and Posttreatment cephalometric records of 20 patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with fixed functional appliances (Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device and PowerScope) were compared. Values of various cephalometric parameters were used to evaluate the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes. Wilcoxon signed-rank test (intragroup comparison) and Mann–Whitney U test (intergroup) were used to see significant differences in the parameters ( P ≤ .05).

Results:

Both the appliances were successful in correcting the Class II discrepancy. Skeletal changes were seen significantly in both the groups, though they were more in the Forsus patients. Dentoalveolar changes were predominantly seen in PowerScope patients. Also, an improvement in soft tissue profile was seen in both the groups.

Conclusion:

From our study, we concluded that the PowerScope and the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device are equally good options for the correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion due to a retrognathic mandible, as they achieve changes in all the three aspects: skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue.

Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes comparison between the Jasper Jumper and Twin Force Bite Corrector in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to compare the dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes in Class II malocclusion patients treated with Jasper Jumper and Twin Force Bite Corrector associated with fixed orthodontic appliances.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The sample comprised 60 subjects divided into 3 groups. Patients with Class II malocclusion, mandibular retrusion, slight or no crowding and with no previous orthodontic treatment were eligible. Group 1 comprised 20 patients treated with the Jasper Jumper (JJ), with an initial age of 12.39 years. Group 2 comprised 20 patients treated with the Twin Force (TF), with an initial age of 11.83 years. The control group consisted of 20 untreated Class II subjects with an initial age of 12.13 years. Intergroup pretreatment comparisons were performed with One-way analysis of variance and intergroup treatment changes were compared with the Analysis of Covariance, both followed by Tukey test.

RESULTS

The TF group showed greater increase in mandibular length (6.23mm±4.64, P=0.004) than the control group (2.94mm±1.75). The mandibular incisors in the experimental groups presented significantly greater labial inclination and protrusion than the control (Md1.NB; JJ: 4.19°±2.09; TF: 4.46°±6.83; control: 1.13°±2.08, P=0.000/Md1-NB; JJ: 1.95mm±1.45; TF: 1.74mm±1.79; control: 0.31mm±0.81, P=0.000). In addition, the treated groups also showed significantly improvement of the dental relationships (Overjet; JJ: -4.05mm±4.64; TF: -3.80mm±2.12; control: 0.05mm±1.12, P=0.000/Overbite; JJ: -2.52mm±1.46; TF: -2.93mm±2.13; control: -0.63mm±1.35, P=0.000).

CONCLUSION

The Jasper Jumper and Twin Force associated to fixed appliances were effective in correcting Class II malocclusion with a combination of skeletal and dentoalveolar changes. However, the TF seems to provide more skeletal effects with greater maxillary growth restriction and mandibular length increase when compared to the JJ.

Evaluation of Sagittal Changes in Class II Div 2 Patients with Decelerating Phase of Growth by PowerScope Appliance: A Retrospective Cephalometric Investigation

BACKGROUND

Restricted mandibular growth is observed in Class II Div 2 malocclusions. The fixed functional appliances are used to effect the skeletal changes in patients with end stages of skeletal maturity.

AIM

This cephalometric study aimed to distinguish the skeletal and dental corrections done in the mandible on skeletal Class II Div 2 subjects when treated with PowerScope appliance (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a cephalometric study based on the retrospective data. The patients selected for this study were with Class II Div 2 malocclusion and assessed to be in decelerating phase of skeletal growth. A total of 12 patients were selected after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. A PowerScope was placed after incisor correction and followed up till Class I molar relation was achieved. The initial values (T1) at the time of placement of the appliance and the final values at the end of the molar correction (T2) were noted. The cephalometric parameters at T1 and T2 were assessed using sagittal occlusal (SO) analysis by Pancherz. The paired Student's t-test was used to analyze pre- and posttreatment changes.

RESULTS

There was sufficient lengthening of the mandible (4.38 mm). Both the dental and skeletal alterations were observed in the mandible. These changes were marked compared to the maxilla. The pre- and posttreatment changes were statistically significant for the mandibular skeletal changes (P < 0.001) as well as mandibular incisor proclination (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The PowerScope can be used as a propeller for sagittal mandibular correction in Class II Div 2 patients.